Congregation for the Causes of Saints

This article is part of a series on the
Roman Curia

The Congregation for the Causes of Saints (Latin: Congregatio de Causis Sanctorum) is the congregation of the Roman Curia that oversees the complex process that leads to the canonization of saints, passing through the steps of a declaration of "heroic virtues" and beatification. After preparing a case, including the approval of miracles, the case is presented to the Pope, who decides whether or not to proceed with beatification or canonization.

History

The predecessor of the congregation was the Sacred Congregation for Rites, founded by Pope Sixtus V on 22 January 1588 in the bull Immensa Aeterni Dei.[1] The congregation dealt both with regulating divine worship, and the causes of saints.

On 8 May 1969, Pope Paul VI issued the Apostolic Constitution Sacra Rituum Congregatio, dividing it into two congregations, the Congregation for the Divine Worship and one for the causes of saints. The latter was given three offices, those of the judiciary, the Promoter General of the Faith, and the historical-juridical.[1]

With the changes in the canonization process introduced by Pope John Paul II in 1983, a College of Relators was added to prepare the cases of those declared as Servants of God.[1] In January 2014, the Prefect of the Congregation announced that at the direction of Pope Francis those working on canonizations must adhere to financial guidelines to eliminate unfairness in the treatment of cases based on the financial resources provided.[2] According to L'Osservatore Romano, Pope Francis hoped to promote the causes of those less well-known, those from poorer regions, and victims of 20th-century.[3]

The current Prefect (appointed 9 July 2008) is Cardinal Angelo Amato, while the current Secretary (appointed 29 December 2010) is Archbishop Marcello Bartolucci. The current Under-Secretary is Fr. Bogusław Turek. The current Promoter of the Faith (Prelate Theologian) is Monsignor Carmelo Pellegrino, formerly a Relator in the Congregation;[4]

Current process

The steps for the recognition of the miracle follow the new rules laid down in 1983 by the apostolic constitution, Divinus Perfectionis Magister. The new legislation establishes two procedural stages: the diocesan one and that of what is known as the Roman Congregation. The first takes place within the diocese where the prodigious event happened. The bishop opens the enquiry on the presumed miracle in which the depositions of the eyewitnesses questioned by a duly constituted court are gathered, as well as the complete clinical and instrumental documentation inherent to the case. In the second, the Congregation examines the documents sent and eventual supplementary documentation, pronouncing its judgment on the matter.

Assessing miracles

The miracle may go beyond the possibilities of nature either in the substance of the fact or in the subject, or only in the way it occurs. So three degrees of miracle are to be distinguished. The first degree is represented by resurrection from the dead (quoad substantiam). The second concerns the subject (quoad subiectum): the sickness of a person is judged incurable, in its course it can even have destroyed bones or vital organs; in this case not only is complete recovery noticed, but even wholesale reconstitution of the organs (restitutio in integrum). There is then a third degree (quoad modum): recovery from an illness, that treatment could only have achieved after a long period, happens instantaneously.

Pre-Congregation

Martyrs

The decision as to the martyr having died for their faith in Christ, and the consequent permission of veneration, lay originally with the bishop of the place in which they had borne their testimony. The bishop inquired into the motive of the person's death and, finding they had died a martyr, sent their name with an account of their martyrdom to other churches, especially neighboring ones, so that, in event of approval by their respective bishops, the cultus of the martyr might extend to their churches also, and that the faithful, as we read of St. Ignatius in the "Acts" of his martyrdom[5] "might hold communion with the generous martyr of Christ" (generoso Christi martyri communicarent). Martyrs whose cause, so to speak, had been discussed, and the fame of whose martyrdom had been confirmed, were known as proved (vindicati) martyrs. As far as the word is concerned it may probably not antedate the fourth century, when it was introduced in the Church at Carthage; but the fact is certainly older. In the earlier ages, therefore, this veneration of the saints was entirely local and passed from one church to another with the permission of their bishops. This is clear from the fact that in none of the ancient Christian cemeteries are there found paintings of martyrs other than those who had suffered in that neighborhood. It explains, also, almost the universal veneration very quickly paid to some martyrs, e.g., St. Lawrence, St. Cyprian of Carthage, Pope St. Sixtus of Rome,[6]

Confessors

The veneration of confessors – of those, that is, who died peacefully after a life of heroic virtue – is not as ancient as that of the martyrs. It was in the fourth century, as is commonly held, that confessors were first given public ecclesiastical honour, though occasionally praised in ardent terms by earlier Fathers, and although an abundant reward (multiplex corona) is declared by St. Cyprian to be theirs.[7] This is confirmed by the implicit approval of St. Gregory the Great[8] and by well attested facts; in the East, for example, Hilarion,[9] Ephrem,[10] and other confessors were publicly honoured in the fourth century; and, in the West, St. Martin of Tours, from the oldest Breviaries and the Mozarabic Missal,[11] and St. Hilary of Poitiers, as can be shown from the very ancient Mass-book known as "Missale Francorum", were objects of a like cultus in the same century.[12]

The reason for this veneration lies, doubtless, in the resemblance of the confessors' self-denying and heroically virtuous lives to the sufferings of the martyrs; such lives could truly be called prolonged martyrdoms. Naturally, therefore, such honour was first paid to ascetics[13] and only afterwards to those who resembled in their lives the very penitential and extraordinary existence of the ascetics. So true is this that the confessors themselves are frequently called martyrs. St. Gregory Nazianzen calls St. Basil a martyr;[14] St. Chrysostom applies the same title to Eustachius of Antioch;[15] St. Paulinus of Nola writes of St. Felix of Nola that he won heavenly honours, sine sanguine martyr ("A bloodless martyr");[16] St. Gregory the Great styles Zeno of Verona as a martyr,[17] and Metronius gives to St Roterius[18] the same title. Later on, the names of confessors were inserted in the diptychs, and due reverence was paid them. Their tombs were honoured[19] with the same title (martyria) as those of the martyrs. It remained true, however, at all times that it was unlawful to venerate confessors without permission of the ecclesiastical authority as it had been so to venerate martyrs.[20]

Authority to canonize

For several centuries the bishops, or in some places only the primates and patriarchs,[21] could grant to martyrs and confessors public ecclesiastical honour; such honour, however, was always decreed only for the local territory over which the grantors held jurisdiction. Still, it was only the Bishop of Rome's acceptance of the cultus that made it universal, since he alone could permit or command in the Universal Church (the Catholic Church).[22] Abuses, however, crept into this form of discipline, due as well to indiscretions of popular fervour as to the carelessness of some bishops in inquiring into the lives of those whom they permitted to be honoured as saints.

Towards the close of the eleventh century the popes found it necessary to restrict episcopal authority on this point, and decreed that the virtues and miracles of persons proposed for public veneration should be examined in councils, more particularly in general councils. Urban II, Calixtus II, and Eugene III followed this line of action. It happened, even after these decrees, that "some, following the ways of the pagans and deceived by the fraud of the evil one, venerated as a saint a man who had been killed while intoxicated". Pope Alexander III (1159–81) took occasion to prohibit his veneration in these words: "For the future you will not presume to pay him reverence, as, even though miracles were worked through him, it would not allow you to revere him as a saint unless with the authority of the Roman Church".[23] Theologians do not agree as to the full import of this decretal. Either a new law was made,[24] in which case the pope then for the first time reserved the right of beatification, or a pre-existing law was confirmed. As the decretal did not put an end to all controversy, and some bishops did not obey it in as far as it regarded beatification (which right they had certainly possessed hitherto), Urban VIII published, in 1634, a bull which put an end to all discussion by reserving to the Holy See exclusively not only its immemorial right of canonization, but also that of beatification.

Partial list of pending cases

Blesseds (awaiting canonization following approved miracle)

Venerables (awaiting beatification following approved miracle)

Servants of God (awaiting declaration of heroic virtue)

Prefects of the Congregation for Rites since 1903

Prefects of the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints

Secretaries of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Congregation for the Causes of Saints". The Vatican.
  2. ↑ "Vatican introduces low-cost saints in the name of austerity". Vatican Insider. 14 January 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  3. ↑ "Vatican seeks to cut cost of canonizations". Catholic News Agency. 21 January 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  4. ↑ "The Pope appointed Msgr. Carmelo Pellegrino promoter of the Faith to the Congregation for the Causes of Saints". Vatican Radio. November 5, 2012.
  5. ↑ Ruinart, Acta Sincera Martyrum, 19
  6. ↑ Duchesne (1903), Origines du culte chrétien (in French), Paris, FR, p. 284.
  7. ↑ De Zelo et Livore, col. 509; cf. Innoc. III, De Myst. Miss., III, x; Benedict XIV, op. cit., I, v, no 3 sqq; Bellarmine, De Missâ, II, xx, no 5
  8. ↑ Dial., I, xiv, and III, xv
  9. ↑ Sozomen, III, xiv, and VIII, xix
  10. ↑ Greg. Nyss., Orat. in laud. S. Ephrem
  11. ↑ Bona, Rer. Lit., II, xii, no. 3
  12. ↑ Martigny, Dictionnaire des antiquités chrétiennes, s. v. Confesseurs
  13. ↑ Duchesne, op. cit., 284
  14. ↑ Orat. de laud., P.L., XXXVI, 602
  15. ↑ Opp. II, 606
  16. ↑ Poem., XIV, Carm. III, v, 4
  17. ↑ Dial. III. xix
  18. ↑ Acta SS., II, May 11, 306
  19. ↑ Martigny, loc. cit.
  20. ↑ Benedict XIV, loc. cit., vi
  21. ↑ August., Brevic. Collat. cum Donatistis, III, xiii, no. 25 in P.L., XLIII, 628.
  22. ↑ Gonzalez Tellez, Comm. Perpet. in singulos textus libr. Decr. (III, xlv), in cap. i, De reliquiis et vener. Sanct.
  23. ↑ c. i, tit. cit., X. III, xlv
  24. ↑ Bellarmine, De Eccles. Triumph., I, viii

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, February 09, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.