Cousin marriage law in the United States by state
Cousin marriage acceptance differs from one U.S. state to another ranging from being legal to a criminal offense.
Laws regarding first-cousin marriage in the United States
First-cousin marriage is legal
Allowed with requirements or exceptions
Banned with exceptions1
Statute bans first-cousin marriage1
Criminal offense1
----
1Some states recognize marriages performed elsewhere, especially when the spouses were not residents of the state when married.
clarification needed
Cousin marriage laws in: |
First cousin marriage allowed |
Sexual relations or cohabitation a criminal offense |
First-cousin marriages void |
Out-of-state marriages by state's residents void |
All out-of-state marriages void |
Sterility requirements to marry |
First-cousin-once-removed marriages allowed |
Half-cousin marriages allowed |
Marriage with an adopted cousin allowed |
Alabama[1] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Alaska[2][3] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Arizona[4][5][6] |
Only if at least one is unable to reproduce |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes[7] |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Arkansas[8][9][10] |
No |
No |
Yes |
No[11] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
California[12][13][14] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Colorado[15][16] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Connecticut[17][18] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Delaware[19][20][21][22] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
District of Columbia[23] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Florida[24][25] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Georgia[26][27] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Hawaii[28][29] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Idaho[30][31][32][33][34] |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Illinois[35][36][37][38][39][40] |
No, unless both are over 50 or one is infertile |
No |
Yes |
Yes[41] |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
No[42] |
Unknown |
Iowa[43] |
No |
|
Yes |
|
No |
Yes |
|
Unknown |
Indiana[44][45][46][47] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No[48] |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Kansas[49][50][51] |
No |
No |
Yes |
No[52] |
No[53] |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Kentucky[54][55][56][57] |
No |
Yes[58] |
Yes |
Yes[59] |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Louisiana[60][61][62] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
No[63] |
No |
Yes |
No |
If judicial approval in writing is obtained. |
Maine[64][65][66] |
Civil violation/$100 fee |
No |
Civil violation/$100 fee |
Civil violation/$100 fee |
Civil violation/$100 fee |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Maryland[67][68] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Massachusetts[69][70][71] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Michigan |
No[72] |
No |
Yes |
No[73] |
No[74] |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Minnesota[75][76][77] |
Only certain types |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Mississippi[78][79][80] |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Missouri[81][82] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Montana[83][84][85] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Nebraska[86][87][88][89] |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Nevada[90][91] |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
New Hampshire[92][93][94] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
No[95] |
New Jersey[96][97] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
New Mexico[98][99] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
New York[100][101] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
North Carolina[102][103] |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
North Dakota[104][105][106] |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Ohio[107][108][109] |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Oklahoma[110][111] |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Oregon[112][113][114] |
No |
No |
Yes |
No[115] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Pennsylvania[116][117][118] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Rhode Island[119][120] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
South Carolina[121][122] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
South Dakota[123][124][125] |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No[126] |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Tennessee[127][128] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Texas[129][130][131][132] |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Utah[133][134][135] |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Vermont[136][137] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Virginia[138][139] |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Washington[140][141][142] |
No |
No[143] |
Yes |
Yes[144] |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
West Virginia[145][146][147][148][149][150] |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Wisconsin[151][152][153][154][155] |
Yes |
Yes | No |
NO |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Wyoming[156][157][158] |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
- ↑ Code of Ala. § 13A-13-3. Alabama appears to have no law voiding incestuous marriages, although § 30-1-3 does mention incestuous marriages being annulled.
- ↑ Alaska Stat. § 25.05.021 (2010)
- ↑ Alaska Stat. § 11.41.450 (2010)
- ↑ A.R.S. § 25-101 (2010)
- ↑ A.R.S. § 25-112 (2010)
- ↑ A.R.S. § 13-3608 (2010)
- ↑ In addition to statute, see In re Mortenson's Estate, 83 Ariz. 87, 316 P.2d 1106 (1957)
- ↑ A.C.A. § 9-11-106 (2010)
- ↑ A.C.A. § 9-11-107 (2010)
- ↑ A.C.A. § 5-26-202 (2010)
- ↑ See Etheridge v. Shaddock (PDF), 288 Ark. 481, 706 S.W.2d 395 (1986).
- ↑ Cal Fam Code § 2200 (2010)
- ↑ Cal Pen Code § 285 (2010)
- ↑ Estate of Levie (1975, Cal App 1st Dist) was a California case on a purported first-cousin marriage contracted in Nevada. It found the marriage void per the usual rule.
- ↑ C.R.S. 14-2-110 (2010)
- ↑ C.R.S. 18-6-301 (2010)
- ↑ Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-21 (2010)
- ↑ Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-191 (2010)
- ↑ 13 Del. C. § 101 (2010)
- ↑ 13 Del. C. § 102 (2010)
- ↑ 13 Del. C. § 104 (2010)
- ↑ 11 Del. C. § 766 (2010)
- ↑ D.C. Code § 46-401.01 (2010)
- ↑ Fla. Stat. § 741.21 (2010)
- ↑ Fla. Stat. § 826.04 (2010)
- ↑ O.C.G.A. § 19-3-3 (2010)
- ↑ O.C.G.A. § 16-6-22 (2010)
- ↑ HRS § 572-1 (2010)
- ↑ HRS § 707-741 (2010)
- ↑ Idaho Code § 32-205 (2010)
- ↑ Idaho Code § 32-206 (2010)
- ↑ Idaho Code § 32-209 (2010)
- ↑ Idaho Code § 32-501 (2010)
- ↑ Idaho Code § 18-6602 (2010)
- ↑ § 750 ILCS 5/212 (2010)
- ↑ § 750 ILCS 5/213 (2010)
- ↑ § 750 ILCS 5/216 (2010)
- ↑ 750 ILCS 5/301 (2010)
- ↑ 720 ILCS 5/11-11 (2010)
- ↑ In re Estate of Mary Kathrein was an Illinois Supreme Court case ruling that first cousins once removed are not to be confused with first cousins.
- ↑ In addition to statute, see Meisenhelder v. Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co., 170 Minn. 317, 213 N.W. 32 (1927)
- ↑ See In re Flores, 96 Ill. App. 3d 279, 51 Ill. Dec. 885, 421 N.E.2d 393 (1 Dist. 1981)
- ↑ Chaper 595.19 Void Marriages
- ↑ Burns Ind. Code Ann. § 31-11-1-2 (2010)
- ↑ Burns Ind. Code Ann. § 31-11-8-3 (2010)
- ↑ Burns Ind. Code Ann. § 31-11-8-6 (2010). Note that the laws listed do not pertain to cousin marriage.
- ↑ Burns Ind. Code Ann. § 35-46-1-3 (2010)
- ↑ See Mason v. Mason, 775 N.E.2d 706, 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1605 (2002).
- ↑ K.S.A. § 23-102 (2009)
- ↑ K.S.A. § 23-115 (2009)
- ↑ K.S.A. § 21-3602 (2009)
- ↑ Moore, A Defense of First-Cousin Marriage, 10 Cleveland Marshall L. Rev. 136 (1961)
- ↑ See In re Estate of Loughmiller, 229 Kan. 584, where a foreign first cousin marriage was recognized in Kansas.
- ↑ Kentucky Revised Statutes § 402.010 (2010)
- ↑ KRS § 402.040 (2010)
- ↑ KRS § 402.990 (2010)
- ↑ KRS § 530.020 (2010)
- ↑ Class B misdemeanor if marriage entered into; Class A misdemeanor if the couple cohabits after being convicted of entering into a prohibited marriage.
- ↑ A marriage between first cousins will not be recognized in Kentucky even if it is consummated in another state. OAG 71-78.
- ↑ La. C.C. Art. 90 (2010)
- ↑ La. C.C. Art. 94 (2010)
- ↑ La. R.S. 14:78 (2010)
- ↑ See Ghassemi v. Ghassemi
- ↑ 19-A M.R.S. § 659 (2010)
- ↑ 19-A M.R.S. § 701 (2010)
- ↑ 17-A M.R.S. § 556 (2010)
- ↑ Md. FAMILY LAW Code Ann. § 2-202 (2010)
- ↑ Md. CRIMINAL LAW Code Ann. § 3-323 (2010)
- ↑ ALM GL ch. 207, § 1 (2010)
- ↑ ALM GL ch. 207, § 2 (2010)
- ↑ ALM GL ch. 272, § 17 (2010)
- ↑ "Michigan Marriage License Laws > MI Wedding Officiants". Retrieved 10 February 2013.
- ↑ See In re Miller's Estate, 239 Mich. 455, 214 N.W. 428 (1927)
- ↑ In addition to statute and preceding reference, see Toth v Toth (1973) 50 Mich App 150, 212 NW2d 812.
- ↑ Minn. Stat. § 517.03 (2009)
- ↑ Minn. Stat. § 518.01 (2009)
- ↑ Minn. Stat. § 609.365 (2009)
- ↑ Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-1 (2010)
- ↑ Miss. Code Ann. § 93-1-3 (2010)
- ↑ Miss. Code Ann. § 93-5-29 (2010)
- ↑ § 451.020 R.S.Mo. (2010)
- ↑ § 568.020 R.S.Mo. (2010)
- ↑ Mont. Code Anno., § 40-1-104 (2010)
- ↑ Mont. Code Anno., § 40-1-401 (2010)
- ↑ Mont. Code Anno., § 45-5-507 (2010)
- ↑ R.R.S. Neb. § 42-103 (2010)
- ↑ R.R.S. Neb. § 42-117 (2010)
- ↑ R.R.S. Neb. § 28-702 (2010)
- ↑ R.R.S. Neb. § 28-703 (2010)
- ↑ Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 125.290 (2010)
- ↑ Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 201.180 (2010)
- ↑ RSA 457:2 (2010)
- ↑ RSA 457:3 (2010)
- ↑ RSA 639:2 (2010)
- ↑ Prohibition of marriages between first cousins is applicable where the persons to be married are related only by adoption. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. 46. (New Hampshire)
- ↑ N.J. Stat. § 37:1-1 (2010)
- ↑ N.J. Stat. § 2C:14-2 (2010)
- ↑ N.M. Stat. Ann. § 40-1-7 (2010)
- ↑ N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-10-3 (2010)
- ↑ NY CLS Dom Rel § 5 (2010)
- ↑ NY CLS Penal § 255.25 (2010)
- ↑ N.C. Gen. Stat. § 51-3 (2010)
- ↑ N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-178 (2010)
- ↑ N.D. Cent. Code, § 14-03-03 (2010)
- ↑ N.D. Cent. Code, § 14-03-08 (2010)
- ↑ N.D. Cent. Code, § 12.1-20-11 (2010)
- ↑ ORC Ann. 3101.01 (2010)
- ↑ ORC Ann. 3105.31 (2010)
- ↑ ORC Ann. 2907.03 (2010)
- ↑ 43 Okl. St. § 2 (2010)
- ↑ 21 Okl. St. § 885 (2010)
- ↑ ORS § 106.020 (2009)
- ↑ ORS § 163.525 (2009)
- ↑ Oregon State Bar | http://www.osbar.org/public/legalinfo/1131_Marriage.htm
- ↑ See Leefield v. Leefield, (1917) 85 Or 287, 166 P 953.
- ↑ 23 Pa.C.S. § 1304 (2010)
- ↑ 23 Pa.C.S. § 3304 (2010)
- ↑ 18 Pa.C.S. § 4302 (2010)
- ↑ R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-1-1 (2010)
- ↑ R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-1-2 (2010)
- ↑ S.C. Code Ann. § 20-1-10 (2009)
- ↑ S.C. Code Ann. § 16-15-20 (2009)
- ↑ S.D. Codified Laws § 25-1-6 (2010)
- ↑ S.D. Codified Laws § 22-22A-2 (2010)
- ↑ S.D. Codified Laws § 25-1-38 (2010)
- ↑ See Garcia v. Garcia, 25 S.D. 645, 127 N.W. 586 (1910)
- ↑ Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-101 (2010)
- ↑ Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-302 (2010)
- ↑ Tex. Fam. Code § 2.004 (2010)
- ↑ Texas Family Code, Title 1, Chapter 6, Subtitle B
- ↑ Tex. Fam. Code § 6.201 (2010)
- ↑ Tex. Penal Code § 25.02 (2010)
- ↑ Utah Code Ann. § 30-1-1 (2010)
- ↑ Utah Code Ann. § 30-1-4 (2010)
- ↑ Utah Code Ann. § 76-7-102 (2010)
- ↑ 15 V.S.A. § 1a (2010)
- ↑ 13 V.S.A. § 205 (2010)
- ↑ Va. Code Ann. § 20-38.1 (2010)
- ↑ Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-366 (2010)
- ↑ Rev. Code Wash. (ARCW) § 26.04.020 (2010)
- ↑ Rev. Code Wash. (ARCW) § 26.09.040 (2010)
- ↑ Rev. Code Wash. (ARCW) § 9A.64.020 (2010)
- ↑ While no longer a criminal offense in Washington, prosecutions for sexual relations between cousins had taken place under a former statute. See State v. Nakashima, 62 Wash. 686, 114 P. 894 (1911).
- ↑ Evasive marriages were held to be void in Washington even though there was no statute specifically making them such. See Johnson v. Johnson, 57 Wash. 89, 106 Pac. 500 (1910).
- ↑ W. Va. Code § 48-2-302 (2010)
- ↑ W. Va. Code § 48-2-303 (2010)
- ↑ W. Va. Code § 48-2-503 (2010)
- ↑ W. Va. Code § 48-3-103 (2010)
- ↑ W. Va. Code § 48-2-602 (2010)
- ↑ W. Va. Code § 61-8-12 (2010)
- ↑ Wis. Stat. § 765.03 (2010)
- ↑ Wis. Stat. § 765.04 (2010)
- ↑ Wis. Stat. § 765.21 (2010)
- ↑ Note that marriage abroad to circumvent the laws carries criminal penalties in Wisconsin; see Wis. Stat. § 765.30 (2010)
- ↑ Wis. Stat. § 944.06 (2010)
- ↑ Wyo. Stat. § 20-1-111 (2010)
- ↑ Wyo. Stat. § 20-2-101 (2010)
- ↑ Wyo. Stat. § 6-4-402 (2010)
See also
References