Amerind languages

Amerind is a hypothetical higher-level language family proposed by Joseph Greenberg in 1960 and elaborated by his student Merritt Ruhlen.^[1][2][3][4] Greenberg proposed that all of the indigenous languages of the Americas belong to one of three language families, the previously established Eskimo–Aleut and Na–Dene, and with everything else— otherwise classified by specialists as belonging to dozens of independent families—as Amerind. Due to a large number of methodological flaws in the 1987 book Language in the Americas, the relationships he proposed between these languages have been rejected by the majority of historical linguists as spurious.^{[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]}

The term Amerind is also occasionally used to refer broadly to the various indigenous languages of the Americas without necessarily implying that they are a genealogical group. To avoid ambiguity, the term Amerindian is often used for the latter meaning.

Background

The idea that all the languages of the Americas are related goes back to the 19th century when early linguists such as Peter Stephen DuPonceau and Wilhelm von Humboldt noticed that the languages of the Americas seemed to be very different from the better known European languages, yet seemingly also quite similar to each other. When studies of American Indian languages began in earnest in the early 20th century linguists quickly realized that the indigenous languages were in fact not all that similar, but had a diversity much greater than among the languages of Europe. After a period of uncertainty about whether indigenous languages could be described and investigated by the methods applied to European languages the first linguists began the daunting task of trying to classify the languages of the Americas by using the comparative method.

Among the most prolific and gifted linguists of his times was Edward Sapir, who was among the first to apply the comparative method to native American languages. However, contrary to current practice in historical linguistics Sapir also often relied on "hunches" and "gut feeling" when proposing new language families. Some of these suggestions have been proven correct while others have not. Sapir entertained the idea that ultimately all languages of the Americas might turn out to be provably related and such a phenomenon as the apparent Pan-American tendency to have first person forms with a prefixed n- was suggestive for this line of thought.

Since Sapir's death in 1939 linguists have spent their time researching his proposals, and generally there have been two opposing camps in this endeavor: the so-called "lumpers" who are generally favorably inclined towards notions of genetic relationships, and the "splitters" who are generally critical of such proposals expecting successful family relations to be proven by the most rigorous standards of scholarship. Joseph Greenberg worked in the tradition of "lumpers" and following Sapir he accepted kinds of evidence that are not generally acceptable to those who hold that only actual linguistic reconstruction through the comparative method can yield reliable proof of genetic relationships between languages. In elaborating his classification of the Amerind languages Greenberg relied heavily on Sapir's early work on the North American languages and the highly impressionist classification of South American languages by Paul Rivet.

Pronouns

The main argument for the genetic unity of most native American languages is an observed pronominal pattern in many native American languages that have first person forms with n- and second person forms with m-. This pattern was first noted by Alfredo Trombetti in 1905. This pattern was also noted by Sapir which caused him to suggest that ultimately all native American languages would turn out to be related. In a personal letter to A. L. Kroeber he wrote (Sapir 1918):^[22]

The supposed "n/m – I/you" pattern among Native American languages has attracted attention even from those linguists who are normally critical of such proposals. Johanna Nichols has investigated the distribution of the languages that have the n/m contrast and found that they are mostly confined to the western coast of the Americas, and that similarly they exist in East Asia and Oceania. This caused her to suggest that they had spread through diffusion.^[23] This notion was rejected by Lyle Campbell who argued that in fact the n/m pattern was not statistically significant in either area compared to the rest of the world. Campbell also showed that several of the languages that had the contrast today had not had it historically and that largely the pattern was consistent with chance resemblances, especially when taking into consideration the statistic prevalence of nasal consonants in all the pronominal systems of the world.^[5]

At right is a selection of singular Amerind pronouns from various languages, each of which are from separate well-attested families.^[24][25]

Reception

The consensus among historical linguists specializing in Native American languages is that the Amerind hypothesis is unsupported by valid evidence,^[5][14][26] particularly because the basis for the proposal is mass comparison, but also because of many other methodological flaws made by Greenberg in the elaboration of the hypothesis.^{[10][16][27][28][29][30]} Critics regard this technique as fundamentally flawed, unable to distinguish chance resemblances from those due to a historical relationship among the languages and providing no means of distinguishing resemblances due to common descent from those due to language contact. In addition, critics have pointed out errors in the citation of data, including erroneous forms, erroneous glosses, unjustified morphological segmentation, attribution to the wrong language, and citation of entirely spurious forms.^{[7][8][9][10][13][15][16][27]}

A further criticism is that, contrary to normal scholarly practice, no source references are given for the data, which in most cases come from languages for which there is no standard, authoritative source. In addition, Greenberg does not normalize the spelling of the data, so it is impossible without knowing the source of each form to know what the notation represents.^[15][27]

While sympathetic to the idea of an Amerind language family, Morris Swadesh was critical of many of Greenberg's subdivisions and believed it was due to an insufficient number of comparisons by Greenberg.^[31]

Classification

The 1960 proposal, in its outlines, was as follows:

1. Almosan–Keresiouan
2. Hokan
3. Penutian (incl. Macro-Mayan)
4. Aztec–Tanoan
5. Oto-Mangean
6. Tarascan
7. Macro-Chibchan
   1. Chibchan
   2. Paezan
8. Andean–Equatorial
   1. Andean
   2. Jivaroan
   3. Macro-Tucanoan
   4. Equatorial (with Macro-Arawakan and Tupian)
9. Ge–Pano–Carib
   1. Macro-Ge
   2. Macro-Panoan
   3. Macro-Carib
   4. Nambikwara
   5. Huarpe
   6. Taruma

Below is the current state of Amerindian classification, as given in An Amerind Etymological Dictionary, by Joseph Greenberg and Merritt Ruhlen, Stanford University, 2007.

1. North–Central Amerind
   1. Northern Amerind
      1. Almosan–Keresiouan
         1. Almosan
            1. Algic
            2. Kutenai
            3. Mosan
               1. Chimakuan
               2. Salishan
               3. Wakashan
         2. Keresiouan
            1. Caddoan
            2. Iroquoian
            3. Keresan
            4. Siouan–Yuchi
               1. Siouan
               2. Yuchi
   2. Penutian–Hokan
      1. Penutian
         1. Tsimshian
         2. Chinook
         3. Oregon
         4. Plateau
         5. California
            1. Maiduan
            2. Miwok–Costanoan
            3. Wintun
            4. Yokutsan
         6. Zuni
         7. Gulf
            1. Atakapa
            2. Chitimacha
            3. Muskogean
            4. Natchez
            5. Tunica
            6. Yukian
               1. Yuki
               2. Wappo
         8. Mexican Penutian
            1. Huave
            2. Mayan
            3. Mixe–Zoque
            4. Totonac
      2. Hokan
         1. Northern Hokan
            1. Karok–Shasta
               1. Karok
               2. Chimariko
               3. Shasta–Achomawi
                  1. Shasta
                  2. Achomawi
            2. Yana
            3. Pomoan
         2. Washo
         3. Salinan–Chumash
            1. Salinan
            2. Chumash
            3. Esselen
         4. Seri–Yuman
            1. Seri
            2. Yuman
         5. Waicuri–Quinigua
            1. Waicuri
            2. Maratino
            3. Quinigua
         6. Coahuiltecan
         7. Tequistlatec
         8. Subtiaba
         9. Jicaque
         10. Yurumangui
   3. Central Amerind
      1. Tanoan
      2. Uto-Aztekan
      3. Oto-Manguean
2. Southern Amerind
   1. Andean–Chibchan–Paezan
      1. Chibchan–Paezan
         1. Macro-Chibchan
            1. Cuitlatec
            2. Lenca
            3. Chibchan
            4. Paya
            5. Tarascan
            6. Yanomam
            7. Yunca–Puruhan
         2. Macro-Paezan
            1. Allentiac
            2. Atacama
            3. Betoi
            4. Chimu–Mochita
            5. Itonama
            6. Jirajara
            7. Mura
            8. Paezan
            9. Timucua
            10. Warrao
      2. Andean
         1. Aymara
         2. Itucale–Sabela
            1. Itucale
            2. Mayna
            3. Sabela
         3. Cahuapana–Zaparo
            1. Cahuapana
            2. Zaparo
         4. Northern Andean
            1. Catacao
            2. Cholona
            3. Culli
            4. Leco
            5. Sechura
         5. Quechua
         6. Southern Andean
            1. Qawasqar
            2. Mapudungu
            3. Gennaken
            4. Chon
            5. Yamana
   2. Equatorial–Tucanoan
      1. Equatorial
         1. Macro-Arawakan
         2. Cayuvava
         3. Coche
         4. Jivaro–Kandoshi
            1. Cofán
            2. Esmeralda
            3. Jivaro
            4. Kandoshi
            5. Yaruro
         5. Kariri–Tupi
         6. Piaroa
         7. Taruma
         8. Timote
         9. Trumai
         10. Tusha
         11. Yuracaré
         12. Zamuco
      2. Macro-Tucanoan
         1. Auixiri
         2. Canichana
         3. Capixana
         4. Catuquina
         5. Gamella
         6. Huari
         7. Iranshe
         8. Kaliana–Maku
         9. Koaia
         10. Movima
         11. Muniche
         12. Nambikwara
         13. Natu
         14. Pankaruru
         15. Puinave
         16. Shukuru
         17. Ticuna–Yuri
         18. Tucanoan
         19. Uman
   3. Ge–Pano–Carib
      1. Macro-Carib
         1. Andoke
         2. Bora–Uitoto
         3. Carib
         4. Kukura [spurious]
         5. Yagua
      2. Macro-Panoan
         1. Charruan
         2. Lengua
         3. Lule–Vilela
         4. Mataco–Guaicuru
         5. Moseten
         6. Pano–Tacanan
      3. Macro-Gê
         1. Bororo
         2. Botocudo
         3. Caraja
         4. Chiquito
         5. Erikbatsa
         6. Fulnio
         7. Ge–Kaingang
         8. Guató
         9. Kamakan
         10. Mashakali
         11. Opaie
         12. Oti
         13. Puri
         14. Yabuti

See also

• Principal advocates of the Amerind hypothesis or its predecessors
  • Alfredo Trombetti
  • Joseph H. Greenberg
  • Merritt Ruhlen
• Non-Amerind American language families
  • Na-Dené
  • Eskimo–Aleut

Notes

References

External links

• Google.books: Greenberg, Joseph. 'Language in the Americas'. 1987. ISBN 0-8047-1315-4
• The home page of Merritt Ruhlen, one of the advocates of the Amerind hypothesis.

Links to related articles Languages of North America Sovereign states Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize Canada Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic El Salvador Grenada Guatemala Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Panama Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago United States Dependencies and other territories Anguilla Aruba Bermuda Bonaire British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Curaçao Greenland Guadeloupe Martinique Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Barthélemy Saint Martin Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saba Sint Eustatius Sint Maarten Turks and Caicos Islands United States Virgin Islands Languages of South America Sovereign states Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador Guyana Paraguay Peru Suriname Uruguay Venezuela Dependencies and other territories Falkland Islands French Guiana South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Languages by continent templates Africa Asia Europe North America Oceania South America Indigenous peoples of the Americas Pre-history Paleo-Indians Pre-Columbian era Classification Archaeology Genetics Mythology/Religion Mythologies of the indigenous peoples of the Americas‎ - (Native American religion) Mesoamerican mythology - (Mesoamerican religion) European colonization European colonization Population history Columbian Exchange Modern societies by country North America Dominica Greenland Canada United States Jamaica Mexico Central America El Salvador Costa Rica West Indies Panama South America Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Ecuador Paraguay Peru Uruguay Venezuela Related topics Indigenous American studies Indigenous languages Indigenous Movements Indigenous art Artists Writers Category Portal Pre-Columbian civilizations and cultures  Americas Paleo-Indians  · Genetic history · Archaeology of the Americas · Indigenous peoples of the Americas  North America North American pre-Columbian cultures – Caddoan Mississippian – Chichimeca –Hopewell tradition – Coles Creek – Fremont – Marksville – Mississippian – Mogollon – Plaquemine – Plum Bayou – Poverty Point – Troyville – Weeden Island –  Mesoamerica Mesoamerican pre-Columbian chronology – Capacha – Cholula – Coclé – Epi-Olmec – Huastec – Izapa – Mezcala – Mixtec – Olmec – Pipil – Quelepa – Shaft tomb tradition – Teuchitlan – Tarascan – Teotihuacan – Tlatilco – Tlaxcaltec – Toltec – Totonac – Veracruz – Xochipala – Zapotec  South America South American Indigenous people – pre-Columbian chronology – Cañaris – Chachapoya – Chancay – Chavín – Chimú – El Abra – Hydraulic culture of mounds (Bolivia) – Las Vegas – Lima – La Tolita (Tumaco) – Manteño-Guancavilca – Mapuche – Moche – Mollo – Muisca (Chibchas) – Nariño – Nazca – Norte Chico – Quimbaya – San Agustín – Shuar – Sican – Taino – Tairona – Tiwanaku – Tierradentro – Valdivia – Wari Aztec Maya civilization Inca Empire – Andean civilizations  Language Nahuatl Mayan languages Quechua  Writing Aztec writing Maya script Quipu  Religion Aztec religion Maya religion Inca religion  Mythology Aztec mythology Maya mythology Inca mythology  Calendar Aztec calendar Maya calendar  Society Aztec society Maya society Inca society  Infrastructure Chinampas Maya architecture Inca architecture (road system) Incan agriculture  History Aztec history Inca history  People Moctezuma I Moctezuma II Cuitláhuac Cuauhtémoc K'inich Janaab' Pakal Uaxaclajuun Ub'aah K'awiil Jasaw Chan K'awiil I Manco Cápac Pachacuti Atahualpa Manco Inca Yupanqui Túpac Amaru II  Conquest Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire (Hernán Cortés) Spanish conquest of the Maya Spanish conquest of Yucatán (Francisco de Montejo) Spanish conquest of Guatemala (Pedro de Alvarado) Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire (Francisco Pizarro) See also Portal:Indigenous peoples of North America – Portal:Mesoamerica – Columbian Exchange – Mesoamerican writing systems – Native American cuisine – Native American pottery – Population history of the indigenous peoples of the Americas – Pre-Columbian art – Painting in the Americas before Colonization Pre-Columbian North America Periods Lithic Archaic Formative Classic Post-Classic Archaeological cultures Adena Alachua Ancient Pueblo (Anasazi) Baytown Belle Glade Buttermilk Creek Complex Caborn-Welborn Calf Creek Caloosahatchee Clovis Coles Creek Deptford Folsom Fort Ancient Fort Walton Fremont Glades Glacial Kame Hopewell List of Hopewell sites Hohokam Leon-Jefferson Mississippian List of Mississippian sites Mogollon Monongahela Old Cordilleran Oneota Paleo-Arctic Paleo-Indians Patayan Plano Plaquemine Poverty Point Red Ocher Santa Rosa-Swift Creek St. Johns Steed-Kisker Tchefuncte Tocobaga Troyville Archaeological sites Angel Mounds Crystal River Archaeological State Park Bandelier National Monument The Bluff Point Stoneworks Cahokia Chaco Canyon Casa Grande Coso Rock Art District Eaker Effigy Mounds National Monument Etowah Indian Mounds Eva Folsom Site Fort Ancient Fort Center Gila Cliff Dwellings National Monument Holly Bluff Site Hopewell Culture National Historical Park Kincaid Mounds Kolomoki Marksville Meadowcroft Rockshelter Mesa Verde Moorehead Circle Moundville Mummy Cave Nodena Site Ocmulgee National Monument Old Stone Fort Parkin Park Pinson Mounds Portsmouth Earthworks Poverty Point Pueblo Bonito Rock Eagle Rock Hawk Russell Cave National Monument Salmon Ruins Serpent Mound Spiro Mounds SunWatch Taos Pueblo Toltec Mounds Town Creek Indian Mound Winterville Wupatki National Monument Miscellaneous Black drink Buhl Woman Calumet Chunkey Clovis point Container Revolution Eastern Agricultural Complex Eden point Effigy mound Falcon dancer Folsom point Green Corn Ceremony Horned Serpent Kennewick Man Kiva Metallurgy Mi'kmaq hieroglyphic writing Medicine wheel Mound builders N.A.G.P.R.A. Stickball Norse colonization of the Americas Piasa Southeastern Ceremonial Complex Three Sisters agriculture Thunderbird Underwater panther Related Genetic history Indigenous Portal of North America Pre-Columbian era