Melvin Tumin
Melvin M. Tumin | |
---|---|
Born |
Newark, New Jersey | February 10, 1919
Died |
March 3, 1994 75) Princeton, New Jersey | (aged
Nationality | American |
Occupation | Sociologist |
Known for | Studying race relations, social stratification, education, crime and violence |
Melvin Marvin "Mel" Tumin (February 10, 1919 – March 3, 1994) was an American sociologist who specialized in race relations. He taught at Princeton University for much of his career.[1]
Life and career
Tumin was born and grew up in Newark, New Jersey. His mother, Rose Yawitz Tumin, raised him and his two brothers on her own after the death of his father when Tumin was in his very early teens. He was the middle of the three brothers; Edward Tumin was his younger brother, and Israel Tumin was his older brother. He earned his undergraduate degree in psychology from University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1939. He received his Ph.D. in sociology and anthropology from Northwestern University in 1944.[1] While attending graduate school, he shared an apartment in Chicago with the future famous author, Saul Bellow.[2] According to Tumin, as told to his sons, Bellow incorporated words from a conversation he had at some point into Bellow's first novel, Dangling Man. Like Tumin, Bellow received a degree in sociology and anthropology from Northwestern. In the early 1940s, Tumin did field work for his doctoral thesis in Guatemala; this was later published as his first book, Caste in a Peasant Society. To ensure his safety while in Guatemala (a dictatorship at that time), he obtained and carried on him a letter from the then head of internal security warning that no harm was to be done to him.
After graduating, Tumin taught at Wayne State University and served on the Mayor's Commission on Race Relations in Detroit.[1]
In 1947 he joined Princeton University, where he held appointments until his retirement in 1989; he was appointed as a full professor sometime in the early 1960s. Tumin's work on racial segregation and desegregation was published by the Anti-Defamation League in 1957. In the 1960s he also taught at Columbia University Teachers College.[1]
Tumin was President of The Society for the Study of Social Problems for the period 1966-67.[3] Tumin received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 1969.[4]
Tumin directed a task force of the U.S. National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence and was an author of three volumes of its 1970 report Crimes of Violence.[1]
Tumin died of cancer at the Medical Center in Princeton, New Jersey.[1] In 1994, the Princeton University Sociology Department established an annual Melvin M. Tumin lecture, in honor of Tumin. According to the press release issued by the University, these annual lectures honor "the memory of Professor Melvin Tumin, whose writing on social inequality edified and inspired a generation of American social scientists."[5]
Social stratification
In 1953, Tumin challenged the Davis–Moore hypothesis of social stratification with his paper "Some principles of stratification: a critical analysis".[6][7] Tumin took Davis–Moore to imply that social stratification was mostly inevitable and provided a positive function for society. He analyzed the arguments of Davis and Moore and found them wanting in a number of respects.[7] In a reply to Tumin's paper, Davis stated that his ideas seek to explain inequality, rather than justify it. Davis also accused Tumin of a number of errors.[8]
Tumin's 1967 book Social Stratification: The Forms and Functions of Inequality was widely used as a textbook and was re-issued in 1985.[1]
Inspiration for The Human Stain
The author Philip Roth, a friend of Tumin, said that his novel The Human Stain (2000) was inspired by an incident that happened to the professor.[9][10] According to Roth, Tumin inquired about two students who had not attended his class all semester, asking, “Does anyone know these people? Do they exist or are they spooks?” Unknown to Tumin, both students were African American. As spooks can be a racial slur for black people (in addition to meaning ghosts or spies), Tumin was subjected by the university to an inquiry into possible hate speech, described by Roth as a "witch hunt".[9] Tumin eventually emerged blameless.[9]
Selected publications
- Moore, Wilbert E; Tumin, Melvin (1949). Some social functions of ignorance. American Sociological Review Vol. 14, No. 6 (Dec., 1949), pp. 787–795
- Tumin, Melvin (1953). Some principles of stratification: A critical analysis. American Sociological Review Vol. 18, No. 4 (Aug., 1953), pp. 387–394
- Tumin, Melvin (1957). Some unapplauded consequences of social mobility in a mass society. Social Forces Vol. 36 p. 32 ff. (1957-1958)
- Tumin, Melvin (1958). Desegregation: Resistance and Readiness Princeton University Press, ISBN 9780691093130
- Tumin, Melvin (1961). Social Class and Social Change in Puerto Rico. ISBN 9780691086132
- Tumin, Melvin (1967). Social Stratification: The Forms and Functions of Inequality. Prentice-Hall, ISBN 9780138185916
- Tumin, Melvin (1975). Caste in a Peasant Society: A Case Study in the Dynamics of Caste. Greenwood Press, ISBN 978-0-8371-8390-9
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Wolfgang Saxon (5 March 1994). "Melvin M. Tumin, 75, Specialist in Race Relations". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
- ↑ Saul Bellow bibliography
- ↑ "Past Presidents, Vice-Presidents, and Editors". sssp1.org. The Society for the Study of Social Problems. Retrieved September 12, 2012.
- ↑ "Fellows (1969, Scott – Whitacker)". gf.org. John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. Retrieved September 14, 2012.
- ↑ Princeton University, Office of Communications, Nov. 17, 1997.
- ↑ Tumin, Melvin (1953). "Some principles of stratification: a critical analysis". American Sociological Review 18 (4): 387–394. doi:10.2307/2087551. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Subberwal, Ranjana (2008). "Davis–Moore Debate". Sociology Dictionary. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. pp. D1–D2. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- ↑ Davis, Kingsley (1953). "Some principles of stratification: a critical analysis: Reply". American Sociological Review 18 (4): 394–397. doi:10.2307/2087552. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Philip Roth (September 7, 2012). "An Open Letter To Wikipedia". The New Yorker. Retrieved September 9, 2012.
- ↑ Alison Flood (September 11, 2012). "Philip Roth's complaint to Wikipedia". The Guardian. Retrieved September 23, 2012.