1729 English cricket season
| Cricket formats | first-class and single wicket |
|---|
The 1729 English cricket season is noted for the earliest known innings victory and the earliest known surviving cricket bat. References to six historically significant matches have been found.[fc 1]
First-class matches
Note that these matches are unofficially first-class.[fc 2]
| date | match title | venue | result | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 June (Tu) | Kent v Sussex | Walworth Common | result unknown | [1] |
| notes |
The match was for fifty pounds per side with a play or pay rule agreed. It is the earliest match featuring a team that is expressly called Sussex, though teams raised by patrons in earlier seasons are understood to have been composed of Sussex players. | |||
| 30 July (Wed) | Dartford v London | Dartford (precise venue not specified) | result unknown | [2] |
| notes |
The teams were described as "the Gentlemen of Dartford and London"; the stake was fifty pounds. | |||
| 5 August (Tu) | Gentlemen of Middlesex v Gentlemen of London | The Woolpack, Islington | result unknown | [3] |
| notes |
The venue was described as "in the Field behind the Woolpack Back Gate near Sadler’s Wells", the match having a stake of £50 per side. Several sources have listed the match in 1728 due to an error in original research. | |||
| 5 August (Tu) | London v Dartford | Kennington Common | Dartford won "very much" | [4] |
| notes |
Described thus: "a great Cricket Match at Kennington Common between the Londoners and the Dartford men, for a considerable Sum of Money, Wager and Betts, and the latter beat the former very much".[5] | |||
| 26 August (Tu) | Surrey v Kent | Farnham (precise venue not specified) | result unknown | [5] |
| notes |
The Daily Journal on 26 August reported that a match would be played same day near Farnham between "Mr Steed (sic) of Kent and his Company, against the best Players in the County of Surrey".[5] | |||
| 28 August (Th) | Mr Edwin Stead’s XI v Sir William Gage’s XI | Penshurst Park | Sir William Gage’s XI won by an innings? | [6][7] |
| notes |
Stead v Gage was also titled Kent (Stead) v Surrey, Sussex & Hampshire (Gage). It was 11 a side and played for 100 guineas with "some thousands" watching.[6] This match seems to have resulted in the earliest known innings victory as Gage's XI "got (within three) in one hand, as the former did in two hands, so the Kentish men (i.e., Stead's XI) threw it up". The report added re Thomas Waymark that "a groom of the Duke of Richmond signalised himself by extraordinary agility and dexterity".[6] The report then states that "(Waymark) turned the scale of victory, which for some years past has been generally on the Kentish side".[6] This indicates that inter-county matches had been played for many years previously and that there was keen rivalry with each team seeking ascendancy: i.e., as "champions" or, given a 1728 reference to the superiority of Kent, at least of "bragging rights".[3] Penshurst Park surrounds Penshurst Place, then the seat of John Sidney, 6th Earl of Leicester, near Tonbridge in Kent. | |||
| ? Sept | Sussex, Surrey & Hampshire v Kent | Lewes (precise venue not specified) | result unknown | [6] |
| notes |
A report dated 13 September says that: "the great match played at Penshurst will be played again in Sussex".[6] This is the first time that Hampshire is known to be used in a team name, though not individually.[3] | |||
County cricket
It appears that Gage's XI was representative of three counties and so should perhaps be considered a Rest of England team formed to challenge Kent, who had hitherto enjoyed: "the scale of victory, which for some years past has been generally on the Kentish side" (see above). The match on 24 June involved a team specifically named Sussex, but the result is unknown. Despite losing to Gage's team in August, Kent under the patronage of Edwin Stead is generally believed to have been the strongest county team[fc 3] of the 1720s.[8]
Other events
There is a bat in The Oval pavilion which belonged to John Chitty of Knaphill, Surrey. Dated 1729, it is the oldest known bat.[9] It looks more like a field hockey stick than a modern cricket bat but its curvature was to enable the batsman to play a ball that was always rolled or skimmed along the ground, as in bowls, never pitched. Pitching began about 30 years later and the straight bats used nowadays were invented in response to the pitched delivery.[3]
Dr Samuel Johnson attended the Universityof Oxford from October 1728 until the following summer and later told James Boswell that cricket matches were played there. Boswell mentioned this in his Life of Samuel Johnson.[1]
A local game in Gloucester on Monday, 22 September is the earliest known reference to cricket in Gloucestershire.[9]
First mentions
Counties
Clubs and teams
- Gentlemen of London
- Gentlemen of Middlesex
- Sussex (pre-county club)
- Sussex, Surrey & Hampshire
Players
- none
Venues
- Walworth Common
- The Woolpack, Islington
- Farnham
Footnotes
- ↑ Note that surviving match records to 1825 are incomplete and any statistical compilation of a player's career in that period is based on known data. Match scorecards were not always created, or have been lost, and the matches themselves were not always recorded in the press or other media. Scorecard data was not comprehensive: e.g., bowling analyses lacked balls bowled and runs conceded; bowlers were not credited with wickets when the batsman was caught or stumped; in many matches, the means of dismissal were omitted.
- ↑ "First-class cricket" was officially defined in May 1894 by a meeting at Lord's of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season. Pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective and the "unofficial first-class" designation, as applied to a given match, is based on the views of one or more substantial historical sources. For further information, see First-class cricket, Forms of cricket and History of cricket.
- ↑ "Champion County" is an unofficial seasonal title proclaimed by media or historians prior to December 1889 when the official County Championship was constituted.
References
- 1 2 Maun, p. 38.
- ↑ Maun, pp. 38–39.
- 1 2 3 4 Leach, John (2007). "From Lads to Lord's – 1729". Stumpsite. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
- ↑ Buckley, p. 3.
- 1 2 3 Maun, p. 39.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Waghorn, p. 7.
- ↑ Wilson, p. 50.
- ↑ Leach, John (2008). "Champion cricket teams since 1728". Stumpsite. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
- 1 2 Bowen, p. 263.
Bibliography
- Bowen, Rowland (1970). Cricket: A History of its Growth and Development. Eyre & Spottiswoode.
- Buckley, G. B. (1935). Fresh Light on 18th Century Cricket. Cotterell.
- Maun, Ian (2009). From Commons to Lord's, Volume One: 1700 to 1750. Roger Heavens. ISBN 978-1-900592-52-9.
- Waghorn, H. T. (1906). The Dawn of Cricket. Electric Press.
- Wilson, Martin (2005). An Index to Waghorn. Bodyline.
Additional reading
- ACS (1981). A Guide to Important Cricket Matches Played in the British Isles 1709 – 1863. Nottingham: ACS.
- Altham, H. S. (1962). A History of Cricket, Volume 1 (to 1914). George Allen & Unwin.
- Birley, Derek (1999). A Social History of English Cricket. Aurum.
- Buckley, G. B. (1937). Fresh Light on pre-Victorian Cricket. Cotterell.
- Major, John (2007). More Than A Game. HarperCollins.
- Marshall, John (1961). The Duke who was Cricket. Muller.
- McCann, Tim (2004). Sussex Cricket in the Eighteenth Century. Sussex Record Society.
- Underdown, David (2000). Start of Play. Allen Lane.
External links
- Leach, John (2008). "Classification of cricket matches from 1697 to 1825". Stumpsite.
| ||||||
| ||||||||||