Mauritian general election, 1886

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Mauritius
Constitution
Foreign relations

Politics portal

General elections were held for the first time in Mauritius between 11 and 20 January 1886.[1] They followed the introduction of a new constitution the previous year. The Democrats and Reformists (also known as the Oligarchs) each won five of the ten elected seats.[1]

Electoral system

The new constitution provided for a 28-member Council of Government, which consisted of the Governor, 12 officials, 5 appointed members and 10 elected members.[2] The ten elected members were returned from nine constituencies formed from the nine districts, which all districts returning one member except Port Louis, which returned two.[3] Voting took place in each constituency on a different day, starting in Port Louis on 11 January and ending in Grand Port on 20 January.[1]

The franchise for the elections was severely limited; the right to vote was restricted to male British subjects aged 21 and over and who possessed Rs300 of immovable property or movable property worth Rs3,000, a monthly salary of Rs50, those paying rent of Rs25 a month or paying a licence duty of at Rs200 a year. People married to eligible voters, or the oldest son of a qualifying widow were also entitled to vote.[3] As a result, although the population of Mauritius was 359,688, only 4,061 people were eligible to vote,[1] of which just 253 were Asian.[4]

Campaign

A total of 25 candidates contested the elections; led by William Newton,[1] the Reformists nominated ran candidates in all ten constituencies. The Democrats put forward nine, with their leader Onésipho Beaugeard running in two constituencies. The remaining six candidates were independents, one of whom (Arthur Pitot) also ran in two candidates.[1]

Despite the limited franchise, election notices were published in English, French, Hindustani (written in Arabic script), Tamil and Chinese.[5]

Results

Party Votes % Seats
Democrats2,70949.215
Reformists2,13638.805
Independents66011.990
Total5,50510010
Registered voters/turnout4,06191.7
Source: Le Mauricien

By constituency

Constituency Candidate Party Votes %
Flacq
(222 registered)
Charles AdamReformists12559.5
Yves Pierre JollivetDemocrats8540.5
Grand Port
(273 registered)
Henri Joseph PortalReformists10950.5
Edgar GalletDemocrats6228.7
Fabien RaultIndependent4520.8
Moka
(187 registered)
Henri LeclezioReformists13781.5
Onéipho BeaugeardDemocrats3118.5
Pamplemousses
(270 registered)
Charles Joseph PlanelDemocrats15651.8
W A EdwardsReformists9631.9
De Evenor ChazalIndependent4515.0
Louis VigoureuxIndependent41.3
Plaines Wilhems
(653 registered)
Célicourt AntelmeDemocrats40767.3
Povah AmbroseReformists19432.1
Arthur PitotIndependent40.7
Port Louis
(1,986 registered)
Onésipho BeaugeardDemocrats94126.4
Gustave de ConolisDemocrats87924.7
William NewtonReformists70519.8
John Alexander FergusonIndependent52314.7
Georges GuibertReformists51114.4
Rivière du Rempart
(163 registered)
Edgar AntelmeDemocrats6139.6
Louis RouillardReformists5535.7
P L ChastellierIndependent3824.7
Rivière Noire
(115 registered)
Vincent GeoffroyReformists5551.4
Thorny PitotDemocrats5147.7
Arthur PitotIndependent10.9
Savanne
(192 registered)
Virgil NazReformists14980.5
Anderson James ForresterDemocrats3619.5

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 HISTOIRE: Les premières élections générales opposent Oligarques et Démocrates Le Mauricien, 26 December 2011
  2. Sydney Selvon (2012) A New Comprehensive History of Mauritius: From British Mauritius to the 21st century
  3. 1 2 Constitutional Evolution of Mauritius from British rule to Independence Government of Mauritius
  4. Dolf Sternberger, Bernhard Vogel, Dieter Nohlen & Klaus Landfried (1978) Die Wahl der Parlamente: Band II: Afrika, Zweiter Halbband, p1394
  5. Kenneth Ballhatchet (1995) "The structure of British official attitudes: Colonial Mauritius 1883−1968" The Historical Journal, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp989−1011
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, December 02, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.