Ambush predator

A water bug nymph attacking a fish.
A female goldenrod crab spider (Misumena vatia) capturing the female of a pair of mating flies.

Ambush predators or sit-and-wait predators are carnivorous animals or other organisms, such as some nematophagous fungi and carnivorous plants, that capture or trap prey by stealth or by strategy (typically not conscious strategy), rather than by speed or by strength. In animals, ambush predation is characterized by an animal scanning the environment from a concealed position and then rapidly executing a surprise attack.[1]

Strategy

Animal ambush predators usually remain motionless (sometimes hidden) and wait for prey to come within ambush distance before pouncing. Ambush predators are often camouflaged, and may be solitary animals. This mode of predation may be less risky for the predator because lying-in-wait reduces exposure to its own predators.

So long as the active predator cannot move faster than its prey, it has little advantage over the ambush predator. However, if the active predator's velocity increases, its advantage increases sharply.[2]

There are many intermediate strategies for ambush predators; for example, when a pursuit predator is faster than its prey over a short distance, but not in a long chase, then either stalking or ambushing becomes necessary as part of the strategy.[2]

There are however, many dimensions to predation and many overlapping strategies; for example some predators exploit predictable prey pathways that offer opportunities intermediate between ambush and pursuit. Animals with such strategies include cats of all sizes, crocodiles and some insects such as predators that haunt ant trails. Ambush predators include many fish, snakes, and other reptiles, as well as some mammals, birds, insects and spiders.

In vertebrates

Mammals

Though capable of sprinting, the cougar is typically an ambush predator. It stalks through brush and trees, across ledges, or other covered spots, before delivering a powerful leap onto the back of its prey and a suffocating neck bite. The cougar is capable of breaking the neck of some of its smaller prey with a strong bite and momentum bearing the animal to the ground. The head of the cat is round and the ears are erect. Its powerful forequarters, neck, and jaw serve to grasp and hold large prey. It has five retractable claws on its forepaws (one a dewclaw) and four on its hind paws. The larger front feet and claws are adaptations to clutching prey.[3]

Leopards and domestic cats are also ambush predators with similar tactics.

Ray-finned fish

Many ray-finned fish are ambush predators. Depending on the species, their ambushes can occur at the surface of the water, in the main body of the water, or at the bottom. The methods used also vary and include a sudden lunging, rapid inhalation of water containing prey, and the use of lures.

Surface-dwellers

Alligator gars (Atractosteus spatula) are relatively passive, seemingly sluggish solitary fish, but voracious ambush predators. They are opportunistic night predators and are primarily piscivores, but they will also ambush and eat water fowl and small mammals that may be floating on the surface. Their method of ambush is to float a few feet below the surface, and wait for unsuspecting prey to swim within reach. They lunge forward, and with a sweeping motion grab their prey, impaling it on their double rows of sharp teeth.[4]

Open-water dwellers

Northern pike waiting to ambush prey

The Esociformes are a small order of ray-finned fish, with two families, the Umbridae (mudminnows) and the Esocidae (pikes). Pikes tend to be lie-in-wait, ambush predators, with elongated snouts, long, well-muscled torsos, forked tails, and dorsal and anal fins set well back and opposite each other for rapid acceleration along a straight line, allowing the fish to quickly emerge from cover to capture their prey. Prey capture is facilitated by the impaling of the prey animal on the sharp teeth, after which the pike retreats to cover, turns the prey around, and swallows it, head first. The northern pike, may reach lengths as great as 1.5 m (4.6 ft). Anatomically, the pikes are characterized by the presence of shark-like, maxillary teeth. Mudminnows are much smaller than the related pikes, with usual lengths of less than 20 cm. However, they are also extremely efficient, lie-in-wait, ambush predators, feeding mostly on the invertebrates commonly found in warm backwaters.

The Malawi eyebiter (Dimidiochromis compressiceps) is a non-territorial, open-water predator, but also an ambush predator. Their laterally-compressed bodies are an adaptation that permits them to hide amongst aquatic plants and dart out to grasp prey as it passes. These cichlids are mainly piscivorous, especially on small fish.[5]

Bottom-dwellers

Frogfishes catch prey by sudden opening of their jaws.

The eastern frogfish (Batrachomoeus dubius) is a bottom-dwelling fish endemic to coastal eastern Australia.[6] The fish is found at depths of 1–150 metres along the continental shelf but also estuaries and inshore reefs.[7] It is an ambush predator with a large expandable mouth. It catches prey by suddenly opening their jaws, which enlarges the volume of the mouth cavity up to 12-fold and pulls the prey (crustaceans, molluscs and other whole fishes) into the mouth along with water. The attack can be as fast as 6 milliseconds,[6]

The devil scorpionfish (Inimicus filamentosus) is a piscivorous ambush predator. It is nocturnal and typically lies partially buried on the sea floor or on a coral head during the day, covering itself with sand and other debris to further camouflage itself. It has no known natural predators. When disturbed by a scuba diver or a potential predator, it fans out its brilliantly colored pectoral and caudal fins as a warning. Once dug in, it is very reluctant to leave its hiding place. When it does move, it displays an unusual mechanism of subcarangiform locomotion — it crawls slowly along the seabed, employing the four lower rays (two on each side) of its pectoral fins as legs.[8][9][10][11]

The warteye stargazer (Gillellus uranidea) is a species of sand stargazer which can be found in sandy areas on reefs or among rocks. It is an ambush predator, burying itself nearly completely in the sand and waiting for prey items to come along. It can reach a maximum length of 5 cm.[12]

Mastiglanis asopos is a species of three-barbeled catfish. It is a strictly sand-dwelling species which spends the daytime buried in the top layer of sand. It forages mostly at night and sometimes in the morning. As an ambush predator, it poises in the streamlet channels where water is flowing, supported by a tripod formed by its pelvic and anal fins, spreading both its very long barbels and the filamentous dorsal and pectoral-fin rays, thus forming a kind of "drift-trap". When the fish intercepts food, it will lunge at these food particles; after lunging for a short distance, it will return to its previous hunting spot. This behaviour is similar to that seen in the tripod fish.[13]

Grouper are ambush predators with a powerful sucking system that sucks their prey in from a distance.

The tripodfish Bathypterois grallator uses tactile and mechanosensory cues to identify food; it apparently does not have special visual adaptations to help it find food in the low-light environment. When the fish is perched with its long rays on the ocean floor, it can get food without even seeing it. The tripodfish’s mouth ends up at just the right height to catch shrimp, tiny fish, and small crustaceans swimming by. They seem to prefer to perch on the mud using much elongated fin rays in their tails and two pelvic fins to stand, facing upstream into the current to ambush with the pectoral fins turned forward so the outthrust projecting fins resemble multiple antennae. The fish senses objects in the water with its front fins. These fins act like hands. Once they feel prey and realize it is edible, the fins knock the food into the fish’s mouth.[14] The fish faces into the current, waiting for prey to drift by.[15][16][17]

Some fish have the ability to change colour and use this in their ambush behaviour. The Ambon scorpionfish camouflages itself by changing colour and then waits for prey to come close whereupon they lunge forward and inhale the prey.

Variable habitat

The American anglerfish (Lophius americanus) is an ambush predator which spends most of its time on the seabed partly covered in sediment waiting for suitable prey to pass. It can swim slowly or "walk" with the help of its pectoral fins. Its diet normally consists of fin and ray fish, squids, cuttlefish and occasionally carrion.[18] After storms it has been reported on the sea surface where it has been recorded as catching seabirds.[19]

Cartilagenous fish

side view of the head of a preserved shark
The cookiecutter shark has a short, rounded head with large, anteriorly placed eyes and a transverse mouth.

The cookiecutter shark (Isistius brasiliensisis) is best known for being an ambush predator that bites neat, round chunks of tissue from marine mammals and large fish. It is considered a facultative ectoparasite but also wholly ingests smaller prey. It has a wide gape and a very strong bite, by virtue of heavily calcified cranial and labial cartilages.[20] With small fins and weak muscles, this shark spends much of its time hovering in the water column.[21] To maintain neutral buoyancy, its liver, which can comprise some 35% of its weight, is rich in low-density lipids. As this species has higher skeletal density than Euprotomicrus or Squaliolus, its body cavity and liver are proportionately much larger, and the oil content is much higher.[21] Its large caudal fin allows for a quick burst of speed to catch larger, faster prey that come in range.[21][22]

Like other members of its family (Squatinidae), the angelshark (Squatina squatina) is a nocturnal, ambush predator that buries itself in sediment and waits for passing prey, mostly benthic bony fishes but also skates and invertebrates. It is well-adapted for camouflaging itself on the sea floor, as it has a flattened form with enlarged pectoral and pelvic fins, giving it a superficial resemblance to a ray.

The tasselled wobbegong (Eucrossorhinus dasypogon) feeds on fish, crustaceans, and cephalopods.[23] Its capacious mouth allows large prey to be swallowed, with one documented case of a 1.3 m (4.3 ft) long individual consuming a 1.0 m (3.3 ft) long brownbanded bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium punctatum).[24] During daytime, this species is an opportunistic ambush predator. It preys upon schooling nocturnal fishes such as squirrelfishes, soldierfishes, and sweepers that often shelter in the same cave. Tiny fishes and crustaceans have been seen settling atop the resting wobbegong's head, attracting larger fishes that are in turn attacked by the wobbegong. Observations in captivity have further revealed that this species engages in active luring behaviour. When it perceives food nearby, it begins to slowly wave its tail back and forth; its caudal fin resembles a small fish, complete with a dark eyespot at the base. The shark typically rests with its head elevated, which places it within striking distance of any prey drawn by its tail.[23]

Reptiles

Crocodilians

Crocodile ambushing wildebeest crossing the Mara River

The Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) possesses unusual predatory behaviour as it has the ability to hunt both within its natural habitat and out of it, which often results in unpredicted attacks on almost any other animal up to twice its size. Nile crocodiles are apex predators throughout their range. In the water, they are an agile and rapid hunter, using both movement and pressure sensors to catch any prey unfortunate enough to place themselves inside or near the waterfront.[25][26] Most terrestrial prey are caught by ambush attacks when the animal approaches water to drink. The crocodile slowly comes closer, most of its body underwater, sometimes only its eyes and nostrils visible. On other occasions more of its head and upper body visible. The attack is sudden and unpredictable. The crocodile lunges its body out of the water and grasps its prey. The teeth of a crocodile are not for tearing up flesh but to bite deep in to the prey and hold on to it. The immense bite force, which may be as high as 22,000 N in large adults, ensures the prey item can't escape from the grip. The prey is usually killed by drowning or being torn apart by "death rolls". On land, the Nile crocodile can gallop to chase prey.[27] Most hunting on land is done at night by lying in ambush near forest trails or roadsides, up to 50 m from the water's edge.[28]

Lizards

A chameleon's tongue striking at food

Chameleons (family Chamaeleonidae) are highly adapted to being ambush predators. They can change colour to match their surroundings and often climb through trees with a swaying motion to mimic the movement of the leaves and branches they are surrounded by. All chameleons are primarily insectivores and feed by ballistically projecting their long tongues from their mouths to capture prey located some distance away. While the chameleons' tongues are typically thought to be 1.5 to 2.0 the length of their bodies (excluding the tail), smaller chameleons (both smaller species and smaller individuals of the same species) have recently been found to have proportionately larger tongue apparatuses than their larger counterparts.[29] Thus, smaller chameleons are able to project their tongues greater distances than the larger chameleons that are the subject of most studies and tongue length estimates, and can project their tongues more than twice their body length.[30] Tongue projection occurs extremely quickly, reaching the prey in as little as 0.07 seconds,[31][32] having been launched at accelerations exceeding 41 g.[32] The power with which the tongue is launched, known to exceed 3000 W kg−1, exceeds that for which muscle is able to produce, indicating the presence of an elastic power amplifier to power tongue projection.[31]

The mulga dragon (Caimanops amphiboluroides) is a species of agamid lizard found in Western Australia. The species grows up to 25 cm long. The patterning over the legs and body is grey and brownish streaks. This provides an excellent camouflage on mulga trees, its usual habitat, The mulga dragon generally remains motionless and unobserved, allowing it to be an ambush predator and to elude animals that would prey on it.[33]

Komodo dragons (Varanus komodoensis) are carnivores. Although they eat mostly carrion,[34] they will also ambush live prey with a stealthy approach. When suitable prey arrives near a dragon's ambush site, it will suddenly charge at the animal and attempt to grasp the underside or the throat.[35] The Komodo dragon's diet is wide-ranging, and includes invertebrates, other reptiles (including smaller Komodo dragons), birds, bird eggs, small mammals, monkeys, wild boar, goats, deer, horses, and water buffalo.[36] The Komodo dragon hunts in the afternoon, but stays in the shade during the hottest part of the day.[37] These special resting places, usually located on ridges with cool sea breezes, are marked with droppings and are cleared of vegetation. They serve as strategic locations from which to ambush deer.[38] Komodo dragons have been observed knocking down large pigs and deer with their strong tails.[39]

Turtles

Cantor's giant softshell turtle ambushes prey from the mud of river bottoms.

A number of turtle species are ambush predators, including chelydrid snapping turtles. The common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentinais) is an aquatic ambush hunter, capturing its prey with its beak-like jaws.[40]

Cantor's giant softshell turtle (Pelochelys cantorii) can grow up to approx 2 m in length.[41][42] It is an ambush predator and primarily carnivorous, feeding on crustaceans, molluscs and fish (although some aquatic plants may also be eaten).[43] The turtle spends 95% of its life buried and motionless, with only its eyes and mouth protruding from the sand. It surfaces only twice a day to take a breath.[42][43][44] Similarly, the New Guinea giant softshell turtle (Pelochelys bibroni) is considered to be an ambush predator.[45]

Snakes

Malabar pit viper in typical ambush pose of snakes.

The eastern green mamba is a diurnal, arboreal, secretive species of snake. It tends to spend most of its time above the ground in relatively dense brush, where it is well camouflaged.[46] This species is not commonly found on land unless motivated by thirst, prey, or the need to bask in the sun (thermoregulation).[47] It is an alert, nervous, excellent climber and extremely agile snake. In a study of the movement patterns of two adult specimens of this species over a 27-day period, the researcher found their activity range areas to be very small compared to other predators who actively hunt prey rather than ambush them. This is in contrast to most elapid species, including other mambas, who tend to actively hunt or forage for prey. The study's preliminary evidence sheds some light on this species' method of hunting prey and suggests that it may be an ambush predator due to the sit-and-wait behaviour displayed. However, this evidence does not preclude active foraging by this species; one specimen systematically hunted a sleeping bat.[48]

The black mamba (Dendroaspis polylepis) is a diurnal ambush predator.[49] If the prey attempts to escape, the black mamba will follow up its initial bite with a series of strikes. When hunting, the black mamba has been known to raise a large portion of its body off the ground. The black mamba will release larger prey after biting it, but smaller prey, such as birds or rats, are held onto until the prey's muscles stop moving.[49] They have been known to prey on bushbabies, bats, and small chickens.[50]

The Antiguan racer (Alsophis antiguae) is a diurnal snake which is an ambush predator, primarily eating lizards. While the species sometimes hunts for its food, it is more typically an ambush predator, waiting for prey with most of its body buried beneath leaves. The racer typically eats a lizard once every two weeks.[51]

Birds

The zone-tailed hawk (Buteo albonotatus), which resembles the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), flies among flocks of turkey vultures then suddenly breaks from the formation and ambushes one of them as its prey.[52] There is some controversy about whether this is a true case of mimicry.[53]

Darters feed mainly on mid-sized fish but far more rarely, they eat other aquatic vertebrates such as frogs, toads, newts, salamanders, snakes, turtles and even baby crocodilians, and large invertebrates including crabs, crayfish, shrimps, insect and molluscs. These birds are foot-propelled divers which quietly stalk and ambush their prey; then they use their sharply pointed bill to impale their prey. They do not dive deep but make use of their low buoyancy made possible by wettable plumage, small air sacs and denser bones.[54] On the underside of the cervical vertebrae 5-7 is a keel, which allows for muscles to attach to form a hinge-like mechanism that can project the neck, head and bill forward like a throwing spear. After they have stabbed the prey, they return to the surface where they toss their food into the air and catch it again, so that they can swallow it head-first. Like cormorants, they have a vestigial preen gland and their plumage gets wet during diving. To dry their feathers after diving, darters move to a safe location and spread their wings.[55]

Vertebrates using lures

The alligator snapping turtle uses its tongue to lure fish.

Many ambush predators actively attract their prey towards them before ambushing them. These animals are often classified as aggressive mimics. The promise of nourishment as a way of attracting prey. The alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) is a well-camouflaged ambush predator. Its tongue bears a conspicuous pink extension that resembles a worm and can be wriggled around;[56] fish that try to eat the "worm" are themselves eaten by the turtle. Similarly, some snakes employ caudal luring (tail luring) to entice small vertebrates into striking range.

In invertebrates

Insects

An example of an ambush predator and its trap
Closeup of an antlion larva
Sand pit trap of an antlion

Some ambush predators build traps to capture their prey. Lacewings are a flying insect in the order Neuroptera. In some species, their larval form, known as the antlion, is an ambush predator. Eggs are laid in the earth, often in caves or under a rocky ledge. The juvenile creates a small, crater shaped trap. The antlion hides under a light cover of sand or earth. When an ant, beetle or other prey slides into the trap, the antlion grabs the prey with its powerful jaws.[57] [58]

The majority of the 2,400 species of praying mantises are ambush predators, although some ground and bark species actively pursue prey. Species that are predominantly ambush predators camouflage themselves and spend long periods standing perfectly still. They largely wait for their prey to stray within reach, but most mantises chase prey if it strays closely enough. In pure ambush mode, a mantis lashes out at remarkable speed when a target does get within reach. When the prey is a butterfly or other flying insect, the mantis snatches it out of the air. Praying mantises are deliberate when they move, and only do so when there is good reason to. When they do move, they often travel forward while gently rocking back and forth. This helps them to blend in with the bush or tree on which they are climbing, as it sways in the breeze.[59][60][61]

The Reduviidae, also known as "assassin bugs", are a large family of the Hemiptera order. They are slightly unusual among the Hemiptera because almost all are terrestrial ambush predators (most other predatory Hemiptera are aquatic). Though there are spectacular exceptions, most members of the family are fairly easily recognizable: they have a relatively narrow neck, sturdy build and formidable curved proboscis (sometimes called a rostrum).

Arachnids

The atypical tarantulas, or purseweb spiders, (family Atypidae) build a silken tube parallel to the surface of the ground. While up to 8 cm of the tube lie on the ground, about 20 cm are buried vertically. The spider rests at the bottom of the tube. When prey walks on the exposed part, the spider, alerted by the vibrations, stabs it through the silk, cuts the web and drags it inside to be eaten.[62]

The European yellow-tailed scorpion (Euscorpius flavicaudis) is a small, black scorpion measuring about 35–45 mm long. It is a fossorial scorpion with relatively large, strong claws (pedipalps) and a short, thin tail. It is an ambush predator, lying motionless at the entrance to its lair, but moving quickly to capture prey that wander past. The main prey of E. flavicaudis are woodlice, although most small insects are taken. Scorpions may go for long periods of time without food.

A wide range of spiders are known as "trapdoor spiders". These spiders excavate a burrow and seal the entrance with a web trapdoor hinged on one side with silk. The most well-known door is the “cork”-type, which is thick and beveled to precisely fit the opening. The other is the “wafer”-type door, a more simple sheet of silk and dirt. The top of the door is usually camouflaged with bits of debris such as twigs and rock, making it very difficult to detect. The spider spins silk fishing lines, or trip wires, that radiate out of the burrow entrance. When the spider is using the trap to capture prey, its chelicerae hold the door shut on the end furthest from the hinge. The vibrations of passing prey are conducted by the silk and alert the spider whereupon it quickly throws open the door, ambushes the prey and returns with it down the tube. [63][64]

Malacostraca

Polycheles typhlops is a species of blind, deep-water, decapod crustacean. It probably acts as an ambush predator, hiding buried in the sediment with its claws raised above the surface.[65] Its main prey are bony fish and other crustaceans, such as shrimp, mysids and amphipods.[66]

Mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda) consist of both ambush predators (‘spearers’) and foragers (‘smashers’). Spearers hide in sandy burrows and capture evasive prey, whereas smashers search for prey away from their burrows and typically hammer hard-shelled, sedentary prey. Zebra mantis shrimp (Lysiosquillina maculata) ambush evasive prey primarily at night while hidden in burrows, striking very hard and fast (mean peak speed 2.30 m s–1 and mean duration 24.98 ms).[1]

Cephalopods

The world's largest invertebrate, the colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni), roams the deep waters of the Southern Ocean where it is believed to be an ambush predator of prey such as chaetognatha, large fish such as the Patagonian toothfish, and other squid. It is thought to have a slow metabolic rate, needing only around 30 grams (1.1 oz) of prey daily.[67] A single 5 kg Antarctic toothfish provides enough nourishment for a 500 kg colossal squid to survive for 200 days. These estimates of its energetic demands suggest it is a slow-moving ambush predator which uses its large eyes primarily for predator detection rather than active hunting.[68]

Asteroidia

Leptasterias tenera is a small starfish with five arms and a slow growth rate. It can grow to a diameter of 16 cm. Leptasterias tenera is an ambush predator. It remains stationary on the seabed for long periods, snaring any small crustaceans which come into contact with it, gripping them with its tube feet and pedicellariae and flexing its arms to transfer the prey to its mouth. Large items are pushed as far as they will go into the pyloric stomach but only the portion inside is digested at first.[69]

In microorganisms

Pfiesteria is a genus of heterotrophic dinoflagellates that has been associated with harmful algal blooms and fish kills. Research suggests that Pfiesteria behaves as an ambush predator and utilizes a "hit and run" feeding strategy by releasing a toxin that paralyses the respiratory systems of susceptible fish, such as menhaden, thus causing death by suffocation. It then consumes the tissue sloughed off its dead prey.[70]

In extinct animals

The thylacine was exclusively carnivorous. Its stomach was muscular, and could distend to allow the animal to eat large amounts of food at one time, probably an adaptation to compensate for long periods when hunting was unsuccessful and food scarce.[71] Analysis of the skeletal frame and observations of it in captivity suggest that it preferred to single out a target animal and pursue that animal until it was exhausted. Some studies conclude that the animal may have hunted in small family groups, with the main group herding prey in the general direction of an individual waiting in ambush.[72] Trappers reported it as an ambush predator.[71] Although the living grey wolf is widely seen as the thylacine's counterpart, it has been proposed that the thylacine was more of an ambush predator as opposed to a pursuit predator. In fact, the predatory behaviour of the thylacine was probably closer to ambushing felids than to large pursuit canids. Consequently, at least in terms of the postcranial anatomy, the vernacular name of "Tasmanian tiger" may be more apt than "marsupial wolf".[73]

References

  1. 1 2 deVries, M.S., Murphy, E.A.K. and Patek S.N. (2012). "Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: the spearing mantis shrimp". Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 4374–4384. doi:10.1242/jeb.075317.
  2. 1 2 Scharf, I., Nulman, E. Ovadia, O. and Bouskila, A. (2006). "Efficiency evaluation of two competing foraging modes under different conditions" (PDF). The American Naturalist 168 (3): 350–357. doi:10.1086/506921.
  3. "Cougar". Hinterland Who's Who. Canadian Wildlife Service and Canadian Wildlife Federation. Archived from the original on 2007-05-18. Retrieved May 22, 2007.
  4. Wills, B. "Alligator Gar". Earthwave Society. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
  5. Marc Elieson Dimidiochromis compressiceps in Cichlid Forum
  6. 1 2 Bray, Dianne. "Eastern Frogfish, Batrachomoeus dubius". Fishes of Australia. Retrieved 14 September 2014.
  7. "Batrachomoeus dubius(White, 1790) Eastern frogfish". FishBase. Retrieved 14 September 2014.
  8. William A. Gosline, W.A. (July 1994). "Function and structure in the paired fins of scorpaeniform fishes". Journal Environmental Biology of Fishes 40 (3): 219–226. doi:10.1007/BF00002508. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
  9. World Database of Marine Species: Spiny devil fish. Accessed 03-22-2010.
  10. Scott Michael (Winter 2001). "Speak of the devil: fish in the genus Inimicus" (PDF). SeaScope 18. Retrieved 2010-03-27.
  11. WetWebMedia.com: The Ghoulfish/Scorpion/Stonefishes of the Subfamily Choridactylinae (Inimicinae), by Bob Fenner. Accessed 03-27-2010.
  12. Froese, Rainer and Pauly, Daniel, eds. (2013). "Gillellus uranidea" in FishBase. April 2013 version.
  13. Zuanon, Jansen; Bockmann, Flávio A.; Sazima, Ivan (2006). "A remarkable sand-dwelling fish assemblage from central Amazonia, with comments on the evolution of psammophily in South American freshwater fishes". Neotropical Ichthyology 4 (1): 107–118. doi:10.1590/s1679-62252006000100012.
  14. Hoar, W.S.; Randall, D.J.; Conte, F.P. (1997). Deep-Sea Fishes. Fish Physiology 16. Academic Press. p. 344. ISBN 0-12-350440-6.
  15. Hyde, N. (2009). Deep Sea Extremes. Crabtree Publishing Company. p. 16. ISBN 0-7787-4501-5.
  16. Winner, C. (2006). Life on the Edge. Lerner Publications. p. 18. ISBN 0-8225-2499-6.
  17. Gage, J.D. and Tyler, P.A. (1992). Deep-sea biology: a natural history of organisms at the deep-sea floor. Cambridge University Press. p. 86. ISBN 0-521-33665-1.
  18. "Goosefish, Lophius americanus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics" (PDF). US Department of Commerce: National Marine Fisheries Service. 1999.
  19. Bigelow, H.B. and W.C. Schroeder (1953). "Fishes of the Gulf of Maine". Fishery Bulletin (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service) 53: 1–577.
  20. Widder, E.A. (November 1998). "A predatory use of counterillumination by the squaloid shark, Isistius brasiliensis". Environmental Biology of Fishes 53 (3): 267273. doi:10.1023/A:1007498915860.
  21. 1 2 3 Compagno, L.J.V. (1984). Sharks of the World: An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization. p. 9395. ISBN 92-5-101384-5.
  22. Martin, R.A. Deep Sea: Cookiecutter Shark. ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Retrieved on January 26, 2010.
  23. 1 2 Michael, S.W. (2001). Aquarium Sharks & Rays. T.F.H. Publications. pp. 89–92. ISBN 1890087572.
  24. Ceccarelli, D.M. and Williamson, D.H. (2012). "Sharks that eat sharks: opportunistic predation by wobbegongs". Coral Reefs 31 (2): 471. Bibcode:2012CorRe..31..471C. doi:10.1007/s00338-012-0878-z.
  25. "Nile Crocodile: Photos, Video, E-card, Map – National Geographic Kids". Kids.nationalgeographic.com. 2002-10-17. Retrieved 2010-03-16.
  26. "Crocodiles ambushing migrating wildebeest - warning, graphic content". National Geographic. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  27. "Nile Crocodile – Crocodylus niloticus". Angelfire.com. Retrieved 2010-03-16.
  28. Dinets, V.L. (2011). "On terrestrial hunting in crocodilians". Herpetological Bulletin 114: 15–18.
  29. Anderson, C.V.; Sheridan, T.; Deban, S.M. (2012). "Scaling of the ballistic tongue apparatus in chameleons". Journal of Morphology 273 (11): 1214–1226. doi:10.1002/jmor.20053. PMID 22730103.
  30. Anderson, Christopher V. (2009) Rhampholeon spinosus feeding video. chamaeleonidae.com
  31. 1 2 de Groot, J.H. & van Leeuwen, J.L. (2004). "Evidence for an elastic projection mechanism in the chameleon tongue". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271 (1540): 761–770. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2637.
  32. 1 2 Anderson, C.V. and Deban, S.M. (2010). "Ballistic tongue projection in chameleons maintains high performance at low temperature". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (12): 5495–5499. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.5495A. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910778107.
  33. Browne-Cooper, Robert; Brian Bush; Brad Maryan; David Robinson (2007). Reptiles and Frogs in the Bush: Southwestern Australia. University of Western Australia Press. pp. 145, 146. ISBN 9781920694746.
  34. Chris Mattison, (1992). Lizards of the World. New York: Facts on File. pp. 16, 57, 99, 175. ISBN 0-8160-5716-8.
  35. Tara Darling (Illustrator). Komodo Dragon: On Location (Darling, Kathy. on Location.). Lothrop, Lee and Shepard Books. ISBN 0-688-13777-6.
  36. Vidal, John (12 June 2008). "The terrifying truth about Komodo dragons". London: guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 19 June 2008.
  37. "Komodo National Park Frequently Asked Questions". Komodo Foundation. Retrieved 25 October 2007.
  38. Alison Ballance; Morris, Rod (2003). South Sea Islands: A Natural History. Hove: Firefly Books Ltd. ISBN 1-55297-609-2.
  39. Auffenberg, Walter (1981). The Behavioral Ecology of the Komodo Monitor. Gainesville, Florida: University Presses of Florida. ISBN 0-8130-0621-X.
  40. "Common Snapping Turtle". Canadian Museum of Nature. 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2014.
  41. "Rare soft shell turtle, nesting ground found in Cambodia," ScienceDaily, May 19, 2007.
  42. 1 2 Mydans, "How to Survive in Cambodia: For a Turtle, Beneath Sand," New York Times, May 18, 2007.
  43. 1 2 Ernst, Barbour, and Altenburg, Turtles of the World, 1998.
  44. Das, Indian turtles: A field guide, 1985.
  45. Bonin, Franck, Bernard Devaux, and Alain Dupré. Turtles of the World. JHU Press, 2006.
  46. Spawls, S., Branch, B. (1995). The Dangerous Snakes of Africa. Blandford. pp. 49–51. ISBN 978-0-88359-029-4.
  47. O'Shea, Mark (2005). Venomous Snakes of the World. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12436-1.
  48. Angilletta, MJ. (1994). "Sedentary behaviors by Green Mambas Dendroaspis angusticeps" (PDF). Herpetological Natural History 2 (2): 105–111. Retrieved 26 April 2014.
  49. 1 2 Richardson, Adele (2004). Mambas. Mankato, Minnesota: Capstone Press. p. 25. Retrieved 2010-05-19.
  50. Haagner, GV; Morgan, DR (January 1993). "The maintenance and propagation of the Black mamba Dendroaspis polylepis at the Manyeleti Reptile Centre, Eastern Transvaal". International Zoo Yearbook 32 (1): 191–196. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.1993.tb03534.x.
  51. "The S Files". The Antiguan Racer Conservation Project. 2001. Archived from the original on 31 December 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-15.
  52. Willis, E. O. (1963). "Is the Zone-Tailed Hawk a Mimic of the Turkey Vulture?". The Condor 65 (4): 313–317. doi:10.2307/1365357.
  53. Clark, William S. (2004). "Is the zone-tailed hawk a mimic?". Birding 36 (5): 495–498.
  54. Ryan, P.G. (2007). "Diving in shallow water: the foraging ecology of darters (Aves: Anhingidae)". Journal of Avian Biology 38: 507–514. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04070.x.
  55. Myers, P., Espinosa, R., Parr, C.S., Jones, T., Hammond, G.S. and Dewey, T.A. (2009). "Anhingidae". Animal Diversity Web.
  56. Spindel, E. L.; Dobie, J. L.; Buxton, D. F. (2005). "Functional mechanisms and histologic composition of the lingual appendage in the alligator snapping turtle, Macroclemys temmincki (Troost) (Testudines: Chelydridae)". Journal of Morphology 194: 287–301. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051940308.
  57. "Video of lion ant larva ambushing an ant.". National Geographic. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  58. "Antlion ambush". BBC. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  59. "Praying mantis ambushes a grasshopper". National Geographic. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  60. "Nature wildlife: Praying mantis". BBC. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  61. "How the praying mantis hides". Pawnation. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  62. Piper, R. (2007). Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals. Greenwood Press.
  63. "Trapdoor spiders". BBC. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  64. "Trapdoor spider". Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum. 2014. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  65. Adolf Kotthaus (1966). "Erstnachweis von Polycheles typhlops (Decapoda reptantia) für isländische Gewässer" [First record of Polycheles typhlops (Decapooda reptantia) from Icelandic waters]. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen (in German) 13 (4): 348–353. Bibcode:1966HWM....13..348K. doi:10.1007/BF01611954.
  66. F. Sardà, J. B. Company, G. Rotllant & M. Coll (2009). "Biological patterns and ecological indicators for Mediterranean fish and crustaceans below 1,000 m: a review". Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19: 329–347. doi:10.1007/s11160-009-9105-6.
  67. Rosa, R. and Seibel, B.A. (2010). "Slow pace of life of the Antarctic colossal squid.". Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, published online on April 20, 2010 90: 1375–1378. doi:10.1017/S0025315409991494.
  68. Bourton, J. (2010). "Monster colossal squid is slow not fearsome predator.". BBC. Retrieved December 1, 2014.
  69. Hendler, G. and Franz, D.R. (1982). "The biology of a brooding seastar, Leptasterias tenera, in Block Island Sound" (PDF). Biological Bulletin 162 (1): 273–289. doi:10.2307/1540983.
  70. Eichhorn, Susan E.; Raven, Peter H.; Evert, Ray Franklin (2005). Biology of Plants. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. p. 205. ISBN 0-7167-1007-2.
  71. 1 2 Dixon, J. "Chapter 20". Fauna of Australia 1b. Australian Biological Resources Study (ABRS).
  72. "Information sheet: Thylacine Thylacinus cynocephalus" (PDF). Victoria Museum. April 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 November 2006. Retrieved 21 November 2006.
  73. Figueirido, B., and Janis, C.M. (2011). "The predatory behaviour of the thylacine: Tasmanian tiger or marsupial wolf?". Biology Letters 7 (6): 937–940. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0364.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, February 01, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.