Asco (art collective)

Asco was an East Los Angeles based Chicano artist collective, active from 1972 to 1987. Asco adopted its name as a collective in1973, making a direct reference to the word’s significance in Spanish ("asco"), which is disgust or repulsion. Asco’s work throughout 1970s and 1980s responded specifically to socioeconomic and political problems surrounding the Chicano community in the United States, as well the Vietnam War.[1] Harry Gamboa, Jr., Glugio "Gronk" Nicandro, Willie Herrón and Patssi Valdez form the core members of the group.[2]:38

Origins

Political and Cultural Influences

A lot of our friends were coming back in body bags and were dying, and we were seeing a whole generation come back that weren’t alive anymore. And in a sense that gave us nausea… that is Asco, in a way. --Gronk[3]

The term Asco functions as a means of contextualizing and responding to the effects of the Vietnam war. This era, which art historian Arthur C. Danto has described as an era of revulsion, compelled young people to seek a new vocabulary for opposition through the growing importance of media, the impact of public mobilization, and new modes drawn from Happenings and spontaneous “be-ins”.[4] Socio-economic and regional factors additionally gave cause for revulsion. The shifting landscape of East Los Angeles during the 70s was particularly influential in Asco’s work. The construction of freeway interchanges and the retention of walls dividing formerly connected neighborhoods fostered a hostile environment. Asco as a group was part of what Raul Homero Villa deems the “expressway generation”,[5] a generation aware and affected by how public policies and urban planning could create conditions of disparity and stratification both economically and geographically.

Last year at this time I was very active in the affairs of my community. I was deeply bothered and disgusted with the condition of my community and of the Mexican American people. I learned to distrust and dislike everything that was pro-establishment.—Harry Gamboa Jr., 1969.[6]

The members were, as Mr. Gamboa has described it, “self-imposed exiles” who felt the best way to exercise artistic freedom and express solidarity with the Mexican-American cause was, paradoxically, to run screaming from most Mexican-American art at the time, or at least from its political structures and the stereotypes imposed on it by mainstream culture.[7] Asco’s emphasis on the street in their work and media hoaxes they manufactured illustrated the mergence of performance art with activism and protest. Asco occupies a unique place in the cultural landscape of Los Angeles. It deviated from the Chicano Muralism movement which was heavily nationalistic, instead occupied a balanced position between the mainstream and its counter-movement.

Artistic Influences

Some heavy influences of Asco art were Dada and Arte Povera. They used similar methods of recycling and reapportionating information to make something entirely different in meaning and form.[8]

Historical Context in East LA

“Geographically and culturally segregated from the then-embryonic L.A. contemporary art scene and aesthetically at odds with the dominant Chicano nationalism, at times Asco found a home in the new, interdisciplinary, artist-run spaces like Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions (LACE). On other occasions they chose to bypass galleries and museums altogether, and exhibit and perform in the streets.”[9]

“We only know the east side, we don’t really know the west side and the west side doesn’t know us.” – Willie Herron[10]

"Los Angeles has little sense of the past or of place. A partial explanation for this is that Euroamericans have devoted little time or energy to learning the history of the region, treating that history much the same as they do learning other languages... However, there are other reasons for [Mexicans] lack of visibility in Los Angeles history. Until recently, Mexicans in L.A., unlike their counterparts in San Antonio, did not have sufficient numbers to affect the politics of the city or even the Catholic Church, to which a majority of them belong. In addition, the vastness of the city and lack of cheap transportation have made it imperative for Mexicans, like other working-class Angelenos at the bottom of the wage scale, to live close to work... The city's addiction to urban renewal projects has also resulted in the dispersal of Mexicans throughout the city via displacement of working-class renters. Even homeowners were not immune to massive projects, which uprooted entire Mexican neighborhoods to make sure that the suburbs had freeways..."[11]

Additional members

In addition to the core members, the following notable artists were also involved with ASCO at one point or another:[2]:38[12]

Community and Method

Asco’s aesthetic proposals were principally informed by questions that dealt with the way in which U.S. national politics affected the Chicano community, which they culturally identified with, and addressed through their works. That said, Asco really defied older Chicano methods of artistic resistance against exclusion.There was a considerable amount of anti-Chicano propaganda through mainstream journalism and commercial television therefore creating within Asco an artistic response that would counter the saturation of negative images about the Chicano movement. They decided to create works were concerned with socioaesthetic modes such as violence and street life. The surreal nature of the work jarred the sensibilities of the traditionalist audience.[13] Their methods evolved and tried to move away from the static nature of Muralism towards performance where they had public displays of what they called no emotion, and finally these performances were conceptualized for their new photographic genre of the No Movie.[14] The sequence of No Movies was conceptualized by Gamboa as a photonovela, like a comic book illustrated with photographs.[15] The implication of the No Movies’ merging of protocinematic performance and the still image into which it was condensed becomes evident when we contrast it with the murals which they were initially constructed against. Asco’s work had a transient nature along with the poverty of their means, and their aestheticization of everyday barrio life they signaled a critique of the Murals commitment to durability, idealized imagery, and at some times the use of expensive paint.[15] Therefore with all this in mind the singularity of the photographs found in the No Movies gesture towards a narrative yet unlike industrialized and glamorized Hollywood they are Imperfect, materially limited alluding by that to their political situation.

Works

Regeneración (1971)

Gamboa, Gronk, Herron, and Valdez’s first collaboration was Regeneración, a journal propagating Chicano cultural and political nationalism. Harry Gamboa, Jr. became editor in 1971 and Gronk, Herron, and Valdez were recruited individually by Gamboa to create art for the journal.[1] Initially the magazine was published as Carta Editorial under activist Francisca Flores. The name change to Regeneración in 1970 pays homage to the radical newspaper of the same name published in Los Angeles by the Partido Liberal Mexicano (PLM) led by Ricardo Flores Magon during the Mexican Revolution[2]:153 in the 1900s.The name change marks a shift of editorial emphasis and format provoked by the advent of a new political era while both referencing and embodying historical continuity of Chicano activism in Los Angeles .[2]:153

Regeneración was one of the many publications produced during the Chicano movement. Each publication had its own regional focus and political agenda. Regeneración functioned as a venue for both early Chicana feminist thought and for the artwork of the Asco, who had recently graduated from high school.[2]:151 It is characteristic of the print culture of the Chicano movement through its convergence of commentary, news, photojournalism, poetry, and visual art. As opposed to the conventional medium of Social Realism, Asco instead contextualized aspects of the avant-garde into their own circumstances.[2]:153 The images they produced expressed the absurdity and violence of their experience in East Los Angeles in the early 1970s.The magazine's studio space was provided by Herron, who used his mother's garage as an art studio.[1]

Regeneración’s first volume featured artwork directly corresponding with the political and cultural orientation of other Chicano publications and also adopted a lengthier magazine format.

Gamboa’s involvement with Regeneración

Gamboa joined Regeneración in the midst of the riot of August 29, 1970, in East L.A. at the Chicano Moratorium.[2]:153 He encountered Francisca Flores, where she handed him her copy of Regeneración and agreed to allow Gamboa to edit the next issue. This event proved decisive in creating a sense of urgency within the Chicano movement and was highly influential in the work of Asco. Gamboa’s drawings appearing in the subsequent issue drew on pre-Conquest imagery while coinciding with the iconography associated with the radical press and the Chicano movement. The following volume included contributions from Willie F. Herrón III and Patssi Valdez. Their contributions allowed artwork to gain a more prominent role in the magazine.

Their artwork conveys the group's (and mainly Gamboa’s) anger, frustration, and despair at the events and aftermath of the Chicano Moratorium. Their frustrations were aimed namely towards corruption in the police force and towards the death of journalist Ruben Salazar by the L.A. County Sheriffs, which perpetuated violence towards the Chicano population.[2]:151

Herrón, Valdez’s and Gronk's contributions

In contrast to the specificity of Gamboa’s contributions, Herrón’s contributions focus on the broader conditions of life in the barrio, namely the environment of violence and poverty and the suffering it imposes. His work is characterized by a level of abstraction which produces imagery that is frequently dark, pessimistic, and grotesque. His influences extend from die Neue Sachlichkeit and German Expressionism to Surrealism.[2]:153

Valdez contributed a number of drawings to the first issues and by the final issue of Regeneración she expanded her work to combine ink drawing with collage, performance, photography, and texts. Many of her mixed media collages and photographs address the representation of femininity and self in terms of performativity.[2]:157

Gronk's drawings were described as "broodingly implicit with dream-sexual connotations."[1]

Performance art and No Movies

During the 1970s Gamboa, Gronk, Herron, and Valdez collaborated on numerous projects which addressed contemporary popular culture and specifically the media.

Stations of the Cross and Walking Mural

Stations of the Cross, a reference to Christ’s carrying of the cross to his crucifixion, was one of Asco’s earliest collaborations. Performed on Christmas Eve in 1971, Stations of the Cross functioned as a Vietnam war protest[1] and poked fun at Catholic traditions.[16] The members of Asco dressed in costumes and carried a huge cardboard cross down Whittier Boulevard in East Los Angeles, and subsequently a crowd of holiday shoppers gathered. Asco led them to the local U.S. Marine recruiting station, then used the cross to blockade the entrance.[17] The performance was meant to mock the Chicano mural movement by utilizing stereotypical religious iconography prevalent in Chicano Muralism. The group performed Walking Mural the following year on Christmas Eve. The members of the group appropriated stereotypical Chicano iconography into their dress, with Valdez parodying the ubiquitous Virgen de Guadalupe. This piece put Asco into a dangerous situation due to the potential for violent community reaction. Regarding this fact, Gamboa reflected that, "Ether the police were going to take care of you or someone in the neighborhood was going to take care of you. So you met a lot of resistance because it was so conservative. And to even to stray into the sensitive area of religious icons or even hinting that you might not believe in certain things or might even question what America is all about, again, you were setting yourself up to be someone that's punished".[18]

Spray Paint LACMA

Asco, Spray Paint LACMA, 1972. Colour photograph. Photograph: Harry Gamboa, Jr, showing Patssi Valdez.

Spray Paint LACMA is Asco’s most well-known No Movie. The piece was done in reaction to racial prejudices against Chicanos perpetuated by a curator at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art in 1972. Gamboa met with the curator to discuss the possibility of including Chicano art in future exhibitions, only to be told that Chicanos were incapable of producing anything other than folk art. In response, Asco spray-painted their names onto the outside entrance of LACMA. Utilizing graffiti as a technique alludes to the stereotype of the Chicano as a gang member who vandalizes public spaces. Asco appropriates the technique of graffiti as an assertive means of resistance.[19] Spray Paint LACMA was documented in photos by Gamboa and Valdez and their names were whitewashed within the next day.[1]

No Movies

No Movies addresses the exclusion of Chicanos within both mainstream Hollywood and the avant-garde cinemas of Los Angeles.[17] No Movies consisted of conceptual performance art which usually involved elaborate scenarios and utilizing the landscape of Los Angeles as a set. The scenarios were recorded on 35 mm slides, with one chosen for projection as the official record. The final film still functioned as a poster, summarizing and advertising a movie that was non-existent. No Movies occupy a liminal space between the mural movement and the Super-8 films. Asco utilized the limited material resources available to them to allegorize their political situation.[17] The stills were later disseminated throughout the community through their use in presentations in schools, colleges, and public libraries, and eventually into the art world and media.

Additionally the group invented the Asco Awards, also known as the Aztlán or No Movies Awards, in order to parody similar ceremonies held by Hollywood.

List of No-Movies

Exhibitions

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gamboa, Jr., Harry (July 1991). "In the City of Angels, Chameleons, and Phantoms: Asco, a Case Study of Chicano Art in Urban Tones (or Asco Was a Four-Member Word)". In Castillo, Richard Griswold Del; McKenna, Teresa; Yarbro-Bejarano, Yvonne. Chicano Art: Resistance and Affirmation, 1965-1985. Los Angeles, California: Wight Art Gallery. pp. 121–130. ISBN 0943739152.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gunckel, Colin (2011). "'We Were Drawing and Drawn into Each Other': Asco’s Collaboration through Regeneracion". In Chavoya, C. Ondine; Gonzalez, Rita. Asco: Elite of the Obscure : a Retrospective, 1972-1987. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag. ISBN 9783775730037.
  3. Gronk, transcript of oral history interview, Los Angeles, 20 and 23 Jan. 1997, Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, available on-line at: http://www.aaa.si.edu/collections/oralhistories/transcripts/gronk97.htm.
  4. Danto, Arthur C. (29 March 1999). "Correspondence School Art". The Nation: 30.
  5. Villa, Raul Homero (2000). Barrio-Logos: Space and Place in Urban Chicano Literature and Culture. University of Texas Press. ISBN 9780292787421.
  6. Harry Gamboa, Jr. “Autobiography: 1960 EOP Admissions Statement,” M753, Box 2, Folder 26, East Los Angeles Walkouts and related miscellaneous/ Garfield High School, c. 1968-70, Gamboa Collection, Stanford Libraries Special Collections, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
  7. Kennedy, Randy (2011-08-25). "Works by Asco at the Los Angeles Museum". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2015-10-20.
  8. "Galería de la Raza: ASCO". www.galeriadelaraza.org. Retrieved 2015-10-20.
  9. "Asco". Galeria de la Raza. Galeria de la Raza. Retrieved October 20, 2015.
  10. "Asco: Elite of the Obscure, A Retrospective, 1972–1987 | LACMA". www.lacma.org. Retrieved 2015-10-20.
  11. Acuña, Rodolfo (1996). Anything but Mexican. New York/London: Verso. p. 19.
  12. Bleys, Rudi (27 October 2000). Images of Ambiente: Homotextuality and Latin American Art, 1810-today. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0826447234. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  13. Jackson, Carlos F. Chicana and Chicano Art: Protestarte. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2009. Print.
  14. Jackson, Carlos F. Chicana and Chicano Art: Protestarte. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2009. Print.
  15. 1 2 James, David E. "Hollywood Extras: One Tradition of "Avant-Garde" Film in Los Angeles." October 90 (1999): 3-24. Web.
  16. Kennedy, Randy (25 August 2011). "Chicano Pioneers". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 James, David E. (2011). "No Movies: Projecting the Real by Rejecting the Reel". In Chavoya, C. Ondine; Gonzalez, Rita. Asco: Elite of the Obscure : a Retrospective, 1972-1987. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag. p. 181. ISBN 9783775730037.
  18. 1 2 Lampert, Nicolas (2012). A People's Art History of the United States: 250 Years of Activist Art and Artists Working in Social Justice Movements. The New Press. ISBN 1595583246.
  19. Jones, Amelia (2011). "Traitor Prophets: Asco’s Art as a Politics of the In-Between". In Chavoya, C. Ondine; Gonzalez, Rita. Asco: Elite of the Obscure : a Retrospective, 1972-1987. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag. p. 128. ISBN 9783775730037.
  20. Kennedy, Randy (August 25, 2011). "Chicano Pioneers". The New York Times.
  21. "Culture Monster". Los Angeles Times.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, October 21, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.