José María Ramos Mejía

Born 1849
Buenos Aires
Died 1914
Buenos Aires
Language Spanish
Nationality  Argentina
Alma mater University of Buenos Aires
Literary movement Positivism
Notable works Rosas y su tiempo

José María Ramos Mejía (1849–1914) was a politician and historian of Argentina.

Biography

He was born in Buenos Aires in 1849, son of colonel Matías Ramos Mejía and Francisca Madero. He made studies of medicine, promoting changes to the academic standards in 1871, which would be achieved between 1873 and 1880. He graduated in 1879, with a thesis about brain trauma.

He kept working at the University of Buenos Aires, and headed the newly created professorship of nerve pathology in 1887. He made further studies of nerve and mental pathology, being considered later as one of the first researchers of psychiatry in Argentina.[1] He was vicepresident of the Buenos Aires municipal commission in 1882, first director of public assistance in 1883, national deputee between 1888 and 1892, head of the National department of hygiene between 1893 and 1899, and president of the National Council of Education. He died in 1914.

Work as historian

His first book, "Neurosis de los hombres célebres en la historia argentina" (Spanish: Neurosis of noteworthy men in the history of Argentina) was started during his studies, and published in 1887. His work was influenced by Vicente Fidel López, and influenced later historians as José Ingenieros, Lucio López and Luis Agote.

As a historian, he rejected the current tradition of making studies of history with the point of view fixed on elites or notable key people, but rather on the social groups that promoted those peoples into importance. He considered the Argentine War of Independence as the result of romantic peoples, the Argentine Civil War as the result of aggressive peoples, and his own time period of 1890 as the result of passive peoples.

He included phrenologist analysis of historical peoples, as part of a new wave of positivist historians that sought to combine history with science.[2] However, phrenology is currently rejected as a pseudo-science.

Works

Bibliography

References

  1. Gelman, p. 203
  2. Gelman, p. 204