Kirov-class battlecruiser

For the World War II era class, see Kirov-class cruiser.
Kirov-class battlecruiser Frunze
Class overview
Builders: Baltic Shipyard, Leningrad
Operators:
Built: 1974–1998
In service: From 1980
Planned: 5
Completed: 4
Cancelled: 1
Active: 1 (1 undergoing modernization)
Retired: 2
General characteristics
Type: Heavy guided missile cruiser/battlecruiser with nuclear marine propulsion
Displacement:
  • 24,300 tons standard
  • 28,000 tons full load
Length: 252 m (827 ft)
Beam: 28.5 m (94 ft)
Draft: 9.1 m (30 ft)
Propulsion:
Speed: 32 knots (59 km/h; 37 mph)
Range:
  • 1,000 nmi (1,900 km; 1,200 mi) at 30 kn (56 km/h; 35 mph) (combined propulsion)
  • unlimited at 20 kn (37 km/h; 23 mph) on nuclear power
Complement: 710
Sensors and
processing systems:
  • Radars: (NATO reporting name):
  • Voskhod MR-800 (Top Pair) 3D search radar, foremast
  • Fregat MR-710 (Top Plate) 3D search radar, main mast
  • 2 × Palm Frond navigation radar, foremast
  • Sonar: Horse Jaw LF hull sonar
  • Horse Tail VDS (Variable Depth Sonar)
Electronic warfare
& decoys:
2 x PK-2 Decoy dispensers (400 rockets)
Armament:
Armour: 76 mm plating around reactor compartment, light splinter protection
Aircraft carried: 3 helicopters
Aviation facilities: Below-deck hangar

The Kirov-class battlecruiser is a class of nuclear-powered warship of the Russian Navy, the largest and heaviest surface combatant warships (i.e. not an aircraft carrier or amphibious assault ship) in operation in the world. Among modern warships, they are second in size only to large aircraft carriers, and of similar size to a World War I-era battleship. The official designation of the ship-type is "heavy nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser" (Russian: тяжёлый атомный ракетный крейсер). The ships are often referred to as battlecruisers by western defense commentators due to their size and general appearance.[3]

Originally built for the Soviet Navy, the class is named for the first of a series of 4 ships to be constructed, Kirov, which was renamed Admiral Ushakov in 1992. Original plans called for the construction of 5 ships, however the last was cancelled. In Russia this class of ship is usually referred to by the designation Project 1144 Orlan (sea eagle). Only Pyotr Velikiy is currently operational. Admiral Nakhimov is projected to re-enter the Russian Navy in 2018. Russia planned to reactivate the remaining two vessels by 2020,[2][4] but recent reporting suggests that the reactors in Admiral Ushakov and Admiral Lazarev are in a poor condition, and these ships cannot be safely reactivated.[5][6][7]

The appearance of the Kirov class played a key role in the recommissioning of the Iowa-class battleships by the United States Navy in the 1980s.[8][9][10]

The Kirov hull design also was used for the nuclear-powered SSV-33 command ship Ural.

Design

Armament

Admiral Ushakov (ex-Kirov), lead ship of the class.

The Kirov class's main weapons are 20 P-700 Granit (SS-N-19 Shipwreck) missiles mounted in deck, designed to engage large surface targets. Air defense is provided by twelve octuple S-300F launchers with 96 missiles and a pair of Osa-MA batteries with 20 missiles each. Pyotr Velikiy carries some S-300FM missiles and is the only ship in the Russian Navy capable of ballistic missile defence.[2] The ships had some differences in sensor and weapons suites: Kirov came with SS-N-14 anti-submarine warfare (ASW) missiles, while on subsequent ships these were replaced with 9K331 Tor surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems. The Tor installation is in fact mounted further forward of the old SS-N-14 mounting, in the structure directly behind the blast shield for the bow mounted RBU ASW rocket launcher. Kirov and Frunze had eight 30 mm (1.2 in) AK-630 close-in weapon systems, which were supplanted with the Kashtan air-defence system on later ships.

Other weapons are the automatic 130 mm (5 in) AK-130 gun system (except in Kirov which had two single 100 mm (4 in) guns instead), 10 21-inch (533 mm) torpedo/missile tubes (capable of firing SS-N-15 ASW missiles on later ships) and Udav-1 with 40 anti-submarine rockets and two sextuple RBU-1000 launchers.

Fire control

Aerial port view of the foredeck of Kalinin illustrating the differences from the lead ship of the class.
  2 Kashtan point defense gun/missile system
  2 SA-N-9 vertical SAM launchers
Aerial starboard view of the foredeck of Kirov.
  4 single 30mm Gatling guns
  2 pop-up (lowered) SA-N-4 SAM launchers
  20 SS-N-19 cruise missile launchers
  12 SA-N-6 SAM launchers
  1 twin SS-N-14 antisubmarine warfare/surface-to-surface missile launcher

Deployment

The Russian flagship Pyotr Veliky

The lead ship, Kirov (renamed Admiral Ushakov in 1992 after the dissolution of the Soviet Union) was laid down in June 1973 at Leningrad's Baltiysky Naval Shipyard, launched on 27 December 1977 and commissioned on 30 December 1980. When she appeared for the first time in 1981, NATO observers called her BALCOM I (Baltic Combatant I).

Kirov suffered a reactor accident in 1990 while serving in the Mediterranean Sea. Repairs were never carried out, due to lack of funds and the changing political situation in the Soviet Union.

In 1983, a command and control ship, the SSV-33 Ural was launched, although the ship would not be officially commissioned until 1989. She utilized the basic hull design of the Kirov-class vessels, but with a modified superstructure, different armament, and was intended for a different role within the Soviet Navy. Ural was decommissioned and laid up in 2001, due to high operating costs, and is scheduled to be scrapped in 2017.

Frunze, the second vessel in the class, was commissioned in 1984. She was assigned to the Pacific Fleet. In 1992, she was renamed Admiral Lazarev. The ship became inactive in 1994 and was decommissioned four years later. She is currently in reserve. On 19 September 2009, General Popovkin, Deputy MOD for Armaments, said the MOD is looking into bringing Admiral Lazarev back into service.[11]

Kalinin, now Admiral Nakhimov, was the third ship to enter service, in 1988. She was also assigned to the Northern Fleet. Renamed Admiral Nakhimov, she was mothballed in 1999 and reactivated in 2005. She is in overhaul at Severodvinsk Shipyard.

Construction of the fourth ship, Yuriy Andropov, encountered many delays; her construction was started in 1986 but was not commissioned until 1998. She was renamed Pyotr Veliky (Peter the Great) in 1992.[12] She currently serves as the flagship of the Russian Northern Fleet.

On 23 March 2004, English language press reported the Russian Navy Commander-in-Chief, Fleet Admiral Vladimir Kuroedov said Pyotr Veliky's reactor was in an extremely bad condition and could explode "at any moment", a statement which may have been the result of internal politics within the Russian Navy.[13] The ship was sent to port for a month, and the crew lost one-third of their pay.

A fifth Kirov-class cruiser was planned; originally named Fleet Admiral of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov (also reported as Dzerzhinsky), the ship was never laid down.[12] The name was later changed to Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya (October Revolution),[14] and then just Kuznetsov;[15] finally, on 4 October 1990, the plan for a fifth ship was abandoned.[12]

Ships

Name Namesake Builder Laid down Launched Commissioned Fate
Admiral Ushakov
(ex-Kirov)
Admiral Fyodor Fyodorovich Ushakov Baltiysky Zavod, Leningrad 27 March 1974 26 December 1977 30 December 1980 In reserve
Admiral Lazarev
(ex-Frunze)
Admiral Mikhail Petrovich Lazarev 27 July 1978 26 May 1981 31 October 1984 In reserve
Admiral Nakhimov
(ex-Kalinin)
Admiral Pavel Stepanovich Nakhimov 17 May 1983 25 April 1986 30 December 1988 Undergoing refit.[16]
Pyotr Velikiy
(ex-Yuriy Andropov)
Tsar Imperator Vserossiyskiy Pyotr Velikiy 11 March 1986 29 April 1989 9 April 1998 Active in service
Admiral Flota Sovetskogo
Soyuza Kuznetsov

(ex-Dzerzhinsky, ex-Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya)
Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Soyuza Nikolay Gerasimovich Kuznetsov N/A Cancelled 4 October 1990

The Russian Navy initially planned to return both Admiral Ushakov and Admiral Lazarev to service after several years of disuse. However, it was later indicated that the condition of the reactor cores of both ships was such that it would prove difficult, expensive and potentially dangerous to remove the spent nuclear fuel and repair the cores. As a consequence, it is likely that both ships will be scrapped.[5][6][7]


The flight deck of Kalinin showing the hangar doors open and a Ka-25 and a Ka-27.

See also

References

  1. Archived February 23, 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Russian Warship Tests Missile Defense Capability". RIA Novosti. 20 September 2012.
  3. Armi da guerra, De Agostini, Novara, 1985.
  4. "Upgraded Nuclear Cruiser to Rejoin Russian Navy in 2018 | Defense". RIA Novosti. 2013-06-13. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
  5. 1 2 "Only one nuclear cruiser to be modernized". Barentsobserver. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
  6. 1 2 "Shipyard director fears radiation accident". Barentsobserver. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
  7. 1 2 "Only one nuclear cruiser to be modernized". Barentsobserver. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
  8. Middleton, Drew (1981-03-13). "Pentagon likes budget proposal, but questions specifics". The New York Times. p. A14.
  9. Bishop, p. 80.
  10. Miller and Miller, p. 114.
  11. Agentsvo Natsionalnykh Novostey (Russian) 19 September 2009
  12. 1 2 3 Ударные корабли, Том 11, часть 1, Ю.В. Апалков, Галея Принт, Санкт-Петербург, 2003
  13. "Kuroyedov declares 'Peter the Great' could explode 'at any moment'". Bellona. Retrieved 2011-12-28.
  14. John Pike (2012-03-19). "Kirov Class - Project 1144.2". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
  15. John Pike. "Kirov Class - Project 1144.2". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2014-02-09.
  16. "Russian Shipyard Sevmash Ordered New Equipment for Overhaul of Kirov Class Cruiser Nakhimov". 6 January 2015.

Bibliography

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Kirov class battlecruiser.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, February 14, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.