Tor functor

In homological algebra, the Tor functors are the derived functors of the tensor product functor. They were first defined in generality to express the Künneth theorem and universal coefficient theorem in algebraic topology.

Specifically, suppose R is a ring, and denote by R-Mod the category of left R-modules and by Mod-R the category of right R-modules (if R is commutative, the two categories coincide). Pick a fixed module B in R-Mod. For A in Mod-R, set T(A) = ARB. Then T is a right exact functor from Mod-R to the category of abelian groups Ab (in the case when R is commutative, it is a right exact functor from Mod-R to Mod-R) and its left derived functors LnT are defined. We set

\mathrm{Tor}_n^R(A,B)=(L_nT)(A)

i.e., we take a projective resolution

\cdots\rightarrow P_2 \rightarrow P_1 \rightarrow P_0 \rightarrow A\rightarrow 0

then remove the A term and tensor the projective resolution with B to get the complex

\cdots \rightarrow P_2\otimes_R B \rightarrow P_1\otimes_R B \rightarrow P_0\otimes_R B  \rightarrow 0

(note that ARB does not appear and the last arrow is just the zero map) and take the homology of this complex.

Properties

\cdots\rightarrow\mathrm{Tor}_2^R(M,B)\rightarrow\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(K,B)\rightarrow\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(L,B)\rightarrow\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(M,B)\rightarrow K\otimes B\rightarrow L\otimes B\rightarrow M\otimes B\rightarrow 0.
\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(R/(r),B)=\{b\in B:rb=0\},

from which the terminology Tor (that is, Torsion) comes: see torsion subgroup.

\mathrm{Tor}_n^R \left (\bigoplus_i A_i, \bigoplus_j B_j \right) \simeq \bigoplus_i \bigoplus_j \mathrm{Tor}_n^R(A_i,B_j)

Here is the idea for abelian groups (i.e., the case R=Z and n=1). Fix a free resolution of L
i
as follows

 0 \to M_i \to K_i \to L_i,

so that M
i
and K
i
are free abelian groups. This gives rise to a double-complex with exact rows and columns

Start with x \in TorZ
1
(L
1
, L
2
), so \beta_{03}(x) \in Ker(\beta_{13}). Let x
12
\in M
1
\otimes K
2
be such that \alpha_{12}(x
12
) = \beta_{03}(x). Then

 \alpha_{22}\circ \beta_{12}(x_{12}) = \beta_{13} \circ \alpha_{21}(x_{12}) = \beta_{13} \circ \beta_{03}(x) = 0,

i.e., \beta_{12}(x
12
) \in Ker(\alpha_{22}). By exactness of the second row, this means that \beta_{12}(x
12
) = \alpha_{21}(x
21
) for some unique x
21
\in K
1
\otimes M
2
. Then

 \alpha_{31}\circ\beta_{21}(x_{21}) = \beta_{22}\circ\alpha_{21}(x_{21}) = \beta_{22}\circ\beta_{12}(x_{12})=0,

i.e., \beta_{21}(x
21
) \in Ker(\alpha_{31}). By exactness of the bottom row, this means that \beta_{21}(x
21
) = \alpha_{30}(y) for some unique y \in TorZ
1
(L
2
, L
1
).

Upon checking that y is uniquely determined by x (not dependent on the choice of x
12
), this defines a function TorZ
n
(L
1
, L
2
) \to TorZ
n
(L
2
, L
1
), taking x to y, which is a group homomorphism. One may check that this map has an inverse, namely the function TorZ
n
(L
2
, L
1
) \to TorZ
n
(L
1
, L
2
) defined in a similarly manner. One can also check that the function does not depend on the choice of free resolutions.

See also

References