List of topics characterized as pseudoscience

This is a list of topics that have, at one point or another in their history, been characterized as pseudoscience by academics or researchers. These characterizations were made in the context of educating the public about questionable or potentially fraudulent or dangerous claims and practices - efforts to define the nature of science, or humorous parodies of poor scientific reasoning. Criticism of pseudoscience, generally by the scientific community or skeptical organizations, involves critiques of the logical, methodological, or rhetorical bases of the topic in question.[1] Though some of the listed topics continue to be investigated scientifically, others were only subject to scientific research in the past and today are considered refuted but resurrected in a pseudoscientific fashion. Other ideas presented here are entirely non-scientific, but have in one way or another infringed on scientific domains or practices. Many adherents to or practitioners of the topics listed here dispute their characterization as pseudoscience.

Each section summarizes the pseudoscientific aspects of that topic.

Physical sciences

Astronomy and space sciences

  • Anunnaki from Nibiru (Sitchin) (variant) - Zecharia Sitchin proposed in his book The 12th Planet (1976) that ancient Sumerian cuneiform suggests that ancient astronauts (the Anunnaki from the planet Nibiru) visited Earth and created human beings through biogenetics. Sitchin claims that these writings tell of a Planet X beyond the dwarf planet Pluto. Scholars have criticized his interpretations and qualifications (noting that he has no degree in Semitic Languages). Michael Heiser, who has a Ph.D. in Hebrew Bible and Semitic Languages, has challenged Sitchin to present one text that confirms his claims.[8][9]
  • Ancient astronauts from the Sirius star-system (Temple) (variant) - Robert K. G. Temple's proposal in his book The Sirius Mystery (1976) that the Dogon people of northwestern Mali preserved an account of extraterrestrial visitation by aliens from the Sirius star-system around 5,000 years ago (core evidence the Dogon people and Sirius B claim).[10]

Earth sciences

Energy

  • Free energy – particular class of perpetual motion which purports to create energy (violating the first law of thermodynamics) or extract useful work from equilibrium systems (violating the second law of thermodynamics). This is in contrast to proposals made most notably by Harold Puthoff[43] which involve the extraction of zero point energy,[44] a real energy which in quantum mechanics is thought not to be available to do work.[42]
  • Water-fueled cars – an instance of perpetual motion machines.[45] Such devices are claimed to use water as fuel or produce fuel from water on board with no other energy input.[46]

Physics

Life sciences

Agricultural sciences

Psychology

  • Hypnotherapy – therapy that is undertaken with a subject in hypnosis.[76] It is widely considered a branch of Complementary and Alternative Medicine though its founder – James Braid – has been described as "one of the most ardent and influential critics of pseudo-science."[77]
  • It should be noted that using hypnosis for relaxation, mood control, and other related benefits (often related to meditation) is regarded as part of standard medical treatment rather than alternative medicine, particularly for patients subjected to difficult physical emotional stress in chemotherapy.[78]

Applied sciences

Health and medicine

  • Innate intelligence – form of putative energy, the flow of which is considered by some chiropractors to be responsible for patient health. Chiropractic historian Joseph C. Keating, Jr., PhD. stated: "So long as we propound the 'One cause, one cure' rhetoric of Innate, we should expect to be met by ridicule from the wider health science community. Chiropractors can’t have it both ways. Our theories cannot be both dogmatically held vitalistic constructs and be scientific at the same time. The purposiveness, consciousness and rigidity of the Palmers’ Innate should be rejected."[189]
  • Vertebral subluxation – a Chiropractic term that describes variously a site of impaired flow of innate or a spinal lesion that is postulated to cause neuromusculoskeletal or visceral dysfunction. Scientific consensus does not support the existence of chiropractic's vertebral subluxation.[190]
  • Acupuncture – use of fine needles to stimulate acupuncture points and balance the flow of qi. There is no known anatomical or histological basis for the existence of acupuncture points or meridians.[277][281] Some acupuncturists regard them as functional rather than structural entities, useful in guiding evaluation and care of patients.[275][282][283] Dry needling is the therapeutic insertion of fine needles without regard to TCM knowledge. Acupuncture has been the subject of active scientific research since the late 20th century,[284] and its effects and application remain controversial among medical researchers and clinicians.[284] Because it is a procedure rather than a pill, the design of controlled studies is challenging, as with surgical and other procedures.[275][284][285][286][287] Some scholarly reviews conclude that acupuncture's effects are mainly placebo,[288][289] and others find likelihood of efficacy for particular conditions.[284][290][291][292]
  • Acupressuremanual non-invasive stimulation of acupuncture points.[293]
  • Acupuncture points or acupoints – collection of several hundred points on the body lying along meridians. According to TCM, each corresponds to a particular organ or function.[293]
  • Cupping therapy – an ancient Chinese form of alternative medicine in which a local suction is created on the skin; practitioners believe this mobilizes blood flow in order to promote healing.[294] Suction is created using heat (fire) or mechanical devices (hand or electrical pumps). Only one controlled trial of cupping has been conducted, and it did not demonstrate any effectiveness for pain relief. A book by Simon Singh and Edzard Ernst claims that no evidence exists of any beneficial effects of cupping for any medical condition.[295]
  • Meridians – are the channels through which qi flows, connecting the several zang-fu organ pairs.[273][296] There is no known anatomical or histological basis for the existence of acupuncture points or meridians.[277][281]
  • Moxibustion – application on or above the skin of smoldering mugwort, or moxa, to stimulate acupuncture points.
  • Qi – vital energy whose flow must be balanced for health. Qi has never been directly observed, and is unrelated to the concept of energy used in science.[297][298][299]
  • TCM materia medica – a collection of crude medicines used in Traditional Chinese medicine. These include many plants in part or whole, such as ginseng and wolfberry, as well as more exotic ingredients such as seahorses. Preparations generally include several ingredients in combination, with selection based on physical characteristics such as taste or shape, or relationship to the organs of TCM.[300] Most preparations have not been rigorously evaluated or give no indication of efficacy.[280][301][302] Pharmacognosy research for potential active ingredients present in these preparations is active, though the applications do not always correspond to those of TCM.[303]
  • Zang-fu – concept of organs as functional yin and yang entities for the storage and manipulation of qi.[273] These organs are not based in anatomy.

Finance

Social sciences

Classical social evolution: Before Darwin's work On the Origin of Species, some models incorporated Enlightenment ideas of social progress, and thus, according to philosopher of science Michael Ruse, were pseudoscientific by current standards, and may have been viewed as such during the 18th century, as well as into the start of the 19th century (though the word pseudoscience may not have been used in reference to these early proposals). This pseudoscientific, and often political, incorporation of social progress with evolutionary thought continued for some one hundred years following the publication of Origin of Species.[318][319]

Racial theories

  • Aryanism, the claim that there is a distinct "Aryan race" which is superior to other putative races,[322] was an important tenet of Nazism, and "the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Gypsies, and other 'non-Aryans.'"[323]
  • Melanin theory – belief founded in the distortion of known physical properties of melanin, a natural polymer, that posits the inherent superiority of dark-skinned people and the essential inhumanity and an inferiority of light-skinned people.[324][325]

Paranormal and ufology

Paranormal subjects[13][16][223] [326] have been subject to critiques from a wide range of sources including the following claims of paranormal significance:

History

Main article: Pseudohistory

Mathematics

Religious and spiritual beliefs

Spiritual and religious practices and beliefs, according to astronomer Carl Sagan, are normally not classified as pseudoscience.[356] However, religion can sometimes nurture pseudoscience, and "at the extremes it is difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from rigid, doctrinaire religion", and some religions might be confused with pseudoscience, such as Traditional Meditation.[356] The following religious/spiritual items have been related to or classified as pseudoscience in some way:

Creation science

Creation science or scientific creationism, the belief that the origin of everything in the universe is the result of a first cause, brought about by a creator deity, and that this thesis is supported by geological, biological, and other scientific evidence.[361]

  • Irreducible complexity – claim that some biological systems are too complex to have evolved from simpler systems. It is used by proponents of intelligent design to argue that evolution by natural selection alone is incomplete or flawed, and that some additional mechanism (an "Intelligent Designer") is required to explain the origins of life.[376][377]
  • Specified complexity – claim that when something is simultaneously complex and specified, one can infer that it was produced by an intelligent cause (i.e., that it was designed) rather than being the result of natural processes.[102][375]

Scientology

Other

Consumer products

Idiosyncratic ideas

The following concepts have only a very small number of proponents, yet have become notable:

Parody pseudoscience

The following are notable parodies of other pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts. See also Category:Humorous hoaxes in science

See also

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Pollak 2002.
  2. O'Neill 2008
  3. Rosenbaum 2009
  4. Hummels, Cameron (27 April 2009). "April 27th: Will the World End in 2012?" (PODCAST). 365daysofastronomy.org. Retrieved 22 September 2009.
  5. Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "Ancient Astronauts and Erich Von Daniken". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 entry in Shermer, Michael, ed. (2002). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience (PDF). ABC–CLIO, Inc. ISBN 1-57607-653-9. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
  7. Trefil, James (March 2007). "Who Were the Ancient Engineers of Egypt?". Skeptical Inquirer (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) 17.1. Retrieved 1 December 2007. The pyramids, as impressive as they are, give no evidence at all for the presence of advanced technology at work in ancient Egypt.
  8. Kilgannon, Corey (8 January 2010). "Origin of the Species, From an Alien View". New York Times (The New York Times Company). Retrieved 29 October 2010. Mr. Sitchin has been called silly before – by scientists, historians and archaeologists who dismiss his theories as pseudoscience and fault their underpinnings: his translations of ancient texts and his understanding of physics.
  9. Carroll, Robert T (1994–2009). "The Skeptic's Dictionary". Zecharia Sitchin and The Earth Chronicles. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved 29 October 2010.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "The Dogon Tribe and Sirius B". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  11. "The Universe At Your Fingertips Activity: Activities With Astrology". Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 3 December 2007. These activities help students to understand the difference between science and pseudoscience by investigating some of astrology's claims.
  12. 12.0 12.1 "Statement of the position of the Iowa Academy of Science on Pseudoscience" (PDF). Iowa Academy of Science. July 1986.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 statement from the Russian Academy of Sciences. Broken Link!
  14. Pollak 2002, "Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... More than 25 percent of the public believes in astrology, that is, that the position of the stars and planets can affect people's lives.
  15. Fraknoi, Andrew (1 January 2003). "Dealing with Astrology, UFOs, and Faces on Other Worlds: A Guide to Addressing Astronomical Pseudoscience in the Classroom". Astronomy Education Review 2 (2): 150–160. doi:10.3847/AER2003022.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "The "Great Moon Hoax": Did Astronauts Land on the Moon?". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  17. Knier, Gil; Bray, Becky (30 March 2001). "The Moon Landing Hoax". NASA. Archived from the original on 22 November 2007. Did we actually send humans to the Moon in the 1960s? Of course we did!
  18. The Great Moon Hoax, NASA
  19. Schilling, Govert (2009). The Hunt For Planet X: New Worlds and the Fate of Pluto. Copernicus Books. p. 111. ISBN 0-387-77804-7.
  20. Morrison, David (2008). "Armageddon from Planet Nibiru in 2012? Not so fast" (BLOG). discovery.com. Retrieved 2 April 2009.
  21. Plait, Phil (2003). "The Planet X Saga: Science" (BLOG). badastronomy.com. Retrieved 2 April 2009.
  22. Brown, Mike (2008). "I do not ♥ pseudo-science" (BLOG). Mike Brown's planets. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  23. Myles Standish (16 July 1992). "Planet X – No dynamical evidence in the optical observations". Astronomical Journal volume= 105 (5): 200–2006. Retrieved 30 April 2009.
  24. Nettleton, Paul (1 September 2005). "Peer Review: Who Built the Moon? by Christopher Knight & Alan Butler". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 5 November 2011.
  25. Angell, Ian O. (1978). "Megalithic mathematics, ancient almanacs or neolithic nonsense". Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 14 (10): 253–258.
  26. NCSE Tackles Climate Change Denial, National Center for Science Education, January 13th, 2012
  27. Shermer, Michael. What Is Pseudoscience?, Scientific American, September 15, 2011
  28. Morrison, David. The Parameters of Pseudoscience, Skeptical Inquirer, Volume 37.2, March/April 2013. Book review of The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe, by Michael D. Gordin.
  29. Brown, Michael. Adversaries, zombies and NIPCC climate pseudoscience, ‘’Phys.org’’, Sep 26, 2013
  30. Plait, Phil.Debunking the Denial: "16 Years of No Global Warming", ‘’Slate.com’’, Jan. 14, 2013
  31. Kennedy, D (30 March 2001). "An Unfortunate U-turn on Carbon". Science 291 (5513): 5513. doi:10.1126/science.1060922. Subscription needed
  32. Brown, R. G. E., Jr. (23 October 1996). "Environmental science under siege: Fringe science and the 104th Congress, U. S. House of Representatives." (PDF). Report, Democratic Caucus of the Committee on Science (Washington, D. C.: U. S. House of Representatives).
  33. Lahsen, Myanna (Winter 2005). "Technocracy, Democracy, and the U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations". Science, Technology, & Human Values 30: 137–169. doi:10.1177/0162243904270710.
  34. "Lysenkoism". Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  35. Sterling, Bruce (June 2004). "Suicide by Pseudoscience" 12 (6). Wired Magazine. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  36. Walker, Bruce (30 November 2009). "The Ghost of Lysenko". American Thinker.
  37. Russell, Jeffrey B. "The Myth of the Flat Earth". American Scientific Affiliation. Retrieved March 14, 2007.
  38. Sagan, Carl. Does truth matter? (PDF). pp. 8–9. [text of proclamation] activities of superstition and ignorance have been growing, and antiscience and pseudoscience cases have become frequent. Therefore, effective measures must be applied as soon as possible to strengthen public education in science.
  39. Guizzo, Erico (January 2009). "Loser: Hot or Not?". IEEE Spectrum 46: 36–38. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2009.4734311. Why it’s a loser: Most experts don’t believe such lower states exist, and they say the experiments don’t present convincing evidence.
  40. Ross, Philip E. (January 2009). "Winners & Losers VI". IEEE Spectrum 46: 31–32. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2009.4734309.
  41. Morrison, Chris (21 October 2008). "Blacklight Power bolsters its impossible claims of a new renewable energy source". New York Times.
  42. 42.0 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 "Scientific American".
  43. Gardner, M (May–June 1998). "Zero Point Energy and Harold Puthoff". Skeptical Inquirer: 13. On the misuse of some physics ideas and cosmology.
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 "Beyond Science", on season 8 , episode 2 of Scientific American Frontiers.
  45. Ball, Philip (14 September 2007). "Burning water and other myths". Nature News. Retrieved 19 August 2008.
  46. Olsen, Brad. Future Esoteric: The Unseen Realms. CCC Publishing. p. 326.
  47. Carezani, Ricardo. "No Neutrinos". Society for the Advancement of Autodynamics. Retrieved 7 February 2008.
  48. Philipkoski, Kristen (13 July 1999). "Shedding Light in the Dark". Wired News. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Mainstream physicists have considered autodynamics a crackpot theory for decades
  49. 't Hooft, Gerard (2008). "Editorial note". Foundations of Physics 38 (1): 1–2. Bibcode:2008FoPh...38....1T. doi:10.1007/s10701-007-9187-8.
  50. Preiss, Byron (1985). The Planets. Bantam Books. p. 27. ISBN 0-553-05109-1.
  51. Goode, Jamie (1 March 2006). The science of wine: from vine to glass. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24800-7.
  52. Chalker-Scott, Linda (2004). "The Myth of Biodynamic Agriculture" (PDF). Master Gardener Magazine.
  53. Smith, D. (2006). "On Fertile Ground? Objections to Biodynamics". The World of Fine Wine (archived at Skeptical Inquirer) ( (12): 108–113. Retrieved 29 November 2013.
  54. Kirchmann, Holger (1994). "Biological dynamic farming – an occult form of alternative agriculture?". J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 7 (2): 173–187. doi:10.1007/BF02349036.
  55. Randi, James (16 July 2004). "An Important Appeal". James Randi Educational Foundation. Archived from the original (NEWSLETTER) on 8 March 2005. Retrieved 17 November 2007. This is a total quack procedure that has actually killed children.
  56. Maloney, Shannon-Bridget. "Be Wary of Attachment Therapy". Retrieved 17 November 2007.
  57. Berlin, Lisa J.; Ziv, Yair; Amaya-Jackson, Lisa; Greenberg, Mark T. (eds.). "Preface". Enhancing Early Attachments. Theory, Research, Intervention and Policy. Duke series in child development and public policy. Guilford Press. p. xvii. ISBN 1-59385-470-6.
  58. 58.0 58.1 Chaffin, M; Hanson, R; Saunders, BE; Nichols, T; Barnett, D; Zeanah, C; Berliner, L; Egeland, B et al. (2006). "Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems". Child Maltreat 11 (1): 76–89. doi:10.1177/1077559505283699. PMID 16382093.
  59. CESNUR — APA Brief in the Molko Case. [t]he methodology of Drs. Singer and Benson has been repudiated by the scientific community [... the hypotheses advanced by Singer comprised] little more than uninformed speculation, based on skewed data [...] [t]he coercive persuasion theory ... is not a meaningful scientific concept. [...] The theories of Drs. Singer and Benson are not new to the scientific community. After searching scrutiny, the scientific community has repudiated the assumptions, methodologies, and conclusions of Drs. Singer and Benson. The validity of the claim that, absent physical force or threats, "systematic manipulation of the social influences" can coercively deprive individuals of free will lacks any empirical foundation and has never been confirmed by other research. The specific methods by which Drs. Singer and Benson have arrived at their conclusions have also been rejected by all serious scholars in the field.
  60. American Psychological Association Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) (1987-05-11). "Memorandum". CESNUR: APA Memo of 1987 with Enclosures. CESNUR Center for Studies on New Religion. Retrieved 2008-11-18. BSERP thanks the Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control for its service but is unable to accept the report of the Task Force. In general, the report lacks the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA imprimatur.
  61. APA memo and two enclosures
  62. Haldeman, Douglas C. (December 1999). "The Pseudo-science of Sexual Orientation Conversion Therapy" (PDF). ANGLES: the Policy Journal of the Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies 4 (1). Retrieved 7 November 2010.
  63. "Position Statement on Therapies Focused on Attempts to Change Sexual Orientation (Reparative or Conversion Therapies)" (PDF). American Psychiatric Association. May 2000. Retrieved 28 August 2007.
  64. "Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel" (PDF). Just the Facts Coalition. 1999. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
  65. Glassgold, JM (1 August 2009). "Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation" (PDF). American Psychological Association. Retrieved 24 September 2009.
  66. "Barry Beyerstein Q&A". Ask the Scientists. Scientific American Frontiers. Retrieved 22 February 2008. they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. I.e., it's a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where 'like begets like.'
  67. "The use of graphology as a tool for employee hiring and evaluation". British Columbia Civil Liberties Union. 1988. Retrieved 22 February 2008. On the other hand, in properly controlled, blind studies, where the handwriting samples contain no content that could provide non-graphological information upon which to base a prediction (e.g., a piece copied from a magazine), graphologists do no better than chance at predicting the personality traits
  68. National Academy of Science (1999). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, 2nd edition. National Academy Press. p. 48.
  69. Thomas, John A. (2002). "Graphology Fact Sheet". North Texas Skeptics. Retrieved 22 February 2008. In summary, then, it seems that graphology as currently practiced is a typical pseudoscience and has no place in character assessment or employment practice. There is no good scientific evidence to justify its use, and the graphologists do not seem about to come up with any.
  70. "Hypnosis". American Cancer Society. Retrieved 25 February 2008.
  71. 71.0 71.1 Westen et al. 2006 "Psychology: Australian and New Zealand edition" John Wiley.
  72. Cathcart, Brian; Wilkie, Tom (18 December 1994). "Hypnotism does not exist, say experts". The Independent (London). Retrieved 31 March 2010.
  73. NICE Guidance for IBS
  74. Nash, Michael R. "The Truth and the Hype of Hypnosis". Scientific American: July 2001
  75. Lynn, Steven Jay; Lock, Timothy; Loftus, Elizabeth; Krackow, Elisa; Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2003). "The remembrance of things past: problematic memory recovery techniques in psychotherapy". In Lohr, Jeffrey M.; Lynn, Steven Jay; Lohr, Jeffrey M. Science and Pseudoscience in Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 219–220. ISBN 1-57230-828-1. Retrieved 25 February 2008. "hypnotically induced past life experiences are rule-governed, goal-directed fantasies that are context generated and sensitive to the demands of the hypnotic regression situation."
  76. "What is Hypnotherapy and How Does it Differ From Hypnosis?". Hypnos.info. 22 July 2007. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
  77. Robertson, Donald (2009). The Discovery of Hypnosis: The Complete Writings of James Braid, the Father of Hypnotherapy. UKCHH Ltd. p. 15. ISBN 9780956057006.
  78. "Evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that hypnosis, relaxation, and meditation techniques can reduce anxiety, particularly that related to stressful situations, such as receiving chemotherapy". http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071579/
  79. 79.0 79.1 Polichak, James W. "Memes as Pseudoscience". In Shermer, Michael. Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. p. 664f. ISBN 9781576076538.
  80. Tosey, P; Mathison, J (2006). "Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming" (PDF). Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey.
  81. Dilts, R.; Grinder, J.; Delozier, J.; Bandler, R. (1980). Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Volume I: The Study of the Structure of Subjective Experience. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications. p. 2. ISBN 0-916990-07-9.
  82. 82.0 82.1 Corballis, MC (1999). "Are we in our right minds?". In Sala, S. Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions About the Mind and Brain. Wiley, John & Sons. pp. 25–41. ISBN 0-471-98303-9.
  83. Drenth, P J D (1999). "Prometheus chained: Social and ethical constraints on psychology". European Psychologist 4 (4): 233–239. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.4.4.233.
  84. 84.0 84.1 84.2 Witkowski, Tomasz (2010). "Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?". Polish Psychological Bulletin 41 (2): 58–66. doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0.
  85. 85.0 85.1 Stollznow, K (2010). "Not-so Linguistic Programming". Skeptic 15 (4): 7.
  86. 86.0 86.1 Lum, C (2001). Scientific Thinking in Speech and Language Therapy. Psychology Press. p. 16. ISBN 0-8058-4029-X.
  87. von Bergen, C.W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). "Selected alternative training techniques in HRD". Human Resource Development Quarterly 8 (4): 281–294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403.
  88. Druckman, Daniel (November 2004). "Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance". Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 (11): 2234–2260(27). doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01975.x.
  89. Sharpley, C.F. (1987). "Research Findings on Neuro-linguistic Programming: Non supportive Data or an Untestable Theory". Journal of Counseling Psychology 34 (1): 103–107, 105. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103.
  90. 90.0 90.1 Devilly, GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry" (PDF). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 39 (6): 437–45. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644.
  91. Lilienfeld, S; Mohr, J; Morier, D (2001). "The Teaching of Courses in the Science and Pseudoscience of Psychology: Useful Resources". Teaching of Psychology 28 (3): 182–191. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03.
  92. Dunn. D., Halonen. J,Smith. R., (2008). Teaching critical thinking in psychology : a handbook of best practices. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-4051-7402-2. OCLC 214064173.
  93. Norcross; Koocher, Gerald P.; Garofalo, Ariele et al. (2006). "Discredited Psychological Treatments and Tests: A Delphi Poll". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 37 (5): 515–522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515.
  94. Norcross,, John C.; Hogan, Thomas P.; Koocher, Gerald P. (2008). Clinician's Guide to Evidence-based Practices. USA: Oxford University Press. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-19-533532-3.
  95. Glasner, Edwards. S.; Rawson., R. (June 2010). "Evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: review and recommendations for public policy". Health Policy 97 (2–3): 93–104. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013. PMC 2951979. PMID 20557970.
  96. Schmidt, Helmut (1969). "Clairvoyance Tests with a Machine'". Journal of Parapsychology 33.
  97. Schmidt, Helmut (1970). "PK Experiments with Animals as Subjects". Journal of Parapsychology 34.
  98. Schmidt, Helmut (1973). "PK Tests with a High Speed Random Number Generator'". Journal of Parapsychology 37.
  99. Wooffitt, Robin; Holt, Nicola. Looking In and Speaking Out: Introspection, Consciousness, Communication. Andrews UK Limited. p. 32.
  100. Magendie, F. (1844). "IV". An Elementary Treatise on Human Physiology. Translated by John Revere (5th ed.). New York: Harper. p. 150.
  101. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press. pp. 14, 23, 131.
  102. 102.0 102.1 102.2 "ICSU Insight". International Council for Science. 2005. Archived from the original on 2006-07-21.
  103. Iacono, W.G. (2001). "Forensic 'lie detection': Procedures without scientific basis". Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 1 (1): 75–86. doi:10.1300/J158v01n01_05.
  104. Saxe, Leonard; Dougherty, Denise; Cross, Theodore (1983). "Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation". Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
  105. Adelson, R. (July 2004). "Monitor on Psychology – The polygraph in doubt" 35 (7). American Psychological Association. p. 71. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
  106. Bassett, James. "Polygraph Testing". Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  107. Vergano, Dan (9 September 2002). "Telling the truth about lie detectors". USA Today. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  108. Primal therapy homepage
  109. Moore, Timothy (2001). "Primal Therapy". Gale Group.
  110. Merkin, Daphne (5 September 2004). "Psychoanalysis: Is It Science or Is It Toast?". New York Times. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
  111. Cioffi, Frank (1985). "Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-Science and Testability". In Currie, Gregory; Musgrave, Alan. Popper and the Human Sciences. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series. SpringerVerlag. pp. 13–44. ISBN 978-90-247-2998-2.
  112. Popper, K. R. (1990). "Science: Conjectures and Refutations". In Grim, P. Philosophy of Science and the Occult. Albany. pp. 104–110.
  113. Cioffi, Frank (1985). "Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-Science and Testability". In Currie, Gregory; Musgrave, Alan. Popper and the human sciences. Springer. ISBN 978-90-247-2998-2.. Reprinted in Cioffi, Frank (1998). Freud and the question of pseudoscience. Open Court. ISBN 978-0-8126-9385-0.
  114. "Urban Legends Reference Pages: Business (Subliminal Advertising)". The Urban Legends Reference Pages. Retrieved 11 August 2006.
  115. Pratkanis, A. R.; Greenwald, A. G. (1988). "Recent perspectives on unconscious processing: Still no marketing applications". Psychology and Marketing 5 (4): 337. doi:10.1002/mar.4220050405.
  116. 116.0 116.1 116.2 "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding. Science Fiction and Pseudoscience". National Science Foundation.
  117. 117.0 117.1 Frean, Alexandra (30 January 2009). "Universities drop degree courses in alternative medicine.". The Times. Retrieved 5 November 2012. (subscription required (help)). Universities are increasingly turning their backs on homoeopathy and complementary medicine amid opposition from the scientific community to 'pseudo-science' degrees.
  118. Corbyn., Zoë (24 April 2008). "Experts criticise 'pseudo-scientific' complementary medicine degrees.". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  119. Highfield, Roger (22 March 2007). "Alternative medicine degrees 'anti-scientific'". The Daily Telegraph (London). Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  120. von Rohra, E.; Pampallonab, S.; van Wegberga, B.; Hürnyc, Ch.; Bernhardd, J.; Heussere, P.; Cernyf, Th. (2000). "Experiences in the realisation of a research project on anthroposophical medicine in patients with advanced cancer" (PDF). Schweiz Med Wochenschr 130 (34): 1173–84. PMID 11013920.
  121. Klotter, Jule (2006). "Anthroposophical Medicine". Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients 24 (1): 274.
  122. Kiene, Helmut (2001). Complementary Methodology in Clinical Research – Cognition-based Medicine. Heidelberg, New York: Springer Publishers. ISBN 3-540-41022-8.
  123. anonymous. "Miscellaneous Holistic Remedies". Holistic Online. Retrieved 9 February 2008.
  124. Anonymous (13 November 2004). "The Position of Anthroposophic Medicine". Internationale Vereinigung Anthroposophischer Ärztegesellschaften (International Federation of Anthroposophic Medical Associations). Archived from the original on 22 February 2008. Retrieved 9 February 2008. Some medicines are similar to herbal medicinal products, some are prepared according to the guidelines of homeopathic pharmacopoeias.
  125. Alm, JS; Swartz, J; Lilja, G; Scheynius, A; Pershagen, G (May 1999). "Atopy in children of families with an anthroposophic lifestyle" (PDF). Lancet 353 (9163): 1485–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09344-1. PMID 10232315.
  126. Flöistrup, Helen; Swartz, Jackie; Bergström, Anna; Alm, Johan S.; Scheynius, Annika; van Hage, Marianne; Waser, Marco; Braunfahrlander, C et al. (January 2006). "Allergic disease and sensitization in Steiner school children". The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 117 (1): 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.039. PMID 16387585. Retrieved 3 March 2008.
  127. Klotter, Jule (May 2006). "Anthroposophic lifestyle & allergies in children.(Shorts)". Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients 24 (2): 274.
  128. 128.0 128.1 Carroll, Robert. "anthroposophic medicine". Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 9 February 2008.
  129. Hansson, Sven Ove (1991). "Is Anthroposophy Science?". Conceptus XXV (64): 37–49. The claims that anthroposophy is a science are not justified.
  130. Ernst, Edzard (2006). "Mistletoe as a treatment for cancer". BMJ 333 (7582): 1282–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.39055.493958.80. PMC 1761165. PMID 17185706. Anthroposophic drugs are based on ancient alchemistic and homeopathic notions, far removed from the concepts of pharmacology.
  131. Ernst, Edzard, "Anthroposophical Medicine: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials." Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, ISSN 0043-5325, 2004, vol. 116, no4, pp. 128–130
  132. "Report of the Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medical Practitioners, In Opposition to the Licensure of Naturopaths" (PDF). Massachusetts Medical Society. Retrieved 27 January 2008. Many of the means by which naturopaths diagnose these toxins and allergies are outright quackery: electrodiagnostic devices (banned by the FDA as worthless), hair analysis, applied kinesiology, iridology, and more.
  133. 133.0 133.1 "Applied Kinesiology". American Cancer Society. 23 May 2007. Retrieved 27 January 2008. Available scientific evidence does not support the claim that applied kinesiology can diagnose or treat cancer or other illness.
  134. "Applied Kinesiology". Natural Standard. 1 July 2005. Retrieved 27 January 2008. applied kinesiology has not been shown to be effective for the diagnosis or treatment of any disease.
  135. "Applied Kinesiology Status Statement". International College of Applied Kinesiology. 16 June 1992. Archived from the original on 22 March 2008. Retrieved 27 January 2008.
  136. 136.0 136.1 Such as the existence of the geologic column; see Morton, Glenn. "The Geologic Column and its Implications for the Flood". TalkOrigins Archive.
  137. Niggemann, B.; Gruber, C. (August 2004). "Unproven diagnostic procedures in IgE-mediated allergic diseases". Allergy 59 (8): 806–808. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00495.x. PMID 15230811.
  138. Gerez, IF; Shek, LP; Chng, HH; Lee, BW (January 2010). "Diagnostic tests for food allergy" (PDF). Singapore Medical Journal 51 (1): 4–9. PMID 20200768.
  139. Waserman, Susan; Watson, Wade (January 2011). "Food allergy" (PDF). Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 7 (Suppl 1): S7. doi:10.1186/1710-1492-7-S1-S7. PMC 3245440. PMID 22166142.
  140. Wüthrich, B (2005). "Unproven techniques in allergy diagnosis" (PDF). Journal of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology 15 (2): 86–90. PMID 16047707.
  141. Beyer, K; Teuber, SS (June 2005). "Food allergy diagnostics: scientific and unproven procedures". Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 5 (3): 261–6. doi:10.1097/01.all.0000168792.27948.f9. PMID 15864086.
  142. Sicherer, S. H.; Wood, R. A. (December 2011). "Allergy Testing in Childhood: Using Allergen-Specific IgE Tests" (PDF). Pediatrics 129 (1): 193–197. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2382. PMID 22201146.
  143. 143.0 143.1 Bernstein, IL; Li, JT; Bernstein, DI; Hamilton, R; Spector, SL; Tan, R; Sicherer, S; Golden, DB et al. (March 2008). "Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter" (PDF). Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 100 (3, Supplement 3): S1–148. doi:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60305-5. PMID 18431959.
  144. 144.0 144.1 Teuber, Suzanne S.; Porch-Curren, Cristina (June 2003). "Unproved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to food allergy and intolerance". Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 3 (3): 217–221. doi:10.1097/00130832-200306000-00011. PMID 12840706.
  145. Ortolani C, C; Bruijnzeel-Koomen C; Bengtsson U et al. (January 1999). "Controversial aspects of adverse reactions to food. European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Reactions to Food Subcommittee". Allergy 54 (1): 27–45. doi:10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00913.x. PMID 10195356.
  146. Boyce, JA; Assa'ad A; Burks AW et al. (December 2010). "Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel" (PDF). The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 126 (6 Suppl.): S1–S58. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.007. PMID 21134576.
  147. Sackeyfio, A.; Senthinathan, A.; Kandaswamy, P.; Barry, P. W.; Shaw, B.; Baker, M. (February 2011). "Diagnosis and assessment of food allergy in children and young people: summary of NICE guidance". British Medical Journal 342: d747. doi:10.1136/bmj.d747. PMID 21345912.
  148. 148.0 148.1 148.2 "Unorthodox techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of allergy, asthma and immune disorders". Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. November 2007. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
  149. Motala, C; Hawarden, D (July 2009). "Guideline: Diagnostic testing in allergy" (PDF). South African Medical Journal 99 (7): 531–535.
  150. Morris, A. (March 2006). "Complementary and Alternative Allergy Tests". Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology 19 (1): 26–28.
  151. Peter Barrett (2004), Science and Theology Since Copernicus: The Search for Understanding, p. 18, Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 0-567-08969-X.
  152. Quackenbush, Thomas R. (2000). Better Eyesight The complete magazines of William H. Bates. North Atlantic Books. p. 643. ISBN 1-55643-351-4.
  153. Worrall, Russell S.; Nevyas, Jacob; Barrett, Stephen (12 September 2007). "Eye-Related Quackery". Retrieved 17 November 2007. The claims Bates made in advertising his book were so dubious that in 1929 the Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint against him for advertising "falsely or misleadingly"
  154. Pollack, P. (1956). "Chapter 3: Fallacies of the Bates System". The Truth about Eye Exercises. Philadelphia: Chilton Co.
  155. Skarnulis, Leanna (5 February 2007). "Natural Vision Correction: Does It Work?". WebMD. No evidence was found that visual training had any effect on the progression of nearsightedness, or that it improved visual function for patients with farsightedness or astigmatism, or that it improved vision lost to diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, or diabetic retinopathy.
  156. Gardner, Martin (1957). "Chapter 19: Throw Away Your Glasses". Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Courier Dover. pp. 230–241. ISBN 0-486-20394-8. Actually, Bates' theory of accommodation (so necessary to explain the value of his exercises) is so patently absurd that even most of his present-day followers have discarded it.
  157. Bradley, Robyn E. (23 September 2003). "Advocates See Only Benefits From Eye Exercises" (PDF). The Boston Globe (MA).
  158. Marg, E. (1952). ""Flashes" of clear vision and negative accommodation with reference to the Bates Method of visual training" (PDF). Am J Opt Arch Am Ac Opt 29 (4): 167–84. doi:10.1097/00006324-195204000-00001.
  159. Randi, James (11 November 2006). "Swift: the weekly newsletter of the JREF". Retrieved 17 November 2007. This is pure old quackery, it’s wishful thinking, and it’s profitable.
  160. "Biological Rhythms: Implications for the Worker". OTA-BA-463 Box 2-A pg. 30. Office of Technology Assessment. September 1991. Retrieved 21 February 2008. "No evidence exists to support the concept of biorhythms; in fact, scientific data refute their existence.
  161. Carroll, Robert Todd. "Biorhythms". Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 21 February 2008. The theory of biorhythms is a pseudoscientific theory that claims our daily lives are significantly affected by rhythmic cycles overlooked by scientists who study biological rhythms.
  162. Hines, Terence (1998). "Comprehensive Review of Biorhythm Theory" (PDF (SUMMARY)). Psychological Reports 83 (1): 19–64. doi:10.2466/PR0.83.5.19-64. PMID 9775660. Retrieved 20 February 2008. The conclusion is that biorhythm theory is not valid.
  163. 163.0 163.1 Smith, SE (1993). "Body Memories: And Other Pseudo-Scientific Notions of "Survivor Psychology"". Issues in Child Abuse Accusations 5 (4).
  164. Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Lynn, SJ; Lohr, JM, eds. (2002). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. The Guilford Press. ISBN 1-57230-828-1.
  165. "Brain Gym – FAQ". The Official Brain Gym Web Site. Retrieved 11 August 2008. BRAIN GYM works by facilitating optimal achievement of mental potential through specific movement experiences. All acts of speech, hearing, vision, and coordination are learned through a complex repertoire of movements. BRAIN GYM promotes efficient communication among the many nerve cells and functional centers located throughout the brain and sensory motor system.
  166. "About Brain Gym".
  167. "Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Opportunities" (PDF). the ESRC's Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Retrieved 3 August 2007. The pseudo-scientific terms that are used to explain how this works, let alone the concepts they express, are unrecognisable within the domain of neuroscience.
  168. Goswami, Usha (May 2006). "Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?". Nature 7 (5): 406–413. doi:10.1038/nrn1907. PMID 16607400. Retrieved 11 August 2008. Cognitive neuroscience is making rapid strides in areas highly relevant to education. However, there is a gulf between current science and direct classroom applications. Most scientists would argue that filling the gulf is premature. Nevertheless, at present, teachers are at the receiving end of numerous 'brain-based learning' packages. Some of these contain alarming amounts of misinformation, yet such packages are being used in many schools.(subscription required)
  169. "Sense About Science – Brain Gym". Sense About Science. Retrieved 11 April 2008. These exercises are being taught with pseudoscientific explanations that undermine science teaching and mislead children about how their bodies work. ... There have been a few peer reviewed scientific studies into the methods of Brain Gym, but none of them found a significant improvement in general academic skills.
  170. Hyatt, Keith J. (April 2007). "Brain Gym – Building Stronger Brains or Wishful Thinking?". Remedial and Special Education (SAGE Publications) 28 (2): 117–124. doi:10.1177/07419325070280020201. ISSN 0741-9325. Retrieved 12 September 2008. a review of the theoretical foundations of Brain Gym and the associated peer-reviewed research studies failed to support the contentions of the promoters of Brain Gym. Educators are encouraged to become informed consumers of research and to avoid implementing programming for which there is neither a credible theoretical nor a sound research basis.(subscription required)
  171. Gray, Sadie (5 April 2008). "News in brief". London: The Times. Retrieved 1 September 2008. Paul Dennison, a Californian educator who created the programme, admitted that many claims in his teacher’s guide were based on his 'hunches' and were not proper science.
  172. "An Introduction to Chiropractic". National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. November 2007. Retrieved 6 January 2009.
  173. "Standards for Doctor of Chiropractic programs and requirements for institutional status" (PDF). The Council on Chiropractic Education. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 14 February 2008.
  174. Nelson, CF; Lawrence, DJ; Triano, JJ; Bronfort, Gert; Perle, Stephen M; Metz, R Douglas; Hegetschweiler, Kurt; Labrot, Thomas (July 2005). "Chiropractic as spine care: a model for the profession". Chiropractic & Osteopathy 13 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-9. PMC 1185558. PMID 16000175.
  175. Grod, JP; Sikorski, D; Keating, JC (October 2001). "Unsubstantiated claims in patient brochures from the largest state, provincial, and national chiropractic associations and research agencies". Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 24 (8): 514–9. doi:10.1067/mmt.2001.118205. PMID 11677551.
  176. Keating, JC Jr; Cleveland, CS III; Menke, M (2005). "Chiropractic history: a primer" (PDF). Association for the History of Chiropractic. Retrieved 16 June 2008.
  177. Keating, JC Jr (1997). "Chiropractic: science and antiscience and pseudoscience side by side". Skept Inq 21 (4): 37–43.
  178. Johnson, T. (December 1999). "Angry scientists fight university's attempt to affiliate with chiropractic college". Canadian Medical Association Journal 160: 99–100.
  179. "First public chiropractic school causes stir". MSNBC. 17 January 2005. Retrieved 7 November 2010.
  180. Ernst, E; Canter, PH (April 2006). "A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation". J R Soc Med 99 (4): 192–6. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.192. PMC 1420782. PMID 16574972.
  181. Bronfort, G; Haas, M; Evans, R; Kawchuk, G; Dagenais, S (2008). "Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with spinal manipulation and mobilization". The Spine Journal 8 (1): 213–25. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.023. PMID 18164469.
  182. Assendelft, WJ; Morton, SC; Yu, EI; Suttorp, MJ; Shekelle, PG (2004). Assendelft, Willem JJ, ed. "Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): CD000447. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000447.pub2. PMID 14973958.
  183. Ernst, E (May 2008). "Chiropractic: a critical evaluation". Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 35 (5): 544–62. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.004. PMID 18280103.
  184. Thiel, HW; Bolton, JE; Docherty, S; Portlock, JC (October 2007). "Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey". Spine 32 (21): 2375–8; discussion 2379. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557bb1. PMID 17906581.
  185. Ernst E (July 2007). "Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 100 (7): 330–8. doi:10.1258/jrsm.100.7.330. PMC 1905885. PMID 17606755.
  186. Vohra, S; Johnston, BC; Cramer, K; Humphreys, K (January 2007). "Adverse events associated with pediatric spinal manipulation: a systematic review". Pediatrics 119 (1): e275–83. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1392. PMID 17178922.
  187. Barrett, Stephen (31 July 2008). "Chiropractic's Dirty Secret: Neck Manipulation and Strokes". Quackwatch. Retrieved 6 January 2009.
  188. Gouveia, LO; Castanho, P; Ferreira, JJ (May 2009). "Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review". Spine 34 (11): E405–13. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a16d63. PMID 19444054.
  189. Keating, Joseph C. (March 2002). "The Meanings of Innate". Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association 46 (1): 4–10. PMC 2505097.
  190. "Chiropractic: A Profession Seeking Identity". CSICOP. Retrieved 7 January 2009.
  191. Barrett, S (9 March 2008). "Gastrointestinal Quackery: Colonics, Laxatives, and More". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2 September 2008.
  192. 192.0 192.1 "ACS: Colon Therapy". Retrieved 7 December 2008.
  193. "The Craniosacral Therapy Association of the UK".
  194. "Craniosacral Therapy". The Upledger Institute. 2001. Retrieved 27 March 2004.
  195. Ferrett, Mij (1998). "What Is Craniosacral Therapy?". Retrieved 27 March 2004.
  196. "General information on Cranial Osteopathy". The Sutherland Society. Retrieved 24 January 2006.
  197. Green, C; Martin, CW; Bassett, K; Kazanjian, A (1999). "A systematic review of craniosacral therapy: biological plausibility, assessment reliability and clinical effectiveness". Complement Ther Med 7 (4): 201–7. doi:10.1016/S0965-2299(99)80002-8. PMID 10709302. An earlier version of the paper is available without a subscription: Green, C; Martin, CW; Bassett, K; Kazanjian, A (1999). "A systematic review and critical appraisal of the scientific evidence on craniosacral therapy" (PDF). BCOHTA 99:1J. British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assessment. Retrieved 8 October 2007.
  198. Norcross, John C.; Koocher, Gerald P.; Garofalo, Ariele (2006). "Discredited psychological treatments and tests: A Delphi poll". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 37 (5): 515–522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515. ISSN 1939-1323.
  199. Wheeler, Thomas J. (21 February 2006). "A Scientific Look at Alternative Medicine" (PDF). Retrieved 12 January 2012.
  200. Bledsoe, Bryan E. (1 October 2004). "The Elephant in the Room: Does OMT Have Proved Benefit?". JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 104 (10): 405–406. PMID 15537794. Retrieved 12 January 2012.
  201. Hartman, Steve E (8 June 2006). "Cranial osteopathy: its fate seems clear". Chiropractic & Osteopathy 14: 10. doi:10.1186/1746-1340-14-10. ISSN 1746-1340. PMC 1564028. PMID 16762070.
  202. "Cranial Manipulative Therapy". Retrieved 12 January 2012.
  203. Atwood, Kimball C (26 March 2004). "Naturopathy, Pseudoscience, and Medicine: Myths and Fallacies vs Truth". Medscape General Medicine 6 (1): 33. ISSN 1531-0132.
  204. Campion, EW (January 1993). "Why unconventional medicine?". The New England Journal of Medicine 328 (4): 282–3. doi:10.1056/NEJM199301283280413. PMID 8418412.
  205. Carroll, Robert Todd. "crystal power". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 28 July 2007.
  206. Seely, D.R., Quigley, S.M., Langman, A.W. (1996). "Ear candles: Efficacy and safety". Laryngoscope 106 (10): 1226–9. doi:10.1097/00005537-199610000-00010. PMID 8849790.
  207. Beatty M.D., Charles W. "Ear Candling: Is it Safe?". MayoClinic.org. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
  208. Chevalier, Gaetan; Sinatra, Stephan; Oschman, James; Sokal, Karol; Sokal, Pawel (2012). "Earthing: Health Implications of Reconnecting the Human Body to the Earth's Surface Electrons". Journal of Environmental Public Health 2012 (291541): 1–8. doi:10.1155/2012/291541. PMC 3265077. PMID 22291721.
  209. Oschman, James (November 9, 2007). "Can Electrons Act as Antioxidants? A Review and Commentary". The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 13 (9): 955–967. doi:10.1089/acm.2007.7048.
  210. Röösli, M; Moser, M; Baldinini, Y; Meier, M; Braun-Fahrländer, C (February 2004). "Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure – a questionnaire survey". International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 207 (2): 141–50. doi:10.1078/1438-4639-00269. PMID 15031956.
  211. Rubin, G James; Das Munshi, Jayati; Wessely, Simon (2005). "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review of Provocation Studies". Psychosomatic Medicine 67 (2): 224–232. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000155664.13300.64. PMID 15784787.
  212. Goldacre, Ben. "Electrosensitives: the new cash cow of the woo industry". Retrieved 17 November 2007.
  213. "Electromagnetic fields and public health". Retrieved 17 November 2007.
  214. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. ch. 7. ISBN 978-0-16-066579-0. "Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... Polls also show that one quarter to more than half of the public believes in ... faith healing."
  215. Frazier, Kendrick (January 2005). "In the Land of Galileo, Fifth World Skeptics Congress Solves Mysteries, Champions Scientific Outlook". Skeptical Inquirer. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 18 December 2007. The majority of rigorous trials show no effect beyond placebo. (Edzard Ernst)
  216. Copper and Magnetic Bracelets Do Not Work for Rheumatoid Arthritis; randi.org
  217. Quackwear: Big Pseudoscience Wants to Sell You Wearable Metal to Improve Your Health; Alternet; January 10, 2015.
  218. Kayne, SB; Caldwell, IM (2006). Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice (2nd. ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 52. ISBN 9780443101601.
  219. Goldacre, Ben (17 November 2007). "Benefits and Risks of Homoeopathy". The Lancet 370 (9600): 1672–1673. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61706-1. PMID 18022024. Five large meta-analyses of homoeopathy trials have been done. All have had the same result: after excluding methodologically inadequate trials and accounting for publication bias, homoeopathy produced no statistically significant benefit over placebo.
  220. "Homoeopathy's benefit questioned". BBC News. 25 August 2005. Retrieved 30 January 2008. Professor Egger said: "We acknowledge to prove a negative is impossible. "But good large studies of homeopathy do not show a difference between the placebo and the homoeopathic remedy, whereas in the case of conventional medicines you still see an effect."
  221. "Homeopathy: systematic review of systematic reviews". Bandolier. Retrieved 30 January 2008. None of these systematic reviews provided any convincing evidence that homeopathy was effective for any condition. The lesson was often that the best designed trials had the most negative result
  222. "Questions and Answers About Homeopathy". National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. April 2003. Retrieved 30 January 2008. In sum, systematic reviews have not found homeopathy to be a definitively proven treatment for any medical condition.
  223. 223.0 223.1 Beyerstein, BL (1997). "Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2007. Retrieved 14 July 2007.
  224. CSICOP, cited in National Science Foundation Subcommittee on Science & Engineering Indicators (2000). "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding: Science Fiction and Pseudoscience". National Science Foundation. Retrieved 13 July 2007.
  225. "NCAHF Position Paper on Homeopathy". National Council Against Health Fraud. 1994. Retrieved 14 July 2007.
  226. Tyler, Chris (September 2006). "Sense About Homeopathy" (PDF). Sense About Science. Retrieved 29 January 2008. The scientific evidence shows that homeopathy acts only as a placebo and there is no scientific explanation of how it could work any other way.
  227. "Questions and Answers About Homeopathy". National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. April 2003. Retrieved 30 January 2008. a number of its key concepts do not follow the laws of science (particularly chemistry and physics)
  228. "What is Homeopathy". American Cancer Society. 5 January 2000. Archived from the original on 20 January 2008. Retrieved 30 January 2008. Most scientists say homeopathic remedies are basically water and can act only as placebos.
  229. "Scientists attack homeopathy move.". BBC News. 25 October 2006. Retrieved 2 February 2008. In a statement, the Royal College of Pathologists said they were "deeply alarmed" that the regulation of medicine had "moved away from science and clear information for the public"
  230. "Iridology". Natural Standard. 7 July 2005. Retrieved 1 February 2008. "Research suggests that iridology is not an effective method to diagnose or help treat any specific medical condition.
  231. Ernst, E (January 2000). "Iridology: not useful and potentially harmful". Archives of ophthalmology 118 (1): 120–1. doi:10.1001/archopht.118.1.120. PMID 10636425.
  232. "H-175.998 Evaluation of Iridology" (PDF). American Medical Association. Retrieved 30 July 2009. Our AMA believes that iridology, the study of the iris of the human eye, has not yet been established as having any merit as a diagnostic technique.
  233. Kalichman, Seth C. (16 January 2009). Denying AIDS: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, and Human Tragedy. Springer. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-387-79476-1.
  234. 234.0 234.1 "Leaky gut syndrome". NHS Choices. 9 April 2013. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
  235. Cormier, Zoe (2008-03-08). "'Talk Therapy' Takes On Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Coming Soon To Canada". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Retrieved 2011-05-25.
  236. 236.0 236.1 Felstein, Roma (2007-01-09). "Could ME be caused by too much adrenaline?". The Daily Mail (London).
  237. Park, Robert L. (2000). "The Virtual Astronaut". Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. p. 61. ISBN 0-19-513515-6. Not only are magnetic fields of no value in healing, you might characterize these as "homeopathic" magnetic fields.
  238. National Science Foundation (2002). "7". Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. ISBN 978-0-16-066579-0. Among all who had heard of [magnet therapy], 14 percent said it was very scientific and another 54 percent said it was sort of scientific. Only 25 percent of those surveyed answered correctly, that is, that it is not at all scientific.
  239. 239.0 239.1 239.2 "Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97)". American Medical Association. 1997.
  240. 240.0 240.1 240.2 "Ayurvedic medicine". Quackwatch. Retrieved 16 August 2008.
  241. Sharp, Lesley A. (December 2003). "Review of Fluent bodies: Ayourvedic Remedies for Postcolonial Imbalance". Medical Anthropology Quarterly 17 (4): 511–512. doi:10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.512. Retrieved 16 August 2008.
  242. 242.0 242.1 Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 45–4?. ISBN 0-471-27242-6.
  243. Sarris, J., and Wardle, J. 2010. Clinical naturopathy: an evidence-based guide to practice. Elsevier Australia. Chatswood, NSW.
  244. Atwood KC (March 26, 2004). "Naturopathy, pseudoscience, and medicine: myths and fallacies vs truth". Medscape Gen Med 6 (1): 33. PMC 1140750. PMID 15208545.
  245. 245.0 245.1 Barrett S (23 December 2003). "A close look at naturopathy". www.quackwatch.org. Retrieved 20 November 2012.
  246. McKnight, P (2009-03-07). "Naturopathy's main article of faith cannot be validated: Reliance on vital forces leaves its practises based on beliefs without scientific backing". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 2009-03-21.
  247. National Science Board (April 2002). "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding – Science Fiction and Pseudoscience". Arlington, Virginia: National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.
  248. Wahlberg A (2007). "A quackery with a difference – new medical pluralism and the problem of 'dangerous practitioners' in the United Kingdom". Social Science & Medicine 65 (11): 2307–2316. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024. PMID 17719708.
  249. "Iridology is nonsense"., a web page with further references
  250. Carroll, Robert. "Natural". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 2009-03-21.
  251. "NCAHF Position Paper on Over the Counter Herbal Remedies (1995)". National Council Against Health Fraud. 1995. Retrieved 2009-04-17.
  252. Yang, M; Yuping, Y; Yin, X; Wang, BY; Wu, T; Liu, GJ; Dong, BR (2013). Dong, Bi Rong, ed. "Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in adults". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2 (2): CD006338. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006338.pub3. PMID 23450568.
  253. Posadzki, P.; Lee, M. S.; Ernst, E. (2013). "Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Pediatric Conditions: A Systematic Review". Pediatrics 132 (1): 140–52. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3959. PMID 23776117.
  254. Hondras, Maria A; Linde, Klaus; Jones, Arthur P (2005). Hondras, Maria A, ed. "Manual therapy for asthma". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD001002. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001002.pub2. PMID 15846609.
  255. Guglielmo, WJ (1998). "Are D.O.s losing their unique identity?". Medical economics 75 (8): 200–2, 207–10, 213–4. PMID 10179479.
  256. Salzberg, Steven (27 October 2010). "Osteopaths Versus Doctors". Forbes. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
  257. Pilkington, Mark (15 April 2004). "A vibe for radionics". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Scientific American concluded: 'At best, [ERA] is all an illusion. At worst, it is a colossal fraud.'
  258. Radionic Association, cited by BBC (23 May 2006). "10 lesser-known alternative therapies". British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Radionics is a technique of healing using extrasensory perception (ESP) and an instrument.
  259. 259.0 259.1 Isaak, Mark (ed.). "Index to Creationist Claims: Geology". TalkOrigins Archive.
  260. "What is Radionics". The Radionic Association. Archived from the original on 15 January 2008. Retrieved 7 February 2008. This subtle field cannot be accessed using our conventional senses. Radionic practitioners use a specialised dowsing technique to both identify the sources of weakness in the field and to select specific treatments to overcome them.
  261. "Electromagnetic Therapy". American Cancer Society. Retrieved 6 February 2008. There is no relationship between the conventional medical uses of electromagnetic energy and the alternative devices or methods that use externally applied electrical forces. Available scientific evidence does not support claims that these alternative electrical devices are effective in diagnosing or treating cancer or any other disease.
  262. Helwig, David (December 2004). "Radionics". In Longe, Jacqueline L. The Gale Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine. Gale Cengage. ISBN 978-0-7876-7424-3. Retrieved 7 February 2008.
  263. Kunz, Kevin; Kunz, Barbara (1993). The Complete Guide to Foot Reflexology. Reflexology Research Project.
  264. Ernst E (2009). "Is reflexology an effective intervention? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials". Med J Aust 191 (5): 263–6. PMID 19740047.
  265. Norman, Laura; Thomas Cowan (1989). The Reflexology Handbook, A Complete Guide. Piatkus. pp. 22, 23. ISBN 0-86188-912-6.
  266. "Natural Standard". Harvard Medical School. July 7, 2005. Retrieved January 27, 2007.
  267. "Reflexology". National Council Against Health Fraud. 1996. Retrieved 2007-01-27.
  268. Wallace, Sampson; Vaughn, Lewis (24 March 1998). ""Therapeutic Touch" Fails a Rare Scientific Test". CSICOP News. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2007. Despite this lack of evidence, TT is now supported by major nursing organizations such as the National League of Nurses and the American Nurses Association.
  269. O'Mathuna, DP; Ashford, RL (2003–2006). O'Mathúna, Dónal P, ed. "Therapeutic touch for healing acute wounds". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003 (4): CD002766. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002766. Retrieved 27 January 2008.
  270. Courcey, Kevin. "Further Notes on Therapeutic Touch". Quackwatch. Retrieved 5 December 2007. What's missing from all of this, of course, is any statement by Krieger and her disciples about how the existence of their energy field can be demonstrated by scientifically accepted methods.
  271. "Energy Medicine: An Overview". National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 24 October 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2007. neither the external energy fields nor their therapeutic effects have been demonstrated convincingly by any biophysical means.
  272. Unschuld, Paul Ulrich (1985). Medicine in China: A History of Ideas. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-06216-7.
  273. 273.0 273.1 273.2 273.3 "Traditional Chinese Medicine: Principles of Diagnosis and Treatment". Complementary/Integrative Medicine Therapies. The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Retrieved 12 February 2009.
  274. "The Roots of Qi". CSICOP. Retrieved 12 February 2009.
  275. 275.0 275.1 275.2 275.3 NIH Consensus Development Program (3–5 November 1997). "Acupuncture --Consensus Development Conference Statement". National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 17 July 2007.
  276. Barrett, Stephen (30 December 2007). "Be Wary of Acupuncture, Qigong, and "Chinese Medicine"". Quackwatch. Retrieved 4 January 2009.
  277. 277.0 277.1 277.2 "NCAHF Position Paper on Acupuncture (1990)". National Council Against Health Fraud. 16 September 1990. Retrieved 30 December 2007.
  278. Maciocia, Giovanni (1989). The Foundations of Chinese Medicine. Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0-443-03980-1.
  279. Barrett, Stephen (28 March 2008). "Why TCM Diagnosis Is Worthless". Acupuncture Watch. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  280. 280.0 280.1 "Traditional Medicine and Pseudoscience in China: A Report of the Second CSICOP Delegation (Part 1)". CSICOP. Retrieved 12 February 2009.
  281. 281.0 281.1 Mann, Felix (1996). Reinventing Acupuncture: A New Concept of Ancient Medicine. London: Butterworth Heinemann,. p. 14. ...acupuncture points are no more real than the black spots that a drunkard sees in front of his eyes.
  282. Kaptchuk (1983). unknown. pp. 34–35.
  283. White, A.; Ernst, E. (2004). "A brief history of acupuncture". Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 43 (5): 662–663. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg005. PMID 15103027.
  284. 284.0 284.1 284.2 284.3 Ernst, E; Pittler, MH; Wider, B; Boddy, K. (2007). "Acupuncture: its evidence-base is changing". Am J Chin Med. 35 (1): 21–5. doi:10.1142/S0192415X07004588. PMID 17265547.
  285. White, AR; Filshie, J; Cummings, TM; International Acupuncture Research Forum (2001). "Clinical trials of acupuncture: consensus recommendations for optimal treatment, sham controls and blinding". Complement Ther Med. 9 (4): 237–245. doi:10.1054/ctim.2001.0489. PMID 12184353.
  286. Johnson, MI (2006). "The clinical effectiveness of acupuncture for pain relief – you can be certain of uncertainty". Acupunct Med. 24 (2): 71–9. doi:10.1136/aim.24.2.71. PMID 16783282.
  287. Committee on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public (2005). "Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States". National Academies Press. p. 126.
  288. Madsen, MV; Gøtzsche, PC; Hróbjartsson, A (2009). "Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups". BMJ 338 (27 January): a3115. doi:10.1136/bmj.a3115. PMC 2769056. PMID 19174438.
  289. Ernst, E (February 2006). "Acupuncture – a critical analysis". Journal of Internal Medicine 259 (2): 125–37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01584.x. PMID 16420542.
  290. Furlan, AD; van Tulder, MW; Cherkin, DC; Tsukayama, H; Lao, L; Koes, BW; Berman, BM (2005). Furlan, Andrea D, ed. "Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (1): CD001351. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001351.pub2. PMID 15674876.
  291. Lee, ML; Done, ML (2004). Lee, Anna, ed. "Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point P6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (3): CD003281. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003281.pub2. PMID 15266478.
  292. "Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials Section 3" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2003.
  293. 293.0 293.1 NIH Consensus statement: "Despite considerable efforts to understand the anatomy and physiology of the "acupuncture points", the definition and characterization of these points remains controversial. Even more elusive is the basis of some of the key traditional Eastern medical concepts such as the circulation of Qi, the meridian system, and the five phases theory, which are difficult to reconcile with contemporary biomedical information but continue to play an important role in the evaluation of patients and the formulation of treatment in acupuncture." Acupuncture. National Institutes of Health: Consensus Development Conference Statement, 3–5 November 1997. Available online at consensus.nih.gov/1997/1997Acupuncture107html.htm. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  294. "British Cupping Society". Retrieved 2008.
  295. Singh, Simon; Ernst, Edzard (2008). Trick or Treatment. Transworld Publishers. p. 368. ISBN 9780552157629.
  296. "Definition of Chinese meridian theory". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  297. Shermer, Michael (July 2005). "Full of Holes: the curious case of acupuncture". Scientific American 293 (2): 30. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0805-30. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  298. Stenger, Victor J. (June 1998). "Reality Check: the energy fields of life". Skeptical Briefs (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry). Archived from the original on 11 December 2007. Retrieved 25 December 2007. "Despite complete scientific rejection, the concept of a special biological fields within living things remains deeply engraved in human thinking. It is now working its way into modern health care systems, as non-scientific alternative therapies become increasingly popular. From acupuncture to homeopathy and therapeutic touch, the claim is made that healing can be brought about by the proper adjustment of a person's or animal's "bioenergetic fields.""
  299. "Traditional Medicine and Pseudoscience in China: A Report of the Second CSICOP Delegation (Part 2)". CSICOP. Retrieved 15 February 2009.
  300. "Traditional Chinese Medicine: Overview of Herbal Medicines". Complementary/Integrative Medicine Therapies. The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Retrieved 12 February 2009.
  301. Yuehua, N; Chen, J; Wu, T; Jiafu, W; Liu, G; Chen, Jin (2004). Chen, Jin, ed. "Chinese medicinal herbs for sore throat (Review)". Protocols. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004877.
  302. Praities, Nigel (7 August 2008). "GPs warned over Chinese medicine". Pulse. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  303. Normile, Dennis (2003). "ASIAN MEDICINE: the New Face of Traditional Chinese Medicine". Science 299 (5604): 188–190. doi:10.1126/science.299.5604.188. PMID 12522228.
  304. Gardner, Martin (2001). Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Debunking Pseudoscience. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 92–101. ISBN 0-393-32238-6.
  305. Garofalo, Pat (12 July 2013). "Jenny McCarthy's Pseudoscience Has No Place on 'The View'". US News. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
  306. Doja A, Roberts W (November 2006). "Immunizations and autism: a review of the literature". Can J Neurol Sci 33 (4): 341–6. doi:10.1017/s031716710000528x. PMID 17168158.
  307. Immunization Safety Review Committee, Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine (2004). Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ISBN 0-309-09237-X.
  308. Williams, William A. (2000). Encyclopedia of pseudoscience. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-3351-X.
  309. Kirkpatrick and Dahlquist. Technical Analysis: The Complete Resource for Financial Market Technicians. Financial Times Press, 2006, page 3. ISBN 0-13-153113-1
  310. http://seekingalpha.com/article/114523-beating-the-quants-at-their-own-game
  311. http://www.capco.com/sites/all/files/journal-32_article-10.pdf
  312. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1118080
  313. Paul V. Azzopardi (2010). Behavioural Technical Analysis: An introduction to behavioural finance and its role in technical analysis. Harriman House. ISBN 1905641419.
  314. Andrew W. Lo; Jasmina Hasanhodzic (2010). The Evolution of Technical Analysis: Financial Prediction from Babylonian Tablets to Bloomberg Terminals. Bloomberg Press. p. 150. ISBN 1576603490. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
  315. Paulos, J.A. (2003). A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market. Basic Books.
  316. 316.0 316.1 Griffioen, Technical Analysis in Financial Markets
  317. Fama, Eugene (May 1970). "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," The Journal of Finance, v. 25 (2), pp. 383-417.
  318. Ruse, Michael (2013). "Evolution". In Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 239–243. ISBN 022605182X. For the first one hundred and fifty years evolution was -- and was seen to be -- a pseudoscience.
  319. Pigliucci, Massimo (April 2011). "Evolution as pseudoscience?". Ruse’s somewhat surprising yet intriguing claim is that “before Charles Darwin, evolution was an epiphenomenon of the ideology of [social] progress, a pseudoscience and seen as such..."
  320. Gould, Stephen Jay (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York, NY: W W Norton and Co. pp. 28–29. ISBN 0-393-01489-4. Few tragedies can be more extensive than the stunting of life, few injustices deeper than the denial of an opportunity to strive or even to hope, by a limit imposed from without, but falsely identified as lying within.
  321. Kurtz, Paul (Sep 2004). "Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgments?". Skeptical Inquirer Magazine (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry). Archived from the original on 23 November 2007. Retrieved 1 December 2007. There have been abundant illustrations of pseudoscientific theories-monocausal theories of human behavior that were hailed as "scientific"-that have been applied with disastrous results. Examples: ... Many racists today point to IQ to justify a menial role for blacks in society and their opposition to affirmative action.
  322. Regal, Brian. 2009. Pseudoscience: a critical encyclopedia Greenwood Press. pp. 27-29
  323. Encyclopaedia Britannica: Aryan. "This notion, which had been repudiated by anthropologists by the second quarter of the 20th century, was seized upon by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and made the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Gypsies, and other 'non-Aryans.'".
  324. De Montellano, B. R. (1993). "Afrocentricity, Melanin, and Pseudoscience". Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 36: 33–58. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330360604.
  325. Ortiz de Montellano, Bernard R. (17 December 2006). "Afrocentric Pseudoscience: The Miseducation of African Americans". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (New York Academy of Sciences) 775 (1 Phagocytes): 561–572. Bibcode:1996NYASA.775..561O. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb23174.x.
  326. 326.0 326.1 Pollak 2000.
  327. Mann, Johathan (30 August 2002). "They call it cerealogy". CNN.com. Insight. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  328. Prothero, Donald R.; Buell, Carl Dennis (2007). Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-231-13962-5.
  329. Shermer, Michael; Linse, Pat (2002). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ISBN 1-57607-653-9.
  330. "Parapsychological Association website, Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology". Retrieved 24 January 2006.
  331. Alcock, James E. "Electronic Voice Phenomena:Voices of the Dead?". Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Retrieved 8 March 2007.
  332. Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary. Wiley Publishing Company. ISBN 0-471-27242-6.
  333. Shermer, Michael (May 2005). "Turn Me On, Dead Man". Scientific American. Retrieved 28 February 2007.
  334. Hines, Terrence (1988). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal: A Critical Examination of the Evidence. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-419-2. Thagard (1978) op cit 223 ff
  335. "Parapsychological Association website, Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology". Retrieved 24 December 2006.
  336. extrasensory perception. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary.
  337. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. ch. 7. ISBN 978-0-16-066579-0. Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... At least half of the public believes in the existence of extrasensory perception (ESP).
  338. According to skeptical investigator Joe Nickell, the typical ghost hunter is practicing pseudoscience.Ettkin, Brian (27 October 2008). "Skeptic: Ghost hunters practice 'pseudoscience'". Albany Times-Union. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
  339. "Levitation". Skeptic's Dictionary.
  340. Vernon, David (1989). "Palmistry". In Laycock, Donald; Vernon, David; Groves, Colin; Brown, Simon. Skeptical – a Handbook of Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Canberra: Imagecraft. p. 44. ISBN 0-7316-5794-2.
  341. Randi, James (1989). The Faith Healers. Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-535-0.
  342. Vernon, David (1989). Laycock, Donald; Vernon, David; Groves, Colin; Brown, Simon, eds. Skeptical – a Handbook of Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Canberra: Imagecraft. p. 47. ISBN 0-7316-5794-2.
  343. "Psychic surgery". CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 40 (3): 184–8. 1990. doi:10.3322/canjclin.40.3.184. PMID 2110023. Retrieved 28 July 2007.
  344. Carroll, Robert Todd. "Psychic Surgery". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 28 July 2007.
  345. "Psychic surgeon charged". The Filipino Reporter. 17–23 June 2005. Retrieved 28 July 2007.
  346. Vyse, Stuart A. (1997). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford University Press US. p. 129. ISBN 0-19-513634-9. [M]ost scientists, both psychologists and physicists, agree that it has yet to be convincingly demonstrated.
  347. Carroll, Robert Todd. "Rumplogy for Dummies". The Skeptic's Dictionary.
  348. Stableford, Brian M (2006). Science fact and science fiction: an encyclopedia. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-97460-7.
  349. "Russian Alien Spaceship Claims Raise Eyebrows, Skepticism", Robert Roy Britt, SPACE.com
  350. The Universe. LIFE Science Library. LIFE. 1970.
  351. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. ch. 7. ISBN 9780756723699. Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... A sizable minority of the public believes in UFOs and that aliens have landed on Earth.
  352. Webb, John (2001). "Feminist Numerology". Science in Africa. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
  353. Underwood Dudley (1997). Numerology. MAA. ISBN 0-88385-507-0.
  354. Carroll RT (2009-02-23). "neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 2009-06-25.
  355. Lynne Kelly (2004). The Skeptic's Guide To The Paranormal. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 1-74114-059-5.
  356. 356.0 356.1 Sagan, Carl (1996). "Does Truth Matter? Science, Pseudoscience, and Civilization" (PDF). Skeptical Inquirer.
  357. 357.0 357.1 Till, Farrell (1990). "What About Scientific Foreknowledge in the Bible?" (SELF PUBLISHED). The Skeptical Review: 2–5.
  358. Parkins, Michael D.; Szekrenyes, = J. (March 2001). "Pharmacological Practices of Ancient Egypt" (PDF). Proceedings of the 10th Annual History of Medicine. Retrieved 7 November 2010.
  359. Religious outsiders and the making of Americans Robert Laurence Moore; Oxford University Press 1986, page 223
  360. Gottschalk, S., The Emergence of Christian Science in American Religious Life, University of California Press, 1973, p. 224.
  361. Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "Astronomical Aspects of Creationism and Intelligent Design". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  362. Williams, J. D. (2007). "Creationist Teaching in School Science: A UK Perspective". Evolution: Education and Outreach 1 (1): 87–88. doi:10.1007/s12052-007-0006-7.
  363. National Academy of Science (1999), Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, 2nd edition, National Academy Press, archived from the original on 2007-07-09
  364. Young, Davis A. (1995). The biblical Flood: a case study of the Church's response to extrabiblical evidence. Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans. p. 340. ISBN 0-8028-0719-4. Retrieved 16 September 2008.
  365. Isaak, Mark (2007). "Creationist claim CD750". p. 173. Much geological evidence is incompatible with catastrophic plate tectonics.
  366. Fagan, Brian M.; Beck, Charlotte (1996). The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195076184. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  367. Cline, Eric H. (2009). Biblical Archaeology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199741077. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  368. Feder, Kenneth L. (2010). Encyclopedia of Dubious Archaeology: From Atlantis to the Walam Olum. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 031337919X. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  369. Rickard, Bob; Michell, John (2000). "Arkeology". Unexplained Phenomena: A Rough Guide Special. London: Rough Guides. pp. 179–183. ISBN 1858285895.
  370. "The TWiT Netcast Network with Leo Laporte" (VLOG). 2010.
  371. "21st Century Geocentrism".
  372. "Podcast #270 - September 15th, 2010".
  373. Phil Plait (September 14, 2010). "Geocentrism? Seriously?".
  374. "Questions About Intelligent Design: What is the theory of intelligent design?". Discovery Institute, Center for Science and Culture. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
  375. 375.0 375.1 Jones, John (2005). "Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Conclusion". In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents.
  376. "We therefore find that Professor Behe’s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large." Ruling, Judge John E. Jones III, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
  377. Shulman, Seth (2006). Undermining science: suppression and distortion in the Bush Administration. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-520-24702-7. True in this latest creationist variant, advocates of so-called intelligent design ... use more slick, pseudoscientific language. They talk about things like 'irreducible complexity' ... For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience. Mu, David (Fall 2005). "Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design" (PDF). Harvard Science Review 19 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-24.
    Perakh, M (Summer 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Isn't Intelligent – Review of: Unintelligent Design". Cell Biol Educ. 4 (2): 121–2. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-02-0071. PMC 1103713.
    Decker., Mark D. "Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy". College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota. The Discovery Institute and ID proponents have a number of goals that they hope to achieve using disingenuous and mendacious methods of marketing, publicity, and political persuasion. They do not practice real science because that takes too long, but mainly because this method requires that one have actual evidence and logical reasons for one's conclusions, and the ID proponents just don't have those. If they had such resources, they would use them, and not the disreputable methods they actually use.
  378. Martin Gardner Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science, ch. 22, Dover Publications Inc., I957 ISBN 0-486-20394-8
  379. Farley, Robert (30 March 2003). "Detox center seeks acceptance". St Petersburg Times. When Narconon opened its Chilocco facility in 1991, the Oklahoma Board of Mental Health issued a blistering assessment in denying its application for certification. "There is no credible evidence establishing the effectiveness of the Narconon program to its patients," the board concluded. It attacked the program as medically unsafe; dismissed the sauna program as unproven; and criticized Narconon for inappropriately taking some patients off prescribed psychiatric medication.
  380. Robert W. Welkos; Joel Sappell (27 June 1990). "Church Seeks Influence in Schools, Business, Science". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 13 September 2012. A fourth article did not mention Hubbard by name, but reported favorably on Narconon, his drug and alcohol rehabilitation program, which is run by Scientologists.
  381. Kyle Smith (20 April 2007). "DON'T BE TRICKED BY $CI-FI TOM-FOOLERY". New York Post. Those who want a tan from his celebrity glow will urge a fair hearing for his quackery. Obscure City Councilman Hiram Monserrate suddenly finds himself talked about after issuing a proclamation of huzzahs for L. Ron Hubbard. Three: The Ground Zero maladies are so baffling that workers will try anything. Anyone who feels better will credit any placebo at hand – whether Cruise or the Easter Bunny. In 1991, Time called Scientology's anti-drug program "Narconon" a "vehicle for drawing addicts into the cult" – which the magazine said "invented hundreds of goods and services for which members are urged to give up 'donations' " – such as $1,250 for advice on "moving swiftly up the Bridge" of enlightenment. That's New Age techno-gobbledygook for advice on buying swiftly up the Bridge of Brooklyn. Scientology fronts such as the New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Project – its Web site immediately recognizable as the work of Hubbardites by its logo, which looks like the cover of a Robert Heinlein paperback from 1971 – hint that their gimmicks might possibly interest anyone dreaming of weight loss, higher I.Q. or freedom from addiction. And you might be extra-specially interested if you've faced heart disease, cancer, Agent Orange or Chernobyl. As Mayor Bloomberg put it, Scientology "is not science." Nope. It's science fiction.
  382. "30 arrested in Paris crackdown on Scientologists". Agence France-Presse. 14 January 1992. About 30 Scientologists were arrested – and 19 of them later indicted – between May and October 1990 on charges of fraud, conspiracy to defraud and the illegal practice of medicine following the 1988 suicide of a church member in Lyon, eastern France. ... The sect has often found itself in trouble with officialdom the world over, accused of defrauding and brainwashing followers and, in France, of quackery at its illegal anti-drug clinics called "Narconon."
  383. Abgrall, Jean-Marie (2001). Healing Or Stealing?: Medical Charlatans in the New Age (PDF). p. 193. ISBN 1-892941-51-1. Retrieved 24 September 2012. Narconon, a subsidiary of Scientology, and the association “Yes to Life, No to Drugs” have also made a specialty of the fight against drugs and treating drug addicts. ... Drug addicts are just one of the Scientologists’ targets for recruitment. The offer of care and healing through techniques derived from dianetics is only a come-on. The detoxification of the patient by means of “dianetics purification” is more a matter of manipulation, through the general weakening that it causes; it is a way of brainwashing the subject. Frequently convicted for illegal practice of medicine, violence, fraud and slander, the Scientologists have more and more trouble getting people to accept their techniques as effective health measures, as they like to claim. They recommend their purification processes to eliminate X-rays and nuclear radiation, and to treat goiter and warts, hypertension and psoriasis, hemorrhoids and myopia. . . why would anyone find that hard to swallow? Scientology has built a library of several hundreds of volumes of writings exalting the effects of purification, and its disciples spew propaganda based on irresponsible medical writings by doctors who are more interested in the support provided by Scientology than in their patients’ well-being. On the other hand, responsible scientific reviews have long since “eliminated” dianetics and purification from the lists of therapies – relegating them to the great bazaar of medical fraud. ... Medical charlatans do not base their claims on scientific proof but, quite to the contrary, on peremptory assertions – the kind of assertions that they challenge when they come out of the mouths of those who defend “real” medicine.
  384. Asimov, Nanette (2 October 2004). "Church's drug program flunks S.F. test / Panel of experts finds Scientology's Narconon lectures outdated, inaccurate". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 7 September 2012. The program, Narconon Drug Prevention & Education, "often exemplifies the outdated, non-evidence-based and sometimes factually inaccurate approach, which has not served students well for decades," concluded Steve Heilig, director of health and education for the San Francisco Medical Society. In his letter to Trish Bascom, director of health programs for the San Francisco Unified School District, Heilig said five independent experts in the field of drug abuse had helped him evaluate Narconon's curriculum. ... "One of our reviewers opined that 'this (curriculum) reads like a high school science paper pieced together from the Internet, and not very well at that,' " Heilig wrote Bascom. "Another wrote that 'my comments will be brief, as this proposal hardly merits detailed analysis.' Another stated, 'As a parent, I would not want my child to participate in this kind of 'education.' " Heilig's team evaluated Narconon against a recent study by Rodney Skager, a professor emeritus at UCLA's Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, describing what good anti-drug programs should offer students. "We concurred that ... the Narconon materials focus on some topics of lesser importance to the exclusion of best knowledge and practices," Heilig wrote, and that the curriculum contained "factual errors in basic concepts such as physical and mental effects, addiction and even spelling."
  385. Asimov, Nanette (27 March 2005). "Doctors back schools dropping flawed antidrug program". San Francisco Chronicle. The California Medical Association has declared unanimous support for school districts that have dropped Narconon and other "factually inaccurate approaches" to antidrug instruction from their classrooms, and will urge the American Medical Association to do the same. Nearly 500 California doctors also endorsed "scientifically based drug education in California schools"
  386. "Families question Scientology-linked drug rehab after recent deaths". NBC Rock Center. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 2012-09-03.
  387. "Town Welcomes, Then Questions a Drug Project". New York Times (The New York Times Company). 1989-07-17. p. A13.
  388. 388.0 388.1 Dukes, Edwin Joshua (1971). The Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics,. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. p. 834.
  389. Vierra, Monty (March 1997). "Harried by "Hellions" in Taiwan" (newsletter). Sceptical Briefs.
  390. Park, Robert L (2000). p. 39. ISBN 9780198604433. [People] long to be told that modern science validates the teachings of some ancient scripture or New Age guru. The purveyors of pseudoscience have been quick to exploit their ambivalence.
  391. Stenger, Victor J. (January 1997). "Quantum Quackery". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 17 January 2008. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Capra's book was an inspiration for the New Age, and "quantum" became a buzzword used to buttress the trendy, pseudoscientific spirituality that characterizes this movement.
  392. Gell-Mann, Murray (1995). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and Complex. Macmillan. p. 168. ISBN 0-8050-7253-5. Then the conclusion has been drawn that quantum mechanics permits faster-than-light communication, and even tha claimed "paranormal" phenomena like precognition are thereby made respectable! How can this have happened?
  393. Kuttner, Fred; Rosenblum, Bruce (November 2006). "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience". Physics Today (American Institute of Physics) 59 (11): 14–16. Bibcode:2006PhT....59k..14K. doi:10.1063/1.2435631. Archived from the original on 15 November 2007. Retrieved 8 February 2008. We should not underestimate how persuasively physics can be invoked to buttress mystical notions. We physicists bear some responsibility for the way our discipline is exploited.
  394. Bell, J. S. (1988). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. p. 170. ISBN 0-521-52338-9. So I think it is not right to tell the public that a central role for conscious mind is integrated into modern atomic physics. Or that 'information' is the real stuff of physical theory. It seems to me irresponsible to suggest that technical features of contemporary theory were anticipated by the saints of ancient religions ... by introspection.
  395. "cosmetics – Bad Science" (BLOG).
  396. McLaughlin, Martyn (20 December 2007). "Pseudo science can't cover up the ugly truth". The Scotsman (Edinburgh).
  397. Martin Gardner (1957). Fads And Fallacies In The Name Of Science. Dover Publications. pp. 69–79. ISBN 978-0-486-20394-2.
  398. Shermer, Michael. "Rupert's Resonance". Scientific American. Retrieved 13 Jul 2013.
  399. Goldacre, Ben (27 January 2005). "Testing the water". The Guardian (London: Guardian News and Media, Ltd.). Retrieved 29 April 2008.
  400. Water Cluster Quackery. The junk science of structure-altered waters, Stephen Lower
  401. Rousseau, Denis L. (January 1992). "Case Studies in Pathological Science". American Scientist 80 (1): 54–63. Bibcode:1992AmSci..80...54R.
  402. Pang, Xiao-Feng; Feng, Yuan-Ping (Jan 1, 2005). Quantum Mechanics in Nonlinear Systems. World Scientific. p. 579. ISBN 9789812567789. Retrieved 25 March 2015.
  403. The Time Cube: Absolute Proof?
  404. Dvorak, John C. (December 22, 2003). "Don't Call Them Crackpots". PC magazine.
  405. "Truth is cubic?", by Kate Duffy,The Phoenix, Swarthmore College, September 19, 2002. Archived by the Internet Archive, archive copy retrieved July 25, 2010.
  406. Dynamics of Hyperspace
  407. The Timewave: The Zero Date
  408. Kruglyakov, Edward P. "Pseudoscience. How Does It Threaten Science and the Public? Report at a RAN Presidium meeting of 27 May 2003". Zdraviy Smysl (Saint Petersburg Branch of the Russian Humanist Society).
  409. Science gone wrong
  410. Analog science fiction & fact 126 (10–12). 1 January 2006. p. 86. Even sending messages backwards-in-time has mind-bending consequences and has become a standard theme in science fiction (examples: Isaac Asimov's "thiotimoline" pseudo- science-fact articles in Astounding(...)
  411. Jonathan C. Smith (2009). Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker's Toolkit. Wiley Desktop Editions Series (illustrated ed.). John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-8123-5.
  412. "The dangers of creationism in education". Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Retrieved 22 October 2007.
  413. Vergano, Dan (27 March 2006). ""Spaghetti Monster" is noodling around with faith". USA Today Science & Space article. Retrieved 5 February 2007.
  414. Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory, The Onion

References

Further reading

  • Park, Robert (2000). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. Oxford University Press. p. 240. ISBN 978-0195147100.
  • Singer, Barry; Abell, George O. (1983). Science and the paranormal: probing the existence of the supernatural. New York: Scribner. ISBN 0-684-17820-6.
  • Collins, Paul (2002). Banvard's folly: thirteen tales of people who didn't change the world. New York: Picador USA. ISBN 0-312-30033-6.
  • Gardner, Martin (1957). Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science (2nd, revised & expanded ed.). Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-20394-8. Retrieved 14 November 2010  Originally published 1952 by G.P. Putnam's Sons, under the title In the Name of Science
  • Gardner, Martin (1981). Science – good, bad and bogus. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-144-4.
  • Randi, James (1982). Flim-flam!: psychics, ESP, unicorns, and other delusions. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-198-3.
  • Sagan, Carl (1997). The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark. New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-40946-9.
  • Vaughn, Lewis; Schick, Theodore (1999). How to think about weird things: critical thinking for a new age. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Pub. ISBN 0-7674-0013-5.
  • Shermer, Michael (2002). Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: A.W.H. Freeman/Owl Book. ISBN 0-8050-7089-3.

External links