Burmo-Qiangic languages

Burmo-Qiangic
Eastern Tibeto-Burman
Geographic
distribution:
China, Burma
Linguistic classification:

Sino-Tibetan

  • Burmo-Qiangic
Subdivisions:
Glottolog: burm1265[1]

The Burmo-Qiangic or Eastern Tibeto-Burman languages are a proposed family of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken in southwestern China and Burma. It consists of the Lolo-Burmese and Qiangic branches. Tujia, Bai, and perhaps Karenic could also be members, or closely related.

Classification

Guillaume Jacques & Alexis Michaud (2011)[2] argue for a Burmo-Qiangic branch of Sino-Tibetan (Tibeto-Burman) with two primary subbranches, Qiangic and Lolo-Burmese. Similarly, David Bradley (2008)[3] proposes an Eastern Tibeto-Burman branch that includes Burmic (AKA Lolo-Burmese) and Qiangic. Bradley notes that Lolo-Burmese and Qiangic share some unique lexical items, even though they are morphologically quite different; whereas all Lolo-Burmese languages are tonal and analytical, Qiangic languages are often non-tonal and possess agglutinative morphology. However, the position of Naic is unclear, as it has been grouped as Lolo-Burmese by Lama (2012), but as Qiangic by Jacques & Michaud (2011) and Bradley (2008). Jacques' & Michaud's (2011) proposed tree is as follows.

Burmo-Qiangic 
 Lolo-Burmese 

Burmish



Loloish



 Na-Qiangic

Naic



Qiangic



Ersuic




Bradley's (2008) proposal is as follows. Note that Bradley calls Lolo-Burmese Burmic, which is not to be confused with Burmish, and calls Loloish is Ngwi.

Eastern Tibeto-Burman 
 Lolo-Burmese 

Burmish



Loloish




Qiangic



However, Chirkova (2012)[4] doubts that Qiangic is a valid genetic unit, and considers Ersu, Shixing, Namuzi, and Pumi all as separate Tibeto-Burman branches that are part of a Qiangic linguistic area, rather than as part of a coherent Qiangic phylogenetic branch.

See also

References

  1. Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Burmo-Qiangic". Glottolog. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
  2. Jacques, Guillaume, and Alexis Michaud. 2011. "Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages." Diachronica 28:468–498.
  3. Bradley, David. 2008. The Position of Namuyi in Tibeto-Burman.
  4. Chirkova, Katia (2012). "The Qiangic Subgroup from an Areal Perspective: A Case Study of Languages of Muli." In Languages and Linguistics 13(1):133-170. Taipei: Academia Sinica.