Data fusion
Data fusion is the process of integration of multiple data and knowledge representing the same real-world object into a consistent, accurate, and useful representation.
Data fusion processes are often categorized as low, intermediate or high, depending on the processing stage at which fusion takes place.[1] Low level data fusion combines several sources of raw data to produce new raw data. The expectation is that fused data is more informative and synthetic than the original inputs.
For example, sensor fusion is also known as (multi-sensor) data fusion and is a subset of information fusion.
Geospatial applications
In the geospatial (GIS) domain, data fusion is often synonymous with data integration. In these applications, there is often a need to combine diverse data sets into a unified (fused) data set which includes all of the data points and time steps from the input data sets. The fused data set is different from a simple combined superset in that the points in the fused data set contain attributes and metadata which might not have been included for these points in the original data set.
A simplified example of this process is shown below where data set "α" is fused with data set β to form the fused data set δ. Data points in set "α" have spatial coordinates X and Y and attributes A1 and A2. Data points in set β have spatial coordinates X and Y and attributes B1 and B2. The fused data set contains all points and attributes
Input Data Set α
| Point | X | Y | A1 | A2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α1 | 10 | 10 | M | N |
| α2 | 10 | 30 | M | N |
| α3 | 30 | 10 | M | N |
| α4 | 30 | 30 | M | N |
Input Data Set β
| Point | X | Y | B1 | B2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β1 | 20 | 20 | Q | R |
| β2 | 20 | 40 | Q | R |
| β3 | 40 | 20 | Q | R |
| β4 | 40 | 40 | Q | R |
Fused Data Set δ
| Point | X | Y | A1 | A2 | B1 | B2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ1 | 10 | 10 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ2 | 10 | 30 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ3 | 30 | 10 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ4 | 30 | 30 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ5 | 20 | 20 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ6 | 20 | 40 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ7 | 40 | 20 | M | N | Q | R |
| δ8 | 40 | 40 | M | N | Q | R |
In this simple case all attributes are uniform across the entire analysis domain, so attributes may be simply assigned. In more realistic applications, attributes are rarely uniform and some type of interpolation is usually required to properly assign attributes to the data points in the fused set.
In a much more complicated application, marine animal researchers use data fusion to combine animal tracking data with bathymetric, meteorological, sea surface temperature (SST) and animal habitat data to examine and understand habitat utilization and animal behavior in reaction to external forces such as weather or water temperature. Each of these data sets exhibit a different spatial grid and sampling rate so a simple combination would likely create erroneous assumptions and taint the results of the analysis. But through the use of data fusion, all data and attributes are brought together into a single view in which a more complete picture of the environment is created. This enables scientists to identify key locations and times and form new insights into the interactions between the environment and animal behaviors.
In the figure at right, rock lobsters are studied off the coast of Tasmania. Dr. Hugh Pederson of the University of Tasmania used data fusion software to fuse southern rock lobster tracking data (color-coded for in yellow and black for day and night, respectively) with bathymetry and habitat data to create a unique 4D picture of rock lobster behavior.
Data integration
In applications outside of the geospatial domain, differences in the usage of the terms Data integration and Data fusion apply. In areas such as business intelligence, for example, data integration is used to describe the combining of data, whereas data fusion is integration followed by reduction or replacement. Data integration might be viewed as set combination wherein the larger set is retained, whereas fusion is a set reduction technique with improved confidence.
The JDL/DFIG model
In the mid-1980s, the Joint Directors of Laboratories formed the Data Fusion Subpanel (which later became known as the Data Fusion Group). With the advent of the World Wide Web, data fusion thus included data, sensor, and information fusion. The JDL/DFIG introduced a model of data fusion that divided the various processes. Currently, the six levels with the Data Fusion Information Group (DFIG) model are:
Level 0: Source Preprocessing/subject Assessment
Level 1: Object Assessment
Level 2: Situation Assessment
Level 3: Impact Assessment (or Threat Refinement)
Level 4: Process Refinement
Level 5: User Refinement (or Cognitive Refinement)
Although the JDL Model (Level 1-4) is still in use today, it is often criticized for its implication that the levels necessarily happen in order and also for its lack of adequate representation of the potential for a human-in-the-loop. The DFIG model (Level 0 - 5) explored the implications of situation awareness, user refinement, and mission management.[2] Despite these shortcomings, the JDL/DFIG models are useful for visualizing the data fusion process, facilitating discussion and common understanding,[3] and important for systems-level information fusion design.[2]
Application areas
- Geospatial Information Systems
- Business intelligence
- Oceanography
- Discovery science
- Business performance management
- Intelligent transport systems
- Loyalty card
- Cheminformatics
- Bioinformatics
- Intelligence services
- Wireless sensor networks
- Biometrics
Position data fusion
The distance or position of an object can be measured with different sensors. By taking sensors based on different physical principles (magnetic, optical, mechanical) as well the resolution can be lowered as the bandwidth of measurement can be increased. Optimal filtering (in sense of minimizing some norm over a frequency) is a very effective tool used for combining sensor data in real-time. Applied methods with Matlab(TM) code and explanation can be found in the Master Thesis 'Sensor Fusion for Nanopositioning'.[4]
Data fusion from multiple traffic sensing modalities
The data from the different sensing technologies can be combined in intelligent ways to determine the traffic state accurately. A Data fusion based approach that utilizes the road side collected acoustic, image and sensor data has been shown to combine the advantages of the different individual methods.[5]
Decision Fusion
In many cases, geographically-dispersed sensors are severely energy- and bandwidth-limited. Therefore, the raw data concerning a certain phenomenon are often summarized in a few bits from each sensor. When inferring on a binary event (i.e., 
or 
), in the extreme case only binary decisions are sent from sensors to a Decision Fusion Center (DFC) and combined in order to obtain improved classification performance. [6][7][8]
See also
References
- ↑ Klein, Lawrence A. (2004). Sensor and data fusion: A tool for information assessment and decision making. SPIE Press. p. 51. ISBN 0-8194-5435-4.
- 1 2 Blasch, Erik P.; Bossé, Éloi; Lambert, Dale A. (2012). High-Level Information Fusion Management and System Design. Norwood, MA: Artech House Publishers. ISBN 978-1-6080-7151-7.
- ↑ Liggins, Martin E.; Hall, David L.; Llinas, James (2008). Multisensor Data Fusion, Second Edition: Theory and Practice (Multisensor Data Fusion). CRC. ISBN 978-1-4200-5308-1.
- ↑ Piri, Daniel (2014). "Sensor Fusion for Nanopositioning". Vienna, Austria: Vienna University of Technology. p. 140.
- ↑ Joshi, V., Rajamani, N., Takayuki, K., Prathapaneni, Subramaniam, L. V., (2013). Information Fusion Based Learning for Frugal Traffic State Sensing. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
- ↑ Ciuonzo, D.; Papa, G.; Romano, G.; Salvo Rossi, P.; Willett, P. (2013-09-01). "One-Bit Decentralized Detection With a Rao Test for Multisensor Fusion". IEEE Signal Processing Letters 20 (9): 861–864. doi:10.1109/LSP.2013.2271847. ISSN 1070-9908.
- ↑ Ciuonzo, D.; Salvo Rossi, P. (2014-02-01). "Decision Fusion With Unknown Sensor Detection Probability". IEEE Signal Processing Letters 21 (2): 208–212. doi:10.1109/LSP.2013.2295054. ISSN 1070-9908.
- ↑ Ciuonzo, D.; De Maio, A.; Salvo Rossi, P. (2015-09-01). "A Systematic Framework for Composite Hypothesis Testing of Independent Bernoulli Trials". IEEE Signal Processing Letters 22 (9): 1249–1253. doi:10.1109/LSP.2015.2395811. ISSN 1070-9908.
General references
- Hall, Dave L.; Llinas, James (1997). "Introduction to Multisensor Data Fusion". Proceedings of IEEE 85 (1): 6–23.
- Blasch, Erik; Kadar, Ivan; Salerno, John; Kokar, Mieczyslaw M.; Das, Subrata; Powell, Gerald M.; Corkill, Daniel D.; Ruspini, Enrique H. (2006). "Issues and Challenges in Situation Assessment (Level 2 Fusion)" (PDF). Journal of Advances in Information Fusion 1 (2).
Books
- Hall, David L.; McMullen, Sonya A. H. (2004). Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion, Second Edition. Norwood, MA: Artech House, Inc. ISBN 1-5805-3335-3.
- Mitchell, H. B. (2007). Multi-sensor Data Fusion – An Introduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-71463-7.
- Das, S. (2008). High-Level Data Fusion. Norwood, MA: Artech House Publishers. ISBN 978-1-59693-281-4.
External links
 |
Look up data fusion in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
- Sensordata Fusion, An Introduction
- International Society of Information Fusion
- Sensor Fusion for Nanopositioning