Murray v Leisureplay plc
| Murray v Leisureplay plc | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of England and Wales |
| Citation(s) | [2005] EWCA Civ 963, [2005] IRLR 946 |
| Keywords | |
| Contract, remedies | |
Murray v Leisureplay plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 is an English contract law case, concerning the termination of an agreement and penalty clauses.
Facts
An employment contract said ‘in the event of wrongful termination by way of liquidated damages the company shall forthwith pay to the Executive a sum equal to one year’s gross salary, pension contributions and other benefits in kind.’ Leisureplay plc claimed that the bonus should be void as a penalty clause.
In the High Court, Burnton J held it was penal because no account was taken of the Executive’s duty to mitigate his loss.
Judgment
The Court of Appeal held that the bonus was valid. Arden LJ held the clause was ‘generous’ but still liquidated damages, as it was not ‘extravagant or unconscionable’.
See also
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
References
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, March 01, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.