Brantford Collegiate Institute
| Brantford Collegiate Institute and Vocational School | |
|---|---|
| Address | |
|
120 Brant Ave Brantford, Ontario, N3T 3H3, Canada | |
| Information | |
| School board | Grand Erie District School Board |
| Principal | Shayne Mann [1] |
| Vice principals | Ann Myhal, Jim Young [2] |
| School type | Public High School |
| Grades | 9–12 |
| Language | English |
| Mascot | Mustang |
| Colours | Blue and Gold |
| Enrollment | 1286 (as of 2005) |
| Homepage | http://schools.gedsb.net/bci/ |
Brantford Collegiate Institute and Vocational School, also known as simply "Brantford Collegiate Institute" or "BCI", is a secondary school in the city of Brantford. It is commonly known as Brantford's "saving grace", in terms of secondary schools. Its activity is overseen by the Grand Erie District School Board, a medium-sized school board in the Province of Ontario.
For the 2005-06 academic year, the enrollment figures for BCI were: 262 students for Grade 9, 307 for Grade 10, 305 for Grade 11, 392 for Grade 12, and 20 developmentally delayed students, making a total of 1,286.
Relocation controversy
BCI was the Brantford's oldest school and stood as a historic landmark for approximately a century. For a considerable time, the city and the Grand Erie District School Board worked on a plan to update and renovate the deteriorating school building in its original location on Brant Avenue. Significant controversy resulted when the school board reversed its plan to rebuild BCI in its original location - there are now new plans which involve moving the school to Shellard Lane.
Decisions taken by the Board
In November 1997 the Brant County Board of Education presented a report entitled "Planning for our Future - a Master Plan and Education Program for the Future Development of BCI", which recommended rebuilding the school on its original site. No follow-up decision was made and the issue was left with the then newly-amalgamated Grand Erie District School Board (which was created on 1 January 1999) to resolve.
In the summer of 2002, the Board received a report from its senior administration which encouraged trustees to deal with this issue. An ad hoc committee was established and supported rebuilding BCI on its current site. In October 2004 a "Comprehensive Facility Audit" was completed by Jacques Whitford Limited. The report, which was submitted to the Board in April 2005, documented work that would need to be completed over the next 10 years totalling C$12.2million. The report only included basic work which would not deal with issues such as accessibility.
In May 2005 the Board decided by motion to move forward with a community forum and to write to the Minister of Education to request financial assistance in order to revitalise BCI.
That fall, the BCI community forums were held. By all accounts the process was positive and the consensus was that any redevelopment of BCI should be on its current site. On 6 February 2006 the Board in Committee of the Whole approved moving forward with architectural services (provided by MMMC Architects) to assist the Design Committee examining options for the redevelopment of BCI. The options included building a new school on a new site as well as redeveloping BCI on its current site.
On 12 June 2006 the Board in Committee of the Whole approved moving forward with a “Request for Proposals” (RFP) for the architectural services for BCI's redevelopment, and directed the administration to prepare a report on transition plans and costs. In August 2006 the trustees passed a motion with a two-thirds majority to reopen discussion on the location of BCI. On 14 September 2006 another public forum was held. This time the discussion was on how to accommodate BCI students during the school's redevelopment. Parents of students attending other secondary schools in Brantford attended and objected to having their own children's schools disrupted and put on shifts to accommodate BCI students during reconstruction at BCI. Approximately 600 people attended this meeting in which the Board’s presentation addressed the rebuilding of BCI on a new site as well as accommodating BCI on the existing site.
On 2 October 2006 administration presented a plan to rebuild BCI on the existing site while keeping the students on site. The option would increase the costs of the project and delay its completion to 2010. On 16 October 2006 a motion was approved to confirm that BCI would be rebuilt on its current site at a cost not to exceed C$30million. An RFP was approved for an architect and a construction manager.
On 20 November 2006 the Walter Fedy Partnership were selected as architects and engineers, and Atlas Construction were selected as construction managers.
On 8 January 2007, the Board agreed to seek permission from the Minister of Education to adjust the school day to accommodate shifts at BCI while the redevelopment was taking place, and on 26 February the Minister gave his approval. The plan called for the use of shifts, together with the use of the 1960s wing of BCI, portables and nearby Victoria School.
On 19 March 2007 cost estimates for the BCI development on site were reported to be C$33,372,958, which included an auditorium at an approximate cost of C$2.7million (which the Alumni committed to fundraise) and $30,647,969 for a school on a new site. The operating costs for the new school on its current site would be greater because of the additional floor area, but the bussing costs would be greater at the original site.
The Board moved a motion at the meeting on 19 March to go in-camera and discuss a property issue. The property being considered by the board was located in West Brantford on Shellard Lane, which is owned by the city. Board officials had no written information from the city to explain the planning issues but they reported to the trustees that permission could quickly be obtained from the city to build a school. The trustees were told that the Board would be responsible for the costs of some services since the land would not have access to all city services for a number of years.
School Council's reaction
The BCI Council expressed concerns about the process used by the Board. They felt they were misled on the issue because prior to the municipal election in 2006, the Board appeared to have taken the position in favour of rebuilding BCI at its original location, which was then reversed after the 2006 election. The Council reviewed the events of the previous several years where the Board consistently re-confirmed its decision to rebuild BCI on its current site. They praised the community forums as good vehicles to seek input.
The Council pointed to the relationship that BCI had with Wilfrid Laurier University, which had a campus in downtown Brantford. Mohawk College and Nipissing University are also considered to have similar relationships with BCI. The Council's concern was that the new site for BCI was too far away from the city's downtown area to maintain these relationships.
At the time of the relocation decision the vast majority of students walked to BCI. If the school were to be relocated to the proposed new location that would become unfeasible, and therefore the school Board would be met with a significant cost in terms of student transport.
The School Council did not agree with the Board that enrollment would increase significantly at the new site for BCI, and felt that the data used by the Board, taken from 2001 Census, was out of date. Their belief was that new provincial policy called for intensification and infilling and that would increase enrollment at the BCI downtown location. Council said that they were shocked by the Board’s reversal and they believe the decision was made without a commitment that land would be available for the relocated BCI within a short time frame.
Local Reaction
The city's Mayor and councillors, and the administration for the city were upset that the Board reversed its course without any discussion with the city. The Mayor said that he had heard about the Board's decision on the radio. The issue was particularly important to the city because a lot of work and planning to revitalise the downtown area had begun to show results. With Nipissing and Wilfrid Laurier Universities as well as Mohawk College located in the city's core, more people were working and attending school downtown, which was beneficial for downtown businesses. The province was encouraging intensification, and infilling was viewed as good for the environment.
The City said that demographics were not showing growth in south-west Brant and therefore building a new school in the area was difficult to comprehend.
The Mayor of Brantford outlined the timelines for the necessary amendment of the official plans which needed completing before the proposed school site could be developed. The City also indicated that since other development was unlikely to occur for several years, the Board would be responsible for the installation of necessary services for the new school.
Minister of Education's remarks
Remarks by Ontario's Minister of Education, Kathleen Wynne,[3] the school's relocation included:
"During my consultations in Brantford it became clear that some members of the community viewed this fact-finding process as an appeal of the Board’s decision concerning the future of BCI. They wanted the decision overturned by the Ministry of Education. It is important that everyone involved in this very difficult community issue understand that Ontario’s Education Act is the legal framework and it sets out who does what in the delivery of public education. The Ministry does not have the power to overrule locally elected school boards as long as their decisions respect the Education Act and the policy guidelines set by the Ministry."
"School boards are democratically elected to make decisions that are best made at the community level. It would be inappropriate, and not in the best interest of public education, to have every school accommodation issue, all across this vast Province made in Toronto. In this particular case it is clear that the board has exclusive power to make this decision."
"I was asked many times; “How is the board held accountable?” Clearly the board is accountable to the community. Ultimately trustees seek re-election and this democratic process provides direct accountability."
"However in the exercise of this power, trustees and boards must be transparent, inclusive and respectful of the community they represent. Board decisions must serve the best interest of the community and of course their students."[4][5]
Distinguished alumni
- Sara Jeannette Duncan — novelist (1861–1922)
- Emily Pauline Johnson (Tekahionwake) — author and performer (1862–1913)
- Thomas B. Costain — journalist and author (1885–1965)
- Dr. James Hillier — physicist and inventor (1915–2007)
- Dr. John Basmajian — medical researcher (1921–2008)
- Sara Barber — athlete (1950/51-)
- Prof. Alexandra Johnston — Elizabethan-era scholar
- Nick Kaczur - NFL Offensive Lineman - New England Patriots (2005-2011)
- Aaron Carpenter - Team Canada Rugby (2005-Present)
- Alan Moffatt - CFL Offensive & Defensive Lineman (1976-1983)
- Mike Filer- CFL Offensive Lineman - Hamilton Tiger-Cats (2012-Present)
- Mike Beres- Olympic Badminton Player (2000-2008)
References
| ||||||||||||
