Turban effect

Part of a series on
Islamophobia
Issues Persecution of Muslims Islamophobic incidents Counterjihad Eurabia Quran desecration
Specific incidents Bosphorus serial murders Bijeljina massacre Bosnian Genocide Cave of the Patriarchs massacre Dove World Quran-burning controversy Foča massacres Flying imams incident Glogova massacre Israeli settler violence Innocence of Muslims Jerry Klein's 2006 radio experiment Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy Lašva Valley ethnic cleansing Malmö Mosque Attacks 2009–10 Malmö shootings Murder of Balbir Singh Sodhi Murder of Marwa El-Sherbini Minaret controversy in Switzerland Muslim Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide 2011 Norway attacks Omarska camp 2005 Quran desecration controversy 2012 Rakhine State riots Sabra and Shatila massacre Solingen arson attack of 1993 Srebrenica massacre
Organisations 969 Movement David Horowitz Freedom Center Dove World Outreach Center English Defence League European Defence League Pegida Stop Islamization of America Stop Islamisation of Denmark Stop Islamisation of Europe Stop Islamisation of Norway
Blogs Atlas Shrugs The Brussels Journal Jihad Watch Politically Incorrect Fjordman Document.no
Opposition Forum Against Islamophobia and Racism Islamophobia Watch Tell MAMA UK CAIR Muslim American Society Southern Poverty Law Center

The turban effect is a term coined in a paper published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, whose lead author is Christian Unkelbach.^[1] The paper reports on a study in which Australian participants played a video game involving shooting armed characters and refraining from shooting unarmed characters under time pressure. Researchers found that participants were more likely to shoot at individuals wearing turbans or hijabs than those without Muslim attire. Moreover, participants seemed unaware that they had this proclivity.

Interpretation

The authors contend their study provides evidence of Islamophobia, and blame the media for negative portrayals of Muslims. They made no reference to previous military studies which showed the same effect on individuals wearing hoods or helmets, explained as dehumanization.

An opinion piece in The Guardian^[2] by Jonathan Birdwell considered the alternative explanation "that the 'turban effect' does not reveal a deep-seated (and recently revived) prejudice, but rather our instinctual disposition towards inductive reasoning – that is, making predictions about the future on the basis of past experience."

Further reading

• Unkelbach, Christian; Forgas, Joseph; Denson, Thomas (2008). "The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (5): 1409–1413. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.003. 
• Unkelbach, Christian; Schneider, Hella; Gode, Kai; Senft, Miriam (2010). "A Turban Effect, Too: Selection Biases Against Women Wearing Muslim Headscarves". Social Psychological and Personality Science 1 (4): 378–383. doi:10.1177/1948550610378381. 

References