Scratch hardness
Scratch hardness tests are used to determine the hardness of a material to scratches and abrasion. The earliest test was developed by mineralogist Friedrich Mohs in 1820 (see Mohs scale). It is based on relative scratch hardness, with talc assigned a value of 1 and diamond assigned a value of 10. Mohs' scale had two limitations; it was not linear, and most modern abrasives fall between 9 and 10.
Ridgeway[1] modified the Mohs scale by giving garnet a hardness of 10 and diamond a hardness of 15. Woodell[2] extended the scale further by using resistance to abrasion, where diamond equals 42.5. Resistance to abrasion is less affected by surface variations than other methods of indentations.
There is a linear relationship between cohesive energy density (lattice energy per volume) and Woodwell wear resistance, occurring between corundum (H=9) and diamond (H=42.5).[3]
Material | Mohs' scale | Ridgeway's scale | Woodell's scale |
---|---|---|---|
talc | 1 | ||
gypsum | 2 | ||
calcite | 3 | ||
fluorite | 4 | ||
apatite | 5 | ||
orthoclase | 6 | 6 | |
vitreous silica | 7 | ||
quartz | 7 | 8 | 7 |
topaz | 8 | 9 | |
garnet | 10 | ||
corundum | 9 | 9 | |
fused ZrO2 | 11 | ||
fused ZrO2/Al2O3 | |||
fused Al2O3 | 12 | ||
SiC | 13 | 14 | |
boron carbide | 14 | ||
cubic boron nitride | |||
diamond | 10 | 15 | 42.5 |
References
- ↑ Ridgeway, R. R; Ballard, A. H. and Bailey, B. L. (1933). "A revised Mohs hardness scale". Trans Electrochem Soc 63: 369.
- ↑ Woodell, C.E (1935). "Method of Comparing the Hardness of Electric Furnace Products and Natural Abrasives". Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 68: 111–130. doi:10.1149/1.3493860.
- ↑ Plendl, J.N. (1962). "Hardness of Nonmetallic Solids on an Atomic Basis". Phys. Rev. 125 (3): 828–832. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.125.828.
|first2=
missing|last2=
in Authors list (help)