LMS 6399 Fury

LMS 6399 Fury
Type and origin
Power type Steam
Builder North British Locomotive Co.
Serial number 23890
Build date 1929
Specifications
Configuration 4-6-0
UIC class 2′C h3
Gauge 4 ft 8 12 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Leading dia 3 ft 3 12 in (1.003 m)
Driver diameter 6 ft 9 in (2.057 m)
Length 64 ft 2 34 in (19.58 m)
Loco weight 87.10 long tons (88.50 t; 97.55 short tons)
Fuel type Coal
Fuel capacity 5.5 long tons (5.6 t; 6.2 short tons)
Water cap 3,500 imp gal (16,000 l)
Firebox:
  Firegrate area
28 sq ft (2.6 m2)
Boiler pressure 1,400–1,800 psi (9.65–12.41 MPa) (HP boiler),
900 psi (6.21 MPa) (HP drum),
250 psi (1.72 MPa) (LP boiler)
Heating surface:
  Tubes
1,335 sq ft (124.0 m2)
  Firebox 218 sq ft (20.3 m2)
Superheater:
  Heating area
  • 274 sq ft (25.5 m2) (high pressure)
  • 355 sq ft (33.0 m2) (low pressure)
Cylinders Three: 1 HP inside, 2 LP outside
High-pressure cylinder 11 12 in × 26 in (292 mm × 660 mm)
Low-pressure cylinder 18 in × 26 in (457 mm × 660 mm)
Career
Operators London, Midland and Scottish Railway
Numbers 6399
Official name Fury
Disposition Rebuilt in 1935 as Rebuilt Royal Scot class no. 6170 British Legion

The London Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) No. 6399 Fury was an unsuccessful British experimental express passenger locomotive. The intention was to save fuel by using high-pressure steam, which is thermodynamically more efficient than low-pressure steam.

Overview

Built in 1929 by the NBL (North British Locomotive Company) in Glasgow,[1] it was one of a number of steam locomotives built around the world in the search for "Superpower steam". The locomotive was a joint venture between the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS), with Henry Fowler as Chief Mechanical Engineer (C.M.E.) and The Superheater Company[2] with the latter having responsibility for constructing the complex, 3 stage Schmidt-based boiler.[3] The LMS provided a Royal Scot frame and running gear.[4] For the complex boiler, John Brown & Company of Sheffield forged the special nickel-steel alloy high pressure drum and many boiler fittings were imported from Germany[5] but otherwise all manufacture was carried out by NBL.[3]

A 3-cylindered semi-compound compound locomotive, it had one high-pressure cylinder between the frames (11.5 inch bore) and two larger low-pressure outside cylinders (18 inch bore). The Schmidt steam-raising boiler was a 3-stage unit. The primary generator was a fully sealed ultra-high-pressure circuit working between 1400 and 1800 psi (9.7 to 12.4 MPa), filled with distilled water that transferred heat from the firebox to the high-pressure drum. This raised high-pressure steam at 900 psi (6.2 MPa) which was taken to power the cylinders and also recirculate pure water. The third steam raising unit was a relatively conventional locomotive fire tube boiler operating at 250 psi (1.7 MPa) heated by combustion gases from the coal fire.[3] The engine was technically an "ultra-high pressure, semi-compound steam locomotive". It was given the LMS number 6399 and then inherited the name Fury from LMS 6138, which had itself been renamed in October 1929.[6]

After short runs during January 1930, a longer test run from Glasgow to Carstairs was scheduled for 10 February 1930. Approaching Carstairs station at slow speed, one of the ultra-high-pressure tubes burst and the escaping steam ejected the coal fire through the fire-hole door, killing Mr Lewis Schofield of the Superheater Company.[7] Subsequently the burst tube was thoroughly investigated at Sheffield University but no definitive conclusion reached.[8] The boiler was eventually repaired and Fury moved to Derby where a number of running trials were carried out until early 1934, mostly revealing significant shortcomings in performance.[9] Fury's rods and linkages were then removed together with the indicator shelter and test gear when in 1935 it was rebuilt by William Stanier at Crewe Works with a more conventional type 2 boiler becoming 6170 British Legion, the first of the LMS 2 and 2A boilered 4-6-0 locomotives. Despite the accident, Fury was primarily an economic rather than a technological failure. Although tolerating the trials from Derby, Stanier didn't devote much effort to rectifying the faults Fury displayed, no doubt because of his many other work pressures and development of the LMS Turbomotive.[3] Nevertheless, Fury never earned revenue for the LMS and in fact "Fury must have travelled more miles under tow than under its own steam".[10] As many other experimental locomotives showed, the theoretical benefits of ultra high steam pressure steam were hard to realise in practice. Fuel is only one part of the operating costs of a steam locomotivemaintenance is very significant, and introducing extra complications always increased this disproportionally.

In France, the Chemins de fer de Paris à Lyon et à la Méditerranée had bought a Schmidt system 4-8-2 locomotive (no. 241.B.1) and in 1933 this too suffered a burst ultra high pressure tube. The failure was investigated and if a single conclusion could be reached following both incidents, it was that inadequate water circulation in the ultra high pressure circuit was responsible.[3]

References

  1. Bradley, R.P. (1995). Giants of Steam. Yeovil: Oxford Pub. ISBN 0-86093-505-1.
  2. "History of Superheated Steam - The trend of Modern Development". The New Zealand Railways Magazine. 7 June 1932.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Carney 2012.
  4. Reed, B. (1971). Loco Profile 8 Royal Scots. Windsor, England: Profile Publications Ltd.
  5. Court, J.H. (1975). Model Engineer 141 (3055). Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. The Railway Magazine (London). 1929. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  7. "Engine Mishap - "The Explosion on the Fury"". The Glasgow Herald. 22 March 1930.
  8. "Causes of Burst High-Pressure Locomotive Boiler". The Railway Gazette: 543–544. 22 November 1940.
  9. Atkins 1978.
  10. Tufnell, R. (1985). Prototype Locomotives. Newton Abbot: Pub. David & Charles.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, December 03, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.