Néron–Tate height

In number theory, the Néron–Tate height (or canonical height) is a quadratic form on the Mordell-Weil group of rational points of an abelian variety defined over a global field. It is named after André Néron and John Tate.

Definition and properties

Néron defined the Néron–Tate height as a sum of local heights.[1] Although the global Néron–Tate height is quadratic, the constituent local heights are not quite quadratic. Tate (unpublished) defined it globally by observing that the logarithmic height h_L associated to a symmetric invertible sheaf L on an abelian variety A is “almost quadratic,” and used this to show that the limit

\hat h_L(P) = \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\frac{h_L(NP)}{N^2}

exists, defines a quadratic form on the Mordell-Weil group of rational points, and satisfies

\hat h_L(P) = h_L(P) + O(1),

where the implied O(1) constant is independent of P.[2] If L is anti-symmetric, that is [-1]^*L=L, then the analogous limit

\hat h_L(P) = \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\frac{h_L(NP)}{N}

converges and satisfies \hat h_L(P) = h_L(P) + O(1), but in this case \hat h_L is a linear function on the Mordell-Weil group. For general invertible sheaves, one writes L^{\otimes2} = (L\otimes[-1]^*L)\otimes(L\otimes[-1]^*L^{-1}) as a product of a symmetric sheaf and an anti-symmetric sheaf, and then

\hat h_L(P) = \frac12 \hat h_{L\otimes[-1]^*L}(P) + \frac12 \hat h_{L\otimes[-1]^*L^{-1}}(P)

is the unique quadratic function satisfying

\hat h_L(P) = h_L(P) + O(1) \quad\mbox{and}\quad \hat h_L(0)=0.

The Néron–Tate height depends on the choice of an invertible sheaf on the abelian variety, although the associated bilinear form depends only on the image of L in the Néron–Severi group of A. If the abelian variety A is defined over a number field K and the invertible sheaf is symmetric and ample, then the Néron–Tate height is positive definite in the sense that it vanishes only on torsion elements of the Mordell-Weil group A(K). More generally, \hat h_L induces a positive definite quadratic form on the real vector space A(K)\otimes\mathbb{R}.

On an elliptic curve, the Néron-Severi group is of rank one and has a unique ample generator, so this generator is often used to define the Néron–Tate height, which is denoted \hat h without reference to a particular line bundle. (However, the height that naturally appears in the statement of the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture is twice this height.) On abelian varieties of higher dimension, there need not be a particular choice of smallest ample line bundle to be used in defining the Néron–Tate height, and the height used in the statement of the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture is the Néron–Tate height associated to the Poincaré line bundle on A\times\hat A, the product of A with its dual.

The elliptic and abelian regulators

The bilinear form associated to the canonical height \hat h on an elliptic curve E is

 \langle P,Q\rangle = \frac{1}{2} \bigl( \hat h(P+Q) - \hat h(P) - \hat h(Q) \bigr) .

The elliptic regulator of E/K is

 \operatorname{Reg}(E/K) = \det\bigl( \langle P_i,P_j\rangle \bigr)_{1\le i,j\le r},

where P1,…,Pr is a basis for the Mordell-Weil group E(K) modulo torsion (cf. Gram determinant). The elliptic regulator does not depend on the choice of basis.

More generally, let A/K be an abelian variety, let B ≅ Pic0(A) be the dual abelian variety to A, and let P be the Poincaré line bundle on A × B. Then the abelian regulator of A/K is defined by choosing a basis Q1,…,Qr for the Mordell-Weil group A(K) modulo torsion and a basis η1,…,ηr for the Mordell-Weil group B(K) modulo torsion and setting

 \operatorname{Reg}(A/K) = \det\bigl( \langle P_i,\eta_j\rangle_{P} \bigr)_{1\le i,j\le r}.

(The definitions of elliptic and abelian regulator are not entirely consistent, since if A is an elliptic curve, then the latter is 2r times the former.)

The elliptic and abelian regulators appear in the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.

Lower bounds for the Néron–Tate height

There are two fundamental conjectures that give lower bounds for the Néron–Tate height. In the first, the field K is fixed and the elliptic curve E/K and point P ∈ E(K) vary, while in the second, the elliptic Lehmer conjecture, the curve E/K is fixed while the field of definition of the point P varies.

In both conjectures, the constants are positive and depend only on the indicated quantities. (A stronger form of Lang's conjecture asserts that c depends only on the degree [K:\mathbb Q].) It is known that the abc conjecture implies Lang's conjecture, and that the analogue of Lang's conjecture over one dimensional characteristic 0 function fields is unconditionally true.[3][5] The best general result on Lehmer's conjecture is the weaker estimate \hat h(P)\ge c(E/K)/[K(P):K]^{3+\epsilon} due to Masser.[6] When the elliptic curve has complex multiplication, this has been improved to \hat h(P)\ge c(E/K)/[K(P):K]^{1+\epsilon} by Laurent.[7] There are analogous conjectures for abelian varieties, with the nontorsion condition replaced by the condition that the multiples of P form a Zariski dense subset of A, and the lower bound in Lang's conjecture replaced by \hat h(P)\ge c(K)h(A/K), where h(A/K) is the Faltings height of A/K.

Generalizations

A polarized algebraic dynamical system is a triple (V,φ,L) consisting of a (smooth projective) algebraic variety V, a self-morphism φ : V → V, and a line bundle L on V with the property that \phi^*L = L^{\otimes d} for some integer d > 1. The associated canonical height is given by the Tate limit[8]

 \hat h_{V,\phi,L}(P) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{h_{V,L}(\phi^{(n)}(P))}{d^n},

where φ(n) = φ o φ o … o φ is the n-fold iteration of φ. For example, any morphism φ : PNPN of degree d > 1 yields a canonical height associated to the line bundle relation φ*O(1) = O(d). If V is defined over a number field and L is ample, then the canonical height is non-negative, and

 \hat h_{V,\phi,L}(P) = 0 ~~ \Longleftrightarrow ~~ P~{\rm is~preperiodic~for~}\phi.

(P is preperiodic if its forward orbit P, φ(P), φ2(P), φ3(P),… contains only finitely many distinct points.)

References

  1. Néron, André (1965). "Quasi-fonctions et hauteurs sur les variétés abéliennes". Ann. of Math. (in French) 82: 249–331. doi:10.2307/1970644. MR 0179173.
  2. Lang (1997) p.72
  3. 1 2 Lang (1997) pp.73–74
  4. Lang (1997) pp.243
  5. Hindry, Marc; Silverman, Joseph H. (1988). "The canonical height and integral points on elliptic curves". Invent. Math. 93 (2): 419–450. doi:10.1007/bf01394340. MR 0948108. Zbl 0657.14018.
  6. Masser, David W. (1989). "Counting points of small height on elliptic curves". Bull. Soc. Math. France 117 (2): 247–265. MR 1015810.
  7. Laurent, Michel (1983). "Minoration de la hauteur de Néron-Tate" [Lower bounds of the Nerón-Tate height]. In Bertin, Marie-José. Séminaire de théorie des nombres, Paris 1981–82 [Seminar on number theory, Paris 1981–82]. Progress in Mathematics (in French). Birkhäuser. pp. 137–151. ISBN 0-8176-3155-0. MR 0729165.
  8. Call, Gregory S.; Silverman, Joseph H. (1993). "Canonical heights on varieties with morphisms". Compositio Mathematica 89 (2): 163–205. MR 1255693.

General references for the theory of canonical heights

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, November 09, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.