Hong Kong local elections, 2011

Hong Kong local elections, 2011

6 November 2011

All Elected Constituencies 412 (of the 507) seats in all 18 Districts Councils Turnout 41.49%   First party Second party Third party   Leader Tam Yiu-chung Albert Ho Bruce Liu Party DAB Democratic ADPL Alliance Pro-Beijing Pro-democracy Pro-democracy Last election 115 seats, 25.73% 59 seats, 15.38% 17 seats, 4.60% Seats won 136 47 15 Seat change 17 3 1 Popular vote 282,119 205,716 45,453 Percentage 23.89% 17.42% 3.85% Swing 1.84pp 2.04pp 0.75pp   Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party   CF Leader Ho Hau-cheung Cheng Yiu-tong Miriam Lau Party Civil Force FTU Liberal Alliance Pro-Beijing Pro-Beijing Pro-Beijing Last election 18 seats, 2.71% 1 seat, 0.37% 14 seats, 4.39% Seats won 15 11 9 Seat change 3 7 3 Popular vote 35,221 36,646 23,408 Percentage 2.98% 3.10% 1.98% Swing 0.27pp 2.73pp 2.41pp

Map of the winning party by constituency

The 2011 Hong Kong District Council elections were held on 6 November 2011. Elections were held to all 18 District Councils of Hong Kong, returning 412 members from directly elected constituencies, each selecting a council member.^[1] The pro-Beijing camp won the most seats from this election while the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong remained the biggest winner by taking 136 seats.

Background

The Pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong has been urging for universal suffrage for decades. In 2005, a constitutional reform package was carried out by Donald Tsang, the Chief Executive. However, it was voted down by the pan-democrats as it did not state a clear timetable or road map to achieve an ultimate universal suffrage.

On 29 December 2007, the NPCSC (China's Standing Committee of the National People's Congress) announced that the Chief Executive and all members of Legislative Council may be selected by universal suffrage in 2017 and 2020 respectively. The statement by Beijing was unclear and it implied the term "universal suffrage" may be defined by the Central Government.

Afterward, Donald Tsang carried out another reform package in 2009. While the Civic Party and the League of Social Democrats councilors resigned from Legislative Council in order to launch a de facto referendum against the package and urging for real universal suffrage, their ally, the Democratic Party went for negotiation with the mainland officials and carried out a revised proposal. On 24–25 June 2010, the revised package was passed through the Legislative Council. It brought out a major split within the pan-democracy camp. A new radical party, People Power led by Wong Yuk-man and Albert Chan was announced to punish those who betrayal the cause of democracy.^[2] The People Power sent total number of 62 candidates into the election, most of them chose to contest with the Democratic Party and ADPL candidates.

According to the new reform package, general public are allowed to elect district council members into LegCo from the new five-seat district council functional constituency following their nomination within the councillors in the 2012 election. District councils election thus become a new battlefield for the new five seats of LegCo in which many heavyweights chose to run for a seat for the super seats of LegCo including Chan Yuen-han, Ronny Tong and Lee Cheuk-yan.

Pre-election controversies

Political donations

Just one month before the election in October 2011, a leaked document revealed that Jimmy Lai, media mogul of Apple Daily has long been donating money to many supporters of democracy groups.^[3] For example, the Democratic Party received HK$13,690,000 from 2006 to 2010. While the Civic Party received HK$14,566,500 for the same period.^[3] Democracy supporter Catholic Cardinal Joseph Zen was also seen receiving more than HK$20 million,^[3] and the radical League of Social Democrats received HK$1 million last year. Former chief secretary Anson Chan received HK$1.3 million from 2007 to 2009.^[3] According to Sina.com Lai was said to have donated about $10 million to democracy camp groups in a 5-year span.^[4] The Wall Street Journal saw this as part of "a fresh campaign to accuse pro-democracy politicians of being stooges of foreign powers".^[5]

Since 2009–2010 the top four political parties received a total of $70 million in donations.^[6] Pro-establishment political groups are known to receive handsome political donations from many prominent Hong Kong businessmen. Out of that sum more than half ($48,370,000) went to the DAB. This amount was also 2.5 times more than the next pro-Beijing camp, Liberal Party as well as 7 times more than the sum received by pro-democracy camp groups like Civic Party and Democratic party.^[6] The DAB received eight times the amount as the Democratic Party in 2009-10.^[5]

However, there is a serious shortage of people donating to the democracy camp parties. Other than Lai, there seems to be nobody else in HK donating to the democracy camps any more.^[6] According to Emily Lau, first there is definitely a question of transparency with regards to who is donating money.^[6] There is also the issue of revealing donors. The WSJ believed that the taboo on discussing the activities of the Communist Party of China implies the Hong Kong government will never pass a law governing political parties. It added: "As a result, donor transparency will never be mandated."^[5] The Communist Party of China bans and punishes people once they know who is donating to democracy camps.^[6] In this election, the well-financed pro-Beijing parties swept the polls.^[7]

Foreign domestic workers right of abode issues

Right of abode for foreign domestic workers in HK became an election issue as the Civic Party was closely identified with the legal advisers who represented one such Filipina.^[8] The court case Vallejos v. Commissioner of Registration was one of the primary case in 2011. Pro-Beijing DAB argued that 125,000 workers were eligible, and would cause unemployment in Hong Kong to rise from 3.5% to between 7 and 10%.^[9] The Pan-Democrats, particularly the Civic Party, were disadvantaged by this as many HK residents fear granting Filipinos permanent residency will affect them.^[10]

Results

A post-handover record of 1.2 million voters cast their ballots. The pro-Beijing DAB secured the most seats. Albert Ho held his seat, but many other pro-democracy camp heavyweights lost their seat including Tanya Chan, Ronny Tong and Lee Cheuk-yan.^[11] Democratic Party vice chairman Sin Chung-kai admitted that this was "a warning to the pro-democracy camp".^[7]

Results by district

Vote summary

Votes, of total, by camp

  Pro-Beijing (55.42%)

  Pan-democrats (39.34%)

  Other (5.24%)

Seats, of total, by camp

  Pro-Beijing (73.06%)

  Pan-democrats (25.00%)

  Other (1.94%)

Seat summary

Post-election issues

Following the election, pan-democrats complained of irregularities in voter registration records, and a number of candidates who lost in marginal seats made allegations of electoral fraud to the police. The government was criticised for failing to address the issue back in 2006 after alleged instances where multiple voters had registered under a same address surfaced. In defence, Chief Secretary Stephen Lam said that the matter was "investigated thoroughly five years ago", and that "no evidence of vote rigging were found".^[12] The police received 16 such complaints in 2011.^[13]

Among the irregularities alleged was that almost 100 voters in Central used registered offices and hotels as their home addresses.^[13] Democratic Party candidate, Winfield Chong, who lost by 24 votes, said six buildings in the Sai Wan constituency used by approximately 120 voters to register were either being demolished or had been demolished; Yeung Sui-yin, who lost the Belcher seat by 33 votes, filed a complaint with the police, also alleging ballot rigging.^[12][13]

ADPL candidate Lam Kin-man, who lost King's Park constituency by two votes, took up his complaint with the ICAC. Lam alleged that, for example, five registered voters at one flat in the constituency where he was candidate all had different surnames; none of the voters registered at seven flats were present or past owners.^[12][13] two units said to have been used for storage purposes each had 10 registered voters.^[14] Following up on the allegations, the ICAC mounted "Operation Wave Spray", according to which 22 suspects were found to have "provided false information about their residential addresses to election officers"; six of them were charged.^[15]

References

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to 2011 District Council Election in Hong Kong.

• 2011 District Councils Election Official website

Elections and referendums in Hong Kong Chief Executive elections 1996 2002 2005 2007 2012 2017 Election Committee elections 1998 2000 2002 2005 2006 2011 2016 Legislative elections 1985 1988 1991 1995 1996 1998 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 By-elections Sanitary Board and municipal elections 1888 1891 1894 1899 1901 1903 1906 1909 1912 1914 1915 1916 1917 1919 1920 1922 1923 1924 1926 1927 1929 1930 1932 (May) 1932 (Nov) 1933 1935 1936 1937 1939 1940 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1986 1989 1991 1995 District Council elections 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019 NPC elections 1997 2002 2008 2012 Referendums 1896