Compulsory military training in New Zealand
Conscription |
---|
Military service |
Conscription by country |
Compulsory military training (CMT), a form of conscription, was used in New Zealand between 1909 and 1972. Both prior to and after this period, military training in New Zealand has been voluntary.
Origins of military training in New Zealand
Colonial era
Calls for the military training of settlers began in the colony's earliest days.[1] The concern was that the settlers were not used to fire-arms and this could result in them being unable to defend themselves should the need arise. Debate about this continued and in 1843 a militia was formed in Wellington without the Governor's authorisation,[2] which prompted the Governor to send troops to Wellington to disperse the militia.
Further debate took place and in March 1845 the Militia Ordinance 1845 was passed by the legislature enabling the Governor to form a militia if and when required. Call-up training was only when the militia was needed. This ordinance required:
Every man except as hereinafter excepted, between the ages of (18) years and (60) years, being a British subject, and not an aboriginal native, who shall reside within tho colony, shall be liable to serve in such militia. ...
Those exempted under clause 7 were "Judges of the Supreme Court, all members of the Legislative Council, all clergymen, priests, ministers of religion, and catechists." In addition under Clause 9
the Police Magistrate shall have power, after hearing such objections, to strike out of the said list the names of all persons who shall not be liable to serve as militiamen, and also of such as are afflicted by lunacy or unsoundness of mind, or deafness, blindness, lameness, or by any other disorder that may render them unfit for active service in any such militia ....[3]
The first significant use of this legislation was at New Plymouth in 1858 when 400 residents were called up.[4] On 28 May 1858, the Militia Act 1858 replaced the ordinance, but retained the same provisions as the above clauses. Monetary penalties were introduced for not complying with the call-up.[5]
As a result of the land wars that commenced in the early 1860s, the Act was replaced in 1865 by the Militia Act 1865. This new Act changed the requirement to register to by reducing the maximum age from 60 to 55 and including all males who had resided in New Zealand for more than three months. The list of exempted professions was expanded, and Militia were classified into three levels of priority ranging from unmarried men and widowers without children, between eighteen and forty years of age; widowers with children, and married men, between eighteen and forty years of age, unmarried men who can prove that female relatives are dependent upon them for their support; and lastly men between forty and fifty five years of age. Penalties for failing to comply with the Act became considerably tougher with reference to penalties under Imperial legislation.[6]
In 1870 the 1865 Act was repealed and replaced by the Militia Act 1870. The exempted professions were slightly amended, the starting age was lowered from 18 to 17; and the classifications for levels of priority changed to purely age groups – 17 to 30 years old, 30 to 40 years old, and 40 to 55 years old. Penalties in the Act remained mainly fines.[7]
The Russian scare and before World War One
With the Russian scare of the 1880s a permanent military force was set up. The Militia Act was repealed and the Defence Act 1886 came into force. The changes relating to the militia were expanding those liable for service to include Maori, slightly revised the exempted professions, and revised the priority classifications by making those married and aged 17 to 30 or 30 to 40 one step lower priority than those who were single.[8]
In the late 1880s people such as Lord Wolseley, in England and reported in New Zealand, began to make calls for universal compulsory military training of young men.[9] Switzerland was held up as an example of the success of such a system.[10] Debate quietened down until the Second Boer War, when again the issue began to be raised in the press.[11] In 1903/1904, a Royal Commission considered New Zealand's defence needs and concluded that all able-bodied males should be trained in the use of arms.[12]
In 1905, an organisation called the Australasian National Defence League was formed in Australia with the intent to introduce universal compulsory military training for youths and men along the lines of the Swiss system. The proposed system differed from the earlier militia system in that the training was to be organised on a permanent basis rather than just when required. This Australia move was widely reported in New Zealand at the time.[13] In 1906 the National Defence of New Zealand organisation was set up with similar objectives. The organisation advocated compulsory training of all boys and youths up to the age of 21.[14] By 1907 both Australia and Britain had begun to move towards compulsory military training, although not without opposition from Union's, socialist parties, and others.[15][16][17] Legislation was introduced into the Australian Parliament in September 1908.[18] During the New Zealand election campaigns, the Prime Minister, Sir Joseph Ward, stated that he was against forcing compulsory military training on the populace.[19]
Introduction of universal compulsory military training
Defence Act 1909
Ward appears to have changed his mind because in April 1909 he announced that the government intended to introduce compulsory military training for youths up to 21 years old.[20] There was some opposition to the idea, but it was sporadic and very definitely a minority view.[21] In Wellington there was quite pronounced opposition from socialists.[22] The Society of Friends raised the issue of conscientious objectors with Ward.[23]
The Defence Act of 1909 Section 35 brought in a universal training requirement for those aged between 12 and 14 years old (Junion Cadets), 14 to 18 (Senior Cadets), 18 to 21 (General Training Section), and 21 to 30 (the Reserve). There was exemption for religious conscientious objectors under Section 92 of the Act, but the Act required them to perform non-combatant duties. Failure to comply with the Act could result in fines and potentially imprisonment for those who did not pay them. The Act also introduced a range of new offences, a number of which were aimed at the behaviour of those being trained.[24] The Defence Amendment Act 1912 repealed Section 35 (a) and thereby removed the requirement for those aged up to 14 years old to be trained.
There continued to be mixed opposition to the Act such as the Methodists seeking a broader conscientious objection clause and the Tinsmiths and Sheetmetal Workers Union seeking removal of the compulsory requirements.[25] Anti-militarists such as Reginald Williams of the Passive Resisters Union, and the National Peace Council also spoke out against compulsory training.[26] These were all very much in the minority of public opinion and with conscientious objectors being perceived as being shirkers.[27][28] Political opposition to the measures came from the socialists and Federation of Labour.
World War One
Public opinion had tended to harden against conscientious objectors as World War One approached. Alternative service suggested by the government was generally rejected by the public in favour of punishment and imprisonment.[29] In early 1915, England began to move towards conscription.[30] At the time, New Zealand thought the need unlikely.[31] By early 1916 Britain had introduced conscription and debate in New Zealand papers was generally overwhelmingly in favour of following suit. Those opposing it were considered unpatriotic and shirkers by the general public. This attitude was reflected with the introduction of conscription in 1916 in the Military Service Act 1916. The only grounds for conscientious objection were:
That he was on the fourth day of August, nineteen hundred and fourteen, and has since continuously been a member of a religious body the tenets and doctrines of which religious body declare the bearing of arms and the performance of any combatant service to be contrary to Divine revelation, and also that according to his own conscientious religious belief the bearing of arms and the performance of any combatant service is unlawful by reason of being contrary to Divine revelation.[32]
This was a considerable contraction of the exemption under the Defence Amendment Act 1912 which had allowed under Section 65(2)
On the application of any person a Magistrate may grant to the applicant a certificate of exemption from military training and service if the Magistrate is satisfied that the applicant objects in good faith to such training and service on the ground that it is contrary to his religious belief.
Only Christadelphians, Seventh-day Adventists, and Quakers were recognised as conscientious objectors under the 1916 legislation. The combined number of males within these religions was only about 1,200.[33] Of these only 20 to 30 were exempted military service.[34]
The only political opposition to conscription in Parliament came from five members of parliament and trade unions.[35] Five Labour Party members: Fraser, Semple, Armstrong, O'Brien, and Webb were imprisoned for their opposition to conscription.
Of the 124,211 New Zealand men that served during World War One, 91,941 were volunteers and 32,270 were conscripts.[36]
Number of compulsory military trainees from inception till the end of the war
Year | Territorials | Senior Cadets | General training | Rifle clubs |
---|---|---|---|---|
1911–12 | 22,614 | - | - | – |
1912-13 | 23,919 | 24,770 | 1,370 | 4,003 |
1913-14 | 25,902 | 25,332 | 3,729 | 2,577 |
1914-15 | 29,447 | 26,446 | 2,075 | 8,770 |
1915-16 | 26,839 | 27,063 | 3,437 | 7,928 |
1916-17 | 22,174 | 29,832 | - | 7,975 |
1917-18 | 22,933 | 30,668 | - | 7,252 |
1918-19 | 25,626 | 31,109 | - | 6,354 |
Prosecutions
The numbers of prosecutions for breaches relating to compulsory military training and military service were 28 in 1911, 3,187 in 1912, 7,030 in 1913, 6,321 in 1914, 3,136 in 1915, 2,478 in 1916, 2,342 in 1917, and 1,501 in 1918.[37] In addition to prosecutions under the Act, some local authorities implemented by-laws to prohibit the distribution of anti-compulsory military training pamphlets.[38]
Abolition
The compulsory military training provisions of the Defence Act were placed in abeyance in 1930 because of the depression. From July 1931 voluntary training was inaugurated.[39] In this period, high school students were subjected to a few periods each week of military training.
In May 1939 a voluntary military reserve was established in response to the looming crises in Europe.[40]
World War Two
In World War II conscription was reintroduced in June 1940 by the National Service Emergency Regulations of 18 June 1940, made under the Defence Act and the Emergency Regulations Amendment Act of 31 May, and men aged between 18 and 46 became liable to be called up by ballot. Volunteering for Army service ceased from 22 July 1940, although entry to the Air Force and Navy remained voluntary. Difficulties in filling the Second and Third Echelons for overseas service in 1939 and 1940, the Allied disasters of May 1940 and public demand led to its introduction.
This was nine months after the outbreak of war, as the government was reluctant to introduce conscription. Four members of the cabinet, including Prime Minister Peter Fraser, had been imprisoned for anti-conscription activities in World War I, the Labour Party was traditionally opposed to it, and some members still demanded conscription of wealth before men. From January 1942, workers could be manpowered or directed to essential industries.[41]
Conscientious objection was allowed under the legislation provided the applicant could prove that he objected on conscientious grounds before the outbreak of war to the satisfaction of the Appeal Board. Only 200 cases were approved, with 800 being imprisoned for failing to comply with the regulations. A total of 194,000 men served in the armed forces during the war.
Post-war
1949 referendum
On 25 May 1949, Prime Minister Peter Fraser announced that a referendum would be held on the future of CMT. The results on 3 August 1949 strongly approved reintroduction of CMT, with 77.9% in favour and a turnout of 63.5%.[42]
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 568,427 | 77.9 |
Against | 160,998 | 22.1 |
Invalid/blank votes | - | |
Total | 729,245 | 100 |
Source: Nohlen et al. |
Post-referendum
Under the Military Training Act 1949, which went into effect in 1950, all males became liable for military service upon reaching 18 years of age. They were required to register with the Department of Labour and Employment, and, apart from those exempted for medical or compassionate reasons, all had to undergo 14 weeks of intensive full-time training, three years of part-time service and six years in the Army Reserve. All trainees had the option of serving with the Royal New Zealand Navy, Royal New Zealand Air Force or the New Zealand Army. A total of 63,033 men were trained before the Military Training Act was replaced by the Labour Government's National Service Registration Act 1958 in early 1958.
In March 1961, a National Party government, under Keith Holyoake, stopped the registration of 18-year-olds for national service. A new act, the National Military Service Act 1961, was introduced requiring all males to register on their 20th birthdays with the Department of Labour. Ballots based on dates of birth were conducted to decide who would undertake compulsory service. Those selected were required to complete three months initial full-time training, followed by an annual commitment of three weeks part-time training for three years.
Although New Zealand sent troops to the Vietnam war, all who served there were full-time professional volunteer soldiers. Conscripts were not sent, unlike Australians or Americans.
In 1972, a Labour government under Norman Kirk ended National Service, partly as a result of a campaign of civil disobedience and lobbying by the Organisation to Halt Military Service (OHMS, a pun on both resistance and "On Her Majesty's Service").
Since 1972
Since 1972 there has been no conscription. There have been sporadic calls for its re-introduction, especially as a measure to reduce youth crime, but no political party has that as its policy.
Notes
- ↑ Editorial, New Zealand Gazette and Wellington Spectator, Volume 14, Issue 70, 14 August 1841, Page 2
- ↑ Port Nicholson, Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle, Volume II, 2 September 1843, Page 311.
- ↑ "Militia Ordinance 1845 – Conscription, conscientious objection and pacifism – Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand". Teara.govt.nz. 2014-11-12. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ Gazette, Taranaki Herald, Volume VI, Issue 289, 13 February 1858, Page 1
- ↑ "1858 Militia Act > Legislation > Artillery Heritage > New Zealand Artillery : Southern Gunners : Live Firing". Rnza.co.nz. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ "Militia Act 1865". The New Zealand Herald III (741). 30 March 1866. p. 6.
- ↑ "Download Menu". Nzlii.org. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ "Download Menu". Nzlii.org. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ Lord Wolseley on Conscription, Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 90, 16 April 1889, Page 4
- ↑ The Swiss army, Otago Daily Times, Issue 8705, 18 January 1890, Page 6
- ↑ Conscription, Star, Issue 6842, 9 July 1900, Page 2
- ↑ Compulsory military training, Auckland Star, Volume XXXV, Issue 128, 30 May 1904, Page 4
- ↑ Volunteer and Defence Notes, Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 255, 25 October 1905, Page 10
- ↑ National Defence League, Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 203, 25 August 1906, Page 6
- ↑ The Militia, Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXXI, Issue 12287, 3 October 1907, Page 5
- ↑ Trades Union Congress, Star , Issue 9028, 7 September 1907, Page 7
- ↑ Famous Labour leader, Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 305, 23 December 1907, Page 5
- ↑ A Defence Bill, Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 13235, 1 October 1908, Page 7
- ↑ Government Policy Speech, Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 255, 21 October 1908, Page 3
- ↑ New Zealand's Defence, Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 59, 3 April 1909, Page 2
- ↑ Universal training, New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVI, Issue 14035, 15 April 1909, Page 6
- ↑ Mostly uproar. Rowdy meeting in the town hall, Evening Post, Volume LXXVII, Issue 113, 14 May 1909, Page 3
- ↑ Defence Bill - Conscientious objection to service. Deputation to the Premier, Evening Post, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 142, 13 December 1909, Page 8
- ↑ Defence Act 1909
- ↑ Discussion at Methodist Conference, Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 14299, 9 March 1912, Page 6
- ↑ The anti-militarists, New Zealand Herald, Volume LI, Issue 15632, 11 June 1914, Page 9
- ↑ "Shirkers and anti-defenders". The Evening Post. LXXXV (149). 25 June 1913. p. 6.
- ↑ Loveridge, Steven (2014). Calls to Arms: New Zealand Society and Commitment to the Great War. Wellington: Victoria University Press. pp. 138–152.
- ↑ Parliament, Evening Post, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 68, 17 September 1914, Page 8
- ↑ Hint of conscription, Evening Post, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 03, 5 January 1915, Page 7
- ↑ Will conscription come?, Free Lance, Volume XV, Issue 758, 9 January 1915, Page 8
- ↑ Section 18(e)
- ↑ 1911 Census figures
- ↑ The Home Front Vol 1, Nancy Taylor, New Zealand Government Print, 1986, page 244, ISBN 0 477 01259 0
- ↑ Anti-militarists meeting, Evening Post, Volume XCI, Issue 131, 3 June 1916, Page 7
- ↑ New Zealand Official Statistics Yearbook 1919
- ↑ "The New Zealand Official Year-book 1919". Stats.govt.nz. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ Anti-militarist, Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 14279, 15 February 1912, Page 2
- ↑ "THE NEW ZEALAND OFFICIAL YEAR-BOOK, 1932". Stats.govt.nz. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ "THE NEW ZEALAND OFFICIAL YEAR-BOOK, 1940". Stats.govt.nz. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
- ↑ McGibbon 2000, pp. 118–120.
- ↑ Nohlen, D, Grotz, F & Hartmann, C (2001) Elections in Asia: A data handbook, Volume II, p. 722 ISBN 0-19-924959-8
References
- "Conscription" in the Oxford Companion to New Zealand Military History pp 117–120 (2000) edited by Ian McGibbon ISBN
|
|