Double layer (plasma)

Saturnian aurora whose reddish colour is characteristic of ionized hydrogen plasma.[1] Powered by the Saturnian equivalent of (filamentary) Birkeland currents, streams of charged particles from the interplanetary medium interact with the planet's magnetic field and funnel down to the poles.[2] Double layers are associated with (filamentary) currents,[3][4] and their electric fields accelerate ions and electrons.[5]

A double layer is a structure in a plasma and consists of two parallel layers with opposite electrical charge. The sheets of charge cause a strong electric field and a correspondingly sharp change in voltage (electrical potential) across the double layer. Ions and electrons that enter the double layer are accelerated, decelerated, or reflected by the electric field. In general, double layers (which may be curved rather than flat) separate regions of plasma with quite different characteristics. Double layers are found in a wide variety of plasmas, from discharge tubes to space plasmas to the Birkeland currents supplying the Earth's aurora, and are especially common in current-carrying plasmas. Compared to the sizes of the plasmas that contain them, double layers are very thin (typically ten Debye lengths), with widths ranging from a few millimeters for laboratory plasmas to thousands of kilometres for astrophysical plasmas.

Other names for a double layer are electrostatic double layer, electric double layer, plasma double layers, electrostatic shock (a type of double layer that is oriented at an oblique angle to the magnetic field in such a way that the perpendicular electric field is much stronger than the parallel electric field),[6] space charge layer.[7] In laser physics, a double layer is sometimes called an ambipolar electric field.[8] Double layers are conceptually related to the concept of a 'sheath' (see Debye sheath).

The adopted electrical symbol for a double layer, when represented in an electrical circuit is ────DL────. If there is a net current present, then the DL is oriented with the base of the L in line with direction of current.[9]

An overview of double layers in space, experiment and simulation is given in the introduction of ref.[10]

Double layer classification

Hall effect thruster. The electric fields utilised in plasma thrusters (in particular the Helicon Double Layer Thruster) may be in the form of double layers.[11]

Double layers may be classified in the following ways:

  1. The electrons entering at the low potential side of the double layer which are accelerated;
  2. The ions entering at the high potential side of the double layer which are accelerated;
  3. The electrons entering at the high potential side of the double layer which are decelerated and successively reflected; and
  4. The ions which enter the double layer at the low potential side of the double layer which are decelerated and reflected.
Note that in the case of a weak double layer, the electrons and ions entering from the "wrong" side are decelerated by the electric field, however most will not be reflected, as the potential drop is not strong enough.

Double layer formation

Doubler layer formation. Hotter electrons moving into a cooler plasma region (Diagram 1, top) cause a charge imbalance, resulting in a double layer that is able to accelerate electrons across it (Diagram 2, bottom).

There are two different kinds of double layers, which are formed differently:

Current carrying double layers

Current carrying double layers may arise in plasmas carrying a current. Various instabilities can be responsible for the formation of these layers. One example is the Buneman instability which occurs when the streaming velocity of the electrons (basically the current density divided by the electron density) exceeds the electron thermal velocity of the plasma. Double layers (and other phase space structures) are often formed in the non-linear phase of the instability. One way of viewing the Buneman instability is to describe what happens when the current (in the form of a zero temperature electron beam) has to pass through a region of decreased ion density. In order to prevent charge from accumulating, the current in the system must be the same everywhere (in this 1D model). The electron density also has to be close to the ion density (quasineutrality), so there is also a dip in electron density. The electrons must therefore be accelerated into the density cavity, to maintain the same current density with a lower density of charge carriers. This implies that the density cavity is at a high electrical potential. As a consequence, the ions are accelerated out of the cavity, amplifying the density perturbation. Then there is the situation of a double-double layer, of which one side will most likely be convected away by the plasma, leaving a regular double layer. This is the process in which double layers are produced along planetary magnetic field lines in so-called Birkeland currents.

Current-free double layers

Current-free double layers occur at the boundary between plasma regions with different plasma properties. Consider a plasma divided into two regions by a plane, which has a higher electron temperature on one side than on the other (the same analysis can also be done for different densities). This means that the electrons on one side of the interface have a greater thermal velocity. The electrons may stream freely in either direction, and the flux of electrons from the hot plasma to the cold plasma will initially be greater than the flux of the electrons from the cold plasma to the hot plasma, because the electrons from the hot side have a greater average speed. Because many more electrons enter the cold plasma than exit it, part of the cold region becomes negatively charged. The hot plasma, conversely, becomes positively charged. Therefore, an electric field builds up, which starts to accelerate electrons towards the hot region, reducing the net flux. In the end, the electric field builds up until the fluxes of electrons in either direction are equal, and further charge build up in the two plasmas is prevented. The potential drop is in fact exactly equal to the difference in thermal energy between the two plasma regions in this case, so such a double layer is a marginally strong double layer.

Double Layer Formation Summary. Double layers are formed in four main ways[12]

Double layer formation mechanisms

The Moon. The prediction of a lunar double layer[13] was confirmed in 2003.[14] In the shadows, the Moon charges negatively in the interplanetary medium.[15]

The details of the formation mechanism depend on the environment of the plasma (e.g. double layers in the laboratory, ionosphere, solar wind, fusion, etc.). Proposed mechanisms for their formation have included:

Features and characteristics of double layers

Double layer characteristics showing the potential (Φ), electric field (E) and space charge distribution (ρ) across the layer
Typical Double Layers
Location Typical
Voltage drop
Source
Ionosphere 102–104V Satellite
Solar 109–1011V Estimated[31]
Neutron star 1015V Estimated[32]

History of double layers

A cluster of double layers forming in an Alfvén wave, about a sixth of the distance from the left. Click for more details

The research of these objects is a relatively young phenomenon. Although it was already known in the 1920s that a plasma has a limited capacity for current maintenance, Irving Langmuir[48] characterized double layers in the laboratory and called these structures double-sheaths. It was not until the 1950s that a thorough study of double layers started in the laboratory (e.g. Schönhuber, 1958). At the moment many groups are working on this topic theoretically, experimentally and numerically. It was first proposed by Hannes Alfvén (the developer of magnetohydrodynamics) that the polar lights or Aurora Borealis are created by accelerated electrons in the magnetosphere of the Earth.[49] He supposed that the electrons were accelerated electrostatically by an electric field localized in a small volume bounded by two charged regions. This so-called double layer would accelerate electrons Earthwards. Many experiments with rockets and satellites have been performed to investigate the magnetosphere and acceleration regions. The first indication for the existence of electric field aligned along the magnetic field (or double layers) in the magnetosphere was by a rocket experiment by McIlwain (1960). Later, in 1977, Forrest Mozer reported that satellites had detected the signature of double layers (which he called electrostatic shocks) in the magnetosphere.[50]

The most definite proof of these structures was obtained by the Viking satellite,[51] which measures the differential potential structures in the magnetosphere with probes mounted on 40m long booms. These probes can measure the local particle density and the potential difference between two points 80m apart. Asymmetric potential structures with respect to 0 V were measured, which means that the structure has a net potential and can be regarded as a double layer. The particle densities measured in such structures can be as low as 33% of the background density. The structures usually have an extent of 100 m (a few tens of Debye lengths). The filling factor of the lower magnetosphere with such solitary structures is about 10%. If one out of 5 such structures has a net potential drop of 1 V then the total potential drop over a region of 5000 km would be more than the 1 kV which is needed for the electrons to create the aurora. Magnetospheric double layers typically have a strength e\phi_{DL}/k_B T_e \approx 0.1 (where the electron temperature is assumed to lie in the range (2 eV \leq k_B T_e \leq 20 eV) and are therefore weak. The American FAST spacecraft found strong double layers in the auroral acceleration region.[52] Strong Double layers were also found in the return current region by Andersson et al.[53] The return current region is where electrons move upward from the ionosphere to close the auroral current circuit.

In the laboratory, double layers can be created in different devices. They are investigated in double plasma machines, triple plasma machines, and Q-machines. The stationary potential structures which can be measured in these machines agree very well with what one would expect theoretically. An example of a laboratory double layer can be seen in the figure below, taken from Torvén and Lindberg (1980), where we can see how well-defined and confined the potential drop of a double layer in a double plasma machine is. One of the interesting things of the experiment by Torvén and Lindberg (1980)[54] is that not only did they measure the potential structure in the double plasma machine but they also found high-frequency fluctuating electric fields at the high-potential side of the double layer (also shown in the figure). These fluctuations are probably due to a beam-plasma interaction outside the double layer which excites plasma turbulence. Their observations are consistent with experiments on electromagnetic radiation emitted by double layers in a double plasma machine by Volwerk (1993),[55] who, however, also observed radiation from the double layer itself. The power of these fluctuations has a maximum around the plasma frequency of the ambient plasma. It was later found that the electrostatic high-frequency fluctuations near the double layer can be concentrated in a narrow region, sometimes called the hf-spike,[56] on the high potential side of the double layer. Subsequently, both radio emissions, near the plasma frequency, and whistler waves at much lower frequencies were seen to emerge from this region.[57] Similar whistler wave structures were observed together with electron beams near Saturn's moon Enceladus,[58] suggesting the presence of a double layer at lower altitude.

A recent development in double layer experiments is the investigation of so-called stairstep double layers. It has been observed that a potential drop in a plasma column can be split up into different parts. Transitions from a single double layer into two-, three-, or greater-step double layers are strongly sensitive to the boundary conditions of the plasma (Hershkowitz, 1992). These experiments can give us information about the formation of the magnetospheric double layers and their possible role in creating the aurora.

Some scientists have subsequently suggested a role of double layers in solar flares.[59][60][61]

Mathematical description of a double layer

In this section we will take a closer look at the mathematics behind double layers. We first describe a semi-quantitative criterion for the formation of a density dip. We then describe a particularly simple kind of double layer. We then explain how to use the distribution function and the Vlasov–Poisson equation to model more-complex double layers.

Formation of a density dip

First we will take a look at the generation of a double layer in a current-carrying plasma. In 1968 Alfvén and Carlqvist showed that a density dip in a current carrying plasma can be favorable for the generation of a double layer. In this case we look at the plasma as a combination of two fluids, the moving electron fluid and the immobile ion fluid which acts as a neutralizing background. The electron fluid is treated as an essentially zero temperature beam and the ions are assumed to be collisional, and possess some finite temperature.

The density dip in the plasma (of both electrons and ions) will cause an electric field to be generated in order to keep the current density at the same level; i.e., electrons are accelerated in the decreasing part into the dip and decelerated in the increasing part out of the dip. However, this electric field will also have an influence on the first as immobile assumed ions. These ions will be driven out of the density dip, increasing it, and thereby increasing the electric field. When all ions are gone, the electric field has reached its maximum value over the dip. Note that we then have a double-double layer (increasing and decreasing electric field), and one side needs to be transported away.

We will use the quasi-static, non-relativistic description of this mechanism, which is governed by the continuity equation and the momentum equation:

\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (n_e v_e) = 0,
m_e v_e \frac{\partial v_e}{\partial x} = - e E.

Combining these two equations we get an expression for the electric field dependent on the electron density: E = - \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{m_e j_e^2}{2 n_e^2e^3}\right) where j_e = -n_e e v_e the electron current density. The ions will experience an outward force due to this electric field, with F = e n_i E = - \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(m_e n_e v_e^2). Only when the force of the electric field can overcome the force by the ion pressure gradient can the evacuation of the density dip take place. Comparing the two forces (pressure and electric) assuming a quasi-neutral, thermal plasma shows after integration that this can only happen when k_B T_i < m_e v_e^2. This happens to be the Bohm criterion for the stability of a double layer (more below).

Current-carrying double layers formed by single, zero temperature beams

The electron (red) and ion (blue) distributions in phase (velocity and position) space for the double layer described in this section. There are two beam-like (zero temperature) components for each species. The ion velocity is not to scale: it is exaggerated for the purposes of visualisation.

We consider how a single zero-temperature beam of ions and a single zero-temperature beam of electrons, together with a trapped, zero-velocity ion component, and a trapped, zero-velocity electron component, may form a particular class of double layer. The trapped components are referred to as the 'ambient plasma' and will later be allowed to have finite temperature.

Poisson's equation and the conservation of momentum and number density are used to analyse the structure of these double layers, in the 1D, time-independent limit. We are looking for double-layerlike solutions, where there is a well localised region with a potential gradient, outside of which the electric field is zero. The region can be divided into the interval inside the double layer, where there is only one ion component and one electron component, but there is a finite field, and the outside region, where the electric field is zero. For the moment, we need only consider the inside region and the densities and velocities associated with the beams inside the layer.

The electron beam component is streaming with positive velocity v_{e}(x) (to the right), and the ion beam is streaming with negative velocity v_{i}(x) (to the left). Here, the conservation of particle energy means that v_{\alpha}^2(x)/2 m + q_{\alpha} \phi(x) is a constant, and the conservation of particle number means that the current j_{\alpha} = q n_{\alpha}(x) v_{\alpha}(x) is also a constant.

|v_{\alpha}(\phi_{\alpha})|  = \sqrt{v_{\alpha,0}^2 + \frac{2 e \phi_{\alpha}}{m_{\alpha}}},
n_{\alpha}(\phi_{\alpha}) = n_0 v_{\alpha,0} v_{\alpha}^{-1}(\phi_{\alpha}),

where \phi_e = \phi and \phi_i = \phi_{DL}-\phi. Here n_0 and v_{\alpha,0} are respectively the electron (and ion) density and particle drift speed at the low (high) potential side of the double layer.

Now we use Poisson's equation to obtain the maximal current through the double layer, as a function of the potential drop, the fraction of current carried by the ions as compared to the electrons and a temperature limit for the ambient plasma. We chose \phi(x=0) = 0 and \phi(x=d) = \phi_{DL}, with d the thickness of the double layer.


\rho_e = \frac{j_e}{v_e},
\rho_i  = \frac{j_i}{v_i}.

Thus we can write Poisson's equation in the region inside the double layer as

- \frac{1}{4 \pi} \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} = \frac{j_i}{ \sqrt{ v_{i,0}^2 + 2 e (\phi_{DL}-\phi)/m_i } } - \frac{j_e}{ \sqrt{v_{e,0}^2 + 2 e \phi / m_e } }.

Introducing an integration factor d\phi/dx at both sides and integrating over x at the left hand side and over \phi on the right hand side the first integration leads to the square of the electric field (d\phi/dx)^2. The assumption that there is no electric field outside the double layer then leads to the Langmuir condition for non-relativistic double layers:

\frac{j_e}{j_i} = \sqrt{\frac{m_i}{m_e}}.

For this double layer (in a hydrogen plasma) the electron current dominates the ion current by a factor of \sqrt{1836}. (Note that for the same theory for ultra-relativistic double layers gives this fraction equal to 1). Further integration, as done by Raadu (1989), then leads to the Langmuir-Child relation:

j d^2 = (j_e + j_i) d^2 = \left( 1 + \sqrt{\frac{m_e}{m_i}}\right) \frac{4\varepsilon_0C_0}{9} \sqrt{\frac{2e}{m_e}} \phi_{DL}^{1.5},

where C_0 is expressed in terms of the elliptical integrals E and K:

C_0 = 2^{-1.5} (4 \sqrt{2} E ( \sin\pi/8) - (1 + 2\sqrt{2}K(\sin\pi/8))^2 \approx 1.86518.

If we now allow the ambient plasma to be at finite temperature we have to take into account reflected particles more carefully and examine how far they can penetrate into the repulsive electric field. We describe the ambient plasma by a Boltzmann distribution over the double layer:

n_{\alpha,R} = n_{\alpha,0} e^{- \frac{e \phi_{\alpha}}{k_B T_{\alpha}}}.

The densities of the reflected particles are now added to Poisson's equation. In order that the particles in the 'ambient plasma' be truly trapped we require that their temperature be lower than the double layer potential. This can be seen in terms of the restriction that the potential and the electric field have to vanish at the boundaries of the double layer. The precise condition is known as the Bohm criterion:

m_e v_e^2 > k_B T_i.

A double layer of this type cannot form if this criterion is not met. This is the same condition under which a double layer can be formed by an ion density dip (or equivalently, for instability to parallel wavemodes like the ion acoustic or Buneman instability) as discussed before.

The VlasovPoisson equation

In general the plasma distributions near a double layer are necessarily strongly non-Maxwellian, and therefore inaccessible to fluid models. In order to analyse double layers in full generality, the plasma must be described using the particle distribution function f_{\alpha}(\vec{x},t;\vec{v}), which describes the number of particles of species \alpha having approximately the velocity\vec{v} near the place \vec{x} and time t.

The Vlasov–Poisson equations give the time-dependent interaction of a plasma (described using the particle distribution) with its self-consistent electric field. The Vlasov–Poisson equations are a combination of the Vlasov equation for each species \alpha (we take the nonrelativistic zero-magnetic field limit):

\frac{\partial}{\partial t} f_\alpha + \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{x}} f_\alpha + \frac{q_\alpha \vec{E}}{m_\alpha} \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{v}} f_\alpha = 0,

and Poisson's equation for self-consistent electric field:

\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial^2\phi}{\partial x^2} = 4 \pi \rho.

Here q_\alpha is the particle's electric charge, m_\alpha is the particle's mass, \vec{E}(\vec{x},t) is the electric field, \phi(\vec{x}, t) the electric potential and \rho is the electric charge density.

See also

Footnotes

  1. Astronomy Picture of the Day: 23 December 2001 (NASA)
  2. Isbell, J.; Dessler, A. J.; Waite, J. H. "Magnetospheric energization by interaction between planetary spin and the solar wind" (1984) Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 89, Issue A12, pp. 1071510722
  3. Theisen, William L. "Langmuir Bursts and Filamentary Double Layers in Plasmas." (1994) Ph.D Thesis U. of Iowa, 1994
  4. Deverapalli, C. M.; Singh, N.; Khazanov, I. "Filamentary Structures in U-Shaped Double Layers" (2005) American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2005, abstract #SM41C-1202
  5. Borovsky, Joseph E. "Double layers do accelerate particles in the auroral zone" (1992) Physical Review Letters (ISSN 0031-9007), vol. 69, no. 7, Aug. 17, 1992, pp. 10541056
  6. Temerin, M.; Mozer, F. S., "Double Layers Above the Aurora" (1987) NASA Conference Publication, #2469
  7. Block, L. P. "A double layer review" (1978) Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 55, no. 1, May 1978, pp. 5983
  8. Bulgakova, Nadezhda M. et al., "Double layer effects in laser-ablation plasma plumes", Physical Review E (Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics), Volume 62, Issue 4, October 2000, pp. 56245635
  9. Double Layers in Astrophysics, NASA Conference Publication 2469 (NASA CP-2469), (1987) Edited by Alton C. Williams and Tauna W. Moorhead
  10. Meige, A. "Numerical modeling of low-pressure plasmas: applications to electric double layers." Ph.D Thesis, The Australian National University, 2006
  11. See "Helicon Double Layer Thruster study", European Space Agency; "ESA accelerates towards a new space thruster" (2005)
  12. Singh, Nagendra; Thiemann, H.; Schunk, R. W., "Electric Fields and Double Layers in Plasmas (1987) Double Layers in Astrophysics, Proceedings of a Workshop held in Huntsville, Ala., 1719 Mar. 1986. Edited by Alton C. Williams and Tauna W. Moorehead. NASA Conference Publication, #2469"
  13. Borisov, N.; Mall, U. "The structure of the double layer behind the Moon" (2002) Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 67, Issue 04, pp. 277299
  14. Halekas, J. S.; Lin, R. P.; Mitchell, D. L. "Inferring the scale height of the lunar nightside double layer" (2003) Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 30, Issue 21, pp. PLA 1-1. (PDF)
  15. Halekas, J. S et al. "Evidence for negative charging of the lunar surface in shadow" (2002) Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 29, Issue 10, pp. 7781
  16. Hultqvist, Bengt, "On the production of a magnetic-field-aligned electric field by the interaction between the hot magnetospheric plasma and the cold ionosphere" (1971) Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 19, p.749. See also: Ishiguro, S.; Kamimura, T.; Sato, T., "Double layer formation caused by contact between different temperature plasmas" (1985) Physics of Fluids (ISSN 0031-9171), vol. 28, July 1985, p. 21002105.
  17. Torven, S. ""Formation of Double Layers in Laboratory Plasmas (1976) Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 74, p.109
  18. Stenzel, R. L., "Double layer formation during current sheet disruptions in a reconnection experiment" (1982) Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 9, June 1982, pp. 680683.
  19. Thiemann, H.; Singh, N.; Schunk, R. W. "Formation of v-shaped potentials" (1983) In ESA Sixth ESA Symp. on European Rocket and Balloon Programs and Related Res. pp 269275
  20. Yamamoto, Takashi; Kan, J. R. "Double layer formation due to current injection" (1985) Planetary and Space Science, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp. 853861.
  21. Williams, A. C. et al. "Accretion onto neutron stars with the presence of a double layer" (1986) Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 305, June 15, 1986, pp. 759766.
  22. Peratt, Anthony L. "Evolution of the plasma universe. I Double radio galaxies, quasars, and extragalactic jets" (1986) IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (ISSN 0093-3813), vol. PS-14, Dec. 1986, pp. 639660.
  23. Lennartsson, W. "Some Aspects of Double Layer Formation in a Plasma Constrained by a Magnetic Mirror" (1987) NASA Conference Publication, #2469. Washington, D.C.: NASA Scientific and Technical Information Branch., p.275
  24. Lindberg, Lennart "Observations of propagating double layers in a high current discharge" (1988) Astrophysics and Space Science (ISSN 0004-640X), vol. 144, no. 12, May 1988, pp. 313.
  25. Raadu, Michael A.; Rasmussen, J. Juul "Dynamical aspects of electrostatic double layers" (1988) Astrophysics and Space Science (ISSN 0004-640X), vol. 144, no. 12, May 1988, pp. 4371
  26. Singh, Nagendra; Hwang, K. S. "Electric potential structures and propagation of electron beams injected from a spacecraft into a plasma" (1988) Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 93, September 1, 1988, pp. 1003510040.
  27. Lembege, B.; Dawson, J. M. "Formation of double layers within an oblique collisionless shock" (1989) Physical Review Letters (ISSN 0031-9007), vol. 62, June 5, 1989, pp. 26832686
  28. Bulgakova, Nadezhda M. et al. "Double layer effects in laser-ablation plasma plumes" (2000) Physical Review E (Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics), Volume 62, Issue 4, October 2000, pp. 56245635
  29. Singh, Nagendra "Spontaneous formation of current-driven double layers in density depletions and its relevance to solitary Alfven waves" (2002) Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 29, Issue 7, pp. 51
  30. Halekas, J. S.; Lin, R. P.; Mitchell, D. L. "Inferring the scale height of the lunar nightside double layer" (2003) Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 30, Issue 21, pp. PLA 1-1
  31. Carlqvist, P. "On the physics of relativistic double layers" (1982) Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 87, no. 12, Oct. 1982, pp. 2139
  32. Hamilton, R. J., Lamb, F. K., & Miller, M. C. "Disk-accreting magnetic neutron stars as high-energy particle accelerators" (1994) (p.939) Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (ISSN 0067-0049), vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 837839
  33. Block, L. P. "A double layer review" (1978) Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 55, no. 1, May 1978, p. 60.
  34. Hasan, S. S.; Ter Haar, D. "The AlfvenCarlquist double-layer theory of solar flares" (1978) Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 56, no. 1, June 1978, p. 92.
  35. Block, L. P. "A double layer review" (1978) Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 55, no. 1, May 1978, p. 65.
  36. Peratt, Anthony L. Physics of the Plasma Universe (1992) Springer-Verlag
  37. Torven, S. "High-voltage double layers in a magnetised plasma column" (1982) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Volume 15, Issue 10, pp. 19431949
  38. B Song, N D Angelo and R L Merlino "Stability of a spherical double layer produced through ionization" (1992) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp. 938941
  39. Koenraad Mouthaan and Charles Süsskind, Statistical Theory of Electron Transport in the Smooth-Bore Magnetron (1966) Journal of Applied Physics June 1966, Volume 37, Issue 7, pp. 25982606
  40. Alfven, H. "Paradigm transition in cosmic plasma physics" (1982) Physica Scripta, vol. T2:1, 1982, pp. 1019
  41. Alfven, H.; Carlqvist, P. "Interstellar clouds and the formation of stars" (1978) Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 55, no. 2, May 1978, pp. 487509
  42. S Torven, L Lindberg and R T Carpenter "Spontaneous transfer of magnetically stored energy to kinetic energy by electric double layers" (1985) Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 27 143158
  43. Raadu, Michael A.; Rasmussen, J. Juul "Dynamical aspects of electrostatic double layers" (1988) Astrophysics and Space Science (ISSN 0004-640X), vol. 144, no. 12, May 1988, pp. 4371.
  44. Gimmell, Jennifer et al. "Bio-plasma physics: Measuring Ion Transport Across Cell membranes with Plasmas" (2002) American Physical Society, Ohio Section Fall Meeting in conjunction with, abstract #1P.017
  45. Mituo Uehara et al. "Physics and Biology: Bio-plasma physics" American Journal of Physics May 2000 Volume 68, Issue 5, pp. 450455
  46. Alfven, H. "Cosmology in the plasma universe an introductory exposition" IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (ISSN 0093-3813), vol. 18, Feb. 1990, pp. 510.
  47. G. L. Rogoff, Ed., "Introduction", IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 19, p. 989, Dec. 1991. See extract on the Plasma Coalition web site
  48. Langmuir, Irving "The Interaction of Electron and Positive Ion Space Charges in Cathode Sheaths" (1929) Physical Review, vol. 33, Issue 6, pp. 954989
  49. Alfvén, H., "On the theory of magnetic storms and aurorae", Tellus, 10, 104,. 1958.
  50. Mozer, F. S. "Observations of paired electrostatic shocks in the polar magnetosphere" (1977) Physical Review Letters, vol. 38, Feb. 7, 1977, pp. 292295
  51. Boström, Rolf "Observations of weak double layers on auroral field lines" (1992) IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (ISSN 0093-3813), vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 756763
  52. Ergun, R. E., et al. "Parallel electric fields in the upward current region of the aurora: Indirect and direct observations" (2002) Physics of Plasmas, Volume 9, Issue 9, pp. 36853694
  53. Andersson, L., et al. "Characteristics of parallel electric fields in the downward current region of the aurora" (2002) Physics of Plasmas, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp. 36003609
  54. Torven, S.; Lindberg, L. "Properties of a fluctuating double layer in a magnetized plasma column" (1982) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Volume 13, Issue 12, pp. 22852300
  55. Volwerk, M. "Radiation from electrostatic double layers in laboratory plasmas" (1993) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp. 11921202
  56. Gunell, H., et al. "Bursts of high-frequency plasma waves at an electric double layer" (1996) Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp. 643654
  57. Brenning, N., et al. "Radiation from an electron beam in a magnetized plasma: Whistler mode wave packets" (2006) Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 111, Volume 111, Issue A11, CiteID A11212
  58. Gurnett, D. A., et al. "Auroral hiss, electron beams and standing Alfvén wave currents near Saturn's moon Enceladus" (2011) Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 38, Issue 6, CiteID L06102
  59. Hasan, S. S.; Ter Haar, D. "The Alfven-Carlquist double-layer theory of solar flares" (1978) Astrophysics and Space Science vol. 56, no. 1, June 1978, pp. 89107
  60. Khan, J. I. "A model for solar flares invoking weak double layers" (1989) Astronomical Society of Australia, Proceedings (ISSN 0066-9997), vol. 8, no. 1, 1989, pp. 2931
  61. Volwerk, Martin; Kuijpers, Jan "Strong double layers, existence criteria, and annihilation: an application to solar flares" (1994) Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (ISSN 0067-0049), vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 589593

External links

References