Artur Barrio

Artur Barrio
Born 1945
Porto, Portugal
Nationality Brazilian
Education Escola Nacional de Belas Artes (School of Fine Arts) Rio de Janeiro
Known for Interactive art, Performance art, Conceptual art, Installation art
Notable work Situação T/T1, Belo Horizonte 20 April 1970
Movement Modernism
Awards Mario Pedrosa Prize, Associação Brazileira de Críticos de Arte for his exhibition Experiencis n° 1

Artur Barrio (Artur Alipio Barrio de Sousa Lopes) is an artist who lives and works in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Much of his work consists of installation pieces that create interaction with the public. Barrio engages the viewer as participant in his art, often without their knowledge that it is art in which they are participating. By doing so, the participant can have an experience not removed from life but rather incorporated into it. He wants to encourage contact with all of reality including the discards of life such as garbage. He wants us to recognize that this reality is just as real if we can see past the symbolic meanings we attach to these objects. (Manifesto MUD/MEAT SEWER) [1]


Early Life and Training

Barrio was born in Porto, Portugal in 1945.[2] In 1952, he spent six months in Angola “where he discovered the African culture.”[1] He then moved to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1955. In 1967, he attended the Escola Nacional de Belas Artes (School of Fine Arts), one of the centers of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. His teachers included Onofre Penteado, Abelardo Zaluar, Mário Barata and Ítalo Campofiorito.

Barrio returned to Portugal during the Portuguese revolution in 1974. In 1975 he moved to Paris, and then in 1981 to Amsterdam. Currently, he lives successively in Amsterdam, Aix-en-Provence and Rio de Janeiro.[1]


Influences

Artur Barrio is an extreme example of the development of art that took place during his early career. It was a time when barriers within art were being tested and pushed to the breaking point. Barrio expressed his understanding of these artistic forces in his work. We can see the imprint of his time on his work in the content, the materials, and the processes he employs in his work. He makes strong anti-art establishment statements showing a kinship with the Dada artists. He also displays his understanding the Fluxus ideas about flow, process and material usage. These influences combined during the late sixties when the counterculture was at its height. His process, his vision and his materials all meld in a form of Situationist art where his pieces become more than installations but also a part of the reality in which they exist. [3]

Description of Style

Artur Barrio is seeking to create an experience. He uses both ephemeral and precarious materials that provoke an extreme sensorial reaction. Items such as coffee grinds overwhelm the nose while blood or meat produce a gut reaction. There is a concrete connection to the body and to food. This all generates a reanalysis of the immediate environment and sparks questions about what could have been the cause of these scenes. Artur Barrio changes the normal familiar surroundings and attempts to transport the visitor (participant), possibly through a little discomfort, to a place where everything needs to be more deeply examined.

Social/Political context

For much of Artur Barrio's career, Brazil was in the hands of a military dictatorship after the coup d'état in 1964.

In 1970 he created Situação…DEFL…+s+…ruas…Abril…(Unleashing confusion on the streets…Situation) consisting of “the placement of five hundred plastic bags containing blood, nails, dung, waste, and other debris in downtown Rio during the peak of the dictatorship’s repression” [4]

At the time of his (Situation T/T1) it was not uncommon for people to disappear. “Autonomous para-police forces (Death Squads) took on the work of “social cleansing”, eliminating delinquents, the marginalized and street children.” [1] His bloody packages question the status of those that have disappeared and bring into focus the “socially apprehensible possibilities of” [1] governments and other institutions.

Artistic Movements

Artur Barrio himself rejects art categories. In his “MANIFEST: against the art categories, against the salons, against the awards, against the jury, against the art critique” (Rio de Janeiro February 1970),[1] Barrio explains his discontent with the top down view of art imposed by an aesthetic elite. In his view, this elite prescribes the materials necessary to create art. These materials were out of reach to Barrio and much of the population of the Third World at the time. His use of inexpensive materials (garbage, toilet paper and urine) was a rejection of the aesthetic elite and the art world they controlled, including the definitions of art categories, salons, awards, juried shows, and critics.

Although Barrio rejects art categories we can see that there are several ideas that he embraces that link him to Modernist movement. He was highly influenced by the Fluxus ideas, a group that took its name from the concept of “flow”. The idea that you could use whatever you have at hand to make art reflects the idea of anti-commercial art. His work could also be seen as Neo-Dada in its rejection of the prevailing standards in art. He rejects the standard materials of an artist in favor of perishables. He also often rejected typical spaces, preferring to stage his Situations in public places. There are even influences of process art in the way that Barrio would, almost ritualistically, construct his packages (Situation T/T1). Almost all of the works of Artur Barrio are a form of Installation art.

Interpretation of Work

Artur Barrio does not see his work as the creation of a finished product. He is an interactive artist; he creates the situation where people interact with and react to artifacts that Barrio has put in place. One of his best known such works, Situação T/T1, (Unfolding of the Body Situation), was titled literally as a situation, not just a stagnant piece of art. In this work Barrio constructed "bloody packages"[1] and tied them loosely. He then strategically placed these "blood-stained rags (trouxas ensanguentadas) in a park to provoke public reactions before police arrived."[4]

Barrio has always pushed the boundaries of what materials can be used in the production of art. He has used salt, the toilet paper coffee grinds, meat, blood, feces and urine.

Barrio has no interest in the preservation of his pieces since the art he is interested in is the experience of creating the art and the experience of interacting with art. To Barrio, the artifacts that are used to create these experiences are not the art and do not need to be preserved.

Legacy

Artur Barrio has become more accepting of the greater art community. His work (or replicas created as examples of his work) is now exhibited with increasing frequency.[5] However, his attitude is not the main reason that Artur Barrio is now working within the larger established art community. The greater change was not in Artur Barrio but rather in the art word itself. Barrio still “views curators and institutions … as completely superfluous to requirements for works of art and exhibitions. In his eyes curators are reduced to the role of logistics co-ordinators and as such, the institution in turn becomes no more than a (temporary) channel for his work.” [1] However it is because of the work of Artur Barrio and many artists like him that Conceptual art[6] and the use of untraditional media in art has become acceptable.

Barrio now exhibits his work internationally.

Artworks

Exhibits

Artur Barrio at the opening of “Actions After Actions”

Currículo (Resume), Exposições Individuais (Individual expositions)

Exhibition with Other Brazilian Artists

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Barrio, Artur. “Artur Barrio : Barrio-Beuys.” Gent, Belgie : Stedelijk Museum loor Actuele Kunst, 2005. ISBN 90-75679-22-X"
  2. ↑ Birth : Havlice, Patricia Pate. “Index to artistic biography” Metuchen, N.J., Scarecrow Press, 1973. ISBN 0-8108-0540-5
  3. ↑ Smith, Roberta. "Walking on Coffee, Trying to Get a Fix on a Master of Impermanence". The New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved 30 August 2015.
  4. 1 2 Ramirez, Mari Carman and Olea, Hector. “Inverted Utopias: avant-garde Art in Latin America” New Haven : Yale University Press; [Houston, Tex.] : Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, c2004. ISBN 0-300-10269-0
  5. ↑ Pym, William. "Foreign Exchange". ARTFORUM. Retrieved 30 August 2015.
  6. ↑ Case Study Study Artur Barrio – Interminável 2005, Conservation department - S.M.A.K. Ghentc Case

Sources and further reading

English External links

Portugués External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, August 31, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.