Gamow–Teller transition

A Gamow–Teller transition is a type of nuclear beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and antineutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin $S=1$ , leading to an angular momentum change $\Delta J = 0,\pm 1$ between the initial and final states of the nucleus. This is in contrast to a Fermi transition, in which the spins of the emitted particles couple to $S=0$ and so the angular momentum of the initial and final states are unchanged ( $\Delta J=0$ ). Gamow-Teller and Fermi transitions correspond to two different forms of leading order behavior of the weak interaction Hamiltonian in the non-relativistic limit: ^[1]

$\hat{H}_\text{int} = \begin{cases} G_{V}\hat{1} \hat{\tau} & \text{Fermi decay} \\ G_{A}\hat{\sigma} \hat{\tau} & \text{Gamow–Teller Decay} \end{cases}$

\hat{\tau}

= isospin transition matrix which turn protons to neutrons and vise-versa

\hat{\sigma}

= Pauli spin matrices, which lead to

\Delta J = 0,\pm 1

\hat{1}

= identity operator in spin space, leaving

J

unchanged.

G_{V}

= Weak vector coupling constant.

G_{A}

= Weak axial-vector coupling constant.

The theoretical work in describing these transitions was done between 1934 and 1936 by Nuclear Physicists George Gamow and Edward Teller at George Washington University.

The Weak Interaction and Beta Decay


Fermi's interaction showing the 4-point fermion vector current, coupled under Fermi's coupling constant, "Gf". Fermi's theory was the first theoretical effort in describing nuclear decay rates for beta decay. The Gamow–Teller theory was a necessary extension of Fermi's theory.

β decay had been first described theoretically by Fermi's original ansatz which was Lorentz-invariant and involved a 4-point fermion vector current. However, this did not incorporate Parity violation within the matrix element in Fermi's Golden Rule seen in weak interactions. The Gamow–Teller theory was necessary for the inclusion of parity violation by modifying the matrix element to include vector and axial-vector couplings of fermions. This formed the matrix element that completed the Fermi theory of β decay and described parity violation, neutrino helicity, muon decay properties along with the concept of lepton universality. Before the Standard Model of Particle Physics was developed, George Sudarshan and Robert Marshak, and also independently Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann, determined the correct tensor structure (vector minus axial vector, V − A) of the four-fermion interaction. From there modern electroweak theory was developed, which described the weak interaction in terms of massive Gauge Bosons which was required for describing high energy particle cross-sections.

Conservation rules for Beta Decay

Baryon number is conserved

B = \frac{n_q - n_{\bar{q}}}{3}

where

n_q

is the number of constituent quarks, and

n_{\overline{q}}

is the number of constituent antiquarks.

Beta decay just changes neutron to proton or, in the case of negative beta decay (electron capture) proton to neutron so the number of individual quarks don't change. It is only the baryon flavor that changes, here labelled as the isospin.

Up and down quarks have total isospin $I = \frac{1}{2}$ and isospin projections

I_\text{z} = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2} & \text{up quark} \\ -\frac{1}{2} & \text{down quark} \end{cases}

All other quarks have I = 0.

In general

I_\text{z} = \frac{1}{2} (n_\text{u} - n_\text{d})

Lepton number is conserved

L \equiv n_{\ell} - n_{\bar{\ell}}

so all leptons have assigned a value of +1, antileptons −1, and non-leptonic particles 0.

\begin{matrix} & \text{n} & \rightarrow & \text{p} & + & \text{e}^- & + & \bar{\nu}_\text{e} \\ L: & 0 & = & 0 & + & 1 & - & 1 \end{matrix}

Angular momentum

For allowed decays, the net orbital angular momentum is zero, hence only spin quantum numbers are considered.

The electron and antineutrino are fermions, spin-1/2 objects, therefore they may couple to total $S=1$ (parallel) or $S=0$ (anti-parallel).

For forbidden decays, orbital angular momentum must also be taken into consideration.

Fermi decay

In Fermi decay, the electron and neutrino emitted from the β-decay parent nucleus have spin vectors which are anti-parallel to one another.

This means

\Delta I = 0 \Rightarrow

no change in the total angular momentum of the nucleus

Examples

{}^{14}_8 \text{O}_6 \rightarrow {}^{14}_7 \text{N}^*_7 + \beta^+ + \nu_\text{e}

I_i = 0^+ \rightarrow I_f = 0^+ \Rightarrow \Delta I = 0

also $\Delta \pi = 0 \Rightarrow$ parity is conserved: $\pi (Y_{\ell\,m}) =(-1)^{\ell}$ .

{}^{14}_7 \text{N}^*_{7}

= excited state of N

Examples

{}^6_2 \text{He}_4 \rightarrow {}^6_3 \text{Li}_3 + \beta^- + \bar{\nu}_\text{e}

I_i = 0^+ \rightarrow I_f = 1^+ \Rightarrow \Delta I = 1

also $\Delta \pi = 0 \Rightarrow$ parity is conserved: $\pi (Y_{\ell\,m}) =(-1)^{\ell} \Rightarrow$ the final ⁶Li 1⁺ state has $L = 1$ and the $\beta + \bar{\nu}_\text{e}$ state has $S = 1$ states that couple to an even parity state.

Gamow–Teller Transition

In nuclear transitions governed by strong and electromagnetic interactions (which are invariant under parity), the physical laws would be the same if the interaction was reflected in a mirror. Hence the sum of a vector and a pseudovector is not meaningful. However, the weak force, which governs beta decay and the corresponding nuclear transitions, does depend on the chirality of the interaction, and in this case pseudovectors and vectors are added.

The Gamow–Teller Transition is a pseudovector transition, that is the selection rules for beta decay caused by such a transition involve no parity change of the nuclear state.^[2] The spin of the parent nucleus can either remain unchanged or change by ±1. However, unlike the Fermi Transition, transitions from spin 0 to spin 0 are excluded.

In terms of total nuclear angular momentum, the Gamow–Teller transition ( $I_i \rightarrow I_f$ ) is

\Delta I = I_f - I_i = \begin{cases} 0 & I_i = I_f = 0 \\ 1 & I_i = 0 \text{ and } I_f = 1 \end{cases}

Mixed Fermi and Gamow–Teller decay

Due to the existence of the 2 possible final states, each β decay is a mixture of the two decay types. This essentially means that some of the time the remaining nucleus is in an excited state and other times the decay is directly to the ground state. Unlike Fermi Transitions, Gamow–Teller Transitions occur via an operator that operates only if the initial nuclear wavefunction and final nuclear wavefunction are defined. The Isospin and Angular Momentum selection rules can be deduced from the operator and the identification of allowed and forbidden decays can be found. ^[3]

Examples

{}^{21}_{11} \text{Na}_{10} \rightarrow {}^{21}_{10} \text{Ne}_{11} + \beta^+ + \nu_\text{e}

I_i = \frac{3}{2}^+ \Rightarrow I_f = \frac{3}{2}^+ \Rightarrow \Delta I = 0

{}^{21}_{11} \text{Na}_{10} \rightarrow {}^{21}_{10} \text{Ne}^*_{11} + \beta^+ + \nu_\text{e}

I_i = \frac{3}{2}^+ \Rightarrow I_f = \frac{5}{2}^+ \Rightarrow \Delta I = 1

The above reaction involves "mirror" nuclei, nuclei in which the number of protons and neutrons is just interchange.

One can measure the angular distributions of β particles to determine what the mixture is between the two decay types (Fermi and Gamow–Teller).

The mixture can be expressed as a ratio of matrix elements (Fermi's golden rule relates transitions to matrix elements)

y \equiv \frac{g_\text{F} M_\text{F}}{g_\text{GT} M_\text{GT}}

^[4]

The interesting observation is that y for mirror nuclei is on the order of the value of y for neutron decay while non-mirror nuclear decays tend to be an order of magnitude less.

Physical Consequences

Conservation of Weak Vector Current

The Conservation of Vector Current hypothesis was created out of the Gamow–Teller theory. The Fermi decay is the result of a vector current and is dominant in the decay of the neutron to a proton while the Gamow–Teller decay is an axial-current transition. Conservation of Vector Current is the assumption that the weak vector current responsible for the decay is conserved. Another observation is that the Fermi transitions illustrate how the nucleons inside the nucleus interact as free particles despite being surrounded by mesons mediating the nuclear force. This is useful in considering the barrier tunnelling mechanism involved with alpha decay and in deriving the Geiger–Nuttall law.

Forbidden decays

The Fermi decays ( $\Delta I = 0$ ) are often referred to as the "superallowed" decays while Gamow–Teller ( $\Delta I = 1$ ) decays are simple "allowed" decays.

Forbidden decays are those which are substantially more improbable, due to parity violation, and as a result have long decay times.

Now the angular momentum (L) of the $\beta + \nu$ systems can be non-zero (in the center-of-mass frame of the system).

Below are the Observed Selection Rules for Nuclear Beta-Decay:^[5]

Transition	L	ΔI	Δπ
Fermi	0	0	0
Gamow–Teller	0	0, 1	0
first-forbidden (parity change)	1	0, 1, 2	1
second-forbidden (no parity change)	2	2, 3	0
third-forbidden (parity change)	3	3, 4	1
fourth-forbidden (no parity change)	4	4, 5	0

Each of the above have Fermi ( $S = 0$ ) and Gamow–Teller ( $S = 1$ ) decays.

So for the "first-forbidden" transitions you have

\vec{I} = \vec{L} + \vec{S} = \vec{1} + \vec{0} \Rightarrow \Delta I = 0,1

Fermi

and

\vec{I} = \vec{L} + \vec{S} = \vec{1} + \vec{1} \Rightarrow \Delta I = 0,1,2

Gamow–Teller

systems.

Notice that $\Delta \pi = 1 \Rightarrow$ (parity violating transition).

The half life of the decay increases with each order:^[6]

\begin{align} {}^{22}_{11} \text{Na}_{11} \left(3^+\right) &\rightarrow {}^{22}_{10} \text{Ne}_{12} \left(2^+\right) + \beta^+ + \nu_\text{e} & t_{1/2} &= 2.6\,\text{years} \\ {}^{115}_{49} \text{In}_{76} \left(\frac{9}{2}^+\right) &\rightarrow {}^{115}_{50} \text{Sn}_{75} \left(\frac{1}{2}^+\right) + \beta^- + \bar{\nu}_\text{e} & t_{1/2} &= 10^{14}\,\text{years} \end{align}

Decay rate

A calculation of the β emission decay rate is quite different from a calculation of α decay. In α decay the nucleons of the original nucleus are used to form the final state α particle (⁴He). In β decay the β and neutrino particles are the result of a nucleon transformation into its isospin complement (n → p or p → n). Below is a list of the differences:

the β electron and neutrino did not exist before the decay
The β electron and neutrino are relativistic (nuclear decay energy is usually not enough to make heavy α nucleus relativistic)
The light decay products can have continuous energy distributions. (before assuming the α carried away most of the energy was usually

a good approximation)

The β decay rate calculation was developed by Fermi in 1934 and was based on Pauli's neutrino hypothesis.

Fermi's Golden Rule says that the transition rate $W$ is given by a transition matrix element (or "amplitude") $M_{i,f}$ weighted by the phase space and Planck's constant $\hbar$ such that

W = \frac{2 \pi}{\hbar} \left| M_{i,f} \right|^2 \times \text{(Phase Space)} = \frac{\ln 2}{t_{1/2}}

From this analysis we can conclude that the Gamow–Teller nuclear transition from 0 → ±1 is a weak perturbation of the system's interaction Hamiltonian. This assumption appears to be true based on the very short time scale (10⁻²⁰ s) it takes for the formation of quasi-stationary nuclear states compared with the time it takes for a β decay (half lives ranging from seconds to days).

The matrix element between parent and daughter nuclei in such a transition is:

$\left| M_{i,f} \right|^2 = \left\langle \psi_\text{Daughter} \phi_\beta \psi_\nu \right| \hat{H}_\text{int} \left| \psi_\text{Parent} \right\rangle$

with the interaction Hamiltonian forming 2 separate states from the perturbation. ^[7]

$\hat{H}_\text{int} = \begin{cases} G_{V}\hat{1} \hat{\tau} & \text{Fermi decay} \\ G_{A}\hat{\sigma} \hat{\tau} & \text{Gamow–Teller Decay} \end{cases}$

References

↑ Samuel S.M. Wong (2004). Introductory Nuclear Physics (2nd Edition). p. 192.
↑ Franz Osterfeld. "Nuclear spin and isospin excitations". Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 491 (1992) - APS Journals.
↑ Samuel S.M. Wong (2004). Introductory Nuclear Physics (2nd Edition). p. 198.
↑ "The Fermi to Gamow–Teller mixing ratio of theβ+ decay of52Mn and time-reversal invariance". E. L. Saw and C. T. Yap. Retrieved 1988-11-3. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
↑ Samuel S.M. Wong (2004). Introductory Nuclear Physics (2nd Edition). p. 200.
↑ Willard F. Libby (1981). Radioactivity & particle physics and, Radioactive fallout & technology. University of California. p. 303.
↑ Samuel S.M. Wong (2004). Introductory Nuclear Physics (2nd Edition). p. 192.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, November 26, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.