Periodical cicadas

Periodical cicada
Magicicada sp. from Brood XXIII, 2015
A Magicicada chorus with M. septendecim, M. cassini, and M. septendecula
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hemiptera
Suborder: Auchenorrhyncha
Infraorder: Cicadomorpha
Superfamily: Cicadoidea
Family: Cicadidae
Subfamily: Cicadettinae
Genus: Magicicada
W. T. Davis, 1925
Type species
Cicada septendecim [1]
Linnaeus, 1758

Magicicada is the genus of the 13-year and 17-year periodical cicadas of eastern North America. Although they are sometimes called "locusts", this is a misnomer as cicadas belong to the taxonomic order Hemiptera, suborder Auchenorrhyncha, while locusts belong to Orthoptera.[2]

Magicicada spp. spend most of their 13- and 17-year lives underground feeding on xylem fluids from the roots of deciduous forest trees in the eastern United States.[3] After 13 or 17 years, mature cicada nymphs emerge at any given locality, synchronously and in tremendous numbers. After such a prolonged developmental phase, the adults are active for about 4 to 6 weeks.[4] The males aggregate into chorus centers and attract mates. Within two months of the original emergence, the life cycle is complete, the eggs have been laid and the adult cicadas are gone for another 13 or 17 years.

Description

The familiar winged imago (adult) periodical cicada has red eyes and a black dorsal thorax. The wings are translucent and have orange veins. The underside of the abdomen may be black, orange, or striped with orange and black, depending on the species.[5]

Adults are typically 2.4 to 3.3 cm (0.9 to 1.3 in), depending on species, slightly smaller than the annual cicada species found in the same regions of the United States. Mature females are slightly larger than males.[6]

Magicicada males typically form large aggregations that sing in chorus to attract receptive females. Different species have different characteristic calling songs. The call of decim periodical cicadas is said to resemble someone calling "weeeee-whoa" or "Pharaoh."[7] The cassini and decula periodic cicadas have songs that intersperse buzzing and ticking sounds.[6]

Cicadas do not bite or sting. Like other Auchenorrhyncha, they have mouthparts used in piercing plants and sucking their sap. A cicada's proboscis can also pierce human skin when it is handled, which is painful but in no other way harmful. These cicadas are not venomous, and there is no evidence that they transmit diseases. They pose little threat to mature vegetation, although planting new trees or shrubs is best postponed until after an expected emergence of the periodical cicadas. Mature plants rarely suffer lasting damage, although twig die-off or flagging can result from egg-laying.[8]

Life cycle

Transformation of the periodical cicada from the mature nymph to the adult

Nearly all cicadas spend years underground as juveniles, before emerging above ground for a short adult stage of several weeks to a few months. The seven periodical cicada species are so named because, in any one location, all of the members of the population are developmentally synchronized—they emerge as adults all at once in the same year. This periodicity is especially remarkable because their life cycles are so long—13 or 17 years. Cicadas of all other species (perhaps 3000 worldwide) are not synchronized, so some adults mature each summer and emerge while the rest of the population continues to develop underground. Many people refer to these non-periodical species as annual cicadas since some are seen every summer. The life cycles of most annual species range from two to ten years, although some could be longer.

The nymphs of the periodical cicadas live underground, usually within 2 ft (61 cm) of the surface, feeding on the juices of plant roots.[9] The nymphs of the periodical cicada undergo 5 instar stages in their development underground. The difference in the 13 and 17 year life cycle is the time it takes for the second instar to mature. While underground, the nymphs move deeper below ground feeding on larger roots.[10]

Emergence holes
Magicicada molting
Magicicada in final molting stage prior to hardening of exoskeleton

The nymphs emerge on a spring evening when the soil temperature at about 20 cm (8 in) depth is above 17.89 °C (64 °F). In most years in the United States, this works out to late April or early May in the far south, and late May to early June in the far north. Emerging nymphs climb to a suitable place on the nearby vegetation to complete their transformation into an adult cicada. They molt one last time and then spend about six days in the leaves waiting for their exoskeleton to harden completely. Just after this final molt, the teneral adults are white, but darken within an hour.

Adult periodical cicadas live only for a few weeks—by mid-July, all have disappeared. Their short adult life has one purpose: reproduction. The males "sing" a species-specific mating song; like other cicadas, they produce loud sounds using their tymbals. Singing males of a single Magicicada species form aggregations (choruses) that are sexually attractive to females. Males in these choruses alternate bouts of singing with short flights from tree to tree in search of receptive females.[11] Most matings occur in "chorus" trees.[5]

Receptive females respond to the calls of conspecific males with timed wing-flicks, which attract the males for mating.[12] The sounds of a "chorus"—a group of males—can be deafening and reach 100 dB. In addition to their "calling" or "congregating" song, males produce a distinctive courtship song when approaching an individual female.[5]

Magicicada egg slits (circled in red)

Both males and females can mate multiple times, although most females seem to mate just once. After mating, the female cuts V-shaped slits in the bark of young twigs and lays approximately 20 eggs in each, for a total of 600 or more eggs. After about six to ten weeks, the eggs hatch and the newborn nymphs drop to the ground, where they burrow and begin another 13 or 17-year cycle.

Predator satiation survival strategy

The nymphs emerge in large numbers at about the same time, sometimes more than 1.5 million individuals per acre (>370/m²).[13] Their mass-emergence is a survival trait called predator satiation: for the first week after emergence, the periodical cicadas are an easy prey for reptiles, birds, squirrels, cats, and other small and large mammals.[4][14] Early ideas maintained that the cicadas' overall survival mechanism was simply to overwhelm predators by their sheer numbers, ensuring the survival of most of the individuals. It was hypothesized that the emergence period of large prime numbers (13 and 17 years) was a predator avoidance strategy adopted to eliminate the possibility of potential predators receiving periodic population boosts by synchronizing their own generations to divisors of the cicada emergence period.[15] Another viewpoint holds that the prime numbered developmental times represent an adaptation to prevent hybridization between broods with different cycles during a period of heavy selection pressure brought on by isolated and lowered populations during Pleistocene glacial stadia, and that predator satiation is a short term maintenance strategy.[16] This hypothesis was subsequently supported through a series of mathematical models, and stands as the most widely accepted explanation of the unusually lengthy and mathematically precise immature period of these insects.[17] The length of the cycle was hypothesized to be controlled by a single gene locus, with the 13-year cycle dominant to the 17-year one.,[18] but this interpretation remains controversial and unexplored at the DNA level.

Impact on other populations

Cycles in cicada populations are significant enough to affect other animal and plant populations. For example, tree growth has been observed to decline the year before the emergence of a brood, because of the increased feeding on roots by nymphs.[19] Moles, which feed on nymphs, have been observed to do well during the year before an emergence, but suffer population declines the following year, because of the reduced food source.[20] Wild turkey populations respond favorably to increased nutrition in their food supply from gorging on cicada adults on the ground at the end of their life cycle. Uneaten carcasses of periodic cicadas decompose on the ground, providing a resource pulse of nutrients to the forest community.[19]

Cicada broods may also have a negative impact. It has been suggested that squirrel populations have been negatively impacted, because the egg laying activity of female cicadas damaged upcoming mast crops.

Broods

Magicicada (both teneral and fully developed). Photo by Arthur D. Guilani
Magicicada septendecim
Cicada prior to final molt
Newly molted Brood XIII

Periodical cicadas are grouped into broods based on the calendar year when they emerge (see chart below and maps on www.magicicada.org). For example, in 2014, the 13-year Brood XXII emerged in Louisiana and the 17-year Brood III emerged in western Illinois and eastern Iowa.

In 1898, entomologist C. L. Marlatt assigned Roman numerals to 30 different broods of periodical cicadas: 17 distinct broods with a 17-year life cycle, to which he assigned brood numbers I through XVII (with emerging years 1893 through 1909); plus 13 broods with a 13-year cycle, to which he assigned brood numbers XVIII through XXX (1893 through 1905).[21]

Many of these hypothetical 30 broods, however, have not been observed. Furthermore, two of the brood numbers assigned by Marlatt (Broods XI and XXI) existed at one time, but have become extinct. The Marlatt numbering scheme has been retained for convenience (and because it clearly separates 13- and 17-year life cycles), although today only 15 broods are known to survive.[22]

Name Nickname Cycle (yrs) Last emergence Next emergence Extent
Brood I Blue Ridge Brood 17 2012 2029 Western VA, WV
Brood II East Coast Brood 17 2013 2030 CT, MD, NC, NJ, NY, PA, DE, VA, DC
Brood III Iowan Brood 17 2014 2031 IA
Brood IV Kansan Brood 17 2015 2032 KS, MO, OK, NE
Brood V 17 1999 2016 Northeast OH, MD, PA, VA, WV
Brood VI 17 2000 2017 GA, NC, SC
Brood VII Onondaga Brood 17 2001 2018 Upstate NY[Note 1]
Brood VIII 17 2002 2019 OH, PA, WV
Brood IX 17 2003 2020 Western VA, WV, NC
Brood X Great Eastern Brood 17 2004 2021 From NY to NC along the East Coast, inland to IL and MI[Note 2]
Brood XI 17 1954 Extinct Last seen in 1954 in Ashford, CT along Fenton River.
Brood XIII Northern Illinois Brood 17 2007 2024 Northern IL and in parts of IA, WI, and IN[Note 3]
Brood XIV 17 2008 2025 Southern OH, KY, TN, MA, MD, NC, PA, northern GA, Western VA and WV, and parts of NY and NJ[Note 3]
Brood XIX Great Southern Brood 13 2011 2024 AL, AR, GA, IN, IL, KY, LA, MD, MO, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, and VA[Note 4]
Brood XXI Floridian Brood 13 1870 Extinct Last recorded in 1870. Historical range included the FL panhandle
Brood XXII Baton Rouge Brood[24] 13 2014 2027 LA, MS[Note 5]
Brood XXIII Lower Mississippi River Valley Brood 13 2015 2028 AR, IL, IN, KY, LA, MO, MS, TN
  1. Consists only of M. septendecim
  2. Largest of all 17-year periodical broods
  3. 1 2 Premature emergences, or "straggling" occurred in 2003 and 2006.[23]
  4. Largest of all 13-year periodical cicada broods
  5. This 13-year brood does not include M. neotredecim.

Taxonomy

There are seven recognized species within Magicicada. Three of them follow a 17-year cycle:

Four more species follow a 13-year cycle:

These seven species are also sometimes grouped differently into three subgroups, the so-called "Decim species group," "Cassini species group," and "Decula species group," reflecting strong similarities of each 17-year species with one or more species with a 13-year cycle.[25]

Distribution

Generally, the 17-year cicadas are distributed more in the northern states of the eastern United States, while the 13-year cicadas occur in the southern states, but some may overlap slightly. For example, Broods IV (17 year cycle) and XIX (13 year cycle) overlap in western Missouri and eastern Oklahoma.[26][27] Their emergences should again coincide in 2219, 2440, 2661, etc., as they did in 1998[28] (although distributions change slightly from generation to generation and older distribution maps can be unreliable.[27]). An effort is currently underway to generate new distribution maps of all periodical cicada broods. This effort makes use of crowdsourced records and records collected by entomologists.[29]

Evolution

Not only are the periodical cicada life cycles curious for their prime numbers—13 or 17—their evolution is intricately tied to one- and four-year changes in their life cycle.[16][18] One-year changes are less common than four-year changes and are probably tied to variation in local climatic conditions. Four-year early and late emergences are common and involve a much larger proportion of the population than one-year changes.

Recent research suggests that in extant periodical cicadas the 13- and 17-year life cycle evolved at least eight different times in the last 4 million years and that different species with identical life cycles developed their overlapping geographic distribution by synchronization of life cycle to existing dominant populations.[30] The same study estimates that the Decim species group split from the common ancestor of the Decula plus Cassini species groups around 4 million years ago (Mya). At around 2.5 Mya the Cassini and Decula groups split from each other.

The Sota et al. (2013) paper also calculates that the first separation of extant 13-year cicadas from 17-year cicadas took place in the Decim group approximately 530,000 years ago (ya) when the southern M. tredecim split from the northern M. septendecim. The second noteworthy event took place about 320,000 ya with the split of the western Cassini group from its conspecifics to the east. The Decim and the Decula clades experienced similar western splits but these are estimated to have taken place 270,000 and 230,000 ya, respectively. The 13- and 17-year splits in Cassini and Decula took place after these events.

The 17-year cicadas largely occupy formerly glaciated territory and as a result their phylogeographic relationships reflect the effects of repeated contraction into glacial refugia (small islands of suitable habitat) and subsequent re-expansion during multiple interglacial periods. In each species group, Decim, Cassini, and Decula the signature of the glacial periods is manifested today in three phylogeographic genetic subdivisions: one subgroup east of the Appalachians, one midwestern, and one on the far western edge of their range.

The Sota et al. data suggest that the founders of the southern 13-year cicada populations we see today originated from the Decim group. These were later joined by Cassini originating from the western Cassini clade and Decula originating from eastern, middle, and western Decula clades. As Cassini and Decula invaded the south they became synchronized with the resident M. tredecim. Today these Cassini and Decula are known as M. tredecassini and M. tredecula. More data is needed to lend support to this hypothesis and others hypotheses related to more recent 13-17-year splits involving M. neotredecim and M. tredecim.

History

Historical accounts cite reports of fifteen- to seventeen-year recurrences of enormous numbers of noisy emergent cicadas ("locusts") written as early as 1737.[31][32] Pehr Kalm, a Swedish naturalist visiting Pennsylvania and New Jersey in 1749 on behalf of his nation's government, observed in late May one such emergence.[31][33] When reporting the event in a Swedish academic journal in 1756, Kalm wrote:

The general opinion is that these insects appear in these fantastic numbers in every seventeenth year. Meanwhile, except for an occasional one which may appear in the summer, they remain underground.
There is considerable evidence that these insects appear every seventeenth year in Pennsylvania.[33]

Kalm then described documents (including one from Benjamin Franklin) that had recorded the emergence from the ground of large numbers of cicadas in Pennsylvania in May 1715 and May 1732. He noted that the people who had prepared these documents had made no such reports in other years.[33] Kalm further noted that others had seen cicadas only occasionally before the large swarms of 1749.[33] He stated that he had not heard any cicadas in Pennsylvania and New Jersey in 1750 in the same months and areas in which he had heard many in 1749.[33]

Kalm summarized his findings in a paper translated into English in 1771,[34] stating:

There are a kind of locusts which about every seventeen years come hither in incredible numbers .... In the interval between the years when they are numerous, they are only seen or heard single in the woods.[31][34]

Based on Kalm's account and a specimen that Kalm had provided, Carl Linnaeus named the insect Cicada septendecim in the tenth edition of his Systema Naturae, in 1758.[5][35]

In 1766, Moses Bartram described in his "Observations on the cicada, or locust of America, which appears periodically every 16 or 17 years" the next appearance of the brood that Kalm had observed in 1749. Bartram noted that upon hatching from eggs deposited in the twigs of trees, the young insects ran down to the earth and "entered the first opening that they could find". He reported that he had been able to discover them 10 feet (3 m) below the surface, but that others had reportedly found them 30 feet (9 m) deep.[36]

In 1775, Thomas Jefferson recorded in his "Garden Book" the insect's 17-year periodicity, writing that an acquaintance remembered "great locust years" in 1724 and 1741, that he and others recalled another such year in 1754 and that the insects had again emerged from the ground at Monticello in 1775. He noted that the females lay their eggs in the small twigs of trees while above ground.[37]

In April 1800, Benjamin Banneker, who lived near Ellicott's Mills, Maryland, wrote in his record book that he recalled a "great locust year" in 1749, a second in 1766 during which the insects appeared to be "full as numerous as the first" and a third in 1783. He predicted that the insects "may be expected again in the year 1800, which is seventeen years since their third appearance to me".[38]

Use as human food

Magicicada is edible when cooked. They have historically been eaten by Native Americans, who would roast them in hot ovens, stirring them until they were well browned.[39]

Charles Lester Marlatt wrote in 1907 that, "The use of the newly emerged and succulent cicadas as an article of human diet has merely a theoretical interest, because, if for no other reason, they occur too rarely to have any real value. There is also the much stronger objection in the instinctive repugnance which all insects seem to inspire as an article of food to most civilized nations. Theoretically, the Cicada, collected at the proper time and suitably dressed and served, should be a rather attractive food. The larvae have lived solely on vegetable matter of the cleanest and most whole-some sort, and supposedly, therefore, would be much more palatable and suitable for food than the oyster, with its scavenger habit of living in the muddy ooze of river bottoms, or many other animals which are highly prized and which have not half so clean a record as the periodical Cicada."[40]

References

  1. Maxine Shoemaker Heath (1978). Genera of American cicadas north of Mexico (Ph.D. thesis). University of Florida. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.42291.
  2. "Periodical Cicada". magicicada.org.
  3. Lloyd, M., and H.S. Dybas (1966). "The periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology". Evolution 20 (2): 133–149. doi:10.2307/2406568. JSTOR 2406568.
  4. 1 2 Williams, K.S., and C. Simon (1995). "The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas" (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology 40: 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Alexander, Richard D; Thomas E. Moore (1962). "The Evolutionary Relationships of 17-Year and 13-Year Cicadas, and Three New Species (Homoptera, Cicadidae, Magicicada)" (PDF). U Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 9 June 2011.
  6. 1 2 Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. pp. 2785–2794. ISBN 1-4020-6242-7.
  7. Stranahan, Nancy. "Nature Notes from the Eastern Forest". Arc of Appalachia. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
  8. Cook, William M.; Robert D. Holt (2002). "Periodical cicada (Magicicada cassini) oviposition damage: visually impressive yet dynamically irrelevant" (PDF). American Midland Naturalist 147 (2): 214–224. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0214:PCMCOD]2.0.CO;2.
  9. Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 123–125.
  10. White, J, and M. Lloyd. 1979. Seventeen year cicadas emerging after eighteen years-a new brood? Evolution 33:1193-1199.
  11. "Magicicada Broods III and XXII will emerge in 2014". www.magicicada.org.
  12. "Sexual Signals in Periodical Cicadas" (PDF). Behaviour.
  13. Dybas, H. S.; Davis, D. D. (1962). "A populations census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)". Ecology 43 (3): 432–444. doi:10.2307/1933372. JSTOR 1933372.
  14. Williams, K. S.; Smith, K. G.; Stephen, F. M. (1993). "Emergence of 13-year periodical cicadas (Cicadidae, Magicicada): phenology, mortality, and predator satiation". Ecology 74 (4): 1143–1152. doi:10.2307/1940484. JSTOR 1940484.
  15. Goles, E.; Schulz, O.; Markus, M. (2001). "Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model". Complexity 6 (4): 33–38. doi:10.1002/cplx.1040.
  16. 1 2 Cox, R. T., and C. E. Carlton (1988). "Paleoclimatic influences in the evolution of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)". American Midland Naturalist 120 (1): 183–193. doi:10.2307/2425898. JSTOR 2425898.
  17. Tanaka, Y, J. Yoshimura, C. Simon, J. Cooley, and K. Tainaka (2009). "Allee effect in the selection for prime-numbered cycles in periodical cicadas". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (22): 8975–8979. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.8975T. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900215106. PMC 2690011. PMID 19451640.
  18. 1 2 Cox, R. T., and C. E. Carlton (1991). "Evidence of genetic dominance of the 13-year life cycle in periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)". American Midland Naturalist 125 (1): 63–74. doi:10.2307/2426370. JSTOR 2426370.
  19. 1 2 Yang, Louie H. (2004). "Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests". Science 306 (5701): 1565–1567. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1565Y. doi:10.1126/science.1103114. PMID 15567865.
  20. National Geographic: Cicada Outbreaks Linked to Other Animals' Booms, Busts.
  21. Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. p. 28.
  22. Post, Susan L. (2004). "A Trill of a Lifetime". The Illinois Steward. Retrieved 9 June 2011.
  23. "Swarms of cicadas emerging in Midwest". Associated Press. 20 May 2007.
  24. "Brood XXII (13-year) The Baton Rouge Brood". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 28 August 2011.
  25. "Magicicada species". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 12 June 2011.
  26. Compare brood IV distribution with brood XIX distribution. From http://www.magicicada.org http://www.magicicada.org/about/brood_pages/broods.php]
  27. 1 2 See figure 1, p. 107, Cooley et al. The distribution of periodical cicadas. American Entomologist, 55:2, 106-112.
  28. Lifecycles Of Cicada Species Are Focus Of Biologist's Research, The UConn Advance, 4/26/2004, Elizabeth Omara-Otunnu
  29. http://www.magicicada.org
  30. Teiji Sota, Satoshi Yamamoto, John R. Cooley, Kathy B. R. Hill, Chris Simon, Jin Yoshimura (2013). "Independent divergence of 13- and 17-y life cycles among three periodical cicada lineages". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (2). Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.6919S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220060110. Retrieved 22 March 2013.
  31. 1 2 3 Marlatt, C.L (1898). The Periodical Cicada in Literature. The Periodical Cicada: An Account of Cicada Septendecim, Its Natural Enemies and the Means of Preventing its Injury, Together With A Summary of the Distribution of the Different Broods (Bulletin No. 14 - New Series, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Entomology) (Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office). pp. 112–118. OCLC 10684275.
  32. Kritsky, Gene (2004). "John Bartram and the Periodical Cicadas: A Case Study". In Hoffmann, Nancy E. and Van Horne, John C. America's Curious Botanist: A Tercentennial Reappraisal of John Bartram 1699-1777. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The American Philosophical Society. pp. 43–51.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 Davis, J.J. (May 1953). "Pehr Kalm's Description of the Periodical Cicada, Magicicada septendecim L., from Kongl. Svenska Vetenskap Academiens Handlinger, 17:101-116, 1756, translated by Larson, Esther Louise (Mrs. K.E. Doak)". The Ohio Journal of Science 53: 139–140. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-02. Republished by Knowledge Bank: The Ohio State University Libraries and Office of the Chief Information Officer.
  34. 1 2 Kalm, Peter (1771). Travels into North America: Translated into English, By John Reinhold Foster 2. London: T. Lowndess. pp. 212–213.
  35. Linnaei, Caroli (1758). "Insecta. Hemiptera. Cicada. Mannifera. septendecim.". Systema Naturae Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis 1 (10 ed.). Stockholm, Sweden: Laurentii Salvii. pp. 436–437.
  36. Bartram, Moses (1766). Observations on the cicada, or locust of North America, which appears periodically once in every 16 or 17 years. Communicated by the ingenious Peter Collinson, Esq. The Annual Register, or a View of the History, Politicks, and Literature, for the Year 1767 (London: Printed for J. Dodsley (1768)). pp. 103–106. OCLC 642534652.
  37. Jefferson, Thomas (1775). Betts, Edward Morris, ed. Thomas Jefferson's garden book, 1766-1824, with relevant extracts from his other writings. Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc. (2008). p. 68. ISBN 1-882886-11-9. OCLC 836062827. Dr. Walker sais he remembers that the years 1724 & 1741 were great locust years. we all remember that 1758 was and now they are come again this year of 1775. it appears that they come periodically from the ground once in 17 years. they come out of the ground from a prodigious depth. it is thought they eat nothing while in this state, laying their eggs in the small twigs of trees seems to be their only business. The females make a noise well known. The males are silent.
  38. Latrobe, John H. B., Esq. (1845). Memoir of Benjamin Banneker: Read before the Maryland Historical Society at the Monthly Meeting, May 1, 1845. Baltimore, Maryland: Printed by John D. Toy. pp. 11–12. OCLC 568468091. Retrieved 2015-10-07.
  39. Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. p. 103.
  40. Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. p. 104.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Magicicada.
Wikispecies has information related to: Periodical cicadas
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, January 20, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.