List of abrogated U.S. Supreme Court decisions
This is a list of decisions of the United States Supreme Court that have been abrogated, in whole or in part, by a subsequent constitutional amendment or Congressional statute. This list does not included decisions overruled by the subsequent Supreme Court decisions.
- This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
By Constitutional amendment
Abrogated decision | Abrogating amendment |
---|---|
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793) | Eleventh Amendment (1795) |
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) | Thirteenth Amendment (1865) |
Fourteenth Amendment (1868) | |
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429 (1895), affirmed on rehearing, 158 U.S. 601 (1895) |
Sixteenth Amendment (1913) |
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) | Nineteenth Amendment (1920) |
Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970) | Twenty-sixth Amendment (1971) |
By federal statute
Arbitration
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger, 348 U.S. 176 (1955) | Judicial Improvements & Access to Justice Act, Pub. L. No. 100-702, § 1019, 102 Stat. 4642, 4646 (1988) |
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985) | Motor Vehicle Franchise Contract Arbitration Fairness Act, Pub L. No. 107-273, 116 Stat. 1758 (2002). |
Bankruptcy
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 (1984) | Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-353, tit. III, § 541(a), 98 Stat. 333, 390 (codified at 11 U.S.C. § 1113) |
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport, 495 U.S. 552 (1990) | Crime Control Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-647, § 3103, 104 Stat. 4789, 4916 |
United States v. Nordic Village, 503 U.S. 30 (1992) | Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-394, tit. I, § 113, 108 Stat. 4106, 4117 (codified at 11 U.S.C. § 106) |
Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Fink, 522 U.S. 211 (1998) | Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-8, tit. XII, § 1222, 119 Stat 23, 196 (codified at 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(3)(B)) |
Crime
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
United States v. Paul, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 141 (1832) | Act of June 25, 1948, § 1, 62 Stat. 686, 686 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 13) |
United States v. Shackleford, 59 U.S. (18 How.) 588 (1855) | Act of Mar. 3, 1865, ch. 86, § 2, 13 Stat. 500, 500 |
Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917) | Child Sexual Abuse & Pornography Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-628, § 5(b)(1), 100 Stat. 3510–11 |
United States v. Teamsters Local 807, 315 U.S. 521 (1942) | Hobbs Act (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1951) |
Williams v. United States, 327 U.S. 711 (1946) | Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-654, § 2, 100 Stat. 3660, 3660–63 |
Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14 (1946) | Child Sexual Abuse & Pornography Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-628, § 5(b)(1), 100 Stat. 3510–11 |
United Steates v. Park, 421 U.S. 658 (1975) | Prescription Drug Marketing Act, Pub. L. No. 100-293, § 4, 102 Stat. 95, 96 (1988) |
United States v. Sells Engineering Co., 463 U.S. 418 (1983) | False Claims Amendments Act of 1986, Pub.L.No. 99-562, § 6, 100 Stat. 3153, 3159–68 |
United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476 (1983) | False Claims Amendments Act of 1986, Pub.L.No. 99-562, § 6, 100 Stat. 3153, 3159–68 |
McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987) | Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-690, § 7603(a), 102 Stat. 4181, 4508 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1346) |
Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135 (1994) | Riegle Community Development and Regulation Improvement Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-325, § 411, 108 Stat. 2160, 2253 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 5323). |
Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995) | Act of Nov. 3, 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-386, 112 Stat. 3469 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)) |
United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008) | Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-21, § 2(f)(1), 123 Stat. 1617, 1618 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1956) |
Education
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Grove City College v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (1984) | Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100-259, 102 Stat. 28 (1988) |
Traynor v. Turnage, 485 U.S. 535 (1988) | Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-687, tit. II & III, 102 Stat. 4105, 4109–22 |
Dellmuth v. Muth, 491 U.S. 223 (1989) | Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-476, § 103, 104 Stat. 1103, 1106 |
Environment
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Secretary of the Interior v. California, 464 U.S. 312 (1984) | Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-508, § 6208, 104 Stat. 1388 , 1388-307–08 |
Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 470 U.S. 116 (1985) | Water Quality Act, Pub. L. No. 100-4, § 306, 101 Stat. 7, 35–36 (1987) |
Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., 484 U.S. 49 (1987) | Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, § 707(g), 104 Stat. 2399, 2683 |
Veterans
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Rose v. Rose Establishment Precedent, 481 U.S. 619 (1987) | Department of Veterans Affairs Act of 1988, Department of Veteran Affairs Codification Act, Pub. L. No. 102-83 |
Rose v. Rose Enforcement Precedent, 481 U.S. 619 (1987) | Amendment to the Social Security Act 1997, Pub. L. No. PL 104-193 |
Federal courts
- Absolute and qualified immunity
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984) | Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-317, 110 Stat. 3847 |
- Anti-Injunction Act
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Toucey v. New York Life Insurance Co., 314 U.S. 118 (1941) | Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 968 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2283) |
- Magistrates
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Wingo v. Wedding, 418 U.S. 461 (1974) | 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) |
- Private right of action
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (1992) | 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-2 |
- Subject-matter jurisdiction
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Pacific Railroad Removal Cases, 115 U.S. 1 (1885) | 28 U.S.C. § 1349 |
Coit Independence Joint Venture v. FSLIC, 489 U.S. 561 (1989) | Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73, § 212(a), 103 Stat. 183, 225–30 |
Finely v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 (1989) | Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1367) |
International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 500 U.S. 72 (1991) | Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-317, § 206, 110 Stat. 3847 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1)) |
Habeas
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Barry v. Mercein, 46 U.S. (5 How.) 103 (1847) | Act of Feb. 5, 1867, ch. 28, 14 Stat. 385, 386 |
Immigration
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33 (1950) | Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1951. 64 Stat. 1044, 1048 |
Boutilier v. INS, 387 U.S. 118 (1967) | Immigration Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-649, § 601, 104 Stat. 4978, 5067 |
De Canas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351 (1976) | Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-603, sec. 101, § 274A(h)(2), 100 Stat. 3359, 3368 |
INS v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183 (1984) | Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-603, § 315(b), 100 Stat. 3359, 3439–40 (1986) |
Labor
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946) | Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 84, 84–90 (codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 251–262) |
General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976) | Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k) |
Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 472 U.S. 353 (1985) | Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-592, 100 Stat. 3342 |
United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439 (1988) | Civil Service Due Process Amendments, Pub. L. No. 101-376, 104 Stat. 461 (1990) |
Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts, 492 U.S. 158 (1989) | Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 101-433, 104 Stat. 978 (1990) |
EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244 (1991) | Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub. Law. No. 102–166, sec. 109, 105 Stat. 1071 |
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007) | Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-2, 123 Stat. 5 |
Native Americans
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) | Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Pub. L. No. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467 (1988) |
Patent
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Tyler v. Tuel, 10 U.S. 324 (1810) | Patent Act of 1836, 5 Stat. 117 (1836) |
United States v. Morton Salt, 338 U.S. 632 (1950) | Patent & Trademark Office Authorization, Pub. L. No. 100-703, § 201, 102 Stat. 4674, 4676 (1988) |
Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518 (1972) | Inventions in Outer Space, Pub. L. No. 101-580, 104 Stat. 2863 (1990) |
Quiet title
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Block v. North Dakota, 461 U.S. 273 (1983) | Quiet Title Actions, Pub. L. No. 99-598, 100 Stat. 3351 (1986) |
Securities fraud
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd, 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010) | Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, sec. 292P(b)(2), § 27(b), 124 Stat. 1376, 1862 (2010) |
Tax
Abrogated decision | Abrogating statute |
---|---|
Cary v. Curtis, 44 U.S. (3 How.) 236 (1845) | Act of Feb. 26, 1845, 5 Stat. 727 |
General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935) | Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-514, § 631, 100 Stat. 2085, 2269–75 (1986) |
Attempted abrogations
Decision attempted to be abrogated | Statute attempting to abrogate | Decision invalidating abrogation |
---|---|---|
United States v. Padelford, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 531 (1869) | 92 Stat. 2076 | United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 128 (1872) |
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) | 18 U.S.C. § 3501 | Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000) |
Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350 (1991) | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, sec. 476, 105 Stat. 2236 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78aa-1) | Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995) |
- Mixed results
First decision | Statute | Second decision |
---|---|---|
Hepburn & Dundas v. Ellzey, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 445 (1805) | 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) | National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., 337 U.S. 582 (1949) |
See also
References
- William N. Eskridge, Jr., Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions, 101 Yale L.J. 331 (1991).