Flora v. United States

Flora v. United States, 357 U.S. 63 (1958)

Argued May 20, 1958
Decided June 16, 1958
Full case name Flora v. United States
Citations

357 U.S. 63 (more)

357 U.S. 63, 78 S. Ct. 1079 (1958), affirmed on rehearing, 362 U.S. 145, 80 S. Ct. 630 (1960)
Prior history Cert. to the 10th Circuit
Holding
A taxpayer must pay the full amount of an income tax deficiency assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue before he may challenge its correctness by a suit in a federal district court for refund under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1).
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Warren, joined by unanimous
Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Flora v. United States, 357 U.S. 63 (1958), affirmed on rehearing, 362 U.S. 145 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a taxpayer generally must pay the full amount of an income tax deficiency assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue before he may challenge its correctness by a suit in a federal district court for refund under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). The Supreme Court agreed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, stating that the full payment rule requires the entire amount of an asserted deficiency to be paid before a refund suit may be maintained.

Importance

If the taxpayer chooses to pay less than the deficiency asserted, the taxpayer's only remedies are (A) a deficiency proceeding in the Tax Court[1] or, (B) in a bankruptcy case, a determination under section 505(a) of the US Bankruptcy Code.[2] That rule can be a problem for a taxpayer who lets the 90-day period (following the issuance of a statutory notice of deficiency, during which he may file a Tax Court petition) expire and then cannot fully pay because of insufficient assets since the assets were seized or voluntarily liquidated for payment.

See also

References

  1. ↑ See generally 26 U.S.C. § 6213.
  2. ↑ See 11 U.S.C. § 505.

External links