Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
| Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC |
|---|
| Court |
House of Lords |
|---|
| Citation(s) |
[1992] 2 AC 1 |
|---|
| Keywords |
|---|
|
Resulting trusts |
Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [1992] 2 AC 1 is an English administrative law case, which declared that councils had no power to engage in interest rate swap agreements because they were beyond the council's borrowing powers, and that all the contracts were void. Their actions contravened the Local Government Act 1972.
See also
Resulting trusts cases |
|---|
| | | | | | | | | Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1966] UKHL 3 | | Re Vandervell’s Trustees Ltd (No 2) [1974] EWCA Civ 7 | | Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington LBC [1996] UKHL 12 | | | | Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Invest Ltd [1968] UKHL 4 | | | | |
|
- English administrative law
Notes
References
External links