Consequences of religiosity

Sociologists of religion have stated that religious behavior may have a concrete impact on a person's life. These consequences of religiosity are thought to include emotional and physical health, spiritual well-being, personal, marital, and family happiness.[1]

In Charles Glock's Religiosity Measure

This term "consequences" as the result of one's religiousness first appeared in Charles Y. Glock's five-dimensional religiosity measure. In the 1960s, Glock attempted to categorize the components of religiosity. In his five-dimensional scheme "consequences" are listed as the final dimension of religiosity. Glock theorized that certain consequences in a person's life can be attributed to religious living. Consequences of religiosity may include emotional and physical health, spiritual well-being, personal, marital, and family happiness. This, however, does not preclude the possibility of these factors working in the reverse as health, happiness and the like may interact with and have an influence on one's level of religiosity.[1][2]

Criticism of the Term

Glock's consequential dimension of religiosity was criticized by some sociologists as they saw Glock's final dimension as consequence of religiosity and not a dimension of it.[3][4]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Cornwall, M., Albrecht, S. L., Cunningham, P. H., & Pitcher, B. L. (1986). The dimensions of religiosity: A conceptual model with an empirical test. Review of Religious Research, 226-244.
  2. ↑ Glock, C. Y. (1972) ‘On the Study of Religious Commitment’ in J. E. Faulkner (ed.) Religion’s Influence in Contemporary Society, Readings in the Sociology of Religion, Ohio: Charles E. Merril: 38-56.
  3. ↑ Fichter, J. H. (1969). "Sociological measurement of religiosity." Review of Religious Research 10:169-177.
  4. ↑ Payne, B. P., & Elifson K. W. (1976) Commitment: A comment on uses of the concept. Review of Religious Research 17:209-215.