Proto-Finnic language

Proto-Finnic or Proto-Baltic-Finnic is the common ancestor of the Finnic languages, which include the national languages Finnish and Estonian. Proto-Finnic is not attested in any texts, but has been reconstructed by linguists. Proto-Finnic is itself descended ultimately from Proto-Uralic.

Background

Three stages of Proto-Finnic are distinguished in literature.

Changes up to Late Proto-Finnic

Phonology

The sounds of Proto-Finnic can be reconstructed through the comparative method.

Transcription

Reconstructed Proto-Finnic is traditionally transcribed using the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet. The following UPA and related conventions are adopted in this article for transcribing Proto-Finnic forms:

Consonants

The Proto-Finnic consonant inventory had relatively few phonemic fricatives, much like that of the modern Finnic languages. Voicing was not phonemically contrastive, but the language did possess voiced allophones of certain voiceless consonants.

The table below lists the consonantal phonemes of Late Proto-Finnic.[10][11] Phones written in parentheses represent allophones and are not independent phonemes. When a consonant is notated in this article with a symbol distinct from the corresponding IPA symbol, the former is given first, followed by the latter.

Proto-Finnic consonants
  Labial Dental/
Alveolar		 Palatal Velar
Nasals m n ([ŋ])
Plosives Voiceless p t k
Voiced (b) (d) (ɡ)
Affricate c /t͡s/
Fricatives Voiceless s h /x/
Voiced (β) (ð) (ɣ)
Trill r
Approximant v /w/ j
Lateral l

Proto-Finnic possessed two phonemic levels of consonant duration, short and long (geminate). The contrast itself had been inherited from Proto-Uralic, but was considerably expanded: all consonants except *r, *h, *j and *w could be short or long. The three plosives and the affricate *c also possessed a half-long duration ([pˑ], [tˑ], [kˑ] and [tsˑ]), but these were in complementary (allophonic) distribution with fully long consonants, and therefore were not phonemic. They appeared in predictable positions as a result of consonant gradation, like the voiced fricatives.

Consonant gradation

Consonant gradation was a process of lenition that affected the obstruents. Short plosives became voiced fricatives, while long plosives became half-long:

Strong grade Weak grade
p b ([β], [b])
t d ([ð], [d])
k g ([ɣ], [ɡ])
c [t͡s] s
s h [x]
pp p' [pˑ]
tt t' [tˑ]
kk k' [kˑ]
cc [tt͡s] c' [t͡sˑ]

Voiced plosives occurred after nasals (mb nd ŋg), voiced fricatives in all other weak grade environments.

Gradation occurred in two different environments, and can therefore be split into two types:

It is unclear whether consonant gradation was a Finnic innovation, or a retention of an old Uralic feature that was lost in most other Uralic branches. It is likely that it was inherited from an earlier stage that was also the ancestor of the Sami languages, which have gradation that is very similar to that found in the Finnic languages. However, it was still productive after certain sound changes specific to Finnic, such as the apocope of final *-i, so it was probably present as a phonetic "post-processing" rule (Surface filter) over a long period of time. It is no longer fully productive in any Finnic language, but most languages still retain large amounts of words preserving the earlier alternations.

Vowels

The Proto-Finnic vowel inventory was very similar to that of modern Finnish, although the distribution of the sounds was different. The following table lists the monophthong vowels reconstructable for Proto-Finnic.[10][12]

Proto-Finnic monophthongs
Front
neutral		 Front Back
Close i, ii
/i/, /iː/		 ü, üü
/ü/, /üː/		 u, uu
/u/, /uː/
Mid e, ee
/e/, /eː/		 (ö), öö
(/ø/), /øː/		 o, oo, (ë)
/o/, /oː/, ([ɤ])
Open ä, ää
/æ/, /æː/		 a, aa
/ɑ/, /ɑː/

All vowels could occur both short and long. In Proto-Uralic, rounded vowels (*u, *ü, *o) could not occur in non-initial syllables, but because of sound changes, they did appear in Proto-Finnic.

The short unrounded mid back vowel *ë was not an independent vowel, but appeared as the counterpart of the front vowel *e in the system of harmony. It merged with *e in most Finnic languages, but not in South Estonian or Votic. See below under vowel harmony for more details.

The status of short *ö is unclear. It was not present in ancestral Proto-Uralic, and many instances of ö found in modern Finnic languages have only developed after Proto-Finnic, due to various sound changes. For example, Finnish has öy from *eü: löytä- 'to find', köysi 'rope' < Proto-Finnic *leütä-, *keüci, while Estonian has unrounded the diphthong instead, giving leida- and köis. Short ö was also generally added to the system for reasons of symmetry, to complete the system of vowel harmony (see below). This happened in Finnish näkö 'sight' < Proto-Finnic *näko, but not in Votic näko.

The existence of long öö is clear, as this sound had regularly evolved from other combinations of sounds, in words of Uralic origin (e.g. *söö- 'to eat' ← Proto-Uralic *sewi-).

Diphthongs

Proto-Finnic also possessed diphthongs, which were formed by combinations of a short vowel with the vowels /i/, /y/ and /u/, or equivalently with the semivowels /j/ and /w/.

Proto-Finnic diphthongs[12]
Front + *i Front + *ü Front + *u Back + *i Back + *u
Close *üi
/yi/ 		*iü
/iy/ 		*iu
/iu/ 		*ui
/ui/
Mid to close *ei, *öi
/ei/, /øi/ 		*eü
/ey/ 		*eu
/eu ~ ɤu/ 		*oi
/oi/ 		*ou
/ou/
Open to close *äi
/æi/ 		*äü
/æy/ 		*ai
/ɑi/ 		*au
/ɑu/

No length contrast occurred in diphthongs. A long vowel followed by a close vowel as a suffix was shortened: e.g. the imperfect forms of *saa- "to receive", *söö- "to eat" were *sai, *söi. This process is the only reconstructible source of *öi, *üi.

Vowel harmony

Proto-Finnic possessed a system of vowel harmony very similar to the system found in modern Finnish. Vowels in non-initial syllables had either a front or a back vowel, depending on the quality of the vowel of the first syllable. If the first syllable contained a front vowel, non-initial syllables would contain such vowels as well, while back vowels in the first syllable would be matched with back vowels in the other syllables. Thus, all inflectional and derivational suffixes came in two forms, a front-harmonic and a back-harmonic variety.

In non-initial syllables, the vowels e and i were originally a single reduced schwa-like vowel in Proto-Uralic, but had become differentiated in height over time. i arose word-finally, while e appeared medially. These vowels were front vowels at the time, and had back-vowel counterparts ë and ï. In Proto-Finnic, ï had merged into i, so that i was now neutral to vowel harmony and could occur in both front-vowel and back-vowel words, even if it was phonetically a front vowel. The vowels e and ë appeared to have remained distinct in Proto-Finnic, and remained so in North and South Estonian (as e and õ) and Votic.[13] In the other Finnic languages, they merged as e.

Phonotactics

Stress was not phonemic. Words were stressed in a trochaic pattern, with primary stress on the first syllable of a word, and secondary stress on every following odd-numbered syllable.

Root words included at least two moras, and generally followed the structure CVCV, CVCCV, CVVCV. Rarer root types included monosyllabic roots, CVV, with either a long vowel (e.g. *maa "land, earth"; *puu "tree, wood") or a diphthong (e.g. *täi "louse", *käü-däk "to walk"); roots with three syllables: CVCVCV (e.g. *petägä "pine"; *vasara "hammer") or CVCCVCV (e.g. *kattila "kettle"); and roots with a long vowel in a closed syllable: CVVCCV (e.g. *mëëkka "sword"). A syllable (and, hence, a word) could begin and end with at most one consonant. Any consonant phoneme could begin or end a syllable, but word-finally only the alveolar consonants (*l, *n, *t, *r, *s and perhaps *c) and the velars *k and *h could appear. Final *-k and *-h were often lost in the later Finnic languages, but occasionally left traces of their former presence.

Word-internal consonant clusters were limited to two elements originally. However, the widespread syncope of -e- (detailed above) could cause a cluster to come into contact with a third consonant. When such impermissible clusters appeared, this was generally solved by deleting one or more elements in the cluster, usually the first. Likewise, the apocope of -i after two or more syllables could create word-final clusters, which were also simplified. This led to alternations that are still seen, though unproductive, in e.g. Finnish:

Note in the examples of tuhatta and kolmatta that Proto-Finnic did not initially tolerate clusters of a sonorant plus a geminate consonant (i.e. clusters like -ntt-). Through loanwords and further syncope, these have only later become permissible in the Finnic languages.

Traditionally a single three-consonant cluster *-str- has been reconstructed for a small group of words showing *-tr- in Southern Finnic and in Eastern Finnish, *-sr- in Karelian and Veps, and /-hr-/ in Western Finnish. This has recently been suggested to be reinterpreted as a two-consonant cluster *-cr- with an affricate as the initial member.

Grammar

All inflectional and derivational endings containing a or u also had front-vowel variants with ä and ü, which matched the vowels in the word stem following the rules of vowel harmony. o did not follow this rule, as noted above.

Endings which closed the final syllable of a word triggered radical gradation on that syllable. An ending could also open a previously closed syllable, which would undo the gradation. Suffixal gradation affected the endings themselves. For example, partitive -ta would appear as -da when added to a two-syllable word ending in a vowel (e.g. *kala, *kalada "fish"), but as -ta after a third syllable or a consonant (*veci, *vettä "water").

Nouns and adjectives

Cases

Proto-Finnic nouns declined in at least 13 cases. Adjectives did not originally decline, but adjective-noun agreement was innovated in Proto-Finnic, probably by influence of the nearby Indo-European languages. The plural of the nominative and accusative was marked with the ending -t, while the plural of the other cases used -i-. The genitive and accusative singular were originally distinct (genitive *-n, accusative *-m), but had fallen together when final *-m became *-n through regular sound change. Some pronouns had a different accusative ending, which distinguished them.

The following cases were present:[10][14]

Case Singular
ending		 Plural
ending		 Meaning/use
Nominative ∅ *-t Subject, object of imperative
Accusative *-n (also -t) *-t Complete (telic) object
Genitive *-n *-ten (-den)
*-iden		 Possession, relation
Partitive *-ta (-da) *-ita (-ida) Partial object, indefinite amount
Locative cases
Inessive *-ssa *-issa Being inside
Elative *-sta *-ista Motion out of
Illative *-sen (-hen) *-ihen Motion into
Adessive *-lla *-illa Being on/at
Ablative *-lta *-ilta Motion off/from
Allative *-len / *-lek *-ilen / *-ilek Motion onto/towards
Other cases
Essive *-na *-ina Being, acting as
Translative *-ksi *-iksi Becoming, turning into
Abessive *-tta(k) *-itta(k) Without, lacking
Comitative *-nek *-inek With, in company of
Instructive *-n *-in With, by means of

The genitive plural was formed in two different ways:

Both types are still found in Finnish, although unevenly distributed. In the western type, the regular loss of -d- after an unstressed (even-numbered) syllable has created forms such as -ain (< *-a-den), which are now archaic, or dialectal.

Adjective comparison

Adjectives formed comparatives using the suffix *-mpa.[10] This suffix survives in all Finnic languages, although in several the nominative has been replaced with -mpi for unclear reasons.

Only the northernmost Finnic languages have a distinct superlative suffix, like Finnish -in ~ -impa-. The suffix was possibly originally a consonantal stem *-im(e)-, which was modified to resemble the comparative more closely in Finnish. Its consonantal nature is apparent in an older, now-obsolete essive case form of the superlative in Finnish, which ended in -inna (< *-im-na < *-ime-na with syncope).

Verbs

Finite forms

Proto-Finnic inherited at least the following grammatical moods:[10]

The indicative mood distinguished between present (which also functioned as future) and past tense, while the other moods had no tense distinctions. New "perfect" and "pluperfect" tenses had also been formed, probably by influence of the Indo-European languages. These were created using a form of the copula *oldak "to be" and a participle.

There were six forms for each mood, for three persons and two numbers. In addition, there were two more forms. One was a form that is often called "passive" or "fourth person", and indicated an unspecified person. The second was the "connegative" form, which was used together with the negative verb to form negated sentences.

All moods except the imperative shared more or less the same endings:[10][15]

Singular Plural
First person *-n *-mmek / -mmak
Second person *-t *-ttek / *-ttak
Third person *-pi (-βi), - *-βat, -
Passive *-tta- + (tense/mood suffix) + *-sen (-hen)
Connegative *-k

The variation between forms with *-e- and forms with *-a- in the 1st and 2nd person plural reflects a former distinction between the dual and the plural (respectively), although this has not been attested from any Finnic variety.

The third person forms only had an ending in the present indicative. In all other tenses and moods, there was no ending and the singular and plural were identical. The 3rd person singular was entirely unmarked in South Estonian: the Late Proto-Finnic ending had evolved from the participle *-pa during the Middle Proto-Finnic stage, and this innovation had not reached South Estonian, which was already separated.

The imperative had its own set of endings:[10]

Singular Plural
First person -ka-da/e-mme/a
Second person -k -ka-da/e
Third person -ka-hen -ka-hen
Passive -tta-ka-hen
Connegative -ga-k

There is also some evidence of a distinct optative mood, which is preserved in Finnish as -os (second-person singular). It is reconstructed as *-go-s, consisting of the mood suffix *-ko- and the second-person singular ending *-s. This mood suffix gave rise to alternative imperative forms in some languages, such as Finnish third-person singular -koon < *-ko-hen (the plural -koot has -t by analogy) and passive -ttakoon < *-tta-ko-hen.

Non-finite forms

In addition, there were also several non-finite forms.[16]

Infinitive I *-tak (-dak) : *-ta- (-da-)
Infinitive II *-te- (-de-)
Gerund ("Infinitive III") *-ma
Action noun ("Infinitive IV") *-minen : *-mise-
Present active participle *-pa (-ba)
Present passive participle *-ttapa (-ttaba)
Past active participle *-nut
Past passive participle *-ttu

Negative verb

Proto-Finnic, like its descendants, expressed negation using a special negative verb. This verb was defective and inflected only in the indicative ("does not", "did not") and the imperative ("do not"). The main verb was placed in its special connegative form, and expressed the main mood. The verb was also suppletive, having the stem *e-. in the indicative and variously *äl-, *el-, *är- or *er- in the imperative.

Originally, the negative verb inflected as a more complete verb: it had both present and past tense, and possibly participles and other moods as well. However, no traces of moods other than the indicative are found in any Finnic language. Usage of the past tense was falling out of use during the Proto-Finnic period as well, and was being replaced by a construction of present tense of the negative verb, plus past active participle. Its forms survive only in the South Estonian dialects. A remnant of what may be either a present active participle or an archaic third-person singular present form survives in the prefix *epä- "un-, not" (Finnish epä-, Estonian eba-).

Negation of non-finite constructions was expressed using the abessive case of the infinitives or participles.

Possessive suffixes

Proto-Finnic also had special possessive suffixes for nouns, which acted partly as genitives. The following are reconstructable:[10]

Singular Plural
First person -ni -mme / -mma
Second person -ci -nne / -nna
Third person -nsa -nsa

As in the verb endings, the variation between *-e- and *-a- in the 1st and 2nd person plural reflects an older dual-plural distinction.

Later developments

The following is an overview of the more important changes that happened after the Proto-Finnic period.

Obstruent cluster assimilation

This change happened very late in the Proto-Finnic period, but as South Estonian developed somewhat differently, it shows that dialectal diversification was beginning to occur around this time.

In South Estonian, *p and *k assimilate to a following dental obstruent:

In other Finnic dialects, the effect is much more limited:

In all Finnic dialects, original *pt and *kt have the same reflex. It is therefore impossible to distinguish them in reconstruction, unless there is additional internal evidence (in the form of grammatical alternations) or external evidence (from non-Finnic languages).

The consonants that formed from this change were not subject to consonant gradation at first, and the geminates generally remained in the strong grade. This is shown in, for example, the Finnish second-person plural verb ending -tte < *-ktek, which would have a single *-t- if it had gradated. In many cases, gradation was extended by analogy however, as in Võro katõssa above, and nätäq "to see" < *näktäk. Finnish and (North) Estonian gained the alternation ht : hd as well, so that they have nähdä : nähty and näha : nähtu respectively (compare Karelian nähtä, Veps nähta with no gradation).

Developments to the affricates *c and *cc

The non-geminated *c becomes *s generally: Proto-Finnic *veci "water", *cika "pig", *-nen : *-ce- (adjective suffix) > Finnish vesi, sika, -nen : -se-. However, occasionally ts or ds remains in South Estonian: Võro vesi, tsiga, -ne : -dse- or -se-. The merging of *c and *s often makes it impossible to distinguish the two sounds using Finnic evidence alone, if internal reconstruction is not viable (e. g., via t ~ s alternations from assibilation, or South Estonian ts versus other Finnic ps/ks).

The geminate affricate *cc generally remains, often spelled ⟨ts⟩. In Karelian, Ingrian and Votic and some Finnish dialects, the two grades remain distinguished (in Karelian as ⟨čč⟩ : ⟨č⟩, in Ingrian and Votic as ⟨tts⟩ ~ ⟨ts⟩). In all other Finnic languages the two grades fall together (written in Veps as ⟨c⟩, as ⟨ts⟩ in the others).

In early Finnish, both grades are fronted to interdental *θθ ~ *θ, which later changes into a variety of other dialect-specific sounds. Examples found are gradation patterns tt : t, ht : h, ht : t, ss : s or non-gradating tt or ht. In early written Finnish, the interdental fricatives are written as ⟨tz⟩ (for both grades) in the earliest records, which in Standard Finnish has led to the spelling pronunciation /ts/ (treated as a consonant cluster and hence no longer subject to consonant gradation).

The vowel õ

In the southern Finnic languages, a new back unrounded mid vowel [ɤ] develops from *e in words with back vowel harmony. For example Proto-Finnic *velka "debt" > Estonian võlg, Võro võlg, but > Finnish velka. South Estonian and Votic show this development in all syllables, so that e and õ become a front and back vowel harmony pair. This may have also occurred in the earlier history of north (Standard) Estonian, but vowel harmony was later abandoned, undoing the change if it did occur.

In South Estonian, õ is a nasal then raised to a central unrounded vowel [ɨ] (represented orthographically as ⟨y⟩), parallel to the development of the other mid vowels. E.g. Võro ynn', Estonian õnn "luck"; Võro ryngas, Estonian rõngas "ring".

In Estonian and Votic, more rarely Livonian, instances of õ also develop by unrounding of earlier short *o. The detailed history of this change is unclear and shows much variation even between individual dialects of (North) Estonian.[17] The development of *o to õ is the most general in Votic (if recent loanwords from Ingrian, Finnish and Russian are discounted)[18] and in the Kodavere dialect of Estonian.[19] Three main groups can thus be distinguished:[20]

Proto-Finnic Votic Estonian Võro Livonian Finnish Meaning Unrounding in
*hopëda õpõa hõbe hõpõ õ'bdõ hopea "silver" All Southern Finnic varieties
*kova kõva kõva kõva kõvā kova "hard"
*souta- sõutaa sõudma sõudma sõidõ soutaa "to row"
*votta- võttaa võtma võtma võttõ ottaa "to take"
*korva kõrva kõrv kõrv kūora korva "ear" South Estonian, North Estonian and Votic
*olki õltši õlg olg' vȯļg olki "hay"
*pohja põhja põhi põhi, põha pū'oj pohja "bottom"
*sormi sõrmi sõrm sõrm' suoŗm sormi "finger"
*kota kõta koda koda kuodā kota "house" Only in Votic and Kodavere Estonian
*oja õja oja oja, uja vȯja oja "ditch"
*oksa õhsa oks oss oksā oksa "branch"
*tohti- tõhtia tohtima toht'ma tū'odõ tohtia "to dare"

A particularly interesting example is "to take", which suggests that at least some instances of this change preceded the general Finnic loss of word-initial *v- before rounded vowels, which affected Finnish and rest of Northern Finnic (which kept a rounded vowel) but not Estonian and the rest of Southern Finnic (which unrounded the vowel). It therefore must have occurred very early, in dialectal Proto-Finnic times.

In a small number of words, Estonian and Votic õ can be additionally found in correspondence to North Finnic a or u. Livonian and South Estonian might align with either side, depending on the word. E.g. [21]

Vowel reduction and loss

Short final vowels are lost after long syllables (two consonants or a syllable with a long vowel or diphthong) in Veps and both North and South Estonian Southern. For example, Proto-Finnic *kakci "two", *neljä "four", *viici "five" > Estonian kaks, neli, viis, Veps kaks', nel'l', viž, Võro katś, nelli, viiś, but > Finnish kaksi, neljä, viisi. This change occurred before the loss of final consonants (if any), as vowels that were originally followed by a consonant were not lost. The loss of final *-i leaves phonemic palatalization of the preceding consonant in many languages, on which see below.

In Livonian, all short final vowels except *a and *ä are lost, thus giving *kakci > kakš as in Estonian, but also *veci "water" > ve'ž, while no vowel was lost in *neljä > nēļa, *kala "fish" > kalā.

Unstressed *o merges into *u in Northern Estonian.

Vowel harmony is lost in Estonian, Livonian and partly Veps, but not South Estonian or Votic. For example, Proto-Finnic *külä "village" > Estonian küla, but > Finnish kylä, Veps külä, Votic tšülä, Võro külä. In Finnish and Karelian, vowel harmony was retained and extended to *o as well, creating a new vowel *ö in words with front vowel harmony.

Many languages in the Southern Finnic group, as well as Veps, show loss of unstressed vowels in medial syllables. In these languages, vowel length is lost before h early on, while diphthongs are simplified into short vowels.

Palatalization

Palatalized consonants are reintroduced into most varieties other than Western Finnish. The most widespread source is regressive palatalization due to a lost word-final or word-medial *-i (a form of cheshirization), and consonant clusters with *j as a second member. In several varieties, there is also progressive palatalization, where a diphthong ending in *-i and the long vowel *ii causes palatalization of a following consonant.

Estonian, Votic and Finnish do not have general palatalization, and š occurs almost solely in loanwords, most commonly of Russian or German origin.

Loss of final consonants

Final *-k was generally lost. It is preserved in some dialects:

Final *-h is widely lost as well. It is preserved:

Standard Finnish inconsistently adopts some words in their Western Finnish shape (e.g. murhe; perhe "family", valheellinen "untrue"), some in their Eastern Finnish shape (e.g. vene; vale "lie").

Final *-n is lost in most of the South Finnic area (as well as widely in modern-day colloquial Finnish). In Votic this triggers compensatory lengthening of the preceding vowel. The 1st person verbal ending resists the change, and generally remains as -n.

Loss of final consonants followed the loss of final vowels. Thus, vowels followed by a lost consonant were preserved.

Loss of voiced obstruents

The voiced obstruents *b/β, *d/δ and *g/γ that occurred as the weak grades of single plosives were often lost or modified in various ways. The simplest outcomes are in the marginal languages Livonian and Veps, where all three are reflected as plain voiced stops b, d and g respectively regardless of environment. The remaining languages show more complex developments.

*b/β develops relatively uniformly:

The development of *d/δ is more diverse:

*g/γ develops somewhat similar to *d/δ, but with several conditional outcomes:

The loss of consonants often created new long vowels and diphthongs, particularly in non-initial syllables. Compare for example:

Lenition

In all Finnic languages except Finnish, Northern Karelian and Votic, the voiceless (strong grade) obstruent consonants *p, *t, *k and *s, are lenited to voiced or lax voiceless obstruents b, d, g, z when occurring between voiced sounds. In Veps and Livonian, these new voiced plosives merge with their weak grade counterparts. In Estonian s remains voiceless and b, d, g are not fully voiced, instead remaining as lax voiceless consonants [b̥], [d̥], [g̊].

Raising or diphthongization of long vowels

In many Finnic languages, long vowels develop into opening diphthongs by raising the onset, or show general raising instead.[22]

The long mid vowels *oo, *öö and *ee become opening diphthongs /uo̯/, /yø̯/, /ie̯/ in Finnish, Karelian, and several marginal dialects of Northern Estonian. In Western Finnish dialects their second component widely becomes more open, producing /uɔ̯/, /yœ̯/, /iɛ̯/ or even /uɑ̯/, /yæ̯/ and either /iæ̯/ or /iɑ̯/ depending on vowel harmony. Diphthongization also occurs in Livonian, but only under certain conditions, and the mid back unrounded long vowel õõ is not affected. In Livonian, the short vowels *o and *e may also diphthongize, leading to a contrast of short uo, ie /wo/, je/ with long ūo, īe /uːo̯/, /iːe̯/.

In South Estonian, raising only occurs in overlong syllables, and results in long close vowels uu, üü and ii.

In Eastern Finnish and Karelian, the low vowels *aa and *ää also diphthongize, becoming Karelian oa, eä, Savonian ua, iä. In standard Livonian, long *aa of any origin is at a late date generally raised to ǭ /ɔː/.

Diphthong assimilation

[22] The diphthong *eü is fully labialized to öü in Northern Finnic and South Estonian. In northern dialects of Veps, new long close vowels are created by the raising of several diphthongs:

North Estonian instead unrounds all diphthongs ending in -ü to -i:

In Savonian Finnish, the 2nd element of all diphthongs is lowered, while unstressed a and ä assimilate to a preceding mid vowel:

In Livonian, *au is labialized to ou, and *äi is palatalized to ei. Following this, the mid diphthongs are smoothed to long vowels under certain conditions:

Coda vocalization

A variety of languages shows a change of a syllable-final consonant into a vowel. This is not one single change, but several independent developments.

In the Southern Finnic group, *n is lost before *s (< Proto-Finnic *s or *c), with compensatory lengthening of the perceding vowel. For example Proto-Finnic *kanci "lid", *pensas "bush" > Estonian kaas, põõsas, but > Finnish kansi, pensas.

In Western Finnish, stop consonants before a sonorant are vocalized to u. E.g. *kapris "goat", *atra "plough", *kakra "oats" > Finnish kauris, aura, kaura, but > Estonian kaber, ader, kaer, Karelian kapris, atra, kakra. Standard Finnish mostly follows the Western Finnish model. Some notable exceptions include kekri "All Saints' Eve feast", kupla "bubble".

Syllable-final *l is vocalized in Veps at a late date, creating u-final diphthongs in the northern and central dialects, long vowels in the southern.

Notes

  1. ↑ Kallio 2007, p. 231.
  2. ↑ Posti 1953, pp. 10–21.
  3. ↑ Kallio 2007, pp. 231–233.
  4. ↑ Itkonen 1949.
  5. ↑ Janhunen 2007, pp. 221–222.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Kallio 2007, p. 233.
  7. ↑ Posti 1953, pp. 26–29.
  8. ↑ Aikio 2012.
  9. ↑ Posti 1953, pp. 83–85.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 Laakso 2001.
  11. ↑ Lehtinen 2007, p. 137.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Lehtinen 2007, pp. 138-139.
  13. ↑ Petri Kallio, The non-initial-syllable vowel reductions from Proto-Uralic to Proto-Finnic, 2012
  14. ↑ Lehtinen 2007, pp. 124-125.
  15. ↑ Lehtinen 2007, pp. 125-126.
  16. ↑ Lehtinen 2007, pp. 134-135.
  17. ↑ Setälä 1937, pp. 450–451.
  18. ↑ Setälä 1937, p. 449.
  19. ↑ Raun 1971, pp. 61–63.
  20. ↑ Viitso 2000, p. 164–165.
  21. ↑ Raun 1971, pp. 64-65.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Viitso 1998, p. 108.

References

  • Aikio, Ante (2012), "On Finnic long vowels, Samoyed vowel sequences, and Proto-Uralic *x", Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran toimituksia 264, ISSN 0355-0230.
  • Itkonen, Erkki (1949), "Beiträge zur Geschichte der einsilbigen Wortstämme in Finnischen", Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 30.
  • Janhunen, Juha (2007), "The primary laryngeal in Uralic and beyond" (PDF), Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran toimituksia 253, ISSN 0355-0230, retrieved 2010-05-05.
  • Kallio, Petri (2007), "Kantasuomen konsonanttihistoriaa" (PDF), Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 253.
  • Laakso, Johanna (2001), "The Finnic languages", The Circum-Baltic languages volume 1: Past and Present, John Benjamins.
  • Lehtinen, Tapani (2007), Kielen vuosituhannet, Tietolipas 215, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, ISBN 978-951-746-896-1.
  • Raun, Alo (1971), "Problems of the Number and Grouping of Proto-Finnic dialects", Essays in Finno-Ugric and Finnic linguistics, Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic series 107, Indiana University
  • Posti, Lauri (1953), "From Pre-Finnic to Late Proto-Finnic", Finnische-Ugrische Forschungen 31.
  • Setälä, E. N. (1891), Yhteissuomalainen äännehistoria. 1. ja 2. vihko. Klusiilit. Spirantit. Nasaalit. Likvidat ja puolivokaalit, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura
  • Setälä, E. N. (1937), Yhteissuomalainen äännehistoria. 3. vihko. Vokaalit, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura
  • Viitso, Tiit-Rein (1998), "Fennic", in Abondolo, Daniel, The Uralic Languages.
  • Viitso, Tiit-Rein (2000), "Finnic affinity", in Nurk, Anu; Palo, Triinu; Seilenthal, Tõnu, Congressus nonus internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Tartu 7.-13.8.2000, pp. 153–177.