Curia regis

Royal Council
Curia regis
Type
Houses Magnum Concilium and the Royal Court
History
Founded 1066
Disbanded c.1215
Preceded by Witenagemot
Succeeded by Parliament of England
Leadership
King
William I
since 1066 (The Norman Conquest)
John
since 1215 (Magna Carta)
Structure
The Magnum Concilium political groups
Tenants-in-chief
Officers of the court
Archbishops, Bishops and certain Abbots
The Royal Court political groups
Officers of the court
Magnates

Curia regis is a Latin term meaning "royal council" or "king's court." It was the name given to councils of advisors and administrators who served early French kings as well as to those serving Norman and later kings of England.

England

In England the Norman kings after the Conquest of England conducted much of the business of state utilizing a council called the curia regis.[1] It was similar to, but not the same as the Witenagemot (or Witan) which advised the Anglo-Saxon kings of England, and the Curia Ducis which served the Dukes of Normandy.[2] This council existed in two forms, the great curia regis or Magnum Concilium, composed of the tenants-in-chief, the great officers of the king's court, and those ecclesiastics who held lands of the king.[lower-alpha 1][3]

This council met on special occasions and were summoned by the king. When not in session it was replaced by a smaller council which itself was in continuous session called the lesser or small curia regis made up of the king's officers of state and those magnates who were at court.[3] The lesser curia regis was in essence the king's royal court and as such was an itinerant court that followed the king in all his travels.[4] The king, when traveling throughout his realm and as an integral part of the court, often heard suitors in person.[4]

The curia regis in either of its two forms did the business of state whether legislative, judicial, or diplomatic. These functions were executed seamlessly with no regard to specialized functions.[3] Neither the greater or lesser curia regis was subservient to the other, as it was considered the same entity.[3] Under the Norman kings the business of government was handled the same regardless of which curia was meeting at the time.[3]

In judicial matters, the basis for the law remained the Anglo-Saxon laws of Edward the Confessor which both William the Conqueror and Henry I promised to uphold.[4] The powers of the sheriffs were retained as well as those of the communal courts (Hundred Courts and Shire Courts).[4] The curia regis attempted to maintain continuity with its predecessor as the Norman kings wanted to be seen as the lawful successors of Edward the Confessor.[4]

Evolution into specialist institutions

Gradually the curia regis began to branch off into entities which formed into other institutions,[lower-alpha 2] one of the first being the exchequer which specialized in the financial matters of government.[5] During the thirteenth century the two forms of the curia themselves began to separate.[5] Even after a split between the two parts both continued to involve themselves in all three functions of the original curia and only slowly began to specialize in one function over the others.[6]

The great curia regis after taking on representative elements formed into Parliament.[7] The first mention of a court of the king's bench (curia regis) being termed "Parliament" was in 1236 during the Michaelmas term (of the great curia regis).[8]


Preceded by
Witenagemot
c. 627-1066
Curia Regis
1066-c. 1215
Succeeded by
Parliament of England
c. 1215-1707

France

Main article: Conseil du Roi

In France the King's Court, called the Curia Regis in Latin, functioned as an advisory body under the early Capetian kings.[9] It was composed of a number of the king's trusted advisers but only a few traveled with the king at any time.[9] By the later twelfth century it had become a judicial body with a few branching off to remain the king's council.[9]

By the fourteenth century the term curia regis was no longer used.[9] However, it was a predecessor to later sovereign assemblies: the Parlement, which was a judiciary body, the Chamber of Accounts, which was a financial body, and the King's Council.[10]

See also

Notes

  1. The ecclesiastics included archbishops, bishops and certain abbots. William the Conqueror required homage of all bishops and abbots for their lands prior to their consecration, so they were summoned to the curia regis as barons. See: William A. Morris, 'The Lesser Curia Regis Under the First Two Norman Kings of England', The American Historical Review, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Jul., 1929), p. 772 & notes 3, 4 and 5.
  2. In his article, 'The Descendants of the Curia Regis', George Burton Adams has provided a simplified chart showing the major offshoots of the curia regis into branches such as the Privy Council, the Cabinet, the Star Chamber, Chancery and House of Lords, and others. See: George Burton Adams, 'The Descendants of the Curia Regis', The American Historical Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Oct., 1907), pp. 11-15.

References

  1. William A. Morris, 'The Lesser Curia Regis Under the First Two Norman Kings of England', The American Historical Review, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Jul., 1929), p. 772
  2. William Searle Holdsworth, A History of English Law, Vol. I (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1922), p. 32
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 George Burton Adams, 'The Descendants of the Curia Regis', The American Historical Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Oct., 1907), p. 12
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 William Searle Holdsworth, A History of English Law, Vol. I (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1922), p. 33
  5. 5.0 5.1 George Burton Adams, 'The Descendants of the Curia Regis', The American Historical Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Oct., 1907), p. 13
  6. George Burton Adams, 'The Descendants of the Curia Regis', The American Historical Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Oct., 1907), pp. 13-14
  7. George Burton Adams, 'The Descendants of the Curia Regis', The American Historical Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Oct., 1907), p. 14
  8. H. G. Richardson and G. O. Sayles, 'The Earliest Known Official Use of the Term "Parliament"', The English Historical Review, Vol. 82, No. 325 (Oct., 1967), p. 747
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 William Kibler, Medieval France: An Encyclopedia (Routledge, 1995), p. 255
  10. Arthur Augustus Tilley, Medieval France: A Companion to French Studies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1922), p. 72

External links