Griffith's experiment

Griffith's experiment discovering the "transforming principle" in pneumococcus bacteria.

Griffith's experiment, reported in 1928 by Frederick Griffith,^[1] was the first experiment suggesting that bacteria are capable of transferring genetic information through a process known as transformation.^[2][3] Griffith's findings were followed by research in the late 1930s and early 40s that isolated DNA as the material that communicated this genetic information.

Pneumonia was a serious cause of death in the wake of the post-WWI Spanish influenza pandemic, and Griffith was studying the possibility of creating a vaccine. Griffith used two strains of pneumococcus (Streptococcus pneumoniae) bacteria which infect mice – a type III-S (smooth) and type II-R (rough) strain. The III-S strain covered itself with a polysaccharide capsule that protected it from the host's immune system, resulting in the death of the host, while the II-R strain did not have that protective capsule and was defeated by the host's immune system. A German bacteriologist, Fred Neufeld, had discovered the three pneumococcal types (Types I, II, and III) and discovered the Quellung reaction to identify them in vitro.^[4] Until Griffith's experiment, bacteriologists believed that the types were fixed and unchangeable, from one generation to another.

In this experiment, bacteria from the III-S strain were killed by heat, and their remains were added to II-R strain bacteria. While neither alone harmed the mice, the combination was able to kill its host. Griffith was also able to isolate both live II-R and live III-S strains of pneumococcus from the blood of these dead mice. Griffith concluded that the type II-R had been "transformed" into the lethal III-S strain by a "transforming principle" that was somehow part of the dead III-S strain bacteria.

Today, we know that the "transforming principle" Griffith observed was the DNA of the III-S strain bacteria. While the bacteria had been killed, the DNA had survived the heating process and was taken up by the II-R strain bacteria. The III-S strain DNA contains the genes that form the protective polysaccharide capsule. Equipped with this gene, the former II-R strain bacteria were now protected from the host's immune system and could kill the host. The exact nature of the transforming principle (DNA) was verified in the experiments done by Avery, McLeod and McCarty and by Hershey and Chase.

Notes

References

• Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty (1944). "Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types: Induction of Transformation by a Desoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus Type III". Journal of Experimental Medicine 79 (1): 137–158. doi:10.1084/jem.79.2.137. PMC 2135445. PMID 19871359. 

(References the original experiment by Griffith. Original article and 35th anniversary reprint available.)

Further reading

• Daniel Hartl and Elizabeth Jones (2005). Genetics: Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 6th edition. Jones & Bartlett.  854 pages. ISBN 0-7637-1511-5.
• Lehrer, Steven (2006). Explorers of the Body (2nd ed.). United States: iUniverse, Inc. ISBN 0-595-40731-5. 

History of biology Fields and disciplines History of agriculture History of agricultural science History of anatomy History of botany History of evolutionary thought History of ecology History of medicine History of model organisms History of plant systematics History of paleontology History of geology History of zoology (through 1859) History of zoology (since 1859) History of phycology History of genetics History of biochemistry History of molecular biology History of RNA biology History of molecular evolution History of immunology History of biotechnology Institutions Rothamsted Experimental Station Pasteur Institute Max Planck Society Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Stazione Zoologica Marine Biological Laboratory Rockefeller University Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Laboratory of Molecular Biology Experiments Griffith's experiment Miller-Urey experiment Luria–Delbrück experiment Avery–MacLeod–McCarty experiment Hershey–Chase experiment Meselson–Stahl experiment Crick, Brenner et al. experiment Nirenberg and Matthaei experiment Nirenberg and Leder experiment Publications On Generation and Corruption History of Animals Historia Plantarum De Materia Medica De humani corporis fabrica De Motu Cordis Micrographia Systema Naturae Philosophie Zoologique Principles of Geology Vestiges of Creation On the Origin of Species "Experiments on Plant Hybridization" The Descent of Man "The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance" What Is Life? Genetics and the Origin of Species "Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease" "Molecular structure of Nucleic Acids" Theories and concepts Germ theory of disease Central dogma of molecular biology Darwinism Great chain of being Hierarchy of life Lamarckism One gene-one enzyme hypothesis Protocell RNA world hypothesis Sequence hypothesis Spontaneous generation Influential figures Aristotle Pedanius Dioscorides Andreas Vesalius William Harvey Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Carolus Linnaeus Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Alexander von Humboldt Charles Lyell Charles Darwin Alfred Russel Wallace Gregor Mendel Louis Pasteur Robert Koch Ernst Haeckel Ivan Pavlov Sergei Winogradsky Jacques Loeb Hugo de Vries E. B. Wilson Thomas Hunt Morgan Aleksandr Oparin Alexander Fleming Edmund Jaeger J. B. S. Haldane Sewall Wright R. A. Fisher Konrad Lorenz Barbara McClintock Theodosius Dobzhansky Ernst Mayr George Beadle Seymour Benzer Rosalind Franklin James D. Watson Francis Crick Fred Sanger Max Perutz John Kendrew Sydney Brenner Joshua Lederberg Walter Gilbert Kary Mullis Stephen Jay Gould Lynn Margulis Carl Woese Jane Goodall Related topics History of science Philosophy of biology Timeline of biology and organic chemistry Ethnobotany Natural history Natural philosophy Natural theology Humboldtian science Relationship between religion and science Eugenics Human Genome Project History of creationism History of the creation-evolution controversy