Lipița culture

Map of Roman Dacia showing Costoboci, Carpi and Free Dacians

Lipiţa culture (Romanian Lipiţa, Polish Lipica other spellings: Lipitsa, Lipitza) is the archaeological material culture representative of a Dacian tribe.[1][2] It took its name from the Ukrainian village of Verkhnya Lypytsya (ukr. Верхня Липиця, Romanian Lipița de Sus (Upper Lipița)), region Rohatyn Raion, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast.

Geography

It is located on the Upper Dniester [3] and Middle Dniester, Upper Prut, in the Carpathians and Subcarpathians of today’s Bukovina, Pokuttya, Galicia, Transcarpathia and Maramureş. It lasted from the middle of the 1st century BC to the beginning of the 3rd century AD.

Lipita type site

2nd century pottery of the Lipița culture in display at the Archaeological Museum of Kraków.

Smiszko (1932), Kostrzewski (1949), Sulimirski (1972), Cigilik (1975), Kozak (1989 and 2006), Shchukin (1989 and 2006) explicitly assign to it a Dacian / North Thracian origin.[4][5][6][7] Still in the early Roman period, this Thracian population was dominated by strong Celtic influences or had simply absorbed Celtic ethnic components [3] One of the most recent settlements on Dniester that is associated with Lipiţa culture is in Remezivtsi that existed before the early third century.[8]

"Flat" cremation cemeteries are typical of this culture.[7] And, along these a few graves have been discovered which differ markedly i.e. richly furnished inhumation burials in ancient mounds with equipment consisting of imported Roman vases and other goods, with a few articles typical of the Celtic culture. The pottery from these burials was a typical Lipita ware.[7] Buried in the graves were evidently members of the ruling class of the Lipiţa culture, presumably of Celtic origin.[7]

Like other pagan Dacians and Thracians, the Lipiţa people cremated their deceased. The remains were buried in a plane or tumular tomb. Only children were inhumed; as they hadn't passed a come of age passage ritual, due of their age, they couldn't be incinerated. These burial customs lasted from the late La Tène and were best preserved in the Upper Tisza basin, a region with a major Dacian cultural perpetuation throughout the ages.

The presence in Kolokolin (Ukraine, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast) and Chizhikovo (Ukraine, (Chyzhykove)) of Dacian pottery made some scholars to include also these memorials of those sites in the Lipiţa culture of the Upper Dniester, which was as linked to it by the Dacian tribe of the Costoboci.[9] Benadik and Kolnik sensing the similarity of these burials to the Zemplin burial ground, included the latter in the Lipiţa culture.[9] However, these burials date from a slightly earlier period, and possess typological difference which makes their inclusion into the Lipiţa culture unlikely.[9]

Culture and trade

2nd century pottery of the Lipița culture in display at the Archaeological Museum of Kraków.

Lipiţa culture is considered by the majority of scholars as representing the Dacian tribe of Costoboci.[1][2]

Roman influences are also visible in the material culture. Likewise, Germanic people from the Przeworsk culture, but also Celts and Sarmatians, came in contact with the Lipiţa people. It seems that no Early Slavs made contact with this area yet, as the first Slavic artifacts in today's Moldavia and Bukovina are not dated earlier than the 5th and 6th centuries AD.

In the first decades of the 3rd century, Lipiţa culture of the Costoboci restricted its territory and gave birth to a new archaeological culture, that of the Carpathian Tumuli culture. A part of the Costoboci inhabiting the Subcarpathian hills withdrew southwards into the mountains, while a small part migrated in Moldavia, joining the Carpi, another Dacian tribe. In any case, some did remain in the northern area of the Lipiţa culture, despite the pressure of the newly arrived East Germanic tribes.

The largest part of the territory of Lipiţa and Carpathian Tumuli archaeological cultures is now inhabited by the Hutsuls, both in Ukraine and in Romania.

Notes

  1. 1 2 Shchukin (1989) 306
  2. 1 2 Parvan, Florescu (1982) 547
  3. 1 2 Jażdżewski & 1948 76.
  4. ↑ Shchukin, Kazanski, Sharov (2006) p.20
  5. ↑ Kostrzewski (1949) p.230
  6. ↑ Kozak & 2006 p.212.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Sulimirski & 1972 p.104.
  8. ↑ Kozak & 2006 212.
  9. 1 2 3 Shchukin & 1989 280.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 12, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.