Kusile Power Station
Kusile Power Station | |
---|---|
Kusile construction seen from the N4 | |
Location of Kusile Power Station in South Africa | |
Country | South Africa |
Location | Witbank |
Coordinates | 25°54′59″S 28°55′02″E / 25.91639°S 28.91722°ECoordinates: 25°54′59″S 28°55′02″E / 25.91639°S 28.91722°E |
Status | Under construction |
Owner(s) | Eskom |
Thermal power station | |
Primary fuel | Coal |
Power generation | |
Units operational | 6 × 800 MW |
Nameplate capacity | 4,800 MW |
Kusile Power Station (formerly known as the Bravo Power Station) in South Africa is a coal-fired power plant under construction by state electricity utility Eskom, about 15 kilometres north of the existing Kendal Power Station near Witbank, Mpumalanga.
It is expected that Kusile would consist of six 800 megawatt coal-fired generating units for a total generating capacity of 4,800 megawatts.[1] Other reports state that the power station would have a total capacity of 5,400 megawatts.[2]
Coal supply
In the minutes of a stakeholder briefing, Eskom stated that it "will obtain most of the coal required for Kusile Power Station from Anglo Coal's New Largo operations, south east of the Kusile Power Station."[3]
Eskom’s consultants estimate that 35 new coal mines will be required to support the Medupi and Kusile plants.[4]
Timeline
- Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism issued a positive Record of Decision on 5 June 2007.[5]
- February 2008: Hitachi Power Africa has been awarded the boiler contract worth R18.5 billion and Alstom S&E has been awarded the turbine island works contract valued at R13 billion."[6]
- April 14, 2011: Black & Veatch Corp. won preliminary approval for $805.6 million in financing from the U.S. Export-Import Bank for the Kusile plant.[7][8]
- May 31, 2011: Eskom announced that the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) had given its initial approval for an $805 million (R5.78 billion) loan to help Eskom build the plant.
Financial institution support
The following institutions are involved in supporting the Kusile Power Station:[9]
Multilateral development banks
- African Development Bank - $500 million corporate loan, November 2008
Banks
- Bank of America - advisory service, October 2010
- Bank of Tokyo Misubishi UFJ - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- Barclays - advisory service, October 2010
- BNP Pribas - corporate loan as part of 1,185 million euro syndicated loan
- Credit Agricole - corporate loan as part of 1,185 million euro syndicated loan
- Credit Mutuel-CIC - corporate loan as part of 1,185 million euro syndicated loan
- Credit Suisse Group - helping with the sale of a stake
- Deutsche Bank - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- FirstRand Bank Ltd - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- HSBC Group - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- JPMorgan Chase - advisory services
- KfW IPEX-Bank - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- Natixis - corporate loan as part of 1,185 million euro syndicated loan
- Nedbank Group - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- Rand Merchand Bank - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- Societe Generale - corporate loan as part of 1,185 million euro syndicated loan
- Standard Bank - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
Export Credit Agencies
- COFACE - corporate loan as part of 1,185 million euro syndicated loan
- Euler Hermes Kreditversicherungs-AG (Hermes) - 705 million euro syndicated loan, December 2009
- Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) - $805 million, April 2011
Investment Funds
- Public Investment Corporation (PIC) - R 9 billion (US $1.2), May 2010
Environmental impacts
The plant is expected to emit an estimated 36.8 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent per year once it is completed.[10]
A 2011 report "The True Cost of Coal: The monstrous price of South Africa's coal addiction" by Greenpeace Africa and the University of Pretoria’s Business Enterprises unit calculated the full costs of the Kusile plant, from climate change to water use, and the impact on health and the environment. It was estimated that the damage caused by Kusile will cost South Africa between R31.2 billion and R60.6 billion a year, and that just 30% of Kusile’s externality cost would be able to generate five times the coal station’s proposed power with renewable energy. Roughly 70% of the total cost was water-related.
Opposition
In November 2011, Greenpeace activists chained themselves to a gate and some climbed a crane to protest the Kusile power station and South Africa's dependence on coal, a few weeks before the country will host a global conference on climate change. Authorities arrested nine people, who were ordered to return to court Nov. 21 on charges of trespassing and malicious damage to property.[11]
See also
- List of coal power stations
- List of largest power stations in the world
- List of power stations in South Africa
References
- ↑ Terence Creamer, "Eskom begins standing its ground, but regaining credibility will be tough", Engineering News, June 6, 2008.
- ↑ Mariaan Olivier, "Regulator to consider new Eskom power station licence", Engineering News, October 22, 2007.
- ↑ Eskom Holdings Ltd, "Second Key Stakeholder Meeting between Eskom and Topigs SA", August 19, 2009.
- ↑ "Move Beyond Coal, Now!: Voices from the Front Lines of the Global Struggle" Sierra Club report, Sep. 2011.
- ↑ Eskom, New Build News", November 2007.
- ↑ "Eskom Announces Major Contracts for Bravo Project", Media Release, February 29, 2008.
- ↑ "South African Coal Plant Wins U.S. Backing Over Environmentalist Protests" Mark Drajem, Bloomberg, April 14, 2011.
- ↑ "Ex-Im Bank Gives Preliminary Approval For $800M Loan To South Africa Power Plant" Wall Street Journal, April 14, 2011.
- ↑ "Kusile Coal Power Plant, Bank Role," BankTrack, accessed April 22, 2011
- ↑ Andreas Spath, "US To Finance Dirty Coal Power In South Africa" Care 2 Care, May 30, 2011.
- ↑ "Greenpeace protests South African coal-fired power station; police arrest 9" Washington Post, November 6, 2011.
|