Vibhajyavāda

Mahinda (buddhist monk)


Early
Buddhism
Scriptures

Gandhāran texts
Āgamas
Pāli Canon

Councils

1st Council
2nd Council
3rd Council
4th Council

Schools

First Sangha
└ Mahāsāṃghika
　├ Ekavyāvahārika
　├ Lokottaravāda
　├ Bahuśrutīya
　├ Prajñaptivāda
　└ Caitika
└ Sthaviras
　├ Mahīśāsaka
　├ Dharmaguptaka
　├ Kāśyapīya
　├ Sarvāstivāda
　└ Vibhajyavāda
　　└ Theravāda

Vibhajyavāda (Sanskrit: विभाज्यवाद; Pāli: Vibhajjavāda; traditional Chinese: 分別說部; ; pinyin: fēnbiéshuō-bù) was an early Buddhist school or a group of early Buddhist schools.

Nomenclature and etymology

The word Vibhajyavāda may be parsed into vibhajya, loosely meaning "dividing", "analyzing" and vāda holding the semantic field: "doctrine", "teachings".[1] According to Andrew Skilton, the analysis of phenomena (Skt. dharmas) was the doctrinal emphasis and preoccupation of the Vibhajyavādins.[2]

History

The Vibhajyavādins are not recorded uniformly by early Buddhist traditions as being a distinct sect, nor being associated with any one period of time.[3] The Theravādin Kathāvatthu does not contain any reference to a Vibhajyavāda school, but the Sammatīyas and the Mahāsāṃghika do mention the Vibhajyavādins, albeit in different ways.[4] According to the Sammatīya sect, the Vibhajyavādins developed from the Sarvāstivāda school.[5] However, the Mahāsāṃghikas saw the Vibhajyavādins as being offshoots from the root schism in Buddhism, which according to them produced three sects: the Sthaviras, the Mahāsāṃghikas, and the Vibhajyavādins.[6] The Mahāsāṃghikas then list the Mahīśāsaka, Dharmaguptaka, Kāśyapīya, and Tāmraparnīya sects as having descended from the Vibhajyavādins.[7]

The Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma Mahāvibhāṣa Śāstra describes the Vibhajyavādins as being the type of heretics who "make objections, who uphold harmful doctrines and attack those who follow the authentic Dharma".[8][9]

Some scholars believe that there was no separate "Vibhajyavāda" sect, but that the term vibhajyavāda was sometimes affixed to the name of a school to indicate that it differed from the main school on some doctrines.[10] In this sense, they would be vibhajyavādins of that particular school.[11] This is also found in the Mahāsāṃghika branch with the Prajñaptivāda school, whose members preferred to be called Bahuśrutiya-Vibhajyavādins.[12] It has been suggested that the Theravādins of Sri Lanka may have been Sthavira-Vibhajyavādins, differing somewhat from the main Sthavira school in their doctrinal interpretations.[13]

In Theravāda traditions

The Third Buddhist Council, under the leadership of Moggaliputta Tissa emphasized this analytical approach. Some sub-divisions of Sthavira school which adopted this approach were regrouped and termed as the followers of Vibhajjavāda. Those not included in the Vibhajjavāda group were the Mahāsāṃghikas, Sarvāstivāda and Sammitīya, who were regarded as having the ‘wrong view’ by the Vibhajjavādins, according to the Theravadin Kathavatthu, a work ascribed to Moggaliputta Tissa.

The Theravada tradition holds that after the Third Council, the Vibhajjavādins evolved into four groups: the Mahīśāsaka, Kāśyapīya, Dharmaguptaka, and the Tāmraparnīya. Theravada is descended from the Tāmraparnīya, which means 'the Sri Lankan lineage'. On the other hand, some sources suggest that Mahīśāsaka, Kāśyapīya and Dharmaguptaka did not evolve directly from the Vibhajjavādins, although an original connection between these groups is posited due to the similarities of their respective Vinayas.

The Vibhajjavadins are claimed to have seen themselves as orthodox Sthaviras.

According to Sinhalese tradition, Buddhism under the name of Vibhajjavāda was brought to Sri Lanka by Mahinda, who is believed to be the son of Emperor Asoka, an event dated by modern scholars to 246 BCE.

See also

Early Buddhist schools

References

  1. ↑ Skilton, Andrew. A Concise History of Buddhism. 2004. p. 67
  2. ↑ Skilton, Andrew. A Concise History of Buddhism. 2004. p. 67
  3. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 51
  4. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 51
  5. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 51
  6. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 51
  7. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 51
  8. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 48
  9. ↑ Tripathi, Sridhar. Encyclopaedia of Pali Literature. 2008. p. 113
  10. ↑ Dutt, Nalinaksha. Buddhist Sects in India. 1998. p. 211
  11. ↑ Dutt, Nalinaksha. Buddhist Sects in India. 1998. p. 211
  12. ↑ Baruah, Bibhuti. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. 2008. p. 48
  13. ↑ Dutt, Nalinaksha. Buddhist Sects in India. 1998. p. 211

Further reading

External links