Satellite state

The term satellite state designates a country that is formally independent in the world, but under heavy political, economic and military influence or control from another country. The term was coined by analogy to planetary objects orbiting a larger object, such as smaller moons revolving around larger planets, and is used mainly to refer to Central and Eastern European countries[1] of the Warsaw Pact during the Cold War or to Mongolia between 1924 and 1990,[2] for example. As used for Central and Eastern European countries it implies that the countries in question were "satellites" under the hegemony of the Soviet Union. In some contexts it also refers to other countries in the Soviet sphere of influence during the Cold War—such as North Korea (especially in the years surrounding the Korean War of 1950–1953) and Cuba (particularly after it joined the Comecon in 1972). In Western usage, the term has seldom been applied to states other than those in the Soviet orbit. In Soviet usage, the term applied to the states in the orbit of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.

The Oxford English Dictionary traces the use of the phrase satellite state in English back at least as far as 1916.

In times of war or political tension, satellite states sometimes serve as buffers between an enemy country and the nation exerting control over the satellites.[3] "Satellite state" is one of several contentious terms used to describe the (alleged) subordination of one state to another. Other such terms include puppet state and neo-colony. In general, the term "satellite state" implies deep ideological and military allegiance to the hegemonic power, whereas "puppet state" implies political and military dependence, and "neo-colony" implies (often abject) economic dependence. Depending on which aspect of dependence is being emphasised, a state may fall into more than one category.

World War II

During World War II, Kingdoms of Romania, Hungary, and Italy were often considered to be satellite states of Nazi Germany.[4]

Soviet satellite states

Post World War I

When the Mongolian Revolution of 1921 broke out, Mongolian revolutionaries expelled Russian White Guards (during the Russian Civil War of 1917–1923 following the Communist October Revolution of 1917) from Mongolia, which became independent when the Qing dynasty collapsed in 1911, with the assistance of the Soviet Red Army. The revolution also officially ended Manchurian sovereignty over Mongolia, which had existed since 1691. Although the theocratic Bogd Khaanate of Mongolia still nominally continued, with successive series of violent struggles, Soviet influence got ever stronger, and after the death of the Bogd Khaan ("Great Khan", or "Emperor"), the Mongolian People's Republic was proclaimed on November 26, 1924. A nominally independent and sovereign country, it has been described as being a satellite state of the Soviet Union in the years from 1924 until 1990.[2][5]

During the Russian Civil War, the Soviet Red Army troops took Tuva in January 1920, which was also part of the Qing Empire of China and a protectorate of Imperial Russia. The Tuvan People's Republic, was proclaimed independent in 1921 and was a satellite state of Soviet Union until its annexation in 1944 by the Soviet Union.[5]

Another early Soviet satellite state in Asia was the short-lived Far East Republic in Siberia.[5]

Post World War II

At the end of World War II, most eastern and central European countries were occupied by the Soviet Union,[6] and along with the USSR made up what is sometimes called the Soviet Empire. The Soviets remained in these countries after the war's end.[7] Through a series of coalition governments including Communist parties, and then a forced liquidation of coalition members unliked by the Soviets, Stalinist systems were established in each country.[7] Stalinists gained control of existing governments, police, press and radio outlets in these countries.[7] Soviet satellite states in Europe included:[7][8][9][10]

The Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia is sometimes referred to as a Soviet satellite,[7][8] though it broke from the Soviet Union in the 1948 Tito-Stalin split, with the Cominform offices being moved from Belgrade to Bucharest, and subsequently initiated formation of the Non-Aligned Movement. The People's Republic of Albania, under the leadership of Stalinist Enver Hoxha, broke ties with the Soviet Union in 1960 following the Soviet de-Stalinization process.[11] These countries were, at least between 1945 and 1948, all members of the Eastern Bloc.

The Democratic Republic of Afghanistan can also be considered a Soviet satellite; from 1978 until 1991 the central government in Kabul was aligned with the Communist bloc, and was directly supported by Soviet military power between 1979 and 1989. The short-lived East Turkestan Republic (1944–1950) was a Soviet satellite until it was absorbed into the People's Republic of China along with the rest of Xinjiang.

Post-Cold War use of the term

Commentators have sometimes expressed concern that United States military and diplomatic interventions in the Middle East and elsewhere might lead, or perhaps has already led, to the existence of American satellite states.[12][13] William Pfaff has warned that a permanent American presence in Iraq would "turn Iraq into an American satellite state."[14] The term has also been used in the past to describe the relationship between Lebanon and Syria, as Syria has been accused of intervening in Lebanese political affairs.[15] In addition, Swaziland and Lesotho have both been described as satellite states of South Africa.[16]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Source: NATO website 2nd Footnote at bottom
  2. 1 2 Sik, Ko Swan (1990). Nationality and International Law in Asian Perspective. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-7923-0876-8.
  3. ↑ Wood, Alan (2005) [1990]. Stalin and Stalinism. Routledge. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-415-30732-1. Retrieved 2009-09-10.
  4. ↑ Axworthy, Mark. Third Axis, Fourth Ally: Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 1941-1945. Arms and Armour Press. p. 9. ISBN 1-85409-267-7.
  5. 1 2 3 Narangoa, Li; Cribb, Robert B (2003). Imperial Japan and National Identities in Asia: 1895–1945. pp. 13, 66. ISBN 978-0-7007-1482-7.
  6. ↑ Wettig 2008, p. 69
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Rao 2006, p. 280
  8. 1 2 Langley 2006, p. 30
  9. ↑ Merkl 2004, p. 53
  10. ↑ Rajagopal 2003, p. 75
  11. ↑ Olsen 2000, p. 19
  12. ↑ http://www.mail-archive.com/news@antic.org/msg10704.html
  13. ↑ http://www.stateofnature.org/normanFinkelstein.html
  14. ↑ Cooley, John (June 18, 2008). "How to silence that Iran war drumbeat". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2009-11-09.
  15. ↑ Wachter, Paul (January 26, 2002). "Who killed Elie Hobeika?". Salon. Retrieved 2009-11-09.
  16. ↑ Mehran Kamrava (2008). Understanding Comparative Politics: A Framework for Analysis. Routledge. pp. 73–. ISBN 978-0-415-77304-1.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, February 16, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.