Pitar dione

Pitar dione
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Bivalvia
Order: Veneroida
Family: Veneridae
Genus: Pitar
Species: P. dione
Binomial name
Pitar dione
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Synonyms

Venus dione
Hysteroconcha dione

Pitar (Hysteroconcha) dione, or the elegant Venus clam, formerly known as Venus dione, is a species of bivalve mollusc in the family Veneridae, the Venus clams. This species is found in the Gulf of Mexico, from eastern Mexico to the West Indies.[1]

This species is unusual in that it has a double series of long, curved spines on the posterior slope of each valve. A closely related species which occurs in the Eastern Pacific is Pitar lupanaria.

The species was named in Systema Naturae in 1758 by the Swedish naturalist Linnaeus. Both there and in his 1771 Fundamenta Testaceologiae, he described the shell in "disquieting[ly]"[2] sexual terms, with the "obscene"[2] Latin words vulva, anus, pubis, mons veneris, labia and hymen.

In human culture: the Venus shell

Linnaeus's drawing of Venus dione in his Fundamenta Testaceologiae, 1771, labelled with overtly sexual descriptors: a: vulva; d: labia; e: hymen; f: nates (buttocks); g: anus.

The species was named by Linnaeus as Venus dione, Venus being the name of the Roman goddess of love, and especially of sex.[2] The specific epithet dione is the name of the mother of Venus in Roman mythology.[3] The later generic name Hysteroconcha is from Greek hyster, womb, and Latin concha, shell.

In his 1758 Systema Naturae, and then in his 1771 Fundamenta Testaceologiae, Linnaeus used a series of "disquieting[ly]"[2] sexual terms to describe the shell: vulva, anus, nates (buttocks), pubis, mons veneris, labia, hymen.[2][4][5] The evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould called Linnaeus's description "one of the most remarkable paragraphs in the history of systematics".[2][6] Some later naturalists found the terms used by Linnaeus uncomfortable; an 1803 review commented that "a few of these terms however strongly they may be warranted by the similitudes and analogies which they express, ... are not altogether reconcilable with the delicacy proper to be observed in ordinary discourse",[2] while the 1824 Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica criticised Linnaeus for "indulg[ing] in obscene allusions."[2]

References

  1. Abbott, R.T. & Morris, P.A. A Field Guide to Shells: Atlantic and Gulf Coasts and the West Indies. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1995. 68-69.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Da Costa and the Venus dione: The Obscenity of Shell Description". Retrieved 19 May 2015. From the Encyclopædia Romana by James Grout.
  3. "Bronze statuette of Venus or her mother, Dione". British Museum. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
  4. Linnaeus (1758). Systema Naturae (10th ed.). pp. 684–685.
  5. Linnaeus (1767). Systema Naturae (12th ed.). pp. 1128–1129.
  6. Gould, Stephen Jay (1995). "The Anatomy Lesson: The Teachings of Naturalist Mendes da Costa, a Sephardic Jew in King George's Court". Natural History 104 (12): 10–15, 62–63.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, October 21, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.