Duplessis Orphans

The Duplessis Orphans (French: les Orphelins de Duplessis) were the victims of a scheme in which approximately 20,000 orphaned children^[1] were falsely certified as mentally ill by the government of the province of Quebec, Canada, and confined to psychiatric institutions.^[2]

Overview

The 1940s and 1950s were considered a period of widespread poverty, few social services, and Catholic predominance in Quebec. The Quiet Revolution of the 1960s had not yet occurred, so the Roman Catholic Church still held major social power.^[3]

Maurice Duplessis, the premier of Quebec, was a strict Catholic. It was the Church’s responsibility to be the sole caretaker of the poor, alcoholics, unwed mothers, and orphans.^[4] He put the schools, orphanages, and hospitals in the hands of religious orders, noting he “trusted them completely.” He signed an order-in-council, changing orphanages into hospitals in order to provide them with federal subsidies.^[5]

Many children were admitted to orphanages because their parents were unmarried, not because they were orphans. Children born out of wedlock went against the Church's values.^[6]

The Quebec government received subsidies from the federal government for building hospitals, but hardly anything for having orphanages. Government contributions were only $1.25 a day for orphans, but $2.75 a day for psychiatric patients.^[3]

The Loi sur les Asiles d’aliénés (Lunatic Asylum Act) of 1909 governed mental institution admissions until 1950. The law stated the insane could be committed for three reasons: to care for them, to help them, or a security measure to maintain social order in public and home life. However, the act did not define what a disruption of social order was, leaving the decision to admit patients up to the psychiatrists.^[7]

The doctors diagnosed the children with various mental illnesses while ignoring their actual mental state. Children in Quebec orphanages were therefore declared “mentally deficient.” Schooling stopped, and the orphans became inmates in a mental institution where they were sexually, physically, and mentally abused by lay monitors and nuns. Children who complained about the conditions were sent to local reform schools.^[3]

Seven religious orders participated: the Sisters of Providence, the Sisters of Mercy, the Gray Nuns of Montreal, the Sisters of Charity of Quebec, the Little Franciscans of Mary, the Brothers of Notre-Dame-de-la-Misericorde, and the Brothers of Charity.^[3]

A commission in the early 1960s investigating mental institutions revealed one-third of the 22,000 patients did not belong.^[3]

The Bédard report of 1962 put an end to the outdated concept of an “asylum,” while many of the orphans reached adulthood and could leave the facility.^[7]

Years later, long after these institutions were closed, the children who had survived them and become adults began to speak out about the harsh treatment and sexual abuse they endured at the hands of some members of institutions and medical personnel. ^[8][9][10]

In a psychiatric study completed by one of the involved hospitals, middle-aged Duplessis Orphans reported more physical and mental impairments than the control group. In addition, the orphans were less likely to be married or to have a healthy social life. 80% reported they underwent a traumatic experience between the ages of 7 to 18. Over 50% said they underwent physical, mental, or sexual abuse. About 78% reported difficulty functioning socially or emotionally in their adult life.^[11]

Legal recourse in the 1990s

By the 1990s, there remained about 3,000 survivors and a large group formed to start a campaign. They called themselves the Duplessis Orphans after Maurice Duplessis, the Premier of Quebec during that time whose government was responsible for their plight. In addition to government and Church responsibility, the College of Physicians of Quebec came under fire after some of the orphans found copies of their medical records that had been falsified. Labelled as mentally deficient, many of these children were subjected to a variety of drug testing and used in other medical experiments.^[12] Released upon reaching the legal age of maturity, they were uneducated and ill-equipped to cope with life as adults.

At first, the government of Quebec stonewalled them, but after they started gaining widespread publicity in March 1999, the Parti Québécois government made a token offer of approximately $15,000 as full compensation to each of the victims. The offer was rejected and the government was harshly criticized by the public and even the provincial Ombudsman, Daniel Jacoby, came out saying that the government's handling of the situation had trivialized the abuse the victims alleged ^[13] Nevertheless, the government still refused to hold an inquiry. In 2001, the claimants received an increased offer from the Quebec government for a flat payment of $10,000 per person, plus an additional $1,000 for each year of wrongful confinement to a mental institution.^[14] The offer amounted to approximately $15,000 per orphan; however, it was limited to each of the surviving 1,100 orphans the government had labeled as mentally deficient, but did not include any compensation for victims of sexual or other abuse.

The offer was accepted by those eligible while the remainder received nothing. The vote on the offer was taken by a show of hands in a closed-door session overseen by Committee chief, the author Bruno Roy, one of very few orphans who enjoyed a successful career following the traumatic experience of youth detention. The results of the vote were later bitterly contested by a group which believed the victims should have received more.^[15] Many believe that justice was not done and criminal wrongdoing was allowed to go unpunished.^[16]

The Quebec Government declined to prosecute the criminal cases.^[17] Opponents of the judgment led by Rod Vienneau of Joliette, Quebec, pointed out that bureaucrats processing the applications for compensation were in many cases being paid over $1,000 per day of work,^[18] whereas the orphans themselves received the same amount for an entire year of their childhood confined illegally to insane asylums.

The Catholic Church publicly announced that they played no responsibility in the orphans’ situation and refused to apologize.^[19] The representative for the seven orders, Sister Gisele Fortier, called the allegations “upsetting … but very much sensationalized, and needs to be put into context.”^[20] Cardinal Jean-Claude Turcotte, archbishop of Montreal, asserted that the religious orders “deserve our respect and have a right to their good name.” This offended many of the Duplessis Orphans. In 2006, one of the Orphans, Martin Lécuyer, stated “it’s important for me, that the church, the priests, that they recognize they were responsible for the sexual abuse, and the aggression. It’s not for the government to set that peace … It’s an insult, and it’s the biggest proof that the government is an accomplice of the church.”^[21]

Fate of the remains

In 2004, members of the "Duplessis Orphans" asked the Quebec government to unearth an abandoned cemetery in the east end of Montreal which they believed held the remains of orphans who may have been the subject of medical experiments. According to testimony by individuals who were at the Cité de St-Jean-de-Dieu insane asylum, the orphans were routinely experimented upon and many died. The group wants the government to exhume the bodies so that autopsies may be performed.^[22]

See also

• Child abuse
• Child sexual abuse
• Duplessis Orphans in the French Wikipedia
• Religious abuse
• List of Indian residential schools in Canada
• Léo-Paul Lauzon In 1999, Lauzon and Martin Poirier issued a report on the money collected by the Quebec government and the Roman Catholic Church who falsely certifying thousands of Quebec orphans as mentally ill.

Notes

References

• Pauin, Marguerite. Maurice Duplessis: Powerbroker, Politician, XYZ Publishing, Montreal, 2005
• Thifault, Marie-Claude and Perreault, Isabelle. "The Social Integration of the Mentally Ill in Quebec Prior to the Bédard Report of 1962", Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 2002, vol.29, no.1

Further reading

• "Les enfants de Duplessis" (Duplessis Children) March 1, 1991, by Pauline Gill
• "Les fous crient au secours " (The mad cry for help) 1961, by Jean-Charles Pagé
• "Naître rien: Des orphelins de Duplessis, de la crèche à l'asile." 2002 by Rose Dufour, with the collaboration of Brigitte Garneau ISBN 978-2-89544-027-7
• "Les enfants de la grande noirceur" 2008 by Rod Vienneau
• "Plaidoyer d'un ex-orphelin réprouvé de Duplessis" 2000 by Jacques Baugé-Prévost
• "Les heures sauvage" 2001 by Bruno Roy

External links

• The Duplessis Orphans at CBC Digital Archives

Abuse Types Anti-social behaviour Bullying Child abuse (neglect, sexual) Cruelty to animals Domestic abuse Elder abuse Harassment Humiliation Incivility Institutional abuse Intimidation Neglect Persecution Personal abuse Professional abuse Psychological abuse Physical abuse Religious abuse Sexual abuse Stalking Structural abuse Verbal abuse more... Related topics Child grooming Complex post-traumatic stress disorder Control Dehumanization Denial Destabilisation Exaggeration Lying Manipulation Minimisation Personality disorders Power Psychological projection Psychological trauma Psychopathy Rationalization (making excuses) Traumatic bonding Victim blaming Victim playing Victimisation

Sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church Manifestations By country In confession From members of orders Consequences Priest transfer Financial Reception Curial Ecclesiastic Journalistic Debate over Causes Government responses Ferns Report John Jay Report Ryan Commission Murphy Report Activist groups Duplessis Orphans Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests Voice of the Faithful Pre-modern Gregorian Reform Liber Gomorrhianus Roman Curia Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors Ecclesiastical response to Catholic sex abuse cases