PRS for Music

Not to be confused with Phonographic Performance Limited.

PRS for Music Limited (formerly The MCPS-PRS Alliance Limited) is a UK copyright collection society and performance rights organisation undertaking collective rights management for musical works. PRS for Music was formed in 1997 as the MCPS-PRS Alliance, bringing together two collection societies: the Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society (MCPS) and the Performing Right Society (PRS).[1] The "PRS for Music" brand was adopted in 2009.

History

The Performing Right Society was founded in 1914 for collecting fees for live performance from sheet music. Initially it was distinct from the activity of the Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society, originally founded in 1911, and renamed in 1924, and Phonographic Performance Limited, founded in 1934 by Decca and EMI, which collected fees for playing gramophone recordings.

The Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society began as MECOLICO, the Mechanical Copyright Licenses Co. in 1911 in anticipation of the Copyright Act of 1911, and merged with the Copyright Protection Society in 1924.[2]

Another agency, the British Copyright Protection Company Ltd. or Britico was founded in 1932 by Alphonse Tournier, specializing on collecting royalties in the UK on French and German musical copyright, and becoming the British Copyright Protection Association Ltd. in 1962. This company, Britico, started to share computer facilities with PRS in 1969.

Fields of activity

PRS for Music Heritage Award

PRS for Music administers the performance rights and mechanical rights of about ten million musical works on behalf of its songwriter, composer and publisher members. PRS for Music licenses and collects royalties on its members' musical works whenever they are publicly performed, or recordings of them are broadcast or played in public spaces, both in the UK and globally through its partner network.[3]

After operating costs are deducted,[4] the remaining money is distributed to the copyright holders (namely, the songwriters and/or the publishers).

The principal sources of PRS revenue collection are: music transmitted on television and radio broadcasts, and music performed live at gigs, concerts and theatres.

PRS for Music also has a large range of tariffs for organisations (businesses, government organisations, educational establishments, and so on) dependent on their size and the extent to which they are using music, and whether they are commercial premises or not as well as many other criteria. Around 350,000 UK businesses[5] have paid for a licence from the PRS, but some workplaces do not need one:

In February 2010, PRS for Music announced its 2009 financial results, which showed a 2.6% increase in revenue to £623 million.[7]

Business area2009 (£m)
Broadcasting & Online177.4
International166.9
Public Performance Sales150.2
Recorded Media128.5
Total623.0

[8]

The total licencing and administration costs of PRS for Music (the MCPS-PRS Alliance) are also published in their annual reports as £70.2 million in 2009.

Licensing enforcement

Legal cases

In 2007, PRS for Music took a Scottish car servicing company to court because the employees were allegedly "listening to the radio at work, allowing the music to be 'heard by colleagues and customers.'"[9] In June 2008, PRS for Music accused eleven police stations of failure to obtain permits to play music, and sought an injunction and payments for damages.[10]

Cross-border European licensing

The Santiago Agreement was established in 2000 between five European collecting societies including the UK's PRS for Music and France's SACEM and Germany's GEMA. The agreement allows each collecting society to collect royalties on behalf of members of the other collecting society — e.g. the PRS would collect money for German artists listed with GEMA — but to restrict licences to be sold only within the member organisation's home country.

The European Commission decided in 2008 that the cross-licensing agreements formed by 24 collecting societies in Europe were in violation of anti-competition laws.[11]

Schools

Along with Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL), PRS for Music use the Centre for Education and Finance Management (CEFM) as agents to collect licensing money from schools and colleges. Universities have separate arrangements.

Enforcement

In 2008, PRS for Music began a concerted drive to make commercial premises pay for annual "performance" licences. In one case it told a 61-year-old mechanic that he would have to pay £150 to play his radio while he worked by himself.[12] It also targeted a bakery that played a radio in a private room at the back of the shop.[13] a woman who used a classical radio to calm her horses[14] and community centres that allowed children to sing carols in public.[15] However, questions have been raised about the tactic of targeting small businesses:

"Radio stations pay large amounts of money to licensing organizations PRS and PPL for the music they play, and music has been on the radio for many years. During the war, there were programmes like Music While You Work. Now, many radio stations have features about workplaces. If the PRS forces people to switch their radios off then how are these stations going to survive? Music has to be heard before people go out and buy it." (The Bolton News)[16]

In March 2009, the on line video-sharing site YouTube removed all premium music videos for UK users, even those supplied by record labels, due to a failure to find "mutually acceptable terms for a new licence" with the PRS.[17][18] As a consequence, PRS established the Fair Play for Creators campaign in order to provide a forum where musicians could "publicly demonstrate their concern over the way their work is treated by online businesses".[19] David Arnold, Jazzie B, Billy Bragg, Guy Chambers, Robin Gibb, Pete Waterman, Mike Chapman, Wayne Hector, Pam Sheyne and Debbie Wiseman sent a letter to The Times newspaper in support of the campaign launched by PRS.[20] A rights deal was settled in September 2009 between PRS and Google that allowed YouTube users in UK to view music videos.[21]

Wiltshire Constabulary refused to pay PRS for a £32,000 licence fee in April 2009. Instead the force told all officer and civilian staff that music could no longer be played in their workplaces but that ban excluded patrol cars. A total of 38 of 49 UK police forces currently hold PRS licences.[22]

In May 2009, the British Chambers of Commerce published a survey of business attitudes to the PRS. Just 6% of companies rated their experience as good or excellent. In contrast, over half said their experience had been poor or very poor. Businesses were also asked to submit comments about their experiences. Many of these replies referred to the PRS’ behaviour as “aggressive” and “threatening”.[23]

In October 2009, the PRS apologised to a 56-year-old shelf-stacker at a village in Clackmannanshire for pursuing her for singing to herself while stacking shelves.[24][25] PRS initially told her that she would be prosecuted and fined thousands of pounds if she continued to sing without a "live performance" licence. However PRS subsequently acknowledged its mistake.[26]

In October 2010, it was reported that Sussex Police, in a money-saving move, were not intending to renew their PRS licence, meaning that police officers would no longer be able to listen to the radio in their squad cars or other work places. [27]

Independent Welsh agency

In 2012, a high percentage of Welsh-language musicians left the PRS to form a separate agency, Eos (Welsh for nightingale), after changes in the way the PRS calculates royalties led to a fifteen-fold decrease in payments. In 2007, the PRS had reclassified Welsh-language station BBC Radio Cymru as a local station, where previously it had been considered a national station. This led to a decrease in royalty rates from £7.50 per minute to 50p per minute of broadcast music. The English-language sister station, BBC Radio Wales, is classified by the PRS as a national station and attracts the higher rates.[28]

As of December 2012, Eos is in negotiations with the BBC, whose Welsh-language service is highly dependent on its members' output. From 1 January 2013, a PRS licence will not be required to play such music, and will not give any permission to do so.[29]

References

  1. ↑ "About us". PRS. Retrieved 3 April 2009.
  2. ↑ Billboard - 6 nov. 1976 "The history of the Mechanical Copyright Protection Society, MCPS. started with a move by several London music publish ... Ltd. It was a merger with a similar organization, the Copyright Protection Society Ltd. in 1924, which led to the adoption of the title Mechanical Copyright Protection ..."
  3. ↑ "PRS for Music".
  4. ↑ "PRS for Music". Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  5. ↑ "More Than Business". Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  6. ↑ "Do I need a music licence?". PRS. Retrieved 3 April 2009.
  7. ↑ "Parliamentary Publications". Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  8. ↑ "PRS for Music Press". Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  9. ↑ Kwik-Fit sued over staff radios, BBC, 5 October 2007, retrieved 20 June 2009
  10. ↑ Sutcliffe, Camilla (12 June 2008), Lancashire Police face music over copyright, This Is Lancashire, retrieved 3 April 2009
  11. ↑ "Unknown (subscription required)". worldlawreport.com. Retrieved 21 October 2009.
  12. ↑ "Mechanic must pay £150 to listen to radio,", Nottingham Evening Post, 15 October 2008, retrieved 3 April 2009
  13. ↑ Lavender, Jane (8 October 2008), "Radio ga ga at Bolton pasty shop", The Bolton News, retrieved 3 April 2009
  14. ↑ Bingham, John (27 March 2009), "Woman who plays classical music to soothe horses told to get licence", The Telegraph (London), retrieved 21 October 2009
  15. ↑ 'enigmax' (15 October 2008), Copyright Cops Target Kids’ Schools and Community Centers, TorrentFreak, retrieved 3 April 2009
  16. ↑ Pendlebury, Steve (15 October 2008), "Use of radio is widespread at work", The Bolton News, retrieved 3 April 2009
  17. ↑ Walker, Patrick (9 March 2009). "YouTube, the UK and the Performing Rights Society for Music". Retrieved 3 April 2009.
  18. ↑ Cochrane, Greg (10 March 2009), YouTube row: Will music fans lose out?, BBC Radio 1 Newsbeat, retrieved 3 April 2009
  19. ↑ "Fair Play for Creators website". Retrieved 3 April 2009.
  20. ↑ "Sounds of YouTube -Google must play a fair price for YouTube", The Times (London), 2 April 2009, retrieved 3 April 2009
  21. ↑ Foster, Patrick (3 September 2009), "Harmony restored as YouTube deal with PRS ends video dispute", The Times (London), retrieved 14 September 2009
  22. ↑ Savill, Richard (15 April 2009). "Police force bans music following licence fee row". London: Daily Telegraph.
  23. ↑ "Performing Rights Society requires urgent review, says BCC". The British Chambers of Commerce. 1 May 2009.
  24. ↑ "Corner shop worker told to stop singing in her store - or pay for a performing licence", Daily Mail (London), 15 October 2009, retrieved 21 October 2009
  25. ↑ Archibald, Ben (15 October 2009), "Shop gran needs licence to trill", The Sun (London), retrieved 21 October 2009
  26. ↑ "Apology for singing shop worker", BBC News, 21 October 2009, retrieved 21 October 2009
  27. ↑ "Force bans police officers from listening to music to save £23,000", Daily Mail (London), 21 October 2010, retrieved 21 October 2010
  28. ↑ Welsh musicians to launch new agency in PRS royalty row
  29. ↑ Newid breindaliadau i arwain at fethu darlledu miloedd o ganeuon? [Will royalty changes stop thousands of songs being broadcast?] (Welsh)

External links

Wikinews has related news: Interview: PRS, the UK's music royalty collection society