Lehmer's conjecture

For Lehmer's conjecture about the non-vanishing of τ(n), see Ramanjuan's tau function.
For Lehmer's conjecture about Euler's totient function, see Lehmer's totient problem.

Lehmer's conjecture, also known as the Lehmer's Mahler measure problem, is a problem in number theory raised by Derrick Henry Lehmer.[1] The conjecture asserts that there is an absolute constant \mu>1 such that every polynomial with integer coefficients P(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x] satisfies one of the following properties:

There are a number of definitions of the Mahler measure, one of which is to factor P(x) over \mathbb{C} as

P(x)=a_0 (x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\cdots(x-\alpha_D),

and then set

\mathcal{M}(P(x)) = |a_0| \prod_{i=1}^{D} \max(1,|\alpha_i|).

The smallest known Mahler measure (greater than 1) is for "Lehmer's polynomial"

P(x)= x^{10}+x^9-x^7-x^6-x^5-x^4-x^3+x+1 \,,

for which the Mahler measure is the Salem number[2]

\mathcal{M}(P(x))=1.176280818\dots \ .

It is widely believed that this example represents the true minimal value: that is, \mu=1.176280818\dots in Lehmer's conjecture.[3][4]

Motivation

Consider Mahler measure for one variable and Jensen's formula shows that if P(x)=a_0 (x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\cdots(x-\alpha_D) then

\mathcal{M}(P(x)) = |a_0| \prod_{i=1}^{D} \max(1,|\alpha_i|).

In this paragraph denote m(P)=\log(\mathcal{M}(P(x)) , which is also called Mahler measure.

If P has integer coefficients, this shows that \mathcal{M}(P) is an algebraic number so m(P) is the logarithm of an algebraic integer. It also shows that m(P)\ge0 and that if m(P)=0 then P is a product of cyclotomic polynomials i.e. monic polynomials whose all roots are roots of unity, or a monomial polynomial of x i.e. a power x^n for some n .

Lehmer noticed[1][5] that m(P)=0 is an important value in the study of the integer sequences \Delta_n=\text{Res}(P(x), x^n-1)=\prod^D_{i=1}(\alpha_i^n-1) for monic P . If P does not vanish on the circle then \lim|\Delta_n|^{1/n}=\mathcal{M}(P) and this statement might be true even if P does vanish on the circle. By this he was led to ask

whether there is a constant c>0 such that m(P)>c provided P is not cyclotomic?,

or

given c>0, are there P with integer coefficients for which  0<m(P)<c ?

Some positive answers have been provided as follows, but Lehmer's conjecture is not yet completely proved and is still a question of much interest.

Partial results

Let P(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x] be an irreducible monic polynomial of degree D.

Smyth [6] proved that Lehmer's conjecture is true for all polynomials that are not reciprocal, i.e., all polynomials satisfying x^DP(x^{-1})\ne P(x).

Blanksby and Montgomery[7] and Stewart[8] independently proved that there is an absolute constant C>1 such that either \mathcal{M}(P(x))=1 or[9]

\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))\ge \frac{C}{D\log D}.

Dobrowolski [10] improved this to

\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))\ge C\left(\frac{\log\log D}{\log D}\right)^3.

Dobrowolski obtained the value C ≥ 1/1200 and asymptotically C > 1-ε for all sufficiently large D. Voutier obtained C ≥ 1/4 for D ≥ 2.[11]

Elliptic analogues

Let E/K be an elliptic curve defined over a number field K, and let \hat{h}_E:E(\bar{K})\to\mathbb{R} be the canonical height function. The canonical height is the analogue for elliptic curves of the function (\deg P)^{-1}\log\mathcal{M}(P(x)). It has the property that \hat{h}_E(Q)=0 if and only if Q is a torsion point in E(\bar{K}). The elliptic Lehmer conjecture asserts that there is a constant C(E/K)>0 such that

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge \frac{C(E/K)}{D} for all non-torsion points Q\in E(\bar{K}),

where D=[K(Q):K]. If the elliptic curve E has complex multiplication, then the analogue of Dobrowolski's result holds:

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge  \frac{C(E/K)}{D} \left(\frac{\log\log D}{\log D}\right)^3 ,

due to Laurent.[12] For arbitrary elliptic curves, the best known result is[12]

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge  \frac{C(E/K)}{D^3(\log D)^2},

due to Masser.[13] For elliptic curves with non-integral j-invariant, this has been improved to[12]

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge  \frac{C(E/K)}{D^2(\log D)^2},

by Hindry and Silverman.[14]

Restricted results

Stronger results are known for restricted classes of polynomials or algebraic numbers.

If P(x) is not reciprocal then

M(P) \ge M(x^3 -x - 1) \approx 1.3247

and this is clearly best possible.[15] If further all the coefficients of P are odd then[16]

M(P) \ge M(x^2 -x - 1) \approx 1.618 .

If the field Q(α) is a Galois extension of Q then Lehmer's conjecture holds.[16]

References

  1. 1 2 Lehmer, D.H. (1933). "Factorization of certain cyclotomic functions". Ann. Math. (2) 34: 461–479. doi:10.2307/1968172. ISSN 0003-486X. Zbl 0007.19904.
  2. Borwein, Peter (2002). Computational Excursions in Analysis and Number Theory. CMS Books in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag. p. 16. ISBN 0-387-95444-9. Zbl 1020.12001.
  3. Smyth (2008) p.324
  4. Everest, Graham; van der Poorten, Alf; Shparlinski, Igor; Ward, Thomas (2003). Recurrence sequences. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 104. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 30. ISBN 0-8218-3387-1. Zbl 1033.11006.
  5. David Boyd (1981). "Speculations concerning the range of Mahler's measure" Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 24(4)
  6. Smyth, C. J. (1971). "On the product of the conjugates outside the unit circle of an algebraic integer". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 3: 169–175. doi:10.1112/blms/3.2.169. Zbl 1139.11002.
  7. Blanksby, P. E.; Montgomery, H. L. (1971). "Algebraic integers near the unit circle". Acta Arith. 18: 355–369. Zbl 0221.12003.
  8. Stewart, C. L. (1978). "Algebraic integers whose conjugates lie near the unit circle". Bull. Soc. Math. France 106: 169–176.
  9. Smyth (2008) p.325
  10. Dobrowolski, E. (1979). "On a question of Lehmer and the number of irreducible factors of a polynomial". Acta Arith. 34: 391–401.
  11. Smyth (2008) p.326
  12. 1 2 3 Smyth (2008) p.327
  13. Masser, D.W. (1989). "Counting points of small height on elliptic curves". Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 117 (2): 247–265. Zbl 0723.14026.
  14. Hindry, Marc; Silverman, Joseph H. (1990). "On Lehmer's conjecture for elliptic curves". In Goldstein, Catherine. Sémin. Théor. Nombres, Paris/Fr. 1988-89. Prog. Math. 91. pp. 103–116. ISBN 0-8176-3493-2. Zbl 0741.14013.
  15. Smyth (2008) p.328
  16. 1 2 Smyth (2008) p.329

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, February 18, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.