Double hermeneutic

The double hermeneutic is the theory, expounded by sociologist Anthony Giddens, that everyday "lay" concepts and those from the social sciences have a two-way relationship.^[1] A common example is the idea of social class, a social-scientific category that has entered into wide use in society. The double hermeneutic is held to be a distinguishing feature of the social sciences.

Giddens (1982) argues that there is an important difference between the natural and social sciences. In the natural sciences, scientists try to understand and theorise about the way the natural world is structured. The understanding is one-way; that is, while we need to understand the actions of minerals or chemicals, chemicals and minerals don’t seek to develop an understanding of us. He refers to this as the ‘single hermeneutic’. (Hermeneutic means interpretation or understanding.) In contrast, the social sciences are engaged in the ‘double hermeneutic’. The various social sciences study people and society, although the way they do so is different. Some social sciences such as sociology don’t just study what people do, they also study how people understand their world, and how that understanding shapes their practice. Because people can think, make choices, and use new information to revise their understandings (and hence their practice), they can use the knowledge and insights of social science to change their practice.

In outlining his notion of the ‘double hermeneutic’, Giddens (1984: 20) explains that while philosophers and social scientists have often considered the way “in which lay concepts obstinately intrude into the technical discourse of social science” that “Few have considered the matter the other way around.” He explains that “the concepts of the social sciences are not produced about an independently constituted subject-matter, which continues regardless of what these concepts are. The ‘findings’ of the social sciences very often enter constitutively into the world they describe” (Giddens 1984: 20).

References

↑ Anthony Giddens, Social Theory and Modern Sociology (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1987)

Science and technology studies

Economics	Economics of science Economics of scientific knowledge

History	History and philosophy of science History of science and technology History of technology

Philosophy	Antipositivism Empiricism Fuzzy logic Philosophy of science Philosophy of social science Philosophy of technology Positivism Postpositivism Social constructivism Social epistemology

Sociology	Actor–network theory Social construction of technology shaping of technology Sociology of knowledge scientific Sociology of scientific ignorance Sociology of the history of science Strong programme

Science studies	Antiscience Bibliometrics Boundary-work Consilience Demarcation problem Double hermeneutic Mapping controversies Paradigm shift Pseudoscience Science citizen communication education normal post-normal rhetoric wars Scientific method consensus controversy Scientometrics Team science Traditional knowledge ecological Unity of science Women in science STEM

Technology studies	Coproduction Cyborg anthropology Digital anthropology Dematerialization Early adopter Innovation diffusion disruptive linear model system user Leapfrogging Normalization process theory Reverse salient Sociotechnical system Technical change Technoscience feminist Technological change convergence determinism revolution transitions Technology and society critique of dynamics theories of transfer Engineering studies Women in engineering

Policy	Digital divide Evidence-based policy Factor 10 Science policy history of science of Politicization of science Regulation of science Socio-scientific issues Technology assessment Technology policy Transition management

Portals Science History of science Technology Sociology Category Associations Journals Scholars

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, November 19, 2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.

Double hermeneutic

See also

References