Edwin Stead
| Personal information | |
|---|---|
| Full name | Edwin Stead |
| Born |
1701 Harrietsham, Kent, England |
| Died |
28 August 1735 London, England |
| Batting style | unknown hand |
| Bowling style | underarm: unknown hand and type |
| Role | patron |
| Domestic team information | |
| Years | Team |
| c.1720–1735 | Dartford Cricket Club |
| c.1720–1735 | Kent |
| Career statistics | |
|
| |
| Source: H. T. Waghorn, 31 May 2008 | |
Edwin Stead (aka Edward Stead) (1701, Harrietsham, Kent – 28 August 1735, London) was a noted patron of English cricket, particularly of Kent teams in the early years of major cricket.[fc 1][fc 2]
Cricket career
Stead, a landowner, was a compulsive gambler who frequently bet on the outcome of cricket matches.[1] Like other patrons, he sought to improve his chances of winning by underwriting select XIs usually made up of players from several Kent parish teams; his teams were therefore of, or near enough, county strength.[2] Dartford Cricket Club, which featured William Bedle, had arguably the best parish team in the game at the time and it is certain that Stead used several Dartford players in his Kent teams, of which he was also the captain.[3]
Stead's teams are recorded in several significant matches from 1724 to 1730.[4] His first known match was probably at Chingford in 1724[5] and it became the subject of a court case after the Chingford team refused to play to a finish when Kent had the advantage.[6] The court, presided over by Lord Chief Justice Pratt, ruled that the match must be played out so that all wagers could be fulfilled. The match resumed and was completed at Dartford Brent on 5 September 1726, though it seems that was not the original venue.[7] A week earlier, on 29 August 1726, Kent had played a combined London and Surrey team on Kennington Common for 25 guineas but the result is unknown.[7]
Stead was a strong rival to the two major Sussex patrons, Sir William Gage and the 2nd Duke of Richmond.[8] He was very successful in 1728 when the report of a game in August said of Kent's latest victory: "the third time this summer that the Kentish men have been too expert for those of Sussex".[9] But Stead was less successful on 28 August the following year when Gage's XI defeated Kent by an innings at Penshurst Park.[10] There was a return match in September, probably at Lewes, but the result is unknown.[11]
The last definite mentions of Stead in a cricket context are in 1730 concerning his presence at certain matches, although Kent remained prominent in the records for the last five years of his life.[12]
Personal life and early death
Edwin Stead was the grandson of Sir Edwyn Stede (sic), who had been knighted by Charles II. He inherited the family estate when he was still only eighteen and became a compulsive gambler, being a keen player of dice and cards in addition to cricket, but Marshall's summary is that "he is said to have lost heavily at all".[13]
Stead's death on 28 August 1735 was reported in the Grub Street Journal on Thursday, 4 September 1735. The report says there were two accounts of his death: one that he died "near Charing Cross"; the other that he died "in Scotland Yard".[14]
Footnotes
- ↑ Note that surviving match records to 1825 are incomplete and any statistical compilation of a player's career in that period is based on known data. Match scorecards were not always created, or have been lost, and the matches themselves were not always recorded in the press or other media. Scorecard data was not comprehensive: e.g., bowling analyses lacked balls bowled and runs conceded; bowlers were not credited with wickets when the batsman was caught or stumped; in many matches, the means of dismissal were omitted.
- ↑ The term "major cricket" deserves some qualification. It is not limited to "first-class cricket" which is a misleading concept that is essentially statistical and may typically ignore the more important historical aspect of a match if statistical information is missing, as is invariably the case re matches played prior to 1772. From that season, scorecards began to be created habitually and there is a continuous and adequate, though incomplete, statistical record commencing in 1772. Major cricket in the Stuart and Hanoverian periods includes both single wicket and eleven-a-side games. Features of these matches include high stakes, large crowds and evidence that the teams are representative of several parishes, perhaps of whole counties. Except in rare instances, village cricket in the shape of a match played between two parish teams, would be classified as minor.
References
- ↑ Birley, p. 19.
- ↑ Altham, p. 31.
- ↑ Underdown, pp. 42–43.
- ↑ Leach, John (2008). "Classification of cricket matches from 1697 to 1825". Stumpsite.
- ↑ Maun, p. 29.
- ↑ Underdown, p. 83.
- 1 2 Maun, p. 33.
- ↑ Marshall, p. 41.
- ↑ Waghorn, p. 7.
- ↑ Maun, p. 39.
- ↑ Maun, p. 40.
- ↑ Maun, p. 42.
- ↑ Marshall, p. 40.
- ↑ Buckley, p. 12.
Bibliography
- Altham, H. S. (1962). A History of Cricket, Volume 1 (to 1914). George Allen & Unwin.
- Birley, Derek (1999). A Social History of English Cricket. Aurum.
- Buckley, G. B. (1935). Fresh Light on 18th Century Cricket. Cotterell.
- Major, John (2007). More Than A Game. HarperCollins.
- Marshall, John (1961). The Duke who was Cricket. Muller.
- Maun, Ian (2009). From Commons to Lord's, Volume One: 1700 to 1750. Roger Heavens. ISBN 978-1-900592-52-9.
- McCann, Tim (2004). Sussex Cricket in the Eighteenth Century. Sussex Record Society.
- Underdown, David (2000). Start of Play. Allen Lane.
- Waghorn, H. T. (1906). The Dawn of Cricket. Electric Press.
External links
- "Dartford Cricket Club History". Dartford Cricket Club. 2012.
- Leach, John (2007). "From Lads to Lord's – profile of Edwin Stead". Stumpsite.