Mega journal
A mega journal (also mega-journal and megajournal) is a peer-reviewed academic open access journal designed to be much larger than a traditional journal by exerting low selectivity among accepted articles. It was pioneered by PLOS ONE.[1][2] This highly lucrative publishing model[2] was soon emulated by other publishers.
Definition
A mega journal has the following defining characteristics:
- broad coverage of different subject areas;[1][2][3][4][5]
- accepting articles for publication based on whether they are technically sound rather than selecting for perceived importance;[1][2][3][4][5][6] and
- gold model of open access where costs are covered by an article processing charge.[1][3][5]
Other less consensual characteristics are:
- "an accelerated review and publication process",[2] "fast turnaround time";[6] and
- "a large editorial board of academic editors",[5] "academic editors".[6] (instead of professional editors)
Mega journals are also always online-only — with no printed version — and are fully open access, in contrast to hybrid open access journals. Some predatory open access publishers use the mega journal model.[1]
Influence
It has been suggested that the academic journal landscape might become dominated by a few mega journals in the future, at least in terms of total number of articles published.[7] Megajournals are also disrupting the market of article processing charges.[8] Their business model may not motivate reviewers, who donate their time to "influence their field, gain exposure to the most current cutting edge research or list their service to a prestigious journal on their CVs."[9] Finally, they may no longer serve as "fora for the exchange ... among colleagues in a particular field or sub-field", as traditionally happened in scholarly journals.[10] To counter that indiscrimination, PLOS ONE, the prototypical megajournal, has started to "package relevant articles into subject-specific collections."[11]
List of mega journals
- This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
- PLOS ONE[1][2][3][4][5][6][12][13][14][15][16]
- Scientific Reports[2][3][5][6][14][16][17]
- SAGE Open[3][4][5][14][16][17]
- SpringerPlus[3][4][5][14][16][17]
- BMJ Open[2][3][5][14][16]
- PeerJ[2][4][5][12][13]
- Biology Open[5][6][16]
- IEEE Access[5][18][lower-alpha 1]
- FEBS Open Bio[5][6]
- AIP Advances[5][16]
- G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics[5][16]
- Open Biology[3][16]
- Cell Reports[14][16]
- Zootaxa[lower-alpha 2]
- Open Library of Humanities[lower-alpha 3]
- De Gruyter Open imprint [lower-alpha 4]
Notes
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "Five Predatory Mega-Journals: A Review". The Charleston Advisor 14 (4): 20–25. doi:10.5260/chara.14.4.20.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Bo-Christer Björk and David Solomon (March 2014). Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (Report). Wellcome Trust. pp. 69 pages.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 "Wiley".
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Claire Creaser (5 May 2014). "The rise of the mega-journal". School of Business and Economics Research Blog. Loughborough University.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 Peter Binfield (19 January 2014). Sönke Bartling & Sascha Friesike, ed. "Novel Scholarly Journal Concepts". Opening Science. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_10.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Frank Norman (9 July 2012). "Megajournals". Trading Knowledge. Frank Norman.
- ↑ Hayahiko Ozono, Okayama University, Participants' Report on The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011. “Burgeoning Open Access MegaJournals”. National Institute of Informatics.
- ↑ Solomon, David J. (2014). "A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals". PeerJ 2: e365. doi:10.7717/peerj.365.
- ↑ Wellen, R. (2013). "Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling". SAGE Open 3 (4). doi:10.1177/2158244013507271.
- ↑ Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access". tripleC 11 (2): 589–597.
- ↑ MacCallum, C. J. (2011). "Why ONE is More Than 5". PLoS Biology 9 (12): e1001235. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001235.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Francisco Osorio (5 April 2013). "Open Library of Humanities: mega journals seeing from the south". Facultad de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Chile.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 "Beyond open access for academic publishers", 15 May 2014, Publishing Technology PLC
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 Dagmar Sitek & Roland Bertelmann, "Open Access: A State of the Art", 2 March 2014, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9
- ↑ James MacGregor, Kevin Stranack & John Willinsky, "The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication", 2 March 2014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_11
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal?", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), p.223-248.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Peter Binfield, "PLoS ONE and the Rise of the Open Access MegaJournal", The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011 February 29, 2012
- ↑ Jeffrey Beall (3 March 2013). "New Term: MOAMJ = Multidisciplinary Open Access Mega Journal". Scholarly Open Access.
- ↑ New IEEE Open-Access “Mega Journal” Aims to Boost Technology Innovation
- ↑ Zhang, Zhi-Qiang (2006). "The making of a mega-journal in taxonomy". Zootaxa (1385): 67–68.
- ↑ "Press Release". Open Library of Humanities.
- ↑ "De Gruyter Open converts eight subscription journals to Open Access megajournals". De Gruyter Open.
Further reading
- Bill Cope and Angus Phillips, The Future of the Academic Journal, 2nd ed., Chandos Publishing, Jul 1, 2014, 478 pages.
- Peter Binfield, "Open Access MegaJournals -- Have They Changed Everything?", Creative Commons New Zealand Blog,
- Sönke Bartling & Sascha Friesike (Editors), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Web is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, Springer, 2014, ISBN 978-3-319-00025-1, 339 pp.