Ellen D. Katz

Ellen D. Katz is an American law professor at the University of Michigan Law School. Katz has written "a significant body of scholarship on voting rights and election law"[1] and has also written and taught on equal protection, civil rights, and legal history.[2][3] A scholar of the Voting Rights Act, she wrote a widely cited empirical study of litigation under that act.[2]

Career

Katz received her B.A in history summa cum laude from Yale College in 1991, and her J.D. in 1994 from Yale Law School, where she was articles editor of the Yale Law Journal.[2] Katz served as a law clerk to Judge Judith W. Rogers of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and then for Justice David H. Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court.[2]

Katz was an attorney with the appellate sections of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division and Environment and Natural Resources Division before joining the Michigan Law faculty in 1999.[2][3]

Katz's work focuses on minority representation, political equality, and anti-discrimination law.[2] Katz's work has been published in various law journals, including the Michigan Law Review and the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.[3]

At Michigan, Katz has taught property, voting rights and election law, law and political participation, education law, and local government law, among other courses.[4]

Katz has been described as "a liberal law professor and a big fan of the Voting Rights Act of 1965," describing the act as "sacred."[5] However, she has also said that Congress should rework the current VRA,[5] and consider "whether the old remedies continue to be the right remedies at this moment going forward."[6] Richard L. Hasen described this as "remarkable" because of Katz's past defenses of the constitutionality of the VRA's section 5.[7]

Katz was a critic of the Supreme Court decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder in 2009, stating that its narrow statutory, rather than constitutional, ruling was "an improbable one"[8] that "allows just everybody involved in the case to declare victory."[9]

Katz is a critic of the Supreme Court's "congruence and proportionality" test for the congressional power of enforcement of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, arguing in her 2003 article Reinforcing Representation that the framers of these Reconstruction amendments intended Congress to have broader power.[10]

Katz has contributed to Richard L. Hasen's Election Law Blog.[11]

In Katz's 2009 article Withdrawal: The Roberts Court and the Retreat from Election Law, Katz examined four important election law decisions of the Roberts Court (Lopez Torres, Washington State Grange, Crawford, and Riley) and criticized the Court's "retreat from its longstanding role as the primary guardian of voting rights" as "coming close to embracing empty formalism."[12]

Katz is married to Daniel Halberstam, also a professor at the University of Michigan Law School.[13]

References

  1. ↑ Steven D. Schwinn, Katz on the Roberts Court and Election Law, Constitutional Law Prof Blog (Feb. 9, 2009).
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Faculty profile: Ellen D. Katz. University of Michigan Law School.
  3. 1 2 3 History and Traditions - Ellen D. Katz, University of Michigan Law School.
  4. ↑ Courses Taught by: Ellen D. Katz, University of Michigan Law School.
  5. 1 2 Adam Liptak, On Voting Rights, Test of History v. Progress, N.Y. Times (Apr. 27, 2009).
  6. ↑ Eliza Newlin Carney, Minority Voter Protection In The Age Of Obama, Nat'l J. (Feb. 16, 2011).
  7. ↑ Rick Hasen, NAMUDNO: Ellen Katz’s Transformation? Election L. Blog (Apr. 28, 2009 7:43 A.M.).
  8. ↑ Adam Liptak, Justices Retain Oversight by U.S. on Voting, N.Y. Times (June 22, 2009).
  9. ↑ Michael Doyle, Supreme Court eases Voting Rights Act regulations, McClatchy Newspapers (June 22, 2009).
  10. ↑ Will Trachman, The Danger of the Drafters' Intent: Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Need to Limit Congressional Power, FindLaw (Apr. 14, 2004) (commenting on Ellen D. Katz, Reinforcing Representation: Congressional Power to Enforce the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments in the Rehnquist and Waite Courts, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 2341 (2003)).
  11. ↑ Ellen D. Katz, Why Reauthorization is Different, Election L. Blog (June 20, 2006).
  12. ↑ Steven D. Schwinn, Katz on the Roberts Court and Election Law, Constitutional Law Prof Blog (Feb. 9, 2009) (commenting on Ellen D. Katz, Withdrawal: The Roberts Court and the Retreat from Election Law, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1615 (2009)).
  13. ↑ Wedding Announcement, Ellen Katz and Daniel Halberstam, N.Y. Times (Dec. 1, 1996).

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, August 07, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.