Reactions on surfaces

Reactions on surfaces are reactions in which at least one of the steps of the reaction mechanism is the adsorption of one or more reactants. The mechanisms for these reactions, and the rate equations are of extreme importance for heterogeneous catalysis. Via scanning tunneling microscopy, it is possible to observe reactions at the solid|gas interface in real space, if the time scale of the reaction is in the correct range.[1][2] Reactions at the solid|gas interface are in some cases related to catalysis.

Simple decomposition

If a reaction occurs through these steps:

A + S AS → Products

where A is the reactant and S is an adsorption site on the surface and the respective rate constants for the adsorption, desorption and reaction are k1, k−1 and k2, then the global reaction rate is:

r=-\frac {dC_A}{dt}=k_2 C_{AS}=k_2 \theta C_S

where:

C_S is highly related to the total surface area of the adsorbent: the greater the surface area, the more sites and the faster the reaction. This is the reason why heterogeneous catalysts are usually chosen to have great surface areas (in the order of a hundred m2/gram)

If we apply the steady state approximation to AS, then:

\frac {dC_{AS}}{dt}= 0 = k_1 C_A C_S (1-\theta)- k_2 \theta C_S -k_{-1}\theta C_S so \theta =\frac {k_1 C_A}{k_1 C_A + k_{-1}+k_2}

and

r=-\frac {dC_A}{dt}= \frac {k_1 k_2 C_A C_S}{k_1 C_A + k_{-1}+k_2}.

Note that, with K_1=\frac{k_1}{k_{-1}}, the formula was divided by k_{-1}.

The result is completely equivalent to the Michaelis–Menten kinetics. The rate equation is complex, and the reaction order is not clear. In experimental work, usually two extreme cases are looked for in order to prove the mechanism. In them, the rate-determining step can be:

k_2 \gg \ k_1C_A, k_{-1},\text{ so }r \approx k_1 C_A C_S.

The order respect to A is 1. Examples of this mechanism are N2O on gold and HI on platinum

k_2 \ll \ k_1C_A, k_{-1}\text{ so }\theta =\frac {k_1 C_A}{k_1 C_A + k_{-1}}

which is just Langmuir isotherm and r= \frac {K_1 k_2 C_A C_S}{K_1 C_A+1}.

Depending on the concentration of the reactant the rate changes:

  • Low concentrations, then r= K_1 k_2 C_A C_S, that is to say a first order reaction in component A.
  • High concentration, then r= k_2 C_S. It is a zeroth order reaction in component A.

Bimolecular reaction

Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism

In this mechanism, suggested by Irving Langmuir in 1921 and further developed by Cyril Hinshelwood in 1926, two molecules adsorb on neighboring sites and the adsorbed molecules undergo a bimolecular reaction:[3]

A + S AS
B + S BS
AS + BS → Products

The rate constants are now k_1,k_{-1},k_2,k_{-2} and k for adsorption/desorption of A, adsorption/desorption of B, and reaction. The rate law is: r=k \theta_A \theta_B C_S^2

Proceeding as before we get \theta_A=\frac{k_1C_A\theta_E}{k_{-1}+kC_S\theta_B}, where \theta_E is the fraction of empty sites, so \theta_A+\theta_B+\theta_E=1. Let us assume now that the rate limiting step is the reaction of the adsorbed molecules, which is easily understood: the probability of two adsorbed molecules colliding is low. Then \theta_A=K_1C_A\theta_E, with K_i=k_i/k_{-i}, which is nothing but Langmuir isotherm for two adsorbed gases, with adsorption constants K_1 and K_2. Calculating \theta_E from \theta_A and \theta_B we finally get

r=k C_S^2 \frac{K_1K_2C_AC_B}{(1+K_1C_A+K_2C_B)^2}.

The rate law is complex and there is no clear order respect to any of the reactants but we can consider different values of the constants, for which it is easy to measure integer orders:

That means that 1 \gg K_1C_A, K_2C_B, so r=k C_S^2 K_1K_2C_AC_B. The order is one respect to both the reactants

In this case K_1C_A, 1 \gg K_2C_B, so r=k C_S^2 \frac{K_1K_2C_AC_B}{(1+K_1C_A)^2}. The reaction order is 1 respect to B. There are two extreme possibilities now:

  1. At low concentrations of A, r=k C_S^2 K_1K_2C_AC_B, and the order is one respect to A.
  2. At high concentrations, r=k C_S^2 \frac{K_2C_B}{K_1C_A}. The order is minus one respect to A. The higher the concentration of A, the slower the reaction goes, in this case we say that A inhibits the reaction.

One of the reactants has very high adsorption and the other one doesn't adsorb strongly.

K_1C_A \gg 1, K_2C_B, so r=k C_S^2 \frac{K_2C_B}{K_1C_A}. The reaction order is 1 with respect to B and −1 with respect to A. Reactant A inhibits the reaction at all concentrations.

The following reactions follow a Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism:[4]

Eley–Rideal mechanism

In this mechanism, proposed in 1938 by D. D. Eley and E. K. Rideal, only one of the molecules adsorbs and the other one reacts with it directly from the gas phase, without adsorbing ("nonthermal surface reaction"):

A(g) + S(s) AS(s)

AS(s) + B(g) → Products

Constants are k_1, k_{-1} and k and rate equation is r = k C_S \theta_A C_B. Applying steady state approximation to AS and proceeding as before (considering the reaction the limiting step once more) we get r=kC_S C_B\frac{K_1C_A}{K_1C_A+1}. The order is one respect to B. There are two possibilities, depending on the concentration of reactant A:

  • At low concentrations of A, r=kC_S K_1C_AC_B, and the order is one with respect to A.
  • At high concentrations of A, r=kC_S C_B, and the order is zero with respect to A.

The following reactions follow an Eley–Rideal mechanism:[4]

See also

References

  1. Wintterlin, J.; Völkening, S.; Janssens, T. V. W.; Zambelli, T.; Ertl, G. (1997). "Atomic and Macroscopic Reaction Rates of a Surface-Catalyzed Reaction". Science 278: 1931–4. doi:10.1126/science.278.5345.1931. PMID 9395392.
  2. Waldmann, T.; et al. (2012). "Oxidation of an Organic Adlayer: A Bird's Eye View". Journal of the American Chemical Society 134: 8817–8822. doi:10.1021/ja302593v.
  3. Keith J. Laidler and John H. Meiser Physical Chemistry (Benjamin/Cummings 1982) p.780 ISBN 0-8053-5682-7
  4. 1 2 Grolmuss, Alexander. "A 7: Mechanismen in der heterogenen Katalyse" [A7: Mechanisms in Heterogeneous Catalysis] (in German). Archived from the original on 3 October 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, December 29, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.