Safe Streets and Communities Act
Bill C-10 | |
---|---|
An Act to Enact the Justice For Victims Of Terrorism Act and to Amend the State Immunity Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Other Acts. | |
Citation | Bill C-10 |
Enacted by | House of Commons of Canada |
Enacted by | Senate of Canada |
Date of Royal Assent | March 13, 2012 |
Legislative history | |
Bill introduced in the House of Commons of Canada | Bill C-10 |
Introduced by | MP Rob Nicholson |
First reading | September 20, 2011[1] |
Second reading | September 28, 2011[1] |
Third reading | December 5, 2011[1] |
Conference committee bill passed | November 24, 2011[1] |
Bill introduced in the Senate of Canada | Bill C-10 |
First reading | December 6, 2011 |
Second reading | December 16, 2011 |
Third reading | March 1, 2012 |
Conference committee bill passed | February 28, 2012 |
Status: Current legislation |
The Safe Streets and Communities Act is a bill that was passed by the 41st Canadian Parliament 154-129 on March 12, 2012.
When Parliament re-convened in September 2011, the Minister of Justice introduced the Safe Streets and Communities Act, an omnibus bill of nine separate measures. The measures include replacing the pardon system with 'record suspensions', mandatory minimum sentences for certain sexual offences and mandatory minimum penalties for certain drug offences, making it illegal to make sexually explicit information available to a child, increasing prison sentences for marijuana offences, reducing the ability of judges to sentence certain offenders to house arrest, allowing immigration officers to deny work permits to foreigners who are at risk of being sexually exploited, and enabling Canadians to sue state sponsors of terrorism for losses due to an act of terrorism.[2][3]
A particularly contentious aspect of the bill was the proposed enhancement of powers given to government authorities to monitor online communications,[4] but this proposal was abandoned after an online petition opposing those measures garnered over 70,000 signatures.[5]
The bill is causing much controversy. While the Canadian Police Association said the bill would work towards keeping communities more safe, it added it was concerned about the cost.[6] The Quebec government said it would refuse to pay for the bill, calling it a short-term "Band-Aid solution."[6] The Ontario government would also refuse to pay.[7] Texan conservatives Judge John Creuzot, Republican Representative Jerry Madden, and Marc Levin also spoke out against the bill; according to Madden, "It's a very expensive thing to build new prisons and, if you build them, I guarantee you they will come. They'll be filled, OK? Because people will send them there."[8]
References
- 1 2 3 4 "Bill C-10 at LegisInfo". Parliament of Canada.
- ↑ Chase, Steven (September 20, 2011). "Weighty Tory crime bill targets drugs, sex offenders, 'out-of-control' youth". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Retrieved September 22, 2011.
- ↑ Chase, Steven (September 20, 2011). "Sweeping Conservative crime bill only 'the beginning'". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Retrieved September 22, 2011.
- ↑ "Internet privacy experts raise concerns over crime bill". CBC News. August 9, 2011.
- ↑ http://openmedia.ca/news/70000-strong-petition-sways-government-plan
- 1 2 Fitzpatrick, Meagan (November 1, 2011). "Quebec will refuse to pay for omnibus crime bill". CBC.ca. Retrieved November 1, 2011.
- ↑ Fisher, Robert (November 4, 2011). "ANALYSIS: McGuinty sends shot across Harper's bow". CBC.ca. Retrieved November 4, 2011.
- ↑ Milewski, Terry (October 17, 2011). "Texas conservatives reject Harper's crime plan". CBC.ca. Retrieved November 1, 2011.
External links
- Safe Streets and Communities Act from the Parliament of Canada website
- Bill C-10 Regressive Approach for Pardons Canada: Canadian Pardon Application Process Now More Prohibitive
- LegalEase podcast discusses the Conservatives' Omnibus Safe Streets and Communities Act from a legal perspective