Treatise on Law
Treatise on Law is St. Thomas Aquinas' major work of legal philosophy. It forms questions 90-108 of the Prima Secundæ ("First [Part] of the Second [Part]") of the Summa Theologiæ,[1] Aquinas' masterwork of Scholastic philosophical theology. Along with Aristotelianism, it forms the basis for the legal theory of Catholic canon law.[2]
Aquinas' notion of law
Question 90 culminates in Aquinas' definition of law:[3]
“ | Thus from the four preceding articles [of Question 90], the definition of law may be gathered; and it is nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated.[4] | ” |
However, strictly speaking, this is a definition of human law.[5] The term "law" as used by Aquinas is equivocal, meaning that the term does not have exactly the same meaning in every case.[6] For Aquinas, law is an "analogous term"—a term with meanings regulated by a chief meaning.[7] Human law is the primary meaning of "law" which is applied analogously to the other meanings.[8]
"an ordinance of reason"
For Aquinas, law must be reasonable;[9] it is based in reason and not in the mere will of the legislator, as "the Jurist" says.[10][11]
"for the common good"
The goal or end of law is the good of the given community upon which it is binding.[12]
Kinds of law
Human law
For Aquinas, human law is only valid if it conforms to natural law. If a law is unjust, then it is not actually a law, but is a "perversion of law".[13][14]
Layout[15]
1. IN GENERAL
- Q. 90: Of the Essence of Law
- Q. 91: Of the Various Kinds of Law
- Q. 92: Of the Effects of Law
2. IN PARTICULAR
- Q. 93: Of the Eternal Law
- Q. 94: Of the Natural Law
- Q. 95: Of Human Law
- Q. 96: Of the Power of Human Law
- Q. 97: Of Change in Laws
- Q. 98: Of the Old Law
- Q. 99: Of the Precepts of the Old Law
- Q. 100: Of the Moral Precepts of the Old Law
- Q. 101: Of the Ceremonial Precepts in Themselves
- Q. 102: Of the Causes of the Ceremonial Precepts
- Q. 103: Of the Duration of the Ceremonial Precepts
- Q. 104: Of the Judicial Precepts
- Q. 105: Of the Reason for the Judicial Precepts
- Q. 106: Of the Law of the Gospel, Called the New Law, Considered in Itself
- Q. 107: Of the New Law as Compared with the Old
- Q. 108: Of Those Things That Are Contained in the New Law
See also
- St. Thomas Aquinas
- Summa Theologica
- Philosophy of law
References
- ↑ THE LOGIC OF NATURAL LAW IN AQUINAS'S "TREATISE ON LAW"
James Fieser
Journal of Philosophical Research, 1992, Vol. 17, pp. 147-164.
accessed Dec-17-2013 - ↑ Dr. Edward N. Peters, CanonLaw.info, accessed Dec-17-2013
- ↑ Gateway Edition, pg. ix
- ↑ https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treatise_on_Law, accessed Dec-19-2013
- ↑ Gateway Edition, pg. viii
- ↑ Gateway Edition, pg. vii
- ↑ Gateway Edition, pg. vi
- ↑ Gateway Edition, pg. x
- ↑ Law of Christ I, pg. 236
- ↑ Gateway Edition, pg. 2 (Summa, Ia-IIæ, Q.90, A.1, Obj.3)
- ↑ J. Budziszewski, Commentary on Treatise on Law, accessed Dec-19-2013
- ↑ Law of Christ I, pg. 236
- ↑ Summa I-II, q95, a2, 'dicendum quod
- ↑ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Natural Law", accessed Dec-20-2013
- ↑ https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treatise_on_Law, accessed Dec-17-2013
Bibliography
St. Thomas Aquinas, Treatise on Law (Summa Theologica, Questions 90-97)
With a New Introduction by Ralph McInerny, University of Notre Dame
Gateway Editions, Regnery Publishing, Inc.
Washington, D.C.
©1956; 2001 printing
Bernard Häring, C.SS.R, The Law of Christ, Vol. I
Translated by Edwin G. Kaiser, C.PP.S.
The Newman Press
Westminster, Maryland
©1961, Second Printing November 1961