Korean War POWs detained in North Korea

Korean War POWs (Prisoners of War) Detained in North Korea (Korean: 국군포로; Hanja: 國軍捕虜) are the tens of thousands of South Korean soldiers who were captured by the North Korean and Chinese forces during the Korean War (1950–53) but were not returned during the prisoner exchanges under the 1953 Armistice Agreement. Most are presumed dead but the South Korean government estimates some 560 South Korean POWs still survive in North Korea.[1][2] The unaccounted South Korean POW issue has been in dispute since the Armistice in 1953. North Korea continues to deny it holds these South Korean POWs.[3] Interest in this issue has been renewed since 1994, when Lt. Cho Chang-ho, a former South Korean soldier presumed to have been killed in the war, escaped from North Korea. As of 2008, 79 former South Korean soldiers have escaped from North Korea.

There have also been reports that several hundred American POWs may not have been returned by North Korea.[4][5] But the vast majority of unaccounted POWs are South Koreans.

Origins

The treatment of Prisoners of War and their repatriation was a complicated issue in the Korean War. Nominally, both the Communists and United Nations forces were committed to the terms of the 1949 Geneva Conventions III, regarding the treatment of POWs. However, both sides applied exceptions and the negotiations regarding POWs were contentious and difficult.[6]

Korean prisoners were assigned to one of three types of POW camps. Peace camps were for POWs sympathetic to communism, reform camps held highly skilled POWs who were indoctrinated in communist ideologies and the third type was the normal POW camps. Prisoners in the first two camp types were prized and not usually exchanged nor released.[7]

The North Koreans viewed South Korean forces not as enemy soldiers protected by the Geneva Conventions, but as fellow Koreans who had been led astray into "war crimes against their people" by imperialist forces. According to such reasoning, it was justified to "re-educate" these South Koreans and allow the ones who were fit to volunteer for the North Korean military. This was common practice and many South Korean POWs had been enlisted in the North Korean military. Although North Korea asserts that all such former South Korean soldiers had volunteered freely, others (including former South Korean POWs who have escaped in recent years) allege there was coercion.[8]

The UN forces found that many of the prisoners it captured were former South Korean citizens who had been enlisted into the Korean People's Army (in many cases, allegedly against their will). Many of the Chinese soldiers who were captured were former Nationalists who had been enlisted into the Chinese People's Liberation Army after the defeat of the Nationalist armies in China in 1949. Large numbers of such prisoners did not want to be returned to North Korea or Communist China. Because of such prisoners, the UN Command was reluctant to abide by a literal interpretation of Article 118 of the Geneva Convention which states that all POWs were to be "released and repatriated without delay after the cessation of active hostilities." [9] The UN wanted a voluntary repatriation where POWs could choose which side to return. The Communists insisted on a full all-for-all exchange according to a literal interpretation of Article 118.[10]

When negotiations for POW exchanges began in 1951, the UN Command estimated that 88,000 South Korean soldiers were missing in action (MIA). However the communist side claimed they held only 7,712 South Korean POWs. The UN Command protested the huge discrepancy in their POW estimates and the number given by the communists, and noted that the number of POWs submitted by the Communists was far smaller than the 65,000 South Koreans that North Korean and Chinese had claimed they had captured in their own announcements. The Communists insisted that many POWs had been killed in UN air raids and died of disease and all captives who had recognized their crimes of "participating in imperialists' war" had been released at the front and allowed to return to their original army or home town. The UN Command noted that only about 200 former POWs had returned to UN lines and charged that the Communist list was small because many South Korean POWs had been press-ganged into joining the North Korean military. The UN demanded that South Korean POWs in the North Korean military also be repatriated. The Communists claimed that all those former POWs who were serving in their forces had volunteered to do so and refuted this as "a conspiracy to carry away more than one hundred thousand soldiers from the People's Army."[6]

South Korea's President Syngman Rhee had been reluctant about the Armistice talks to begin with and was particularly opposed to any involuntary repatriation of former South Koreans to North Korea. Many other South Korean leaders had also been unhappy with the ceasefire negotiations in general as well as the issue of anti-communist POWs in UN custody. The tensions between the South Koreans and their UN allies erupted when the South Koreans unilaterally released 25,000 anti-Communist POWs on June 18 of 1953.[11]

The unilateral release of the anti-Communist POWs by South Koreans complicated negotiations. Doing so without resolving the issue of South Korean MIA missing from the POW lists from the Communist forces may have been detrimental to the POWs that were held in North Korea. However, the fact that the communists began with such a small list of POWs indicated that they had little intention of returning many of the South Koreans.[6]

The UN and the Communists finally signed the Armistice Agreement on July 27, 1953, a little over a month after the release of the anti-communist POWs by South Korea. This ended the fierce fighting which had continued for two years even as negotiations dragged on. Both the UN and Communist forces agreed that POWs who did not desire repatriation would be turned over to a Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission led by the Indian military that would interview individual prisoners and allow them to choose their side in a neutral setting. In the following two months, POWs exchanges were carried out under the agreement. The UN Command repatriated 75,823 communist POWs (among them, 70,183 North Koreans) while the Communists only returned 12,773 UN POWs. Only 8,726 South Koreans were returned. That was less than 10% of the total of South Korean MIAs.

Number of POWs held in North Korea

South Korean POWs

The exact number of South Korean POWs who were detained in North Korea after the war is unknown, as is the number who still survive in North Korea. In its report to the legislature in October 2007, the South Korean Ministry of Defense reported that "a total of 41,971 South Korean soldiers were missing during the Korean War. 8,726 were repatriated through POW exchanges after the Armistice of 1953. Some 13,836 have been determined to have been killed based on other information. To date, the status of 19,409 soldiers has not been confirmed." [1] Most of these unconfirmed were believed to been unrepatriated POWs. Other estimates of South Korean POWs held by the North Koreans at the Armistice have been higher . Yi Hang-gu, a writer and North Korea expert currently in South Korea who had served as a Sergeant in the Korean People's Army, has testified that he commanded former South Korean POWs who had been enlisted into the Korean People's Army during the Korean War. Yi's unit, the 22nd Brigade, was composed mostly of former South Korean captives led by North Korean officers and non-commissioned officers. Yi has said the number of South Korean POWs who survived in North Korea at the end of the fighting "could have been about 50,000-60,000." [12]

The South Korean government estimates that 560 South Korean POWs still survive in North Korea. This number is based upon analysis of various testimonies from defectors and former POWs who managed to escape North Korea. Other researchers (e.g. the Korean Institute for National Unification's 2008 White Paper on Human Rights in North Korea) [13] think the actual number of POWs still alive in North Korea could be higher, since many of the POWs who have recently managed to escape had been presumed to have been killed.

American and other U.N. POWs

On September 17, 1996, the New York Times reported the possible presence of American POWs in North Korea, citing recently declassified documents. The documents showed that the U.S. Defense Department knew in December 1953 that "more than 900 American troops were alive at the end of the war but were never released by the North Koreans". The Pentagon did not confirm the report, saying they had no clear evidence that any Americans were being held against their will in North Korea but pledged to continue to investigate accounts of defectors and others who said they had seen American prisoners there. The North Korean government has said it is not holding any Americans.[14]

Treatment of POWs by North Korean and Chinese forces

North Korea did not recognize the POW status of its South Korean captives, and viewed them as "liberated fighters." Because of this fundamental difference in perspective, captured South Korean soldiers were treated very differently from other UN captives. Articles 49 through 57 of the 1949 Geneva Convention III specifically restrict the use of POW labor for military purposes.[9] However, it was common practice to enlist former South Korean volunteers into its own forces after several weeks of re-education.

Some of the South Koreans were assigned to front line combat units, such as Yi Hang-gu's 22nd Brigade. Many more were assigned to construction units repairing railroads and airfields and disposing unexploded ordnance. This repair work was particularly dangerous due to the heavy air raids on supply lines and airfields in North Korea by UN air forces.[6]

The Chinese forces initially did not recognize the Geneva Conventions and followed its own "Policy of Tolerance". This policy was based upon Confucian codes and traditions where enemy forces who have surrendered are allowed to join their captors. Official Chinese records distinguish between prisoners who were "captured" and those who "surrendered". On July 13 of 1952, the Chinese forces changed their policy and committed to the Geneva Conventions - and demanded full repatriation of its own POWs according to Article 118.

Punishment for transgressions by the South Koreans was harsh. Lt. Cho Chang-ho, a former South Korean artillery officer who escaped from North Korea in 1994, testified before the U.S. Congress on April 27, 2006. In 1952 he had been caught trying to escape back to South Korean lines and was sentenced by court martial to 13 years in prison. He served 6 years in a political prison camp where conditions were unsanitary and prisoners suffered from malnutrition. There were 4 other South Korean officer POWs held with Cho, all of whom perished from disease in prison.[15]

Other UN prisoners also suffered horrific treatment. Out of 7,000 US prisoners, 40 percent died in captivity. Diet and medical conditions were notoriously bad.[16] However, other UN prisoners were not enlisted in large numbers into the North Korean forces or made to work for the communist war effort, the way that South Koreans had been. The diet, as bad as it was, was comparable to that of North Korean peasants and medical supplies were unavailable to doctors.

From 1951, the Chinese tried to improve the treatment of POWs after being alarmed by the excessive death rate. The Chinese recognized the propaganda value of POWs and established permanent POW camps in the far North, close to the Yalu River. The Chinese forces also held indoctrination sessions which many US prisoners charged was attempted 'brainwashing'.[17][18] One of the oddest events held by the North Koreans and Chinese during this war was the 1952 POW olympics. UN and South Korean POWs gathered together in November 1952 at the Pyuktong Camp and competed in many athletic matches, including softball and sack races. Although the event was blatantly propagandistic, many of the POWs cooperated since it was their only opportunity to see if comrades in other camps had survived.[19]

South Korean and other UN POWs were also treated differently with regards to the POW exchange. The majority of surviving UN POWs were repatriated or turned over to the Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission in accordance with Section 3 of the Armistice Agreement. South Koreans who had been enlisted into the North Korean construction units were never reported as POWs during the negotiations to begin with. Some of the former South Korean POWs who have escaped reported that they did not even know there was an exchange of POWs.[20]

Life of POWs in North Korea after the Armistice

After the Korean War, the former South Korean POWs were given North Korean citizenship after formally being discharged from their camps and units. Most of them were assigned to work at coal mines near their camps.[21] Although they were nominally full citizens, they faced much discrimination in their employment and residence.[13]

Within North Korea's rigid caste system, they were amongst the lowest castes and were under surveillance by the State Security (secret police) agency.[22] Even though most POWs are now over 70 years old, their movement and residence is still restricted to remote regions and the surveillance by State Security still continues.[23]

The discrimination extended to the children of POWs who were restricted in their careers, barred from membership in the Workers' Party of Korea, college admissions and military service.[13] Mr. Koh Eul Won, a former POW who escaped to South Korea in 2001, testified that "in North Korea, one must complete military service to be treated like a human being. However, our children were rejected by the military solely for the reason of being the children of POWs. Therefore, our children had no choice but to work in the coal mines as we had done." Young-Bok Yoo, who escaped in 2000, also writes about the discrimination and surveillance in his Memoirs.[24]

South Korean repatriation efforts

The Seoul government regards the POW issues as a "basic national responsibility" related to the protection of its citizens. Since the end of the Korean War, Korean government has repeatedly raised this POWs issue to the North Korea at various meetings. Between 1953 and 1964 Seoul called for the repatriation of POWs 11 times .[25] But North Korea flatly denied any South Korean POWs were being held against their will.

A few months after the first inter-Korean Summit of Jun 15, 2000, the South repatriated all 63 former North Korean agents and guerrillas in its custody who had completed their prison terms in the South and wanted to return to the North. Many in the South criticized the Seoul government for failing to secure the return of South Korean prisoners of war or any civilian abductees in return. The repatriations were a good will gesture and no conditions officially were attached. The South Korea government did expect its gesture to lead to more cooperation and eventual reconciliation between the two sides.[26]

Contrary to the Seoul government's expectation, North Korea only enraged liberals and conservatives alike in the South Korean legislature when it demanded billions of dollars in compensation for alleged atrocities against the repatriated agents.[27] North Korea has consistently refused to discuss the POW issue. During the second inter-Korea summit of October 2007, President Roh Moo-hyun received no response from his North Korean counterpart, Kim Jong-il.[28]

Human rights groups in Korea and other countries have been unhappy with the two previous Presidents, Kim Dae Jung and Roh Moo Hyun with regards to the POW issue. Both the Kim and Roh governments were criticized for being excessively cautious about provoking the North Koreans and "lacking determination" in getting back the POWs.[29][30] Previously, before the 1990s, South Korea was not a democracy and this issue was not raised by grassroots groups before the government.

The Lee Myung Bak government clarified that the POW and abductee issues was of high priority and raised the issue as one of main agendas for inter-Korean dialogues. It has expressed its commitment to persuade the North to take active and sincere measures, although nothing has changed since the 2008 announcement.[31] It has also created an agency within South Korea's Unification Ministry whose task is to deal with North Korean human rights and POW related issues.[32]

Appeals for repatriation by NGOs

Non-governmental Organizations(NGOs) from around the world have appealed for the repatriation of South Korean POWs.

POWs who have escaped from North Korea

On October 1994, Lt. Cho Chang-ho successfully escaped to South Korea. He was the first South Korean POW to have made it out of North Korea since the Korean War ended. Thereafter, during the past decade, as of June 2009, 79 prisoners of war (and about 180 of their family members) have escaped from the North.[33]

In July 2010, a POW was reported to have escaped from North Korea, but was arrested in China and forcibly repatriated.[34] The POW, surnamed Jung, an infantryman of the 3rd Battalion of the Republic of Korea Army, was captured in 1952. After being handed over to North Korea's security forces by the Chinese side's public security bureau, he was reportedly sent to the Yodok concentration camp.[35]

Young-Bok Yoo , a POW who escaped from North Korea in 2000, first published his memoirs in 2010, entitled Under Starry Nights in Hell.[36] He wrote under a pseudonym, Yoo Young-chul. In 2012 his memoirs were translated into English under the title Tears of Blood: A Korean POW's Fight for Freedom, Family, and Justice.[24]

The Database Center for North Korean Human Rights in Seoul Korea (nkdb.org) has published a detailed report based on in-depth interviews with 20 of the former POWs who have escaped to South Korea.[22] The interviews cover their capture, their treatment as POWs during and after the war, their lives in North Korea, their escape from North Korea, and their readjustment to life in South Korea.

Former POWs receive back pay and pensions for their military service from the South Korean government once they reach South Korea. This adds up to a significant payment and is much higher than the assistance that typical North Korean refugees receive when they successfully reach South Korea. Information about the South Korea's policy toward former POWs has circulated among POWs in North Korea and that has encouraged them to try to leave. Private "brokers" are also aware of such policies and actively seek former POWs in North Korea and help arrange their escape for hefty fees.

There are NGOs that help former POWs and their families in South Korea. The former POWs are generally happy with their new lives in South Korea. However, many suffer from health problems due to many years of hard labor and depression from concern for their family members who are still in North Korea. Getting their remaining family members out of North Korea is a top priority.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 2007 Ministry of Defense Report to the National Assembly (2007년 국방부 국정 감사 자료). Ministry of Defense, Republic of Korea. 2007.
  2. ↑ We Have Not Forgotten - Assessing the Issue of ROK POWs in North Korea and Possibilities for Relief (조국은 당신들을 잊지 않습니다 - 국군포로 문제의 실상과 대책). Ministry of Defense, Republic of Korea. National Assembly Library. 2008. http://academic.naver.com/view.nhn?doc_id=15538369
  3. ↑ http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2011/06/24/7/0301000000AEN20110624003900315F.HTML
  4. ↑ The U.S. knew in 1953 North Koreans Held American P.O.W.'s. New York Times, September 17, 1996 article. http://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/17/world/us-knew-in-1953-north-koreans-held-american-pow-s.html
  5. ↑ Nigel Cawthorne's book The Iron Cage is a sequel to his controversial book The Bamboo Cage, about Vietnam War POWs. The Iron Cage concerns unreturned POWs from earlier wars, particularly Korea and World War II.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Man-ho HEO, 2002. "North Korea's Continued Detention of South Korean POWs since the Korean and Vietnam Wars." Korea Journal of Defense Analysis. Vol. XIV, No. 2, Fall 2002. pp. 141-165 http://kida.re.kr/eng/publication/pdf/08-Heo.PDF
  7. ↑ "Chinese operated three types of POW camps for Americans during the Korean War". April 1997. Retrieved 30 March 2013.
  8. ↑ Kyung Seop OH, Yeo Sang YOON, Seon Haeng HUR (2008). A Comprehensive Report on the Issue of Unrepatriated South Korean POWs Held in North Korea. Database Center for North Korean Human Rights. pp. 32-35. http://www.scribd.com/doc/16682782/Comprehensive-Report-on-the-Issue-of-Unrepatriated-South-Korean-POWs-Held-in-North-Korea
  9. 1 2 Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/7c4d08d9b287a42141256739003e636b/6fef854a3517b75ac125641e004a9e68
  10. ↑ Walter G. HERMES, 1992. "Truce Tent and Fighting Front: The United States Army in the Korean War," CHAPTER VII Prisoners of War. http://www.history.army.mil/books/korea/truce/ch7.htm
  11. ↑ Walter G. HERMES, 1992. "Truce Tent and Fighting Front: The United States Army in the Korean War," CHAPTER XX Leader of the Opposition. http://www.history.army.mil/books/korea/truce/ch20.htm
  12. ↑ http://academic.naver.com/view.nhn?doc_id=10519626 International Human Rights League of Korea (1994). "북한억류 한국군 포로들의 실태보고서 (Report on the Situation of South Korean Prisoners of War Detained in North Korea)." 정책과학연구 (Policy Science Research). vol. 6(1994.Dec). 단국대학교 정책과학연구소 (Dankuk University Policy Science Research Center). pp.185-195
  13. 1 2 3 Lee Keum-Soon, Kim Soo-Am, Lim Soon-Hee, Choi Jin-Wook, 2008. 2008 White Paper on Human Rights in North Korea. Korea Institute for National Unification http://www.kinu.or.kr/report/report_03_01.jsp?page=1&num=26&mode=view&field=&text=&order=&dir=&bid=DATA04&ses=&category=2672
  14. ↑ "U.S. Knew in 1953 North Koreans Held American P.O.W.'s.". New York Times. September 17, 1996.
  15. ↑ http://internationalrelations.house.gov/archives/109/ho042706.pdf Testimony given by Lt. Cho Chang-ho to the United States House of Representatives, International Relations Committee on April 27, 2006
  16. ↑ Prisoners of War: U.S. Soldiers as POWs http://www.answers.com/topic/prisoners-of-war-u-s-soldiers-as-pows
  17. ↑ United States of America Korean War Commemoration. Korean War Commemoration Web site. Fact Sheet: POWs in the Korean War. http://korea50.army.mil/history/factsheets/pow.shtml
  18. ↑ US Senate Report 848. Korean War Atrocities. Jan. 11 1954. US Govt. Printing Office http://www.aiipowmia.com/usg/senate848atrocities.pdf
  19. ↑ Bert Kortegaard. 1952 POW Olympics. http://www.kmike.com/POW_Olympics/pow/POW_Olympics_Names.htm
  20. ↑ Brooke, James (August 23, 2005). "Red Cross Officials to Discuss P.O.W.'s Still Alive in North Korea". New York Times.
  21. ↑ POWs in N. Korea Believed to Have Been Sent to Coal Mines http://www.arirang.co.kr/News/News_View.asp?code=Ne2&nseq=90190
  22. 1 2 Kyung Seop OH, Yeo Sang YOON, Seon Haeng HUR (2008). A Comprehensive Report on the Issue of Unrepatriated South Korean POWs Held in North Korea. Database Center for North Korean Human Rights. http://www.scribd.com/doc/16682782/Comprehensive-Report-on-the-Issue-of-Unrepatriated-South-Korean-POWs-Held-in-North-Korea
  23. ↑ 탐사기획: 잊혀긴 국군포로 (Special Investigative Report on the South Korean POWs held in North Korea). June 22–26, 2005, The Segye Ilbo, Korea http://www.segye.com/Articles/Issue/Inquiry/DetailTamsa.asp?page=2&subctg1=&subctg2=&sid=4000028
  24. 1 2 Tears of Blood: A Korean POW's Fight for Freedom, Family, and Justice
  25. ↑ "Repatriation of POWs Sought on 50th Anniv. of Korean War." Korea Times (Seoul, Korea). Jan 28 2000 issue. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-65535014.html This article can also be searched for at the Korea Integrated Newspaper Database(http://www.kinds.or.kr/) using the date and title.
  26. ↑ Alisha RYU (2000) "KOREAS - SPY REPATRIATION." From the Voice of America Correspondent Report. http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/dprk/2000/dprk-000901b.htm
  27. ↑ Jun Kwanwoo (January 9, 2006). "N Korea prisoner demand stuns Seoul". The Standard.
  28. ↑ ("Seoul Considering task force on POWs" Korea Herald, Feb. 23, 2008)
  29. ↑ Ser Myo-ja. "Lack of POW deal called ‘criminal’." Joongang Daily News, October 5, 2007. http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2881147
  30. ↑ Jung Sung-ki. "N. Korea Rebuffs Calls for Rights Improvement" Korea Times, March 5, 2008. http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/06/116_20195.html
  31. ↑ September 2008, Unification Ministry of Korea, "Policy of Mutual Benefits and Common Prosperity" page 34.http://www.unikorea.go.kr/eng/default.jsp?pgname=LIBpublications
  32. ↑ YANG Jung A. "President Lee Should Bring Freedom and Human Rights to North Korean People." The DailyNK, 2008-03-07. http://www.dailynk.com/english/read.php?cataId=nk00300&num=3359
  33. ↑ (The Korea Defense Daily, June 4, 2009) http://kookbang.dema.mil.kr/kdd/HearTypeView.jsp?writeDate=id&writeDateChk=20090604&menuCd=3004&menuSeq=1&kindSeq=6&menuCnt=30911
  34. ↑ "China sends S.Korean POW back to N.Korea", Agence France-Presse, 2010-07-27, retrieved 2010-07-28
  35. ↑ Um, Han-ah (2010-08-11), "Mr. Jung, Korean War POW, Sent Directly To Prison Camp", Open Radio for North Korea, retrieved 2010-08-13
  36. ↑ Kang, Ki-heon (2010-06-25), Memoir tells of 46 years as a POW in the North, retrieved 2010-06-27

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, February 09, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.