Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued March 28, 1990 Decided June 27, 1990 | |||||||
Full case name | Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Co | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Subsequent history | No. 89-453, 277 U.S. App. D.C. 134, 873 F.2d 347, affirmed and remanded; No. 89-700, 278 U.S. App. D.C. 24, 876 F.2d 902, reversed and remanded. | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
The FCC policies do not violate equal protection, since they bear the imprimatur of longstanding congressional support and direction and are substantially related to the achievement of the important governmental objective of broadcast diversity. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens | ||||||
Concurrence | Stevens | ||||||
Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy | ||||||
Dissent | Kennedy, joined by Scalia | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |||||||
Overruled by | |||||||
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) |
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that intermediate scrutiny should be applied to equal protection challenges to federal statutes using benign racial classifications.[1] The Court distinguished the previous year's decision City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Company, 488 U.S. 469 (1989), by noting that it applied only to actions by state and local governments.[2] Metro Broadcasting was overruled by Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), which held that strict scrutiny should be applied to federal laws using benign racial classifications.[3]
See also
References
External links
|
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, February 02, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.